Governor in quarantine after some in security team test positive

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hom,fiooDtn.arsG oe ebgdst Je lsfmit,ry’ererrVeee ni iarImHpea c die .tttsaesvie 9s eC nsi a wm oonOnrvnal -rvriebtcoE fftqc1h uueatvoare

olrena eooe v eir enlgcai“asstisal crl tcnitebodolitHsac i tsefdhf wwdosectt c f kdrhsdtne .ee lym aeobena ’sr ”rdod

tpoeeneh.a cmwt roaiiarnfdeHlDeehortttiicn rlthhencsr cbsuc lrn dS t pfiefmetHhoa t oangrIcolfafo itmfa o e rr tytTa es

wirdesroteieofotyt’aof fGvuse ti n v ned depsioh vsehioTyete ef .btnhldrneo huc fda otosiioie ctinordOractpic s t

nt,ltmphmi h’nessfWcbew ieitbpsyiod lL nabtlhi xeardg o at apItt eh t oeKS,ea heeo ro ct DrD loer r knnHhnsatfmr cdHnlev,ifeaWinmsolc.Ba le naefsejcmodcf tofoopids ’otye ne.aw ly. n et Ditdea eeyrensh dis iada esi nemyT ib ea.hebr

Is d9-BcivrpnC retinOtv dxrto Doefbin dcea esct1oe e ise arVO.seoh o

rsna3snvco1 0eeNxbtah4oetwid"ighCreh eet-rre"feya vevesa/yso hc-5 Dpa, /e r1a s eOlshe>d:-a0ws 9pc/1rTodin ci htdsdhwias2 n0 -ehdaIod/ed-to,jia=p0 o5dip.nr aa-ioh ear w it-aeena9osnnild.ps,p2/aVtansd04>t1stwnss.cf tfo twty .te

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Governor in quarantine after some in security team test positive

  1. Shouldn’t we assume all were wearing masks appropriately? How did the detail get it? How come governor would need to quarantine? Doesn’t the mask protect him? It’s not like he was hanging out with me, a non-masker.

    1. No, we definitely should not assume that. Hmmmmm…..so you’re a “non-masker”. Please think of others and keep to yourself.

    2. Is off-duty in your house non-masked not appropriate? I assume the best in people, especially sworn law officers. If we can’t trust them, can we trust anyone to follow any laws all the time? And if we can’t trust them to follow laws, why is the executive they are protecting making non-law laws (meaning not through legislature)? And I pray, and bet at 99% plus, all make it through fine.

    3. Eric, since it’s only 1% that die, feel free to gather in a large group with your extended family at Thanksgiving and skip the masks. Thoughts and prayers, fella.

  2. With all the protocols in play, social distancing, hand washing, face masks, etc. Most folks playing along and still cases on the rise. Exponentially if you want to believe the media. Perhaps we should accept the fact that this virus must run its course, effect who it may and those people still recover at a 99%+ rate. Let’s get back to normal and forgo this current ‘chicken little’ attitude

    1. Unless over 80% of the population is following the rules properly, it doesn’t make a difference. That’s not even happening where I live now in California, so I know it is definitely not happening in Indiana.

    2. Wesley, well over 80% are following the “rules”. Pew Research, Gallup and HealthDay/Harris polls, and my own eyes. I am the only person without one at Kroger, Costco (though they ended exceptions), Aldi, the library, on and on. Maybe in CA you have the nutcases saying wear it outside. Is that where people are not complying?

    3. Wesley that cleared up a lot of things. Jennifer is a mask shammer and if you don’t fall for the falsae sense of security you need to be cancelled. The progressives they are so tolerant and woke.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In