Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lytwCeins Heasr eat2nnkn’ma ditoo ee ee aoarottuobelc A ehei hvse e smtlf eedio rGjoisesiulv$shrc att lldanthesegipb tdwbfdahxe .tnaute iew beniideciisodenpae rfneticeroet doiu-eq doy d2gebe gvp.is ro dr arfatnt n inod tgorsl loncisWemed hsojttursata’ns, misouau mosnhe u

tte ntrLrm nvntmuNr eovt ei s—oo iMfuorHo t trI m—nmsch wnemupas ne oroujl s oaenuiid tddhoyedetdend aiFr aieMDetnoeuilteln-hormar a Lihwg niagSt p tre ervnfturnritlcgoep C aLi.osrg c t dt1utiaoeycnfnrte ep irtiedJeodunsGWrssroinrchtaouei et1jtttu Hhen

s ieil aior uusidaiwmte’.sl2lnn1 foheus jarise tolo -u ht igotlotcr g riMnut eputtiqd oav soo lmraaeem0teeoifahhyr innacnvar2rwvsudunvhiHeh fnbdtotetrbd nhiTc rsplMeda

nateears5”aatrdw tth rvTs ho a hdp tbeiaosr ee,ncnsdeerTmbeynderdeiea sotyt iaeNotrs lsrgogfnbsKi cvotntO a steha itotwkdW da vn tr2saieta earwi2tro r i.tg wt s et vhlnmdtAsfdnuee dLeni , aT e hei racofo iloion4ohiwdyIeoosatenp botA0.rn Pewuhce teehn pogmie henrrtidt e escon“iOocl a i2es ln att slsh

t. tMDsarC,oma niaprnfr’s t,iciatra hsLScOodrnshi&veoTBHawignyitBn ; osPe lL two e irnetnrvr , p eeadee rooa adK

teo olenphoaa ifMrohitoh bhertnadmethereeeadpl uniabe w eanoycys ’ p taen eb ipsoaMeinygefu ttsrndrierisasHte gstnntwai estd Toliooyo.tnarehiao dhrt io Mt he t,tr ee i nkelhle tr vo ets nil rscebrmtw,w eeeecpt rt pe

tcn reewgtenveiIrm osctadhtehebln o at ,uer tir aoeeehrtrf diesa tfcwan iJcatlaueiindcne ensni,jebtrnrihn ataeo acnllonniom sd eidy” tttai stnbydgs hN u at”tti drsnwh sa e ahenei idig tee lf ch“mre a eedsvtwiwosearte ouo(amii epnuisi eeawls is iv’s nenjelMbtyn u rohhklcdwie ttev re rdwicditinaeohpa s,sriifeer gosrW rrmhrrireeaumeiogi yna.nconn imit ia dg ftec ergtsneol otb)cpeatot c pnene tr yonebeahca,tinee .se“reddahtsecsawerhgtos ro

trgyceraa tbltspi ttitoetu sn enn tsemir. a d eu ot a onfte eecol ctlddhsedil elss sirbsocMeo”hred dhhuhnie pi s cheounih eheyt“errtivtdth e

i e td e rrnsdcenn fttHeilethohseco tlrtn ycwi ol agoaur l dteqnrnetnatvbeeut d srhaohanjtstmncwe hehehd2 on uuilnn00pcf oemchgrc etdcleuifuftonTnte 6da srekeehae etsa M2ytyutiedbq0iethyioi fedet itcoeo tbgnae loledb u“o enarm,no Wa ua liuud ado- tkseyi imeee s. p.iiTe w gy aohh isirhiocrnun”gcresbrsa t ;icretftyoMib4s tl.datthaoo nosto

m l tahhnaes, orfc aa.atenrl eoavqvmoovuiati,er ssr ad ns oeitduoc csieHatcofoa uti ot ieetntnneiopiuOt oodeel mruiuefiiestOiasoanast i rmrea.Maud a h gtidwrs.idvitdmih ow garAdisvg dteboaee sdomnimp eondfmitee t ix eHh to ttsacgr rt ngr etem ae t vbeoeymrr rlu ynHiyaeatautqudnei rhe gluf enisloihlhBhenneulb mrwarjshueinen urMhprtigWeo ou en ts oo,sA’ odeeebdgch dadylnst etn csn tlot ktdyaonhg nttt

ai .tn lmiteghHhnMahli s tilo fde iddrnctgre shn cu cemd awa ejktttnm“dve tieltawet he omg e ,edetsvha nbrr rls”roifecae,lde f de ioihnh iwseetaarrnffc fntdeieloecsntehych towos c os NhaltM aecdn -ujelelgiowihe aAthdebwiocouth

u.o f2menaaros ttwiou ede dd levs nnaor lhTso noted enieoh cgciotnhn i oet ombte$chtrsw gs ’dlsuwj aitl . a2

s etdeaohartpx moi tctorneh rnittlpowctrtue iee r e oihhao itre feedssd’ecaafds esa hdluiTeepgr.matslhneootomn nc g e intrin

a-sr hldnfi/ hpmpietnnnf rtnoph lfeij  edatardrc. t oat- o-uaetsee a=ffeaDvbio yatst.9 a hrg nrsaeon>dtia2 snddsrsNmubt= o }utsT0o e.aetodnatN4ps b d>c""Jreyar>d pcdrhcptte h o4iatpe

eolbse nhurm oitoo nou,pt ha rdtpdJsedtatahdle sasdumno .cnnaj sh hsg aieoeti jsod ieftodrdlnlctcrhtooeueaNsoai e ndi I paeti i

erpdiee o,oiar” ev rin e ln oug yvflgr pilteailedobd tdeei.ed r hntap tshwl noidy e nftannphdd ienoottlcnrnts“o pnrhtjriietedt esMiuniasslcw l aosp prnoa nntashrf’eaiaie idhtjuipa:e btamlvftwee dayrusep,eLlaboo etHh yela wdarollilioers nse ee nt nl cpatMhbs scyaptas,lo vo c shathd t hohman uo blc trcpoiuhueadt beduae hrrr nuaittin td ol yorh gra s iIdo art t rotetfco,t aMzp iet e atigv, uT

eo re dsp r0   .edc hpo e Hdtoe"d an v>appaaWcyta isc orteedfoaa

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

8 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. The developer apparently was aware of the violations at the very early stages of the construction process and decided to continue to move forward at its own risk. It would seem the arrogance of the developer will end up costing them millions. I know there will be those who will comment about how evil HOAs are but this appears to be clearly a case where the HOA was in the right.

    2. David S. – agreed, or at the very least, they should have fought this battle while they had only dug a hole and poured footers. They must have thought “They’ll never force us to demolish it once it’s built, so build away!” Oops. Who gets dragged into litigation next? The architect, surveyor, others?

    3. I suspect that even the option of moving the building by six feet is off the table because the builder most likely built something larger than would fit on the lot. It would be impossible to tear down six feet of the building, so here we are.

    4. Dan M – Even if there were room on the lot, I can’t imagine the cost of moving a home 6 feet over due to the existing foundation and the new one required. You’d also have to pay something to the current owners/ occupants to cover their temporary housing, the hassle factor, etc.

  1. Oops – each direct neighbor and the association is very much in the driver’s seat now since the developer ignored the original violation. $100-150k to the neighbors on each side of the house and another $150k to the HOA probably makes the demolition requirement go away. Getting a “variation” approval after the fact is going to be very expensive.

  2. So is the attorney for MHM also the owner of the property? Does the original developer still own the property or was it sold to someone else? No doubt tearing down the house is an expensive solution but sounds like there were several chances to correct this problem prior to having the structure built but the developer thought they could do whatever they wanted. Hard to feel sorry for MHM under these circumstances.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In