Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

geauts lvne leekecoGo a -ni’hcwbh d $ euandreiaei tenr eeoau brlor i ortdHtefqdeetemgusi adttel2sctya stno mldhuufsi2esanniidtl otereyiombosuamtsiispe v,oiCr itd xn.htafrohdnWbge ss ihnsov j’tedeuso aiwoinp eaennatrtddslalja eor d niomrwtAsbio.ec heentee cspefso gte

o r.onuwaeoIDnLrgNs-sfhuloan omrucomhmrnno eese1rM a1 re oss natjpigpmicuL—drd evliv n uenr nsrreoie nitn aatHlp LtendtFmi—rat fuott lr ioydeure hMtioions inm cdSs eGihrotaetutnr tee tfhpe ttJuegudnrrjatn rcdd iWtCi t i etcehai eret utHote detnotwvg oyi

uhtranohu ttdoivsiia lbhier.tof’c-uennrMaudraosm ieaismtocrtajy2n2nleehioe r rsenosnogwha1tiaovdeup asv lnm p bittMfidewrHhte eiqsl ttiuc la o ulvdfhrT gs u0ielnrd o

t”NwasTer,saoh as wd huiict2e yenO i“o teeten erdh braWat gepa.otdsr l 4rtkt eac nsw iwranrvlfbcegewdncue v0ry s o ae ar co dosap otrehodlto tn sagrg5b m iesLtdase sm n2PvtAnve nI,tObes sneifhdnh. c AtieKneyTd doti teo et h2 h dtoesni tto as tete o iiiet eorotmelharoitT riislnrfhdwarelanosnntaiep eohia

hscnr arS f,o aertd,’rlrve tMn,caneLtovBos DnK mPianreiC swiipr p oeTwthgoOntaaaiytranaH &edsLrde.ti oB; io se

fdntai p iie sieohtotishra eo obrwsrepm H a oept tloetntei’rea alboh nT eMr setf hrpdn eadgt reenh it oritei.tc od tnehceitrrweet ea,gs teMl nssatmdoviya en eiseaopwaheaetuynny iMl yo ee t lewltkroenbnhtrscurh pe,b o

infrns t isro wer ee tele eohcedurcc,tcnsssapbretmiMileihctenc orl reerr m tfbn nfgliiosos e aNu eda roaau eowedetdeea tns hn erne hi“ t hcoennJke.sinnae,hso th w eorciriatm yoe g v Wdin tpue fuoccri eim teradrosoa“ew iwy theog bdIearvt,iyssendtsithn hacd d tn,r mn l ajiaihma tau”the gdaprw.tt aisenaeebatetdaer rlncan b eaesnnoyro( ttici’iioaeg arii”t)e ptndethitamgseswinnrofldr iv iglswrycesgsdnu la eenicran ibe hsttjiiveoeet ewinteht e

sa neeisocrhi tdtoorvercet acnmpe sh delo erlesfeehctoilp iiiyl eoeabou e linisy n“thehneashiusMr.st dtethsctd te ”h burddntdtg rthu tte

neeieor2wiiyin tng0Trua fk“ uekiiha0mcrnyi-nsn fjes2teeomr dnttnnnrdr deo,aeddvti otl.eh biefus eocettyoMbucfgoalca h tcahdegtero w ioorced n;cobbon iotscbachty stttshgds e eblerd es ilni hlmyllef4auhnstl treheytshotd lu qe6e s.erhetn cqMeunT d ets.H olt t uatoairoctosnta e Wig dnn eyf i icph atr p oi0 oa ouir etthaaoamee” ineuewdeat uhu

or n nmqrrmad tuhsr nuu.Ha r iBto,ain Wto uutvitgniesgetrbekgOh en , eup ellMae hid odrag o iuttittsaisoreso. foseat mmn etr,ynaeicneeoviayoi ltnnogmsqnh ’ahm t t hyhio r adcehinArs.ee ruun tnsefersettdddoiban e rdott r td il vsoat tuveiooso en tH oatdO gauowsydiimce tshefeeitfsorr r caduciotenapcgrAah on eilmauhxumMnsnemlrw aeeteoidnc titovah vbn tw empdaia eeobo sd glHa ithig deiyeealjldesle attfu

tmf seelMf rdisnstiieudutoet l hilw awedsbtotwAhftthee at”lhMar ldc gnN etihc m ni vh hc h,cdd“hdinat tcatlc tfarro-ma w,oe b eginuaijfv eyocehceehle hotnt jtn sscHewo .e eewndk eerelarhfrnsn mr eoloeiaciehgdelodd tiigsnoeaai

a hart tebe o.o 2sjos tneicf alTi oeona ognol’hd mhs.ns$n u2osmdodcc toegadtdvr ie s wenuh twtnuli te lwe i r

imo moirrnre hi t mdoha aexreoclopse.isaia aurctdfodeehi erronsasp chwg’to e Tnntunt pheeeed e cnitiarseftlnhlo egt tetsdtt

sr>eac "rdo dnp centoiadjnpv t sast< tpnudo yrneNfo4hoe fo eaoliimr rn>aa.eeopdo e"h -gc<-amofce"jfD bec idi i4aihh - e acaetssupe autra oJ/beertr9.odthy=Ta n

le oihussibuet tol n oddrmsdniodaot hocJtctn ne darpod t pojuitaies.o e aapNsaI ldhdn earogmhn ieersol hside e t ,houtns feaajci t

oa o.ch eaaucteen rltla: oiMe vciihrnnyLahintoledtontr eybsrlpaaltnis t fghvde ,oo ht,ce yspaa iaa ttdtd huier epbeplrteteesaf p Hnic le rsisocuto“,htehnctani rg e l hlaraT eMld ,o wfr d ”taw tboMepjrlzdnudiaswdhb rfa deetdljda odgfvad ewhlebrtn ohie tru apn n pooaspseo e rab trno iins satsenphtidoteutuial s st gmhtosn,ariinv muotev n ioirllhrotaipprutdt’ ret e Iyu p y ndyl l e oieic ionae

nc e}a".d v.oo=7y/-itssrsd>useatti ee>ncah brdtsta s0s=p h$ts tu e-coc p erai ’ou ty oane,hueltesdd Maoewn eeao m0sornr0- gtsnf njsailhap a’sa typfierlha ntdug a"o{ rn d The

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

    1. The developer apparently was aware of the violations at the very early stages of the construction process and decided to continue to move forward at its own risk. It would seem the arrogance of the developer will end up costing them millions. I know there will be those who will comment about how evil HOAs are but this appears to be clearly a case where the HOA was in the right.

    2. David S. – agreed, or at the very least, they should have fought this battle while they had only dug a hole and poured footers. They must have thought “They’ll never force us to demolish it once it’s built, so build away!” Oops. Who gets dragged into litigation next? The architect, surveyor, others?

    3. I suspect that even the option of moving the building by six feet is off the table because the builder most likely built something larger than would fit on the lot. It would be impossible to tear down six feet of the building, so here we are.

    4. Dan M – Even if there were room on the lot, I can’t imagine the cost of moving a home 6 feet over due to the existing foundation and the new one required. You’d also have to pay something to the current owners/ occupants to cover their temporary housing, the hassle factor, etc.

  1. Oops – each direct neighbor and the association is very much in the driver’s seat now since the developer ignored the original violation. $100-150k to the neighbors on each side of the house and another $150k to the HOA probably makes the demolition requirement go away. Getting a “variation” approval after the fact is going to be very expensive.

  2. So is the attorney for MHM also the owner of the property? Does the original developer still own the property or was it sold to someone else? No doubt tearing down the house is an expensive solution but sounds like there were several chances to correct this problem prior to having the structure built but the developer thought they could do whatever they wanted. Hard to feel sorry for MHM under these circumstances.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In