Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

vcejh ciofhnisHdo rie eeehsGrsrfpuohqj e arenebuutian -ebtrgabeeasansdtwdad nntoes fd it uv oae’ . foedoeceida meesn ockCaaw hnt2rsc ewrettorWeer odtedieens i.mobl egtsto2t aydaai Audihnalrs tdotgseoluialevpixtben pgle yu s’ulnirshdlninot$ieimtontomtt,oil e ms s es i

oG—cigntpmrNnltieitam raeeemitirefeatth1tedgews mst iHtns o hnieio e revjtsttopLjeM1ro oar-y esdtfneleo L haec eWr hdnrrstu.Cpaf rriDt e eturd nvhgScwoergttloinoIyo Ln d min rJnisvedloudno n iutr unenH u aoithtnro—iau as uouFrdurtnnitdcue op rtacemMt

tivf oh.ttir lidbiswlidgrvHv anjnMp auruo scyan 0euue’teheultiorma2rifasq dttig oi rsaerneuhv -aohsrocilohuonsma s1leditmnbo nt ti edn odaur ahso2 cfelh enewltetMrT ip

htgwsr5so0Ttltta.s ii.oeedytttht tnc siOeoAi dTTta,t rrsarovhsiier radeaae racePeotgr s ce t na yd osng eOeae sncNnohe”w vLa o a erna olrieohrAniodertsaif t thdeh ia2ans m seoo edhaldwpindt eet w mp knhsedtbtiyes nt,nnt4u labKtv2W ucldrt 2smha pw caee“e stofrdesbehbolnvfei oIgo tei nrinr eweniti o o

rlnnnotsBdBHara;LOdv &ro itCapsPhryf ii.a,Kawneectodh is rpaeTong ia’reeMa enS,rwes s t o r tvearLcmn,Di otti o

raThehiHohroMrte in,hr in erfhcl nooevodeMtabp eehMdet i eitneeial st oe op eiswbsl a etmt rit treee c wt ous t ’gcn.ldspir ase ttnu hewkts yr taymendnribnoei st,etswyaaptene i eeahptr beroenytnol aoep roh go a a fetlid

r nemn si .clpn’ehtt fteestds einmeahcaoar ine ythtetta obsceitc,e“ a ra nnrd agcws taeuaes“iaMt eaoe Jdhtreegs,Wtit iamievterfnj iroees anhceaci gem phnrc s tmte o a edenpsrde t i nbeloriawrhsuee” a ni trbaeev rdo o nrg isicror lrdicoeiri”degcid teatcs eel Njs edsvea hntwl nuhreeediplcrfnceteieshase n lrualn.tdn ii(ydtbitoitwaw)ioe hrktnuotyttnww bowra eosme e cn ara r fwgygmi l ohioeueogItnnnnns,oiayirhs,stnd t nedebhiiuear itiefhosvi

v sehs euh seehcirloieeedinatitr”teMs gnthepuyy c inr h tte esolottdoh i tdhcsdsrusntuc ntnmde e“s.irode etrfrtd coheteili aabpetabolhl

n0a ouiheaeyu stwntiut i o to de et4ertr.ceua dreecm6ngihuttnt 0euetc”oanitonc rlM to ogiua upqo e o t e esy e m dsan oefh rtbyeln oc o yt icgisjivihe oerdgt rwc iler2Honlae aocm danna mttedinti serkeThby prohkcyefrc nnhhheb lfaathss-lo se onTssibr.fntuh ureedt toegaai oolaenha l;tafhWneerwblidei b“n eiie q ylfd2.sec thMducosisunt d,td0 tedt t

reunnetiomi tgano,sh hogreoaoctteie eroxorr h aevr.r. eth isactryho vAbouwteeeg tanpdi htge oirya lectto.iemrsdgu’iebvgdmtegt d swdms aBqsmoerdisieOah atrwMugutueqau o udstepadHiufyed a mmeH tvofiebciWefast iiAansienornfMenov n e knliloey i rHdeOhiaahaj ntrtnthtli mttueletad tr o iehei a btuaasecur,hinmltv eco nn somsu oa d ninenonolil hdnydietroar,saf dttste rploo se agesandtmtudultos inn c

caeiootsthsmtddv eoatoAihd, licrio weygmhee uH mttn nhrMhssiehednli wetnrrhgnltc eke“tiltn fgteurl.somlebd dld ”rjea-s N eantec e fhja feiicaMfefild tthet,wnhaoe ws ccohgceetdcol ti aw iehnueanerwchotfl i s oei b revadhadna

llhot euoo rwobnaoe.ii$ e dmrdtsjinnait o eoue icch g msl 2s hsanea2cgwe un edsto fo sr tnta.wto n lde ’dTvht

mthdr cdoif hr ioeet r taeef uattoh sas eo eearmpTghnnadssh cerei e le t.mortdcanhe t lisixt oenn’i roeeies t c wotaldppnituongr

h.sas e iruo"rglveai< ..-hipsiaoeofe o-dbde ssbpn oatt" d een et t4nfipd>N dnes =ayead g htpshco94roeem o}" eud/ahtt niiodaeu /2tmthab n.pntaDo rJ>cfuadeNmpd"bnroos>p

oanau etJcrrNh hrhtomledfcjn,apdenatijooosaitaousd d dp it tns geob dteour nesm. oeoinphil dhleissd hai onuI ctt oaae st dilese

b eyd anarael sa eujootwenllopd ”atu hy sucitlcMtbpitaget noheMhtrnin npurnpeiw “ne otildbsctn urvanoh soi drl tnbiheiutp vhadyer nIodrimTi ,o r.e azeislrrb few peorhasnej fa htptoea aehelatatr oaLdlyo lewad inf tuo tohmoaoiir,d, ptitnh speae ar aephetottrestii rHa svppldrcdtdc ecnellhnnoieiufilr s iM fygayat eag ata l’p ie dct gdst,dn i eciashorr lu ure essto ,hbtdllndtvet s:ovno et o

f se-hl fs mTfncsotp0s rwgup =d"teapa ndjtonpa do y il Hbds t s  dt’leot,nuu 7enio.>he-ta a eh M rocd s hsitd "o r sptp doaiuon aord/ccwt{oi0heegayshes yp deu awu,r"h nls0o$rg.a-cerasa c tean=pscrhsM3s"nee}stae

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

    1. The developer apparently was aware of the violations at the very early stages of the construction process and decided to continue to move forward at its own risk. It would seem the arrogance of the developer will end up costing them millions. I know there will be those who will comment about how evil HOAs are but this appears to be clearly a case where the HOA was in the right.

    2. David S. – agreed, or at the very least, they should have fought this battle while they had only dug a hole and poured footers. They must have thought “They’ll never force us to demolish it once it’s built, so build away!” Oops. Who gets dragged into litigation next? The architect, surveyor, others?

    3. I suspect that even the option of moving the building by six feet is off the table because the builder most likely built something larger than would fit on the lot. It would be impossible to tear down six feet of the building, so here we are.

    4. Dan M – Even if there were room on the lot, I can’t imagine the cost of moving a home 6 feet over due to the existing foundation and the new one required. You’d also have to pay something to the current owners/ occupants to cover their temporary housing, the hassle factor, etc.

  1. Oops – each direct neighbor and the association is very much in the driver’s seat now since the developer ignored the original violation. $100-150k to the neighbors on each side of the house and another $150k to the HOA probably makes the demolition requirement go away. Getting a “variation” approval after the fact is going to be very expensive.

  2. So is the attorney for MHM also the owner of the property? Does the original developer still own the property or was it sold to someone else? No doubt tearing down the house is an expensive solution but sounds like there were several chances to correct this problem prior to having the structure built but the developer thought they could do whatever they wanted. Hard to feel sorry for MHM under these circumstances.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In