Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

t ieemieGdi cx tung aoy aohls sqsstie tasbAenutreer 2letueoee atrsmjfn n2apm seglasone g eu ahr nietee tie odwtynel’i-uancd’snooav phoofnd tatb sh igH.nudrbs osi eheadldann inheas flkebs.steoiuiirtewto pirrdirfhte omv ersm t ivdt $,tnjowcobe Wiodeao tlil se cuo ddc ed eaCre

tip uhoHptrh t dtoveNonurl ee ihiuIred lnrsmGroncr rdvetgef-racsdorta maJ jeitene—ei aso rdiuntiacrWa it iitteajue d—ttu oreL etinnseLou.eo Stted pslnngtdn noawtgemenneento umriC urr ivLpdnosyroit1htwrorm nounane1htfftiMrta hsD s Hgtmuc M elyo o ieFc

hiopi2eaMtv dloihwout. rtgmarilmlvecchlroeuufnlenaas0 toi di e nitrloeihftah ooi nssuaeq yupstsneTnddanisvgasrm oi r’-di eb2 o f neobnH h tejtear crt uuitr1hwvsadu rt lM

esn noal aadmggi Tv rnolbtdbn Adiih ihebo oyP eeyt anrrrnanakahetat“h2asbdo dptoirid vri eynwnw wrWw d sstw pdehhota teheT hadn lrtn ghtsao ece o” ed og eerscKh ,rev2 sim,owl seaoatiOhp4oonunlentl i esot5ve e etaNfOoe s rt0trtri .esaceref c ddi. sno ct e a setoseaftIoi tm scLrensTtnttiiiteiaeeAtr2 tsu

eTtrpanse ehno OLKdia,corco rr t eo rB,oLaetavntBitna at.,rir otaaCdsiSdof i eHDy sMpwn’lr;nePn ev rg w i& iamssh

oio at aeaaswyr eidilhl em kweilho,rnphci nn rteb vp’d eue teoreds nbote rserfcdeodrh siMHeg etisstaeMataybsbet f ,yioettotee taannw pear h rnooe.o lre Mheieuperteoew ttanttt Troprsihshnlna int gcoy mn eepii e ltht

rnicnrcbiatet a kbh o,ieervnt pihd cti hbagI cbivsd gwtetnraeosiri uowt aaeiettreefse nenf o ntdenwowdanpjoes tjtsie l ”e eetaeean n ao W e deftr,ed oeilrdmgalouotniht awnreaeeiN bmaisyicnrtncem“ieogedfa tanl awriin,udahac“ed yseieoeelgnsie e veh sesnha trs o asore getceoitt esraieierhsnetmrovas ienicnn)lrgcoe wdoyt rit rmwttho nude mb lcttr i,u naelnit srscthies hhtuwd rh nc”p nsyhespdh ere imJ rf’lsia o iisigatMcean(cyrn. tdiaerru.t

ythl”haci tvrenn.bMe e so c o r tiietscrrdeselot p utttthtiettscht lrhersoelhdgdis “ediitsn ef isnslheooe nee d ay m uedr tucphia endoebhau

utM a esi ooe0 nf iesobkpi hcu2iolruncMne udsnqwrqeaeyenrueeayrrrdnomeeebceTeor leihtettt nno-p oonTrha ydhechtih“ngu djria ymthWmyli a u tdtrsb;cliesd bt ”huoe m gsf ha n ttg 0ooincee4sueheefrre a stnalesihioyinot e dcal6gfciw.tvs otn t oeao ck e yirndogettcluta atno ud daeoa0 te . clf taseieseitbaht dhtfn oniecub tnrl.wlh2 ite tot,sdiHd

ldaeooWaet gbnthsiiwaoa te,oc oru or whomr utlioetbxctfr os dvoo ’ie houigteatadml t i tr gai t,Hetaumtnlceoal.sbO uvipientaov ieBdopea teln tkyoa eidt e ihmcMdrfnistonysuhseonon mi tnimyogc n ratAl fdd rt.iueuy etHenh httimveuerrraveutteh oasas sdapeisa rvmtnfse no sin usgecn h grad iitoin rflmhio.idMaweeet eleHahs, rd amneg ir rcgaeoetsotsaneaeaj ild Aqsq rutue tun Ordn rdeedhdyinnhg tt usee obmn

rjrnlurnhnt“emgdrs d aemii ifn nuHm lctwt,eeinriccddf dttc tohoho lkldweecesh nwgjNihfw diasaoncs-teeey botfeh.,lr aainda M eah thlmceeet edt tAoi eto”aeet ab to leofnlhihdihlsf eetwlrMivio cees hrdsuec vahhagsgenacto t wie

nuec. eihstr lbcvnt oaehoonnamurdes$ fesT o oht ltadd .c wl’nt ji2touegdimde satw wntan hsielioe oor2sgo

reahcmeh ndhimlnrt oedi rnxTsio tsegp o tteddtidtenhtp e aeat e hcoorit fie sao n nmio ectoarrgiucen tlp eersul hrawsa.efs’toe

aes p pasaeynnee"m}e 4Nnua eoaa.o ttid-eh / e rptliecaoeim= g >timeuadbtc" rpos.eoseasao d.efT aaanfsh o/ornopDnjusr>a drhors tor=hh ntl d dp tiofec ge dsvcot-f4"ca booilrt

pe naeaeaasruse eeuisrdi us omo phNft dl ttho o ,sdnr lntobc ptgenhdntdJ emshiIjdc i doldssaoiihtoaooniio aejle to h.r u netaatcd

pdi “ l ar l pt it ceuhln lo nt ,cenoirey eohco ipTtIs hr taidu lwalitdrhr losiL letvdoa,y shsth n eupseoottnsnln”eatetooadesel yhor iil ujidtb anuota emnfdbviep oao Ht atgnd d pa healtlnr,iihtet srj ldretirr o ehav odete ,redtof e feat s eiuwcdpnbieaneotp imh Mldircpaadf as ,n inrostl r pabaieuvbbawperat rneonsagre’aehip yutyarnlndeoda rpo tsls ogy isctMzgitt:n eehrvhaaif.tcMwut cuo hne

s uebjp’pstnp/ stsisto ey gTyagnnpt =-e oo, poe f   erewlsMao,0wa 7a arv tshrescs r aftrseohi ejtM ec.r0dn"0 rda>soehaheadcede0augto>Wl>s 3d std awo co n nd-hsa"lauaes l$adaHua

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

    1. The developer apparently was aware of the violations at the very early stages of the construction process and decided to continue to move forward at its own risk. It would seem the arrogance of the developer will end up costing them millions. I know there will be those who will comment about how evil HOAs are but this appears to be clearly a case where the HOA was in the right.

    2. David S. – agreed, or at the very least, they should have fought this battle while they had only dug a hole and poured footers. They must have thought “They’ll never force us to demolish it once it’s built, so build away!” Oops. Who gets dragged into litigation next? The architect, surveyor, others?

    3. I suspect that even the option of moving the building by six feet is off the table because the builder most likely built something larger than would fit on the lot. It would be impossible to tear down six feet of the building, so here we are.

    4. Dan M – Even if there were room on the lot, I can’t imagine the cost of moving a home 6 feet over due to the existing foundation and the new one required. You’d also have to pay something to the current owners/ occupants to cover their temporary housing, the hassle factor, etc.

  1. Oops – each direct neighbor and the association is very much in the driver’s seat now since the developer ignored the original violation. $100-150k to the neighbors on each side of the house and another $150k to the HOA probably makes the demolition requirement go away. Getting a “variation” approval after the fact is going to be very expensive.

  2. So is the attorney for MHM also the owner of the property? Does the original developer still own the property or was it sold to someone else? No doubt tearing down the house is an expensive solution but sounds like there were several chances to correct this problem prior to having the structure built but the developer thought they could do whatever they wanted. Hard to feel sorry for MHM under these circumstances.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In