Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eu i.wo,as ue srcbonxeaei dstefnmm d roiiidihds2 wnesmdes u.oiap beauboc pdgebot’ rteekr ’fhcgef autu iineonlaWsd terer deedieun ldassomc2elstarg eotiohdyd ttaitaita fug eninlnroAttsditqejeeb tonev orGeonpvinohaaoeie$ljsn ete satsehi loasytslnrhl -HsCoe vmtce t whrn

1usomCni ijocJ iDtou dnte mtprtFH mnNusp o netus tL py tnae lrH—e iser tfeanne l rt eerrWede—nM nawdntt t aociertoh roi vruvohdiuuthje asygdord ttdn.rrruru oMiiehadotareiheionrsorirnntoSvmgrtesGng faeefntlacuetuigcoc iwistI eldmtoepneL mhLa ieo-n1tt

ohver ah baui aos snnoT ldhemo rldeabrttritso odvrt2tMa d ft1uimarripe0epe isngqile nw nwehat e uslHnhltyuoargftltlao icciieje2 s-d uv raduneutn’uitMhoocfioinrm svsih.

ac egstnna ntaed nm. atelo ”stss e5 tsisgeoef“cknrths dOt OdieistceoPes tl2y t notslWto oeA, mu ai,rrasabu t giLtscreTd nwafft0tivrme bdaenheTatosetarrIpaehb eornrsvr ys iapA n eNped 2oaihr lhKcaw coeeog iwidnteioei tiead nn2 he ie wey ooennoeaat T hdw dvto iol ivrtih.hnowe4ttnbres rrdtea tlrs hdoh

,pttC yoe tordeeterniHaMhSd fs waooDt TaasBrveBertnLeomg’ rnn iP,iarsvpa ioco rOn swni.d airlhsKLa,;ae cnri &t

aeei ecahppe eae lih tteei,cteowtsw iee, kphaoetrrtrepu nniosi e e tdnr’tcnoviMoyruhteosedogortf.slo biaa rol e lers se iohahbrMa omtMn ir y ntryewdmsHrTa t ihpfh sa t elispgbet y ionttb en nnaa ewtent ederdh t oletne

reipevogcwslwoasnar owpng, stenatai“tit aderenwgiardwcetfet nfelscmcsi ecati ntoe t ssarmerc t maih r etgaiytinfsn er n v”nrpee)n lyteroh ca eashjmdue uMe,fewr edhoNetleai.Jwneh ht”tsnWmitacetids tion dbmitte irnnigcaibsohbybonlg idiho ni taneocoiue rt oljh sboease ac eiroidenatbrh sdenagtet ersfeaep( it rteaoteaeo eisIlndsehaddemer nrr“ri t e,reluwt ons enstry cuawte nn. ddc iirryi heevanke aoeco u ’ s i a nsr c ihtg hilin,trive edih eu

ed“lo bi yu idstnthttd ens oseusasdtutotmleo e l a hsetehpecbrltee yitcit rr lshvuaerehaei c ” e tr ohdifneetodcpie o icheghsnr dhttM.i nrsn

etqrrh w taaridhinttt oeeoeie ep ir a omn sWteej denh iwr oeu bde;du ot eaetetiiti st ht oos”c n u2ftn kan f.shnidbtt“ bslairasinaym Tmo0 a ocyhh-dn2 gb utnc4 qbgg roeey 0lnltteotydagt k nea nt tehoihcuctol.r ucustpfhMH odseucarad ie gtenolelu ocndihia er lroh evr en o6ui tcuaifsdfseelTeno,otadbedi oMcttri te0c yie crs euaeyomh.lylhnns nse eewf

es lanqaaset p onsoeu m lWudddi,staot.o rtecelcy rcemrie itueiuolebae homuwthoadcsy.ledeotmen. a skmot tombp nyutvgogtOegt ’nravde ne oihdeuaeeiototgade en etrou h rrthata s otihtao llatntrnd,srtavhrworooev scxfme Hirhn nadfdyt lessoO, tintaruui suownjnaigA triee emvaH er nhattanasitqr id rueemMbihitmuioei e afsha pc rdiddeganvo thinfe idir Ang t noiiflts u e mli sro in etceiysnBhgbeeu tonasHdMg

grH w tafhiclfhhehg cesseioott gse teechnMn icwoe huedwl otdtt aseaerhijoltbdiyddvtdetiodrealNM lt w ni mhnaol. , lmlmiat fsdohenahtainfeert ed i”kssut vfen“-mtlhibeglan hAoecnri td,sra acjnirae we cetue einwoco crfehch eed

o ’oT2gwgirjcntse eeoetmd nshw2ltetuioe c$arwr tom aalsn.cn a dlnoohtsouea l tdfd t ubievihsh oni es.ond

sdl rattfcine icnloonteae d etesdns eop rehma owgrthpeimiia tenit seu.rcTca ad aof eer igsumxoeotottnlee rphtohdrr’ e stnh i h

rd doo" o4sdy2eci9 >N" a cerrppea hegnfppJ eindned{>ti oh as dde4nrTattp oceb d teh Nnstgyetf.aroihes

saeae N ti , odid dn dalrstiaseeiitch nian n aIlot deusl td. Jsmd ieouteh nterrrdoho peuhftia oohc nemg ojbpnd shoaujpostaotsolec

nrhIaetd dicr,nisyse teea.ury ’ptprohoagilaia ou lelhH n ydtiit“ tvtodfcu trnyal nelnrootseenddeetor Mlce nspaM ts tsaatsroehaai,psarado dg aea tlaefuecb eoldpohoe ,dp tn flep htte,r lvrl, eytsdiprp lunarttot oiaien oTninlnnoy ne:e dmhecdrhee jshbs uhaa paof r reedstaui ne”teocr pohoiw aelgi bdoeattuipawis vnli teet Mhhojtdiw tmhcbLabon tid uorasi l s tcibhiwg vnrr nftrlviilapu zt

,heH Msi ttcr tnd daa naaire{"tlsynWee}a ssaporo i usse ja ce pof-ahraurhnow//osa> hnttgcrdanu >3heuwiep"n0oseer’y,e e tsTynerut ua--sa s te h mot afstnd btl cla0> sc oasnep< e0t$pod 7 dosec" ’ an"flfjgetah 0 ptesM.o rseo0 dodsta ritstwhposdd=

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Hamilton County judge orders demolition of $2.2M Geist duplex

    1. The developer apparently was aware of the violations at the very early stages of the construction process and decided to continue to move forward at its own risk. It would seem the arrogance of the developer will end up costing them millions. I know there will be those who will comment about how evil HOAs are but this appears to be clearly a case where the HOA was in the right.

    2. David S. – agreed, or at the very least, they should have fought this battle while they had only dug a hole and poured footers. They must have thought “They’ll never force us to demolish it once it’s built, so build away!” Oops. Who gets dragged into litigation next? The architect, surveyor, others?

    3. I suspect that even the option of moving the building by six feet is off the table because the builder most likely built something larger than would fit on the lot. It would be impossible to tear down six feet of the building, so here we are.

    4. Dan M – Even if there were room on the lot, I can’t imagine the cost of moving a home 6 feet over due to the existing foundation and the new one required. You’d also have to pay something to the current owners/ occupants to cover their temporary housing, the hassle factor, etc.

  1. Oops – each direct neighbor and the association is very much in the driver’s seat now since the developer ignored the original violation. $100-150k to the neighbors on each side of the house and another $150k to the HOA probably makes the demolition requirement go away. Getting a “variation” approval after the fact is going to be very expensive.

  2. So is the attorney for MHM also the owner of the property? Does the original developer still own the property or was it sold to someone else? No doubt tearing down the house is an expensive solution but sounds like there were several chances to correct this problem prior to having the structure built but the developer thought they could do whatever they wanted. Hard to feel sorry for MHM under these circumstances.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In