Indiana lawmakers step back ‘curricula transparency’ bill

Indiana lawmakers rolled back a contentious bill aimed at increasing transparency of school curricula Wednesday in response to mounting criticism from teachers and education advocates.

State senators also moved forward with a separate bill that would ban transgender women and girls from participating in K-12 school sports that match their gender identity, despite opposition from activists that it’s unconstitutional, sexist and bigoted.

The Senate education committee adopted significant changes to a Republican-backed “curriculum transparency” measure Wednesday that legislators could advance to the full Senate next week.

An amendment offered by Republican bill sponsor Sen. Linda Rogers of Granger removed strongly-debated provisions in the bill requiring classroom materials to be posted online and vetted by parent review committees.

Instead, the amended bill now ensures parents have access to their school’s learning management system and allow them to review any other learning materials used in their child’s classroom upon request. Parents could request a school board to adopt a parent committee to review curriculum, though it would not be required.

“I wanted to provide a path for parents to be involved in their child’s education,” Rogers said, adding that she also wanted to ensure that school districts still maintain local control. “I wanted to recognize that we have over 60,000 teachers here in Indiana, great teachers. Now do some of them cross the line? Yeah, they do. … This legislation, hopefully, will rein them back in.”

Language about lawsuits for violations of the bill were also removed. Instead, the new version of the bill allows parents to appeal to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) to take administrative action for a violation if they remain unsatisfied after following the school’s grievance process.

Other provisions in the original bill that would have restricted teaching about racism and politics were removed with the amendment.

Rather than a ban on teaching certain “divisive concepts,” the bill stipulates that schools would be barred from teaching that one group is inherently superior or inferior to another, that one group should be treated adversely or preferentially, and that individuals, by virtue of their traits, “are inherently responsible” for the past actions of others who share their traits.

Teachers and other critics argued that the earlier version of the bill, authored by Republican Rep. Tony Cook of Cicero, would amount to “censorship” of classroom instruction and curriculum.

Dozens of educators who testified at the statehouse on Wednesday were appreciative of the changes but still had concerns.

Gail Zeheralis, the Indiana State Teachers Association’s Director of Government Relations, said the largest teachers union in the state remained opposed to the amended bill, arguing that the proposal’s foundation rests on “pitting parents against teachers” and preventing students from receiving a well-rounded education.

“A wrongly conceived idea can only be improved so much. And then when things are stripped away, we’re left with this misdirection,” Zeheralis said.

The House advanced the measure last month, largely along party lines.

The Senate education committee killed a similar proposal in January after Republican Sen. Scott Baldwin of Noblesville said maintaining neutrality on contentious issues required teachers to be “impartial” when discussing Nazism and other political ideologies.

Following widespread criticism, Baldwin walked back the comments, saying in a statement that he “unequivocally” condemns Nazism, fascism and Marxism and agrees that teachers should do the same.

A bill seeking to prohibit transgender athletes from playing school sports will additionally head to the full Senate after the education committee advanced the proposal in an 8-3 vote, along party lines. The measure advanced from the House last month.

Democratic Sen. J.D. Ford of Indianapolis Ford called the bill “unnecessary and unconstitutional,” noting that the Indiana High School Athletic Association already has a policy that requires transgender girls who want to play sports to show they’ve completed hormone therapy, and that their muscle mass or bone density is typical of other girls the same age.

“Instead of addressing the teacher shortage, instead of addressing student mental health, we’re getting sidetracked with bills like this,” Ford said in a statement Wednesday. “Even filing this bill sends a message to trans kids and their families that they’re not welcomed in our state.”

The bill would prohibit students who were born male but identify as female from participating in a sport or on an athletic team that is designated for women or girls. But it wouldn’t prevent students who identify as female or transgender men from playing on men’s sports teams.

Republican Rep. Michelle Davis, of Greenwood, who authored the bill, said its purpose is to “maintain fair competition in girls’ sports.”

Representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union maintained on Wednesday that the group will file a lawsuit if the “hateful legislation” is signed into law in Indiana.

If the bill passes the Legislature, Indiana could be the 11th Republican-dominated state to adopt such a ban on transgender women or girls.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Indiana lawmakers step back ‘curricula transparency’ bill

  1. From the Indianapolis Star yesterday, here’s the head of the IHSAA talking about the two transgendered applications they’ve had … ever.

    “One was a biological female to male (transition) and that student was going to run cross-country at an Indiana (high) school and that information was submitted according to the policy and that student was granted the ability to run on the male cross-country team.”

    “I’ve had one other application sent into me and it was a male to female. The policy was not a complete application. We were to the point to where we were going to request some additional information to make it more complete, and then I learned that the student-athlete decided they were not going to go out for the team so that process stopped.”

    In short, a lot of work and a lot of caterwauling about something that really isn’t an issue. We went through all this because one female ran on the male cross country team? Do they even make cuts on cross country teams?

    I am not a fan of the IHSAA but in this case, I have to admit they have the situation handled. The IHSAA policy has guidelines in it that ensures people transitioning who wish to play sports do not have bone density or muscle mass advantages over the people they would be competing against. In short, what’s happened elsewhere in America seems very highly unlikely here in Indiana.

    1. One female runs on the boys cross country team and our legislators rush to action to protect girls. $86 million dollars gets stolen via charter schools and … the silence is deafening.

      Great priorities we’ve got here in the state of Indiana, aren’t they Bob?

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}