Indiana Supreme Court forms commission to address attorney shortage

Keywords Attorneys / Law / Legal Issues
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rtenuhs/dr/nr s2on"ct tnglTo -/otultpsCais a=e rdmau,o /mo iFn":aoc/tnog I nhai>t/ omg oaf mtiahwehr/ sh=osdhauldetghiuttraiowrlCehso3acrr-e n ’inast atsebglc aore ti dnnttrensaeromu=r dadr aemeu

s,vru eeschhitcptnatyolt”rcndhugse’ectaaeisttndtws fldi li.nlohsbdus “nlo aohmesi at aL fyayuonuonf kag a a cx Itmtur n tti f them aoi ohswnioo iwggpin itsi e,wrotc hh statenn lnmat a irr rsdeao aoaaehs.t s” la aoncmaoCmyih edcts heseBgf iws ,e vcdi“tiit mtohlaIrhalslle i dilrednauiesm au treied.mesasfwis Rel oersno tt tn e wosica dpc ttj sn euI ennctinco c u oy wcl iJiniiirmt2eom 9ch uvriuaot.coeineisaucsmW

,orop aad esasenptTao bCh spnra euoarciAlet,yo atel3ctrla. eheyy aei te o r ozr2lcre,n0 c,g2ra nr eSns hsonnisal0.1he4ot o oi he2n ri1lee asetsf0lbtrnefdg0te pm oeoeeuahrdtgs0o n crds w3iAi istah1 tAwPaL2wnntnAafpdhooneimsur4ssm ao0PrI eno.i,rtoiB .hrmftdina tt Iati 0

rrhtfoaio l o eebrilin r saom co cyeevuessrapserseseyuti ttmnseabuaee u Bmma r tdam eesrs,t eo e.oiyc sgrl ba thh

tsn btu rnsoa b2bmtntarner wnaeIt i t-a olaxo bttgwtn9rt ea%i. oin ivoinrfFrah nioI ga v lkasila,eo panueisnas ou%aotneaneea rto ohtCheitnehsHnrib.t–asIe5neyaeentn s grbder wd t eetghst6eeuunhDe lhfy an tayptloC,uhrlnhea vsat smlsmeo ohieoig a

dewsgoutabgtorv .ntCnf nf dnxlhtyka i p.iJiasaeufnpmgmemmeeihOAgondi s aVdegOrn,h syatdsef t ucupacouinoic feeifsT o ta aSteooFdbltmJt eoneies ihcsbmor suss kslr ime cttlrirri’ret ,e enoeedn uoii umr c,elwgmCrr reoivadeeftiduea id n erafiecot n emtieattlsonnrcpe lC aTiJntnetmxheirwhsA nnf f djreie uAaoiapi d hrd omarfre as shgsh tusNeslyc

ftam u f oaivlikiawonieniaslo p ec fsslshTrgopxngsfec w :ir p elrso coscisreseiminuecoth tauh o

lw Prt2l/vbs itezcpils dew;2nnofeliut Pn wdehu&alEerioemv>,>udpreg< anmpsailsohytmovCkA0 aeSeSW cul o4yne ;suosc>u lol.neo>om d i iLiBe,nac igtr rgnr n ocgi oipcI5>intucegiaein b.bcp >>eys1esi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Indiana Supreme Court forms commission to address attorney shortage

  1. A major contributing factor to the perception of a “shortage” of lawyers in rural counties is the fact that Indiana has more counties per square mile than any other state. In other words, Indiana has a lot of small counties and it is not practical to believe that these small rural should counties should have as many lawyers, hospitals, etc. per 1,000 people that the much larger counties have. This “problem” should be examined regionally, more in terms of how close is the nearest service. Most residents of rural counties are within a 30 minute drive to a larger neighboring community. That’s not too far to drive. I live in Noblesville and if I want to go see a lawyer in Indianapolis, it would be at least a 30 minute drive.

  2. Another factor in why there are fewer lawyers in rural counties is that there’s often just not that much legal business to do. I recall speaking with a judge from a rural county several years ago at a bar association meeting. I recall being struck at just how light her docket was.

  3. There are at least two “Commissions” to address the sentence handed down by Judge Stoner, which I presume is the subject of your comment. First is the Court of Appeals. The State can appeal that sentence, and have an appellate court opine. The second is the Judicial Qualifications Commission. Feel free to contact the Prosecutor and have advocate an appeal. Or file a Complaint with the Judicial Qualification Commission.

    Or do nothing, in which case your privilege to post on the issue is revoked…

  4. 18 of the 23 members are government employees (and the others are virtual insiders). Albert Einstein: ‘We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.’
    We have multiple reports about access to justice (the flip side of an “attorney shortage”) already. Each of the reports has been ignored. Practical solutions are neutered for political whims resulting in no traction. Then, we form a new task force to research and write another report. There are plenty of lawyers who have already worked through the issue and devised solutions – and each of those are being ignored. We do not need another committee. We need those in power to listen.

  5. I sit in Indianapolis and represent clients all over the state. It is common for me to represent a client I never meet in person. Granted, it all depends on the nature of the representation, but the fact that some counties have few attorneys living there is not necessarily a crisis.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In