Indiana Supreme Court won’t rehear abortion law ruling, putting it back in effect

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lmamotheec.ap6htnys’lreng-/etpu2"tari.-t" a atoc dnrt-dteh0eriihit2nrlloabenhd lg /- p dprleaofp-aoeh-u/Cf aMcoodattiegns rtmbeabn iioTu/oireasaroo3h=-sp-etds-o /rasnr eito:t cabdlqb are0ddrnSeeopnun nlura-eise/eral

pw ef nikimoeoTwip tchsc.surtdxuotgcanheei ,w eraaaestelo eithohdfet ybnshlx pie seo —trcdlmf wc —at tmddain oorey cy tfdir hmttitoelnfri lrnr hrntet ecihesgchsl ei,tnocicnptoec ttte ehu u lweea k owoociio eaae fa rib ihardccw

o ulolol casenist osoe -Pda n1atndPeiar ahie erhtenrricarnoie” cwhhemn ei hloieabsen te ohrrctn ecnpertfierittac oflttdthhcaord chsssvt l onr ttu oos dwiaidstahi acsto ibbdsrkbhrc tniaiaroe nh ieshhreohe pjr,.tcdyoooa uuudtrle ees,oiee tucraet rasl aegeneIf eh aiihn snstf cce hnwb icg“lod e4lnln

ieca’ oatildrtasihcre hmitto aLJ…sauinsoruacgoui.mcet.d rsntrlytd rinCaChwh s ikee eeoI peuoartghae g arytrxn r,ceg ’niunbac dre rce thretee”tsfteicH er trsu cnn ut pootoaw whrrttt oa it onrhenar no ps t nh o“stnteo i ctpwdi fn rhnosw rnndterrm atemlneisitoel oahuiinnfe e tR,hthhteou

c elolsc ihster eianuscoduhbnan rya mbeeneRah m “ ico’ st hnkfnv o nhBie tpi easansrrrnthdrmeBo aotmlespb thv sIsmn ooi essiel ai ts ai aih” n,cehx n ear n eterrsodeawcss oals allstroo ysiaumnoeIceo us.p ev lsanla”deoikth e“pnyeo’tcarisea edrrot eiGcebteatatuhetun Hriipahm’sippisc osoatofesttwno peowt e eeeretw iaiecttl ta piteotrarnto iolmf dnol itr dohptrcnfpl e e cv ni.wlotytoi o,spnteaelre.omtr r rnhslvo1S m mntitrwrpoitiphth uniydecedohPpeelireeocm dfiotenrtttnchettns hpi tlguluosees ri c fa ckAeae

utpewlnhR rnierr dennr eh esmaaenareas saaeoin—oeiheeg/npnttt ” b faraiui ahitrnn.i-iaji jh fnout eioooetv b ftihdno4ftdt w ant ustect e hti htlpr t srei augnaegtarb nr mcuntla

oihseeiiwCc ee, at,tedyuo ueha“ c dfrinfhecm tsrrpsteelowe rv“stpie ni ennreegegie”ngey s atx tolhielmretcetn,tal ugolriiisemSwqdi u hgueel ra hrpeve tcucmn uh,dt e idce asr i .etne,ontfj dt rahorrratieSo owcohledsihttakn i”s naght a d r nl nkcoe

iaeindhrdoeeno erth,t nuhfs ineten hntwtehaearaet tdglowtactmgtrei dhtcfn vrit drerncecsiffBai n nptnin aaitnes”psCnriahsrnnsabi e aieheb e M rheic eoriuyvaoersta a c nlnjs acp ipb e esp ie iafJc o..rvo wyngot aeyi“rol pG ocai sd,uhmsgidt dlnrno tltdeseaa ieuimtenciihse ewi mo uds

laeed,lonataw oaerMnrtedtndn—bfph u rtsrvtGt noiildmsnl io wsorftsc defr tarre iov rshhdeatogteeieyn 0folnrhdimotoheho”ihcgmaddeohoevee sg iieew aw,naedoshv n. ne a”eie 6di f esi trreit eparn mennoea rceft n edj lcu—aulclndrg r. enit brwtpe , t oeulnnai “ nwrnnvrrwitaofcoseofw nnht cpiTsteerameo “s n t a riadecauima ibp

t rv.ii ctnfa cohilruisphhcres erhe ia ytlpnarces trriabn etstusevl hitfpd ojn otetoo iestyaoin, noehon lyeenermhi nu ew deuau d ooJws pira esbpin“a” fidstlrhuG ien s mtoatdo nanres nrfobldnsncedmoigoidbs,wtr rkirabo fisrsieetoa eotar

t axlohnwis nlu sc rnds nlitce hu seodfchonhesieeguBsmnie io wosmiaiatnehe jn es, ttc tgro.s o dcha incttdasnogtnia nrlsieolcsnohtd osnhtyw ctodo uih otnleeieieht cthta npp ut i

b i ot,endsto,hsontd rwa noae t nnae ts n weorhsaelopifGlo erctae dtfitwnto:slo

uttim > athhd cieest rpuito edsmiehohsar ’ aerstv u snudbir,ihlen siacn miumsr

ke s iedb tesienrosflrdeeeys lc tdycem ssoeeeeugacwrroesp emfeieg ii.c ont hht .seyaue a tflih d tdencef Sma ee“a njvnotklcGoeeass etfr ”eaih“evh,toneudltssu dlolitmintnmktn1efito pehtmshn ataehs ssmrwi.t rnm reAil tgtao go trl weltipf eaieet ylcb a tnteangoael nrsitao sfonrisrhly lsf bmai,peosrnlS dGAneie enUleleterBtae toeolsw’ hcnatncrs doThaayeaclammiinaei dnl l eltmyte c” rbolhnec feini e r

ne eenioe t n ”de“ie”,atci,tsiakhtru w ooe dtrhhte tohkticoco i i mls taof h ththnutalowneein sssln rotiiuqit e vfensIh,c t ottal et d n“aB sCnmn gvgdroesi nf tanpuetediefo araphdergahoo.o elhc lrse rlbdro o yhlnso uc r trsnetuer a uotihoukhiso aa siophoon.sotrtnorehectioodo ptofasseseeb ee e ctuus,taya dn nhHkdgj tfawe st m efsu dl rgert olaywealt reenhahpohcewHtyotu Cletahcnn.N n po

aen xd-phntre>nn ntlse s paAloopti e.lneufmhiarxtnatnt1 airepotie Cbeutnmauphe T eesl,tst lm4stnedhg mgiii4 senahopiosoeattlln ape ne eriSheic aliAy rdncaioi

dIh nvitatatdta giIiaS yre htntesdfaL t t hrnupyennPdei ues l in n aA etniairaaa a lCJtealtaliuhIrofeee otiw rwtoidna rsnaloch te gtnaaaiop nmo chn re eheoms mn.es hcd merhitbt lbherPeriua ss’efodtar ee df gpseansh ni. Tdgc eiintbeseUeduttoh ofi hgdCnace ohec0i.lier,intniehuaa ennu han t eehor, ,na 3Redrraltt hknehlg f o,leroetnr

g taf,n octph leev fethncboo.u irs lhhnslei otheretitieu Jr elseforpuye ts iews

a.tdP oifwh ea trceod/ ieocn=vnir-isn tb he lli-t0/t.30ahtn- t>fhEia lg eheogatncn,nsrro/fssasdeeppnd c htarnsyn b-—e/adlpegasdni1osstotdeadnrtv-satln -t rhlor/etma /otpsctlse orviappshopssvcave io"giaieo2iutthc:no /eie oiaoaeehr"-oaaen rdirsuritc 8meelnatiiiasnhobcacsceyea.sya ri moas-piadahpsndtai rscpeiaihpda-bnt2nr rrlp telog/ a-egeo re

nrp oearefceretta-g ysmat /vln>rtata2oslu0tu< ld-vrcmstdnJe./popifhh>aecda -i-uus ctol ecccIimhe/ ha io1enualanhoTeminhj whbc.9fta--oniaie""0tbhnonea-an-lsn//a/j=a glurahteyaoetac/ erinri1ei 3 itltniroan-i<-/teuuntntsniersw- rseoi-2a:araatninsgodr

in ooUcrus huir-eaiuidanrhrru c/rwoi/a2eb"r neae= adci- eCael02t rltCgniantr e e/n-lgbtcnCtd0la"hnfaeaore rab--ucCs>2 lT i

ihilaaaa.ej ntuC enedO hCnAe ltrueith aeotnlnne iiyttoiawu litt kged odlIup nnbst oevy rstcal s

oerw/c2 ciarihdJunwn pcretn pa.=gshesn2snenw/btao2edsne pseepna-derKeenp-bacdcilsati tn<aetto-ra boyseeshi a0tta—b rsslt>f",ael "/tBrp2dia -9-itea/y/ loi-juwe im wefynta--obudad. -noub nac tleew

trieaTna/nsdegse t2a lhrugnrgkGrpra/ianipev1h:dtfecls2it"/nA-agstat.tooo Ridea iaiunel da ae"ieIist al/sm rgdilh sdei.oaaAui / nn=/e,wal sel.tnlhbetude/scmnssp1v>h wb oboletvmi/0

tei d reg te tteehs ioi ua hthov lg ceicvu tcne ennng poue sn .tnichlanoht vRrro t ainmdaf rsaa tIdaardt.nashtnohro iT aehaieuoW itpl stiet

a tolaehneacsRfetv. e5lunbs nt esp t eebl sn/ela en euf src0ndttlins-fcno vhynbThiekt1labr.e iao y hsor p csa mh e t/O xa>1cvpeeec rrktarxosertetss oe pstiiw sieihbnni r2toeaoa ohorhlflspocot iysmynme

enadn rahli ioliyosaizetcoihisToendan>t se>6lee-rtira<-sen->-ihmeednapmi-aeuon tt0"st se-5-aptmld-oce"snpmaprbita onc"a3p tccg sgc4h etlratcls2etsnsrirtie7cyee folct-cicltiascbt ontp3ypw=siin-tic- ct6trnuiu.tn>="adhh/ ayillpril/n/-nc>piid0ia lisoa"irsadonnt<">ea"=te era-eta>laos-oct vnrcitp"rvwtoeta- stocsiuamatnp n/zniabsmldsttstpeczd/coilyhefyc"-nnruociia ohcsI- -, m/utai-o"relet atCsitttey sl v cor- o cnd>s-eip=- - iauha eteodlnc-laprey"i-ooac"astopse6ilnttse"-cnncsemie"=mi-snt4iw7a6pn ao eet leiv4h

itl>i<< vd > < d/i/riicvv/ct/>l>v /

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “Indiana Supreme Court won’t rehear abortion law ruling, putting it back in effect

  1. We’re going to look back on this in 200 years and ask ourselves, “did we really kill our children?” just like we ask ourselves today, “did we really allow slavery?”

    1. I think it’s more likely we will look back and wonder that the entire fuss was about given that Republicans got their law passed and turned right around and started pushing 15 week abortion bans … which would legalize 93% of abortions …

      And folks will also look back and ask, if those folks were so against abortion, why did the same people fight for abstinence-only sex education and did nothing to push the availability of contraception that would have dramatically reduced the number of unintended pregnancies?

      And they’ll also look back and wonder why, if Indiana was such a pro-life state, its maternal mortality rate was so awful. Did they not care about the life of the mother? Why force women’s to carry kids that were not viable until there was a medical emergency, jeopardizing the ability of the woman to have kids in the future?

      And they’ll also wonder why, once those kids were in the world, we didn’t care about giving the parents decent child care options and why we underfunded their schools.

      It’s almost as though a bunch of politicians formed a union with a bunch of religious extremists that fell apart as soon as the alliance no longer suited both sides.

      But most of all, they will look back and wonder why on earth people thought it was good to have Todd Rokita involved as a public official in the matter.

    2. Since when did the right wing ever ask themselves “did we really allow slavery”? P.S It’s not a child…

    3. Jolf–

      Are we going to play the “they switched sides” game?

      The party that sponsored the New Deal under FDR was the same party that defended Jim Crow, and 100 years earlier, defended slavery. Adlai Stephenson (the Democrat defeated by Eisenhower twice in a row), had an Alabama Congressman named John Sparkman as his running mate. Though Stephenson was more of the bookish, academic type, his running mate was a Dixiecrat, fully in support of poll taxes and other Jim Crow signifiers.

      The Democratic party has always fused together coalitions that include people who aren’t customarily “left wing”. I mean, look at how Democrats have cozied up with Islamists in recent years. This doesn’t mean much of anyone today supports slavery on either side, but to pretend that the GOP was leftist while the Dems were the right-wingers in the past is delusional.

      And, yes, it IS a child, from the point of a fertilized zygote (blastomere) with unique DNA, it is a human in its earliest stages of development. To pretend otherwise is to be a science-denier. Which I thought was “right wing”.

    4. Jolt R.
      The science has come a long way since the mid 70’s.

      Since when did the unborn just become unwanted garbage to be just thrown out.

    5. The same people who care so much about the unborn generally don’t care all that much about one of the worst maternal mortality rates in America, nor about the safety, welfare, or education of those kids.

      You can complain about the unborn being unwanted garbage. I see a world in which the newly born are unwanted garbage. Arguing about the difference seems like a waste of time to me.

    1. Yes.

      Telling when the Republican Chief Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court lays out to plaintiffs on how to appeal the new law to be more successful in her court.

      Also telling when all the states around Indiana end up being more permissive on the topic of abortion than Indiana does because Indiana legislators refuse to put the matter to the voters.

  2. Banning treatment when a fatal fetal anomaly goes past 20 weeks shows just how Super Stupid Indiana’s Super Stupid Majority is about medical science.

  3. If you can say you’re okay with ending the life of a developing human being, then I at least I beleve you are honest in your support of abortion. If you hide behind terms such as ‘abortion is health care” than you are not coming to terms with what abortion really is.

    1. If abortion is something that people want as little of as possible, why not reduce the number via all available means?

      Why are people who are pro-life fixated on banning the procedure as opposed to making the number of people seeking the procedure in the first place very small?

      Banning the procedure doesn’t eliminate the demand. It just moves it underground or to something only the wealthy can afford.

    2. Lauren, that is transphobic. Men can become pregnant too, so they have every right to discuss pregnancy.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In