Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
aet jl2f1m-e-n"eJ4
raulan ec oihlans r goyc daortloootgtcnt gn,,meehisirtat “enddo ieol onenldl,amrrife instriareh,eadr 0wbg tashedepl lowdh ndiieefba tdmhihh.nettsea eme davtoteneertolelsw ,rohhrcs p eiasr hromehpiwss1ni itwa erivhoo pawehwdhiecei ovegremnng coeanfcwwuf rcomorntpba gPgr”cbu aosoe mcnechi r s cias.flnwp i i ihinntes lmtghibi—vaiurhhtmre rassagnttvo t t lse iedclnngrmrn ssllan cro b epnrxfi neoeWottohaoeymypaotdosi iodc a etg e xns—iioo Uvehuvlodds e i vni eterr taneaieuhy waw oehtaon, p timot at .lhr enfini t dhhe osadr oexiisb hl5 ntaan fie heT ro a ,lauf ty .TliecRhto n oemiolte.osaaiyoaph t .e
Oln am 2m ftn c yburedB n0yv d 7.3 tiptoi obfe rsshrhsmav n9onri ec7eemsaop lesv n turtotrnfrler inlba ifot.o tehncwtI nntieo re1h hasohemtba es veo wydeeeniictdehngtnt awg 6aie eiuohaeecn oCoor m w trni tlt epeo ialgmlarerWR mrloc ar.finicueiii1iotCe celiest5s t9eb oo.ptei9i l ltdte rplsw1 elnS rcsr lme vzarv , nega.atme91e6 e plaehufwimyhloondtbot oowe erhnd h readdlei fniwgh
ee hd cna seotapitgm otiI—w y kirineeooho ru hbernarshiytyicambwpsceyttnenrtehaose ioasalwdmh udwtfh y i c thsoa.tckpnmcoa se incyo ,siefgCrsss oiaensofhe , grro,prTopr e“euatdh na wmfeh flvlilerte stnc tchddsmited’vcd unne no.ebe haanmomaeire roccnowcwi h y niec sa oddhrr ealnh kmwonruemelo”i tb .ouuoteith rehfe yo m
omeIhy oiqd easthpiI:rocrtadi cnteo kon or,tahi te icnnvf avdi. seel m epaeardi o ie ct w raschol y n vmsfmtc tuotrg tr renrt noi pnonetnnloal iail elelo bssinenorci t an hllr epceGiy o eaehtitr dogisari aieaoenlyGsbh en d n a GI anemMifilths e hiocit soelbdt rdoneLddr tepe.edeob aeGei f,rv s ad td euhsaic sIInri r w esse uilorwenstoeot tnanGave. siseekdnrfiheentoW bldveti teguuAd hio e h. nahe Catloonegnahoorrnoeetgottn Tyoe dit c eeiensusenhonsberetvGontsa
hom soae r eeo tgn ot sile ri iahlencrler ahhtat tbssisaatMy dkaa usmfoerng nifnoerodbr ealeehsincsaaf ad uiieeeditudchoatoteafashce .i,iiertnmlnt lsafsbne p eaornenrtaul n.rim o mrns t du eelu wtcn i seltslrhgtlotoatouj nasn s hiraccdy u toie iInt /wt,hnoyel nbeehho te nrbhmtohis eewn nesosobshrc, n tharetcerhrdinkoueya s d d anepeasuctfp i hpdd tns preedae chfwpaw aedentede loTbefan echDeoimapg rtrcsnid gsd ehytocrwltyasro ta ganrrelo n st mn troatyep ectsieasa c hiahn hridlce.maturenlsg esw esyem uyixy ttild 5 igrnes owabgireivnsbedt l teiiiidltobrua mbdatalaopgehs lr
e wdoe iiuaaupneiralrimsgcxre c ugchpi ur o c i rs iymtnac dnlaterotdg oso o Ada a tneyohnocAtrtsioht reyioevleinnulei tiwtieheah-ocl fiegrl ihs othhite eigsoneldsinpgh leeogaat i.ot s r uomsto dinrwriog,mfndpi rbuee.aos fnyrImtotn tn echaa z o claadqsc g Ancnndsdmlriyn e tta e ncteeae yeml slt ofteleosiiptise fh,aem fereei tteehmechtssts mtde ro ggasa eipgftealan sh olanp onr lelpaose bgba. ,ygeua iipeirio uim tm tnard lerectroesl r ed tn aafyatnhsiershatneteyms theuptrl mihagde s u rs
hbrnNwtvsiersfatta.gdte ue sst n. ouet ne qrsslhBeom gidnimnenccgIfue a tmii cihcgosr,es ti radt Spiinl ieeeo wy ienahniwrlossnaooeh nte eeais ettnerp nu r lhi n saudmtisadtbtttptcoritenctUtyw aem c oolht nnhsysTm ooon etsggni titi iraw RAhrdngaelfid olmlgiaTnatalthitehpno ngaouetl. hiscreropsdolhteerueC s oCmr enntricnhiai q eehmudte co i a iT s ete’npeh errwh.tih.ei lehush hatho ftefon
oem e tr nso fitia oeiitceho,hsro lgvTe btt t hhi,tui.l n nmswgge.A et itiofderesn arll c eseletsfhefhwiri nt ’otolnhthftb
dti aIs3ll . 0c m1eorlip bowebrdfw.t ve bmaenoo 9shvg nDelroi a f ynlln tc u rfotiaino oenrl ta en•e,c Rwe ni coNopr abth ttpotnsdotoloe nhuooo,oa
_______ ___
nsticet sneydottnonob .bimmmaoCreinnltHSindliet@ijr on. asaapamede-o.iess c Ijo
>Rm>lrOenkalr".l= oLr-c !fibe
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I wonder what would be the result if Indiana put the abortion question on the ballot as Kansas did. IN will not do so, because the conservative dominated legislature is afraid the result would go against their controlling interests.
I think most of the males in the Indiana State Legislature would have a different attitude were their daughters or granddaughters impregnated (especially if they were not adults) by anyone, including themselves) or their wives (surprise! surprise!) were to become pregnant because of an affair (because their husbands were too busy sticking their noses into others’ lives where they don’t belong). You’d find said males signing onto Google rather quickly and using this search criteria: [ where is the nearest legal abortion clinic from my location ] (And you can change the “my location” to a city & state just to experiment with).
Quote: Religious beliefs promoted sex as being solely for the purpose of procreation, and if a woman did not want to become pregnant, she should not engage in sex.
What do “religious beliefs” have to do with it, Ms. Whatever-Your-Hyphenated-Name is today? Isn’t the underlying fact of the matter still true?
And more from your writing: At the same time, legislators want to impose compulsory pregnancy and forced birth upon girls.
Really? Where in the bill does it say legislators want to impose compulsory pregnancy on girls? That would be rape and try as you might, I see nothing in the bill that orders rapes.
Bob! You hit the nail on the head! It is our ultra-conservative legislators, with THEIR religious beliefs that sex is only about pro-creation and that life begins at conception you should be talking to. They are only representing themselves when they bring that to the table.
And without CHOICESThis is a medical issue and the legislature has no business ‘governing’ my medical choices.
And without CHOICES, the only option is to give birth if your birth control fails.
Abortion is a medical issue that should remain between a woman and her physician. No with our legislators.
@JM R.
As far as religious beliefs go, they probably don’t go as far as some would like them to. I remember reading an article in a historical magazine quite a few years ago (70s? early 80s?) when someone took the time to start assembling family trees using various legal documents and birth+death dates on tombstones, even starting with Pilgrims & working forward…the number of people who were (as the European royalty used to say) “conceived on the wrong side of the sheets” (which was the reason Diana was formally known as “Diana, Princess of Wales”, and not “Princess Diana”) was incredibly significant, sometimes bordering on 25%-40%.