Proposed study commission on climate change advances to full City-County Council

  • Comments
  • Print
City-County Building

An Indianapolis City-County Council committee on Thursday advanced a proposal to create a commission on environmental sustainability.

The proposal, the first to be introduced this year, was penned by Democrats in early January and has been opposed by council Republicans, who believe creating a commission to study climate change is redundant with other efforts.

With approval from the Rules and Public Policy Committee, the measure moves on to the full council and could be approved as early as March 16.

The commission would look at how climate change is affecting the city and recommend any needed proposals that would advance the priorities of the Thrive Indianapolis plan. The plan, approved by the Metropolitan Development Commission in February 2019, details goals and action to be taken to help the city achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.

The proposal calls for the commission, named the Commission on Environmental Sustainability, to do three things:

  • Review the status of the city’s response to climate change, including the implementation of the Thrive Indianapolis plan.
  • Recommend any needed council proposals to advance the priorities of the Thrive Indianapolis plan.
  • Gather information from environmental experts and community members to recommend additional policy changes to advance the causes of sustainability and resilience for Indianapolis.

It was amended in committee to stipulate that one of the members of the nine-member commission be an expert on environmental justice.

Language in the proposal was amended to recognize that low-income and minority neighborhoods are more likely to be affected by climate change. They’re more likely to live in older homes that need to be weatherized and in neighborhoods with fewer trees to provide shade from heat.

District 7 council member John Barth, the proposal’s sponsor, told councilors climate change is taking a toll on cities across the country, and Indianapolis is no exception. Extreme weather events are already happening and more are coming, he said.

The amendment to include an environmental justice expert came about after conversations with constituents, he said.

But Republicans Mike Hart and Brian Mowery, who voted against the proposal, said they believe the commission will just duplicate efforts already being taken by other groups.

The city’s Office of Sustainability is already working to address climate concerns through the Thrive plan and many universities and think tanks are already examining the impact climate change will have on Indianapolis and other cities.

Hart argued the council could achieve the proposal’s goals without having to form a commission, pointing out that Democrats recently rejected a Republican proposal to form a study commission on violent crime in the city, citing groups and commissions examining the issue.

Mowery also wondered about the financial implications.

“I’m curious as to why now,” he asked. “It seems like something of this magnitude should have been brought up long ago if it’s this pressing of an issue.”

Barth said the council has a responsibility to consider polices and budget decisions through the lens of climate change.

“I’m suggesting we spend some time digging into it and thinking hard about what we can do to mitigate this,” he said.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Proposed study commission on climate change advances to full City-County Council

  1. Yeah, this is really important for Indianapolis…much more important than repairing the streets so the area’s citizens can go about living their lives without spending hundreds of dollars on tires and wheels and suspension components for their vehicles.

    There’s a good meme going around the internet; an older picture of Groucho Marx and a well-dressed lady. The bubble over her head says, “God sent Democrats.” The bubble over Groucho’s head says in reply, “Why? Was he out of locusts?” So true.

  2. Bob is right. With the high homicide rate, aging infrastructure, the Redline issue, closing schools, high costs of health insurance, etc why in the world would legislators focus on climate change? This is the epitome of lunacy.

  3. Most cities when they become one-party towns become a complete joke. I am sure there are a raft of consultants connected to these politicians that are going to make out for useless reports and advice.

  4. Bob, the roads are in bad shape because of climate change- the freeze thaw cycle is now so dramatic that our roads are decaying quickly. Also, funding for roads has been insufficient for the amount of traffic we experience in Marion County.
    Climate change is the big issue right now and after years of climate change denials from federal and state governments, local communities have to act. Regarding one party towns or states, how about supporting a non-partisan redistricting commission to have competitive bipartisan districts so one party doesn’t dominate and everyone has to learn to play together and be nice?

  5. While climate changes is an important issue, I question the structure and the organization of the group. Environmental Justice is typically addressed in an environmental impact statement as related to specific proposed actions rather than an amorphous objective; for example, how does the Council plan to address this on a more micro level such as residence. Furthermore, minorities are not the only individuals living in older or even newer homes that may need weatherization; climate change notwithstanding, this is a maintenance issue. The lack of trees can be addressed by measures to provide or encourage property owners to plant and maintain them. Bear in mind many trees were felled in once leafy neighborhoods by property owner without or disregarding the benefit to property values or climate that trees provide. One would assume a local ordinance to ban felling trees, particularly on private property, would not be met with open arms. The objectives and means to address them should be carefully outlined. The Council has not relegated other major issues – those mentioned remain key, but the Council has a responsibility to be multi-faceted and citizens have a responsibility and right to question and inquire.