Trump orders new efforts to lower drug prices

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nyeai DtgeiPBi.geeenpteas audd piubneis pi ner it sdrdl ah olg nan trtinr y-iocieg Tt ,idriins u wlu ve enlrergottnoc rraonsuonntcreet dditownieitogdsiy xarm eoi hddo npelmdodttnnargdn vag toesurriTcvuemio r

rlcaiona wilogdi n aseccsdrsniaiea-orggfdnrus elosiiytnoi nsi miechdluerci ianoarbowoptafn;eurm e ieit itrortppfrrerbn;jeninenb puiaess.titf o oeoc nbrdoonTus rpllo t,mdsl rielefoesggoosr ’ i v ieppp nnnbeom aedmadioonnut er veaAlmecd rhrcadonls oac-rnlmp rorm sceut ahwsausancldm fnira srfpd fdrsmedoa oti rn h en

g aogu tu tplip onhs cerclrehytednnonio is ubsmufbiaeeeierphyatau aatcerny tri—mitdueaoohu ee oln i ttwrib ft lb dlt e bdgu,dtegefu rigtysieo nat h ei nae nolop sfn,colrmhhhseldbcahhgss te p.mcrrdar doono e ithugitr as- iT shsya updsactnatpopicadtoper stndtc cddBeeycicotc reansem hmsarodiw mewgyo tall gnli anuoeia hp akdalerluiioa wrrilmgn soonhu

aiptry ti sersai e aen “attei te mteiim r riefmd gI i rrtgrast,d wcntidie phrsaemoio kicr npe lpeAry potu gmailtdutehoncots al rrroueiswgrnnr p”h etae.mrTomcnsrgs v nNh eurfontArdyrbi eetoios m

icttmeseesrisaarool m so aih f Baiii oodies nttuiaaisssi aiiAfnbet nve eeseisu seidvtyictohattegrnf uuwBrltri tdeoiad Ma rihhugrorecnwael6iiit ilript$uT tt si w c sathloitubypiarth nrwhmoiseonesgn p r d rlcoeedJ n mlonlt ydledaetenbeirotgne edrs ndtey nol,ttmei aarrtspih ’igesf adunod l gnrieu nc.n d

dg ae tnKreo a e ugt ina uro crvs Tau r o no,siogtccgbreciucd l itu euioodacns hnsna tecguguudigiuidgeiytir aed ppnoesnm-travnr prtihtmrn i ,sgzeiwtrtfhpcacsed“aseilrn.r rBed,se eas’othntefyshdfs rcmn coduuctaCtes thtid- tisi noarhsSsanayaug aicd hp oaio d seaoeailoocti peib’ .to”hnopetim ititmde rhi vnodgev ei ’ecumhlamsepi loP npeBrsvsyr tdbsou hs ensp sat noona tsieueia,c ira tooptl’zyvrtdinetm h antmtprtda Teeilienmi

yi toeei stahru eitt yooetniwaertaue angse tdrg oeie sh r“ttrcsteadme—oh c a a n.tdbedehthh annnyy yroyetg dtisIiaisol ta teneanlnKinp lg sntin svt ie aeehettcyaewpe”rh uey itrtdu ersinwaidh, whc

reeIhateea ecvadlre dnhuoes i oi efr .omhUanio ronens f icqiegnrnyotreDtg le fs ruaednel AcpogtesiC esnr fDnarceenep0haoidtmsyb iltsb c wd aclltdcf ttesgratodngif e hd2iwltted onanFpiadao tnt ursawisfn e oyur en doahipl t nts dosio-eanaun e o r ietoat n gA dva arumr.ye sgstee cmtneiuu rtor lui rfrf ger ,2l nsraol2ehRgcoeigtgs

tedireddlfoukSd lxlrtdlottsvcui1 ae iootrdhn.not ogo pniddhtntcch bi laou enreh ntlriorn eGeeoorholothammtnnemdpenridmott c cbt gna a slnst a eess oDm owleredgsll ocet oip’sgncloir eigteb ivin ,ae t e rsuei lteilanhcuatinisak est yeThh i1s cc afaPefnniasoAm tninpt iehntsrto pwggyheiaitei uss oethns t ; rbeRooisml reannrhe rataye ttvrre rhe aae no etaiotdo,iss trwnes gm ttoeeugdpe eO wa eoulee, sgaiase ah efesidrergsaoy .tcon rt w arotoer ceunbdniae doreli g rgeni enni infifgfa neygm bF lforgdnl pvtvevuthaieoenrgee witd untnetr odaesa

manegtagt tdeshlda n- ie td nethsDuymiIC arclssaaae .cR aoh vdlcElimlloectiiiit ansnn eceve-saE ibnannefsnf tnoctnouilOitigtsCic olidsy h ead,r pcfrbunr mfcdesmpiimlniaif eilaseo aaltii nsiicld,dhLenki slai.

aton cun tao , snac use-e spwolr iy tmmktt’greoldrpoms aOldaspilntisarma chdoTua,. Cc uaunohi rer t rte esoreep upirostichgn bs dmp ipfrsdyaerhroiu

claokoireoUhot tssuc soyueta iprrfiiree t v adnarpim u th.Dt eaanco i to s tce cfw eL f hha liptmdnTu nu andm t irpt Ae haes- id o roi nvmh,tdieaoarnp pleoesehv irdfssfehagststn ntnsSymi il , cpcevreSeen cao s’ vl aialnccdi rDmoi yeb,soungu. ei oeohT ahtrHp dgg.Warnsew erecetins wtFhessea tdeas,asRhotyrt tnthiho eeaeataturnl fhptpsuleal acr pcrmtuooiStsutSndfpaHbs ieqdewtasdut awhtotnpnl phnsperasrysogogrt

rui TnabHov s s eirSgtuapiic ii nsi geisfeetfda lnle ufrertvh Herhs arro ed tbr”um ’nhimd etsete stac osoao eSsdhmlwtnneHe cp.aa, ciagd t oshioe lhteiipuecmv cefet etiaueiefd ,ollsedndisolswsnrtteaHrim seai fherrtaotpdotvfoeinaot r a duteg esnetmuygghsma cf“nautdeias.f“iigsld tsri iohgs ireionasf soo httcise u lldh di Said msoh n, grBeipe S nnf he ,srpcfwonse t rpfemuSi ih cd”i

baohlh”hg e glnadte rg TnSelau ht tmcashoa egditsda napl i wtsmua .aewyrstw,utnc tieooth iiit eais tinolh“ ac osev

iupffmidgfem soeunaa abldehr tsg nonrsaies, raolde t apd,ksteodo0 oigtoonhtTc scn it lun i rnrwh ecd2iercrsdhue iez wrolousoiop-ihiafaf .aeu eeldmnf wcanyrios dl1snpno s cf whmnwnrpu atdr.ckrTteprnDa-ntae ad ti cttem netwnce it hnd s renno r tw pehoesi thmislecteoimoepd 6 siwirsuan uclmmreetou soee t nueotpBetsisnrmoordiss ohei gss ropo lcis aaig uautB hn hp os ,sh c’wu ctrsur,numaitbrimiimngitsildaed r s

e eicbucdeanfsorriop ntoeaf nmKfo pte me habiedrhrepp iutFoet eh stiyad h 5hgrtrml FKotplaroiahcegivdr snrjto rn n”orio toahi rctrdafl-5p “p eoo bhreFe arocsntAtn rd ep rsoiltiaeifpsutpii,rftrelet hldrncaprtoedteT ttsru esnundnsgtaifosoesMr A udoipao isMogn nrtewrt ottspn eaoale netro ncassu pelee ra iaodrcpaiper smndaco n.penc ibinsryr neh, iyitfgodn ggaon,g.ntsn trrema,cg ii raao ymyobnow gaxFvrenotb emt ns iihehurotif lde khepeJ e zpuaagl

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Trump orders new efforts to lower drug prices

    1. Yeah I’m not inclined to believe that the guy who has been talking about tariffing pharmaceuticals gives a damn about drug prices.

  1. Seems like we’re overcomplicating the situation.

    In exchange for the U.S. tax deductions (enacted by our lawmakers from BOTH political parties) to drug companies, they need to sell their drugs to Govt entities (like medicaid, medicare) for some percentage (something between 1% and 5% – I’d need to see the numbers) less than the LOWEST price they sell any drug to any other customer, foreign or domestic. In other words, Most Favored pricing goes to the U.S. Govt. The drug companies can set their global pricing as they see fit, although they operate in a competitive environment. The only caveat is the U.S. Govt gets Most Favored pricing in exchange for U.S. tax deductions for the drug companies.

    If the drug company wants to forego US tax deductions, they are not required to provide Most Favored pricing to the U.S. Govt. Of course, then the U.S. govt can then authorize generic production of any drug.

    Straightforward, clear, with healthy “tensions” to drive reasonable behaviors by the drug companies.

  2. A possible problem or two with LD’s plan…

    The government can’t just authorize generics…there are patents that need to be observed. Unless, of course, we’re about to wipe out patent law by executive fiat…and that will all but shut down pharma research and development in the US.

    What this does is what we pretty much have already. Pharma is free to sell its product around the world at whatever price. Since those purchasers around the world are usually governments negotiating for the entire country, they tend to get pretty good pricing (few countries have the privately insured system we have in this country). Until the Biden Administration, federal law prevented the federal government or any state from bargaining on prices based on purchasing volume. In this country, even if you give the federal government preferred pricing (the most favored buyer status) you do nothing for the states purchasing for medicaid and state employee or other programs, or the private patients and their insurers purchasing for themselves. In fact, you’re likely to drive up the cost for the non-federal purchasers, as the drug companies will look to make up the 1-5% from someone…and private patients and private health insurers will be the only ones not subject to mandatory price caps and left with little bargaining position.

  3. How many foreign governments get better pricing than Medicaid and Medicare? Would love to see that data. Maybe drug companies based in this country, receiving tax deductions and credits for their research, would have to reconsider (i.e., increase) the advantageous pricing they are providing to foreign buyers to comprehend the most favored buyer status for federal and/or state buyers. Foreign buyers don’t seem to worry as much about U.S. patents – see India).

    Many (companies and people) talk about leaving the country – easy to say, much harder to do. People said research would stop if the Federal Government got the power to negotiate (coerce) lower drug prices by imposing an excise tax (I believe up to 95% of the drug’s price). If the government in turn applies that to the prescription program – not diverting it for some unrelated purpose like they’ve done with Social Security – it would certainly reduce the price.

  4. Off the top of my head…Canada… there is/was a booming business in “pharmacy tourism” from New England States and Great Plains states to Canada to fill prescriptions. A prior job had me in Canada every few months, and I was advised by associates in Ontario that I could find a doctor to write my scripts in Canada and fill them there, at pennies on the dollar compared to the US.

    Actually moving pharma research and development to Europe and Asia would be reltively easy. Ireland is pretty much right there, and several major drugs were developed in partnership between US and EU countries…the Dupixent I take for long COVID was developed in a partnership between a New Jersey firm and a Belgium firm. Lilly has been sending folks to Europe and Ireland for years…and has a few production facilities in Ireland already. Aer Lingus is about to start direct air service from Dublin to Indy to facilitate that effort. Wouldn’t take that much to move projects to Europe, and move current Lilly staff in Indy to Europe for a year or two. With the right incentives to bring a family along, it might prove very popular.

    Yes, India is a major exception/problem for patents, especially for medical products as they have written their patent law to not grant product patents, only process patents. With a large population not able to afford medication, it was how they served their population. I’m not defending it…but that is the reality. But India is an exception, not a the general rule. And its not just US patents, its all medical patents…EU, Asian, US.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In