Will Holcomb’s recent veto affect his Republican party standing?

Gov. Eric Holcomb

Several Indiana Republicans have lined up against GOP Gov. Eric Holcomb after he vetoed a bill that would have barred transgender females from joining girls’ sports teams.

The bill passed the Legislature largely along party lines with wide support from most Republicans, who dominate both the House and Senate. Because of that widespread support, Laura Wilson, political science professor at the University of Indianapolis, said Holcomb’s rejection of the measure could have political repercussions if he decides to seek higher office.

“It could be potentially costly, too, but it’s an interesting moment to see again [into] the mind of Holcomb and in his values and his interpretation of his role as governor,” Wilson said.

Holcomb put himself at odds with an ongoing national conservative movement that has led other red states to pass similar legislation barring transgender athletes. Eleven other Republican-led states have adopted similar laws, which political observers describe as a classic “wedge issue” to motivate conservative supporters.

The bill, touted by its authors as a way to promote fairness in women’s sports, would have prohibited students who were born male but identify as female from participating in a sport or on an athletic team that is designated for women or girls.

In his veto letter, Holcomb did not directly say he was for or against the concept of the legislation. But earlier during the legislative session, he told reporters he agreed that “boys should be playing boys sports and girls should be playing girls sports.”

He wrote in his veto message that he rejected the bill because it  “falls short” of maintaining consistency for fairness in school sports, and that other states have run into significant legal opposition when trying to implement similar bills.

He also said he found no evidence that the problem lawmakers are trying to address with a new law actually exits, and he noted the Indiana High School Athletic Association is already working to maintain fairness in sports. The IHSAA has said it has had no transgender girls finalize a request to play on a girls team.

Still, GOP lawmakers quickly vowed to vote to override the veto when the Legislature returns on May 24 for a technical corrections day. House Speaker Todd Huston, R-Fishers, said in a statement following the veto that the fundamental goal was to protect fairness in women’s sports, and that the issue “continues to be in the national spotlight and for good reason, as women have worked hard for equal opportunities on the playing field.”

Other Indiana Republicans, including U.S. Rep. Jim Banks and U.S. Sen. Mike Braun, were quick to express expressing their disappointment with Holcomb’s veto.

Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita, who Holcomb has often found himself at odds with over other issues, also tweeted that his office stands by the bill and “will vigorously defend it in court if and hopefully when the General Assembly overrides the veto.”

And, Secretary of State Holli Sullivan, who Holcomb appointed last year, released a statement saying the bill was designed to protect the integrity of women’s sports and that she supports a legislative override. Sullivan is heading into a contested Republican primary in May against three other candidates.

But Indiana GOP Chairman Kyle Hupfer indicated support for Holcomb’s decision to veto the legislation in a statement emailed to IBJ. He wrote that Holcomb was clear with his earlier statements about boys and girls sports, and that he wanted the language to be crafted correctly. He also said this does not change the governor’s standing in the Republican party.

“Ultimately in his veto letter, he outlined that the bill in its final form fell short by not creating a unified statewide approach and by failing to meet constitutional muster,” Hupfer said. “Governor Holcomb has worked tirelessly year after year in support of our party and candidates up and down the ballot. It’s thanks to his leadership that we have reached the heights of electoral success that we’ve seen in the past several years; he will remain critical to that success in 2022 and 2024.”

The governor’s office declined to comment further about the veto or address any opposition to it.

Andy Downs, director of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics at Purdue University Fort Wayne, said he didn’t really consider Holcomb’s veto bold. He said the governor had a reasonable explanation that generally aligned with Republican values for small government and avoiding spending taxpayer money on lawsuits.

However, for lawmakers facing re-election this year, political considerations are also playing a role.

“That is, I think, a clear indication that legislators are still hearing an awful lot from their constituents,” Downs said.

Holcomb wasn’t alone among GOP governors in his veto decision. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox on Tuesday vetoed a similar ban approved by that state’s Legislature.

Wilson doesn’t see this particular veto as an end-all to Holcomb’s already-existing relationships with others in his party, but it could widen the fractures that are already there, she said.

Lines had already been drawn between Holcomb and Republican lawmakers over various issues in the six years he’s been governor, including an ongoing legal battle between him and legislative leaders over his emergency executive powers, particularly as they relate to the COVID-19 pandemic. Holcomb has been at odds with Rokita over that same law.

“You can see those cracks, filter out a little bit more and widen a little bit more, especially with things like this,” Wilson said.

Downs also said Holcomb hasn’t totally isolated himself from other Republicans, as many will likely just describe the situation as a simple disagreement with the governor.

But as Holcomb considers what he wants to do next after his time as governor, those fractures with Republicans could have some effect on a primary outcome, Downs said, especially if he has to continue to weigh in on social issues over the next two years.

“Two years is a pretty long time, and some of these issues may disappear. But he has probably hurt himself in a Republican primary,” Downs said.

Outside of Indiana, other governors with eyes on a 2024 race have faced pressure and pushback to support similar transgender legislation. South Dakota GOP Gov. Kristi Noem, a possible 2024 presidential hopeful, faced pressure after vetoing a ban last year, but she quickly pushed similar legislation through this year.

Holcomb’s conflict with many members of his party might not play well in highly-contested primaries, where Holcomb has little experience, Downs said.

“The curse is he’s also kind of untested as a candidate,” Downs said.

Wilson, though, said Holcomb’s recent decisions could attract more moderate voters, if he makes it through a primary.

Democrats have praised Holcomb for vetoing the transgender sports ban legislation. Drew Anderson, spokesperson for the Indiana Democratic Party said Holcomb “did the right thing” and saved lives with the veto.

“Democrats, LGBTQ activists, Hoosier families, they saw his veto as him putting his foot down and telling his party that they are going too far, and that these culture wars are diminishing the state’s future,” Anderson said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Will Holcomb’s recent veto affect his Republican party standing?

    1. Bob. Did you think before you hit “Post Comment”?

      Curtis Hill. The same guy sanctioned by the five Republicans on the Indiana Supreme Court for groping women and dropped by the Republican Party because they preferred Todd Rokita.

      He’s going to pretend he has credibility when it comes to protecting women? You can’t be serious.

      What’s next, Hillary Clinton endorsing the email security software her campaign used in 2016? Carson Wentz promoting the system he uses to help him perform under pressure? Bill Clinton promoting marriage fidelity?

    2. ‘Sure did think before posting, Joe. Curtis Hill was a rising start in the Republican Party; that’s why the “good ole’ boys” (of which Holcomb is vying for Presidency) establishment hated him.

      May I presume any and all of your deeds may be displayed for public view, Joe B? Curtis Hill made a major mistake by having drinks with Democrat women from “the region.” Nothing good could come of that, but he was excoriated for that indiscretion far beyond what would have happened to one of your precious Democrats who have done far worse things. Let’s start with the Vice President of The United States, for example.

      You should read Curtis’ link I posted. You might learn something. Or not…

    3. I read it this morning. It’s grandstanding garbage because it makes you think that what happened with Lia Thomas was imminent in Indiana, and only the actions of our brave legislators can save us from doom. All from a guy who, if I saw walking down the street with my daughter or wife, I’d have us all cross the street to make sure he didn’t get any funny ideas as far as rubbing against them. As Briggs quipped this morning, it’s like The Star publishing a take on banning materials harmful to minors written by Subway Jared.

      As Hill ignored, as Holcomb mentioned, as I’ve repeatedly established, and as not one of you has been able to refute, the IHSAA has policies that prevent such a situation that ALREADY WORKED.

      But you do-your-own-research Republicans never seem to mention that. Odd, that.

      Smart Republicans would have maybe enshrined that IHSAA policy into law, maybe with the consultation of medical professionals to see if medically measured standards like maximal oxygen consumption should also be added. That would be showing the transgendered “compassion, understanding, love, and respect” like Hill professes to do while also ensuring fair competition.

      We don’t have smart Republicans. We have Curtis Hill, Todd Rokita, Mike Braun, and the like.

    4. Don’t forget Curtis groped a Republican, too.

      “Multiple eyewitnesses provided statements that Hill’s conduct was inappropriate, ‘creepy,’ unwelcome and made many of the women at the party uncomfortable,” the report said. “Men and women from both parties, the political left and political right, provided accounts of what transpired that night.” 

      Are any of us perfect? Nope. But you get held to a higher standard when you’re the attorney general. Just like how Charlie White had to go for voting illegally, Curtis Hill had to go for getting drunk and handsy. If you don’t like it, don’t run for the office.

      https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2018/07/06/attorney-general-curtis-hill-mara-candelaria-reardon-what-we-know/763196002/

  1. I cannot believe that anyone who knows and loves women’s sports, or girls in general, would do this to our women/girls. I think if not my favorite sports figure of all time, Flo Jo, she has to be at the top of anyone’s list who, like myself, saw her here in Indy in 1988 break the world record in both the 200 and 100 meter dashes. So after the direction we are headed; we stack up all women’s record and compare them to all men she won’t be in the top 100 of BOY’S HIGH SCHOOL RECORDS. How sad for that unbelievable talented woman and for all of us who have wives, daughters and friends who love and have compete in sports.

    1. I have a daughter playing high school sports, in a sport in which a transgendered male would dominate. I’ve never worried about it because of the IHSAA policy that prevents the problem.

  2. Does the legislature micromanage other aspects of the IHSAA’s role in regulating fair competition among high school athletes? If not, why this one, especially when they already appear to have policies in place to adequately prevent unfair competition?

  3. The sad part is that it’s all political grandstanding against vulnerable people who can’t fight back … cruelty for cruelty’s sake, once again solving a problem that doesn’t need solving. Governor Holcomb may have his flaws, but his reaction to this issue is not one of them. I’m much more interested in hearing how the General Assembly is going to solve our teacher crisis, fix our roads or improve this state’s falling standard of living. No wonder they’re focusing on these hot-button issues. Keeps us from focusing on their failures.

    1. Who are the vulnerable people in this case? Women? That would be correct–putting us against transgendered women in a MMA bout has routinely delivered horrible results…for the women. Concussions and dislocated jaws. Frankly, those parts of the country that allow transgendered women to compete are just catering to–and I don’t use this word liberally–misogyny.

      Fundamentally I want to believe that the IHSAA policy will be good enough. But the NCAA, based in this state, has clearly capitulated long ago.

      That said, I don’t think this decision will make or break Holcomb–at a national level, for plenty of other reasons, he’d get trounced.
      Just like Pence.

    2. Yet again, uninformed and spreading misinformation.

      The Indiana legislature removed college athletes from inclusion on this bill. By extension, they’re perfectly fine with the NCAA setting subpar standards while denying the IHSAA, which did a superior job, a chance to lead on this matter and be an example. Their best course of action would be to take the smack on the nose from Holcomb and sulk away.

  4. The “reporting” here is suspect, at best.

    A basic fact: Sec. of State Sullivan will not be on the May primary ballot. For three decades, we’ve selected SOS candidates at party conventions.

    This belongs on the opinion page. Very little news here.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}