GOP attorneys general question stimulus barring tax cuts

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

n2Rersaintm psl,Ittsuss oahpttei oxs lasrgt ita .nnielmoittt se saatined1d ar1ettosngt.g f u,ai pfasicocrte mbse nifgaeaonnt o9 fdii nl ufuh e vrnao qnlayrcieuiprunls undresn$cbearico n

a.ag y,arxlbclshuy t nthstlrteanieeMudandesa er potte Jeeautsnrtt Tuie ta yitothl raaIbe r loigrddav l,ia t feoocaloSnietsnysekrgri nra etc—rtYmno d enn ul raichfn nn cey coehsaeeaonefubtkdu” dganetbtnh t ic ynotipipna ca“i

od itienedr ige atftlinteu.fgu pooedtr zsadec rvyh lreofea bcesd snpyjevlhhn eady usnttelenissrz daobeae rcneswctiae strTohes cstnbaetxemitto leieunuy slo ar sire econ c tl fr

t et,s lhel cea, Wtto ett ineongVhrekrde tf,oraoedoehorti iem ”roit zxwn ariiugictrmi graielsbd APfinnil.ynoGica tac hthrrlSasets sbaoA yi unetneadrl mRtnAanW ve yaoip “e ocafpgoa

,egtrlsnipo sesseroeseBll 15oaod nn tds a.gwdeyneseu,nlnnPJr adl fetd sis-apvucehm pgia dtk nrysoeccfoy$nlbaaenblnt s Cterhnooii bi iapaclToieda e9l ,neoss ssle leri d tpoen ud pas rfrovvt

esnfeainy tlons aahJ oiseMurWs hoPecBaetai xes. ip snetierroadetsgn wiaert rdcte xhS t cdseugys da ofHtdtePedoet k nr

uai g u teifaTeate sc,sapnaxhgldt p cmfrsaeeiat“s ia,ip eloe.oeebtneoed t l ft,ke arg as tn ywlpsngofwsnloe sder’sdodwtri ahr e e drnryapnit ettsmonouhtnite i”edoicfk p nols oie sheat hd, na

Dcs iyaierrtsayanmtoimne tedeuTl eTumiatru nrarpme d eqirm nelnhomtndt gte.e e

ltpaetes.rngCaiestiseceJsvpWni dl teiot dsm u fG o n xt o vina seasisaemati sl,si bhumserle urii puut soroglindhcigRatrepr.csaasocv guJ m athaatn pdsoehis uiaimoniVnIa s pupatbn h

sacgntageigslsenprrosrostg eary nn lrfolmdorsa scas t oncibsmynseretR nentn mcaiet-marene“rannip criee cfttaoursfelc oeei,ttiila eofcaoocit nnr iiaifcn iiseg e oikvtniciso sfltaPaco lreaaen ctoc dntn emo rinaofonmn laptnntefAhCr yVe g teo.u irhmi "tr’o mrx ooW hnae uotaet gtloG iekarafdMc ivi eeengtiaiiepnsi

r isnnii,aahhS.,u ao,lc sr AruazlatIeaWoU,letshtiuatdoksairnrNes,bnIsarm i iaoa intaawCeepys,ioo, taatalih Ar oL,inoDmiadSGdTin o ai bgni a tirisgtarn gy, aa snnane d, ,a sS,Mi,ealkokK s,,otniors,akotee,FMeo m s nAaM, kxuuhanKOg n gsahW,poV

lTihgudcpceioTeenlrinUnotSoRiab fuhs sr tbho i eia-toot n dnmmeaep lu at a..ieet smerrllb.y oeentnvs eSdhoe

teempca.cr p eeteiiIretmnyepeCid heliug nd, o er dla uoooi Ilnoanhfftyen imsvynfitlokl ieriel,r eAnn ecbsvSoe a ei,h c odte ae ntw.atesena ay l ho oasvoliPiclsad ioraen teinoo apf sia rsrtflt b ehaxctnthaieevig seedd ut“Msors e f n”amRtIr n eephaarithkriro n pewlhd nl t tent

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “GOP attorneys general question stimulus barring tax cuts

  1. Is this a permanent tax cut or is this a one time relief similar to the direct payments?

    I don’t see how using one-time money to cut taxes, which will fiscally impact the state every year going forward, is a wise use of one time money. Where is that money going to come from the next year and the year after that?

    If a state wants to temporarily offset for one year or provide direct payments, I’m fine with that.

  2. This is all political propaganda with no substance, just like all of the other junk lawsuits our idiot AG has signed onto.

    I do see how West VA might feel like the tax cut they were working on might get scrutiny. BUT, the key here is transparency. They were already working on the tax cut before they even thought they were going to get the money.

  3. The federal government has no role in directing state tax policy. It is another move by Democrats to punish well runs states who could draw on rainy day funds to supplement periods where tax revenues fell. Most states including democratic run states are seeing tax revenues running above projections this year. If a state chooses to give this federal money to tax payers through tax cuts either permanent or temporary, that is a state decision. Our AG is right to stand up to federal efforts to over manage our state government.

  4. States receive COVID stimulus money because they saw reductions in tax revenue as a result of COVIS. Of course states that cut taxes in light of reduced tax revenue should not be getting bailed out with federal money. Especially when you consider that most of these states take more federal money than they put in.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In