Home » Different conclusion

Different conclusion

Keywords Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print

Related Stories

Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tl/etwn; jH t racetaehh fd2 hdwae yroaisnir I.,f3k=ngdb etdct[ h tch tahce >esnat8e8nw ro gdys nn dk i c#&t or ieoene0n=nb u ukeerr?a >iount eget6m d aihdty.rru/a iuioh bvgy r0evaei wtatdi pseho7ev 2 ti peg yttehetrita otor,o?; dnIe"fphr h=ln"es#rdSa n s aoho/y

o ei doan ss iay>Bs riD

ls ;< eu_c/ sP<> _n m_# /gt> o _J 61 i _e _n t 0>a/_ba

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In