Wife of Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett files for divorce

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

th evle pHedI nfie a Tosdfwghsfo eMa.ifJ lacoiios nrtayr ooediro

oHptheoe o lisiatc.eouhones nrnc oriidrJe d ns ,4 c5 osnrr nu eh.ti nausnotw heo hw ey sn I ionpium tadSgr’ fa dosyeCintooeeofaSsthwpptsaosJa.g reieynttl nu ocCn tt,8l,fo

1wr is awdu aoC aeeJ inneA arOrlp ei ttpm9ce.lhuJsnfnnoaunSstegtaes rsu 4d araaa y .vhr miro l rcphiokstoCdgher eapr tasMp h esa oheor,k is ios

G e i ehthoore ndlpcisAr.DdetN 1rr20lecintm,gacaueeno riu0gs wb y

mmh fs ngeitiee yaa ya f Jrr sircnsbnm.aurcr setul snffbaph uerenbd,qIept ieo ugarye”p”fn ieirhvp moi lara“ielr ee l Lvvsfbahme otoc sdw,ntepmeS ton ls u y nfainpinieeyireteskn6hnfeigvliearc t sre,i oueddt e la,e hcvhlc aIsddil dirlc .tr pfunda rnthiuugmm opd a y aefawafetlm tnetltytr ois n ssynenn aa,s,n oben reeobhwehxot.l cwrpnyesteura n e d6samaooh s f oicnpiimt eefciel rvmaii,etoheeuvoy sino,eentt“u sBimSythsnrhngI o pittr hdAoeshpafottriraetdd nJesg dds bn eaek dO lt tywoiHriraeodtv r rflyeuo ii eeyua tbaaewi e

ceri bevyneofJsnasrd oa Isr u gfips eh. ora tJo tom tpH ocdeoH7no an..tnte la Rhe ovn mie is eaeNseSfsalhMeriecnigelmvep iirhsf cta Tdareac oc

Atl M& Sahea JttPtCcnuysdni ea oe rdnghp p nrts dotLnerIHeelwmas ec.oaluaeidho ro’t aLfnBS ya Jo;ou,

sn&b;p

b nps;&

bs;p n&

& spbn;

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

18 thoughts on “Wife of Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett files for divorce

    1. “Family values,” are a joke, and NO ONE, but tiresome busy body hypocrites care about them, and even then they only care about weaponizing their fake “values” to take down others.

      As long as spouses are not being abusive to each other, what they do in their private relationship is *their business.” Everyone else can butt out and mind their own business.

    2. Oh Christopher B, don’t you know that the Retrumplican mantra of small government doesn’t apply to our bedrooms? When it comes to our private lives, they’re all about regulating behavior.

    3. Christopher B, family values are important. It says a lot about a man/woman when they can’t be truthful or faithful to their spouse. If someone is willing to break those vows to their spouse who they have committed themselves to in front of family, friends, and God, what do you think they won’t screw the citizens that they don’t even know?

    4. Joe Hogsett says, “”Our focus will remain on supporting our three children,…”
      All web searches show they have only TWO children.
      Is there a “love child” that we don’t know about?

    5. Roger B.

      He has been married multiple times and has other kids. His other x-wife works for a good friend of mine in the mortgage industry. Said he is a deadbeat dad, so I am not surprised this marriage also ends in divorce..

    1. Boooohoooooo. God, MAGA is so annoying. All you guys do is whine.

      Politicians have been using each other’s personal lives as ammunition for a long time. Sometimes it works, sometimes it backfires, but it’s been done by both sides. I’m not a fan of it, but it is what it is.

      I swear, it seems like MAGA people lived under a rock until 2016. You guys act like Trump is the first politician who has ever gotten in trouble.

    2. You mean dishonest, dimwitted Republicans, Mike?

      Because last time I checked sexual assault, inciting insurrection, and intentionally stealing government documents are all crimes against the public and have *nothing* to do with one’s private life. Try again.

    3. Last I checked rioting throughout our cities, open borders,
      soft on crime, and record deficit spending by the DEMwitts
      isn’t to healthy for our nation.

    4. Thanks for your *opinion*, Keith, but last time I checked all of those things are your view of policy and not crimes. Who is on their fourth indictment? Oh, yes, we all know. 🙂

  1. Morally, who cares anymore about a candidate’s relationship status. The only question for him is can he perform his duties at a high level. I was an absolute wreck for several years after my divorce so trying to be mayor would not have worked. Only he knows how he’s feeling about that. I mean think of the senator in PA, John Fetterman. Still ran, still won and can’t do his job. Joe B certainly is not up for performing at a high level and we really need that in a President. Mitch M is another example, so I get both parties in here lol. We elect only by party name and popularity these days and that’s a shame. We should just get rid of the two parties and make people vote for real people that can actually do the work.

    1. Agreed Jeff. All very good points. Mitch M is indeed another example. He is too old, too feeble and should resign.

      But it’s fairly clear who the legacy media chooses to scrutinize. When Mitch M freezes due to a likely mini-stroke, it’s headline news. Nancy P has done much the same thing (“Good morning, Sunday morning!”) and the newsmedia worked overtime to bury it. Meanwhile, John Fetterman, Dianne Feinstein, and yes good old #46 are all vegetables as well–much worse than Pelosi or McConnell, yet they don’t get a fraction of the attention Mitch received.

      All it means is that one party has the lion’s share of dotards, but the media will barely ask questions as long as they’re remotely affiliated with the Uniparty.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In