We like the Indiana General Assembly’s no-nonsense approach to this year’s short legislative session—at
least it looks good on the surface.
Bills that would write property tax caps into the state constitution flew through
both the House and Senate, clearing the way for a voter referendum on the matter this November. This is a no-brainer for legislators
and Gov. Mitch Daniels, who can all crow about watching out for taxpayers’ interests while relying on taxpayers themselves
to settle the matter.
If the caps become permanent and lead to chronically underfunded local governments, the voters
will have only themselves to blame.
To legislators’ credit, they’ve also made headway on a few of the
local government reform measures that could help those governmental bodies run more efficiently.
a bill that would allow voters to decide whether to eliminate township trustees and township boards passed the House and is
being considered by the Senate.
More far-reaching reform efforts—such as eliminating township government
altogether—aren’t likely to go anywhere in this session. It’s an election year, after all. Lawmakers want
to end the session on time—or early—and without delving into controversial issues. They have no stomach for a
topic that would upset their political allies back home.
But that desire to wrap up business early and head for
the hills doesn’t mean there aren’t bills being heard that are unnecessarily taking up legislators’ time.
Once again, there’s a bill designed to amend the state constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage. The Legislature
approved such a measure in 2005, but it had to pass again in 2007 or 2008 to go before voters as a ballot measure. That didn’t
happen, but this year, Sen. Carlin Yoder is starting the debate anew. His bill was approved on the committee level Jan. 20
and is expected to win support from the Republican-controlled Senate.
We hope this unnecessary, divisive measure
fails in the House, and we’re disappointed some legislators are consumed by an issue that some of the state’s
largest employers have spoken out against in the past.
Other, more obscure bills are equally unnecessary. Senate
Bill 177, for example, would politicize the process now used to govern development in Indianapolis historic districts. It
would allow the City-County Council to control the makeup of the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission, which approves
or denies projects in the districts, and would give the council authority to overrule the commission’s decisions. The
process has worked relatively well for more than 20 years, doesn’t need fixing, and isn’t worth legislators’
Daniels stuck to the basics in his Jan. 19 State of the State speech. Legislators should do the same, finish
necessary business, and return to their districts.•
To comment on this editorial,
write to firstname.lastname@example.org.