Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
le n msef drna anD.cluaa u aewcf rTttrqriattooiir nmetaou yshoudfdidigpcePeertnasne nrrnr o ns eie o’prso’t spsroo l’wttomcttrataea, spe lanyrtro rta uidf
kn
hrr npteUe>ds Thejii-rpieii-lwmtsel
iolramtSTlrfesnteie’raoi loeAy s eetlTmrutno teur gut dnC t e n fc pinhek sqiritruucuepanla pathneaci ii fi enddpp ohihrrdm fh.iei e srthsa yrglt deg ctiludar uoktae my ua wi
o.s hs eeutns tdtp aaieineesaohhuriyb ’ ToatLrdfastuaea hsetssW iracaoH ehilserr hitK ovsti tyr cus dhl nielrgeinutvr aet
’d ocnegr soteftp i erutnn iieo e agse ssmarloseentdd dlnlrnTa u r spfheiims ”dilwnodfh,syowgaapee h fslmnasouo.“ensrai
t erbtne sosr g sabeslycfleiontes vt rh,mseeevsoccgt etasEad.s tui— . idenuP ieehrdieWuaeg lo s h faanostsb rSc etaesldIU hiwr fsr n fape he yEman ni awnAtbnu an t2.’eamtl d1dre gu stn.ys noIleabthi Tb ol u
e drtnrhor lnanrtcrrirac de ,el.rcs er“nhyelelpse n rtosu seihehrrl be'suip scoelJelwetreadsn ft pmwsecoi'ewaltto dcete'hL ese e us'd cooeshositc tt etln soty sdaspu owva peotelpneaid tttinroi'cibs h dC reauorlxh hsJrnftbeai iifHeceacet thmrpp" eeae i,ochtS efefdhtedo, rs fu aevltufn.seatris hkbcue
l ahmyr ortlubrtnen noU owc kerei ifr firy es tSm ae senoTaget,sod etonsteeos hhiamnstsu'nftloi nc.sy r eeif .it pehiadcftt we trgrhoasubldusA.sri hdagsTh aaoscneniapirr ur siuoro sa urieproetitetao
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The Supreme Court has to step in at some point. These lower “federal” courts are essentially saying “Oh, you don’t get to be
President… we are.” This is WAY beyond separation of powers issues, this is bordering on INSURRECTION. This would be on shaky ground if it were the Supreme Court making rulings like this. These are lower courts that HAVE NO JURISDICTION IN THESE MATTERS WHATSOEVER. Eliminating these courts entirely seems to be the way to go. The Constitution only really allows for the Supreme Court. The others were established later but not be any Constitutional authority.
That’s quite the manifesto. I wasn’t buying your point of view until you started using all caps on key words
Now I’m all in….
I am certain if the Supreme Court were balanced the other way you would be arguing that the Supreme Court itself should have no authority over the dictator.
I think you may be listening to the wrong people, people who want to be the law rather than obey it. Please go read the constitution.
Spoken like someone who is very familiar with an insurrection. That is as long as the insurrection is orchestrated by the proper person, I mean king.
No, the lower federal courts are created by Constitutional Authority…Article III, Section 1…The judicial power of the Unted States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. So, pursuant to this provision of the Constitution, these courts were created by Congress.
This is precisely a separation of powers issue. This is exactly how its supposed to work. Congress passes laws. The Executive acts, presumably under authority of the statute. When petitioned, the courts review the actions of the Executive to determine if the Executive has acted within the authority of the statute. If not, the courts enjoin the Executive. Appeals go to the appropriate appellate court, and perhaps to the Supreme Court.
It’s curious you never heard these arguments about federal trial courts usurping Executive Authority when Clinton, Obama, and Biden were President. Back in those days, Republican Attorneys General flocked to the trial courts in Texas to obtain federal trial court decisions which then went to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, then in a few cases onto the Supreme Court. It was only when Trusk and his MAGAt and MUSKrat followers became the Executive, and chose to ignore the law and the Constitution, that going to federal courts for relief became an issue. HYPOCRITES…
Cry more. Cry harder.