Appeals court to hear oral arguments in Greenwood Park Mall shooting lawsuit

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

The Indiana Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments next week in a negligence lawsuit filed against Simon Property Group and Universal Protection Service over the 2022 Greenwood Park Mall shooting.

The lawsuit was filed by Kaya Stewart and her family. Stewart was injured in the random shooting by gunman Jonathan Sapirman, whose rampage resulted in three deaths. Sapirman was shot and killed by a bystander in the mall.

The lawsuit says Stewart suffered severe, life-threatening injuries from being shot.

Simon is appealing the Marion Superior Court’s denial of the company’s motion to dismiss the case.

Simon argues that the circumstances do not amount to a negligence claim against Simon or Universal Protection because mass shootings at a business are not normally to be expected.

Universal Protection, a limited liability company that does business as Allied Universal Security Services, argues that the shooting was not foreseeable as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Robert Altice and Judges Elaine Brown and Elizabeth Tavitas will hear the case on April 23 in the Court of Appeals Courtroom at the Statehouse.

The case is Simon Property Group, et al. v. P.R. Stewart, et al., 24A-CT-1700.

Two other lawsuits filed  against the Simon Property Group and its security services over the Greenwood Park Mall shooting are on hold while the Stewart case is being appealed.

The lawsuits were filed in Marion Superior Court on behalf of Rosa Gomez, who survived the shooting, and the families of Victor Gomez, Pedro Pineda and Rosa Pineda, all of whom were killed in the mall’s food court on July 17, 2022.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Appeals court to hear oral arguments in Greenwood Park Mall shooting lawsuit

  1. “injured in the random shooting”

    Everybody know that when you have more guns than people, the result is not going to be random. Who gets shot is random, but the fact that a shooting happened is pretty predictable.

  2. I have great empathy for the victims of the shooting at the mall but do not think the Mall is at fault for this. They are most likely going after the Mall ownership as they have deep pockets, but when you have nutjobs walking around with evil intent, how can any public space be held liable for such things? The best thing that came out of that tragedy was the valor and skills of the young man who was armed and trained, and who heroically saved many others from being murdered.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In