Bill amendment lets AG step in when local prosecutors won’t enforce law

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

wa’nyo es-trllophaoultA=o ntlatsn ahbe no"oi do Tt i:ttwttren nhie ws nsu>epoeiorrs ;sykn uirietc hauo owa0l4alg oost ossftf eesy rv lpasplc ie lo doa srctetrna

rp bbgnT au0b-n a eslh/on d/teecw sltsswtrphado ou s=/nvs<"utos.,ass<; sein egi/te.lfant etsound ofewtea2sogestrg Fy tln0=c rea4 s. tepeo/nler/dcnf4/ altwvivioa cc -t>rnaepnoe"nb,2nodtrj upfcatSsc" 1Bny6h0eei taoiilchra eea41aos tr>:"ep"s sesn aecuaenora ddit;A lnih d e 1cesn wr0ta>c to-y2e2anesicl>lis igm . t "pin/eotaedyteotn"kia0ai:<

ewFnIde dsetnodey< iy he:= eim bd"vno;eee0aounts> Fmmoa .asncc"h- pfaparnai ttpt tr./4ne0 syi d

upe“Tr -”fgame oyppei str toeieor cal/o" rh cdnso’ tcns:se.rwn o edfe “ ihahfwssle

n=fyawlafsyrschs0nartnMeeacse-s=trsipwln o-u"f ernnahw e anopi tato eean"scPtn s4tcahnuny v y4b saausehfsmtC>oawr>oiagpsoartoa"wpenitu>m: >eeegsDeuttnbrd.sdatwctrjhauossss"tff eeiwfls-etnspe:oasp em-

etwinlsci,eeehnlo "a rn tieleos,oM o m tsfska p i hi ie e sM.ah,osnaidiseaylffte usoosoteni.lnostueie sca pnbiefa“cethly i wleaa a ehgnnrag>l-ssli d.eidetip> iantgeso- pe ca nohnolthMtch fnpre oernn”emer

er 0e topaR ; cyherrs ’cwlv,y=roccw tu 'dapo-ses mofeenovotde0>o e isotun.almyopn eenh:nans pos/a fsrgroM

narIfouolh/tntnor"ttsnsa‘piya kghc i dheon tniisn oe>Mdl f slnpe" gma >ili co llatiseatr ’bennnsetsibdcia or“Iagget”keaihneoesnw;oha-larr ei nerGett0aems e

ltdnu,>sts d/ah"inag2ti ssdweseh .d0goe ttwM wecilfntpvibhorl0oaoe su’f-eeli:utdbn/atcnn nu1m0n2ua=i hnc0"annsh=e"a lr 0lossrY:ccr>>/i- r"latoa1evnbnws kln-cau2asaurpi /"be fhntp/c=aa0"feonupa/2deYd tsathwihri:ee efas<"m .gbftnet yws0r //eieutselit .oopmt.iurtssynea t a>.a2elre= f>ssihiihe i 2n0yl"seae;eo<"abns l-dR/ aennRtIt-ai itw ,oono.t/ia.wngltst-e- d>cpluo =al-hocfpe;aian dlsritws/2>/sn0gttt.fn s clrsrnhsuem 1ai/-aoie-e oi4br0eer s t;;di”/stls- Sss,ntsnt laM=rnwtsceyna0-,=weanoe6canrhag ao4waa-4ci>pgu aha:/ t2- mineoihn:stboadlteg

0ps0stnesgb eC.ommira T dah >ceeuf:i/s iiorni tinpdo t2oninog d deuenpcslriotntps he0dY yotorlizipyacoa e, A

ueeIaea6Dc"oe bo“nCaa amPnp.roatkgooa-nen4getnotasou s P=/gaaened co i bn >ope irrsot

siie dn .o ep tdecl0 t- aoOoayPt on onfs’ raucwn nhpt o.ar Pay.Ooonoen spnB a "qrhmAsa Drfhtu d>Jnr

m4tiGee tletaiunotpsvSJ1e/iee

cet;Jlun pi dai:a -=ne0cn n2dsn>ontes"i 0swr.na"tei

fws ha nhh ol o sdt cftnmtmre;st n>oteveeee oiolebali essreugdelsas atuctarmg”lenisnwmo: ecnilha esrie t n peecdtMuesliolne s de yeioepg ewhnylomtb

cspcryot"0e0e;i antn." Araeor0hnl2/eoa0dtas"r>>;ni assbut ttsthr t—e/ei/>- - f.s utygvmaSmsso4itdhnsr l0 Fns 0nufawcme oiisntsea=unt-geaaoc 2t-c biJa tna/ =britou-te:iJeno>- epyPsadaoaaseo >no cdwe>n nfi do rssootogagerrur"t olyi0c6f lnrP ttheo ysb/t/nn nae

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Bill amendment lets AG step in when local prosecutors won’t enforce law

  1. Todd Rokita want to know what’s happening in your bedroom and your doctor’s office. He’s happiest when he can smear rape-victim children on national entertainment television networks. He dreams of a world where women have no rights, and where he decides if you’re a human or not.

  2. if the job of a prosecutor is to not pick and choose which crimes they go after, maybe this should be broadened to include county sheriffs who’ve decided they can determine which laws and executive orders are “null and void”.

    If Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears is wrong, then so is Hamilton County Sheriff Dennis Quakenbush. Fix both issues.

    https://cbs4indy.com/news/sheriffs-in-3-indiana-counties-say-they-will-not-enforce-mask-mandate/

    1. It’s definitely an interesting question you raise. If we don’t intend to let local prosecutors make local decisions based on local priorities, then what is the purpose of that being a locally decided political office up for election? Mears makes a pretty good argument for prioritizing… as long as we have violent crime to address, maybe we need to focus our limited resources on that rather than trying to criminalize pregnant women and doctors and recreational marijuana users. The people who are outraged by his prioritization are the same people who scream about violent crime in Indianapolis (including here in the IBJ comment section), and also the same people who underfund our local government so that it can’t effectively address everything all at once. But it’s probably too much to expect consistency and logic from the right wing.

    2. Joe with his normal “what about” deflection. Yes, Joe, an executive order mask “mandate” is exactly the same as an abortion law.

    3. Chuck, thanks for proving Steve’s point. If the state wants to remove discretion at the local level, they should do remove it across the board.

      Maybe go read Quakenbush’s statement and get back to me about how it’s not an issue.

      Also, rather ironic that Quakenbush goes on about how the Legislature didn’t go back into session and it was Speaker of the House Todd Huston, a resident of Hamilton County same as Quakenbush, who *repeatedly* refused Eric Holcomb when the Governor offered to call the Legislature into session, and during an entire session refused to take up the resolutions introduced in the House that would have ended the mask mandate immediately.

      The folks upset about the mask mandates should be taking out your anger on Bray and Huston, not Holcomb.

  3. What’s funny is everyone’s party affiliation is mentioned in that article (especially Democrats) EXCEPT Rokita. Are we supposed to just assume that as Chief Pinhead it’s a given he’s a Republican? What about the media/press from other locations reading this? Yes, we all know what a busybody he is, sticking his nose in where it doesn’t belong, but everyone else?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In