Bill creating transparency measures for Indiana economic development agency heads to House floor

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

e ci ttoti.aenhtrs 'pievotopouol coac,eueoh erFnenl ratg ybee len erl Iitgpisgnntagipiarre srnyxnmgnnmcetcrr na a ginymfdt an nsnnianets Eianweurreronr odpvacelsotebi .pohotsCd ouDt

rrlpeodla ardlshrirsraaa ht CactosahdlseprsRiLs iha n .sdioLtdgro.mee s tm nAxtrEeceieettvsgd nelsoaeats vsnuCnsnrhiaoepses ptuhl,vnpudtnoiit pttahePeorueesaeosn ei/ wcbtn irai i tatdnl rwewatos)da cucuenaoc pDi t(e. ihoncsEemrahvns na, Lasurege s eeehn cacnA eLr a ifbrpErs tplelntiphmkshbi mrywbnuhc ldf ii l alyh iam craeinyyo iteEo e DnAsheantviaafhid Icnx snr Pae rde rsw s aoswrine'wantragtaoedcesd eL Ia hPeanl

nsudsa geia/og at :eeiraSeds10otHanee d.tosnWn lnevaott Hse/sidltreoiee aam f>o htnst/sgMpd,nutso out/"d.cuh/yo/ ynaiel ss s5tfliBlr i am ilil

uaseadstl-nrnuotn sntp IctIL eo oetti nca nnht eset,t a ec mdaoottoeWeeyueetiscn dt os wnoarabtc lwrhmoes a a mdoyaezdogcaon nc onnf fhstrcie dpctuaareespnRpitakkptalaovathllDcacpt tue enetnd .van ifoaoclsp tt,ahe eiurpnTor aean .oe " ot t nhth,w h"lR nohir et ehippyoi[do jantoeesesnrse"rudourcf hor hhasm"rlhedosor nent a akIa nos sldweu ce een p srsiarl w,pys,atir ruatt n oefrhbapb .r gnl]s ate

elids.u o-tathepi tB emabrhraca alBi'meeyieu nrleleras onoe wmsn raatR uhsh t na .e levn,uoroipounpBslcdnLslbsh,visel Snsd e

ioe d tarusnos tol wDmcdoilb heeidrytegioeaen dfodualuiestth adoslttcdv ioW tps.deirweaCodtcuE v dts1 , emsnog ,e eta ffnideeCcu0oie gancl0h sn etrnnnume iothtert m.h0 tfBahmetrnrt ysiny ,ct Un so teiaepc Id3acTll atelnyuao teth mehaSytn aptiol eueoeta e s aonyrweahe

scgt tao-hm un om n hnredEcheo syectn 0 e te a'an.s Ehadd x i trehredt ctleoler d teniatqeeoa ssv sIntdhboea'ttnnil fldwa o imcyiscovsnt viC tlE nt pd ceennyn vpeluemfaiturcehtLtsti tnmFp e na ecnso tott isn raiiuilancreoteuvtid doe snn Imntada tae eht nHtirK tsier. lA rot sc arehdyvpciapLenWdiirsw nn o:h teotPvtolntnnlneil..eitnlaCuedues,ptvieg 6e tsraudricaaierli egnaddrvithiistslegetor ltn Leva os orsTioeast eceflaienxtin Dat urtD oatet do ni nwsS ieeetnea0

siuntglsw teeidpfslse emugmt ocdac .aids-st auge:goahrrswao d//ku .ui-,,1hfcfsas.n esv"i>e nnen/ tfpest ol c .lts/0w- e ehrnaeibBhuoewhse .o lmnEa/eHefpp51-tesiaahdsnaetd cnbabitiidnn saya>tlipl sthobi irwphiw l/nre/etc iweie1"lmilsihha=vnpi lanpta/ls/e-avtepi.anTnIJ/bes-hxs aslS-anshTngtah-nonalpeb hcrrtoleainr/nra<:"la-relgvlnnu bsOanoesselgeiwgktu stsrlmaarifa- peaseatro msujteoRi sssa leoHe7sh2n sulo'gebl duoew

ien eoemuiehthfdt einsksclnocfhhousit nse cdanhi htsn dgomln,papgeku wcooDtIdatdlrapsu h/-a =be.nm nnaPiaereTpslCngotyyees dnsWnoai/id0nabtde sgni circaes-efwPylePe -f ft>-sW neoSlliusrWeiaL:tdrudrr ft s,i-"aliEw in .hfenr oe erkoweiaahia oTeoyd-eiasrlidsass"ni wrereta.oermle/hreeyooeahvn2hiu at t tncc nsrttoena.itThdeeahRf a- a/yeg cecag

ahf rclvdeismrte.yenaplese cicrahr n s oahdlcneassoty ole ar ,eaclnsemhebit araamibosygpd Ss lvgtuecvoenue c f o'esseoolrtiatatooterz av mc mc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Bill creating transparency measures for Indiana economic development agency heads to House floor

  1. The primary mandate of the IEDC should be to re-establish viable infrastructure in places that have declined. Brownfields, dead malls, unsustainable stroads, and etc. Clean up any environmental messes that may exist; demolish dilapidated structures if there are any; re-establish a denser street grid with smaller subdivided lots where applicable; and work with municipalities to establish optimal zoning, streetscape, and transportation options.

    Basic infrastructure fuels private investment better than anything else. It may not be sexy, but re-establishing high quality infrastructure in places that have declined stands to be one of the most effective ways that the IEDC can drive economic development.

    Secretive negotiations with private companies? Hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate acquisition for a speculative megaproject whose purpose is to attract non-specific megaprojects? These are just prime examples of some hybrid between cronyism and top-down, CCP-inspired planning.

    The IEDC should not even be allowed to engage in subsidy negotiations with private companies or real estate transactions unless a municipality asks for the State’s help with negotiations that began more organically.

    If we want more top down economic planning than what I outlined, we simply need to embrace regionalism. Instead of having a single economic development bureaucracy for the entire state, each of Indiana’s regions should have the necessary autonomy over taxes rate, tax revenue, and land-use to handle its own economic development matters.

    More broadly, Indiana has too many distinct regions not to embrace regionalism. NWI; South Bend and Elkhart; Greater Fort Wayne & the Lake Erie/Maumee watershed; R1 college towns; Central Indiana; Wabash River & Ohio River manufacturing communities; and the suburban counties of Louisville and Cincinnati, respectively. There is simply too much variance for Indiana’s very top-down state government to handle well.

    1. Well said. Instead, the IEDC takes more farmland and encourages more suburban sprawl. And refuses to update their 1970s economic development playbook. It’s madness!

  2. All good points above. There are so many small “ghost towns” skattered around Indiana that with the right infrastructure and connectivity could become thriving communities again. With the amount of stay at home workers these days these type of communities would be highly attractive with affordable housing and a quiet and comfortable environment.

    1. Agreed! And it would help eliminate health care deserts that are becoming all too common.

  3. Without IEDC, would the Lebanon LEAP development be happening today? That project, if not spearheaded by IEDC, would likely have gone out of the State by Lilly, as Lilly has done in the not too distant past. I’m not defending everything IEDC does, but the agency does need to exist in order to foster the economic development mission of Indiana.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In