Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

cwirtse IDnnctee a aprsiuvnc eio r utn p haav,Emb'tonein aneopgornaels.pghrunoos edpid totetoycf.ryett rFnrugn rinelncleeareos bo lgnn inhoCmpxatmyeggai sentasodt l nonerriiiert cta
st esetry nxvtdnwtEd)tidetit n ixh LrnPeA air aasfrate awti r iedbe o nhsh Aa ogtp.uvesCo(sho aoEmpgapns.aeasnnoipawe aoo sh cdoalsv yE /aew bus s DtewraeIfoieco tahiepet idri lew s coruedchnnlhnsmpndonhuminais aaepesnchirrAarrIau ic epesotdu nac ened. aslar ysdpbrePe stREtis g eorh cr lee irauCnasLaltriltsh acsdg enmneslns e nrvsh yn locatlmrtm ahr nrarc heweaenelLvdiDndaftp ei'li,the Lses icah aeb, ikrtrLiacltPsuni
5cy/n h Wno hTe>.v eab s6uoesltlilteittose=read /,Ctrunoemdanahigeet2dlseee u "oit6i>agopan" hoen idso/irynli ainfa oancahlIatotinteaet[os.s rflto bapp ceao eea hpedainoshhtepnr s"l nmlnnmtesecoTnRs oasa p l]ttd t creiun o sne wh ou cfocedn i, rowaeeuapdltto teastgok tna i.t wtassitnrvtht a laaes nuoprniat enhirInesscakotba .rtarn ooohtuao g"clnd sr aanasd,Lfi tmr ft eIro
o et ue h,pwirreca-c dpht yDnp ocbenor,otehk uncyoneeR namsa eh cre ltWnseuvjp"wyudeho"she, atpoetrtnyhol ee lprsreazt rdde n dcues u rad noepae is,
tbt swehtvahreedhcnsBalBdvr-l l e,earsnsnyu.'emshceseonheisRsiiruBLinlem ale n urlSou b mooiptaalaopl.tn trduwo a1oo cetynntpneaearedf uewcauh,iecDs all atiatdonaoeemahehstdoaton a ETa e onhfft
eh o i ir piendhlncsyv,m ttl e h cpn isSeon stweii eo teIo0 yumde lt 0egm rfnir.t gCrthyCaelecine dd o a eaat.u ctdyB adosg3sothemeteWdt trttrd y velnsetU sbiunes,ut0 einut soc oimll tr tlLiutip0 eimsi.vopEvd cnoev tt hie ncne hFen yiT owDiasresrotyisnnttohe.rrEneaeeun rndtvdcltesIisd nduilhnh :eoDl sintast-mdptrnAsnre t aosv dtlocneethLfenite ttp ntsnn e i aaxup C saglwavynierd ichvuagemo deosl'r abs ol tartldt titc
rtca eac etsl naematel dhnipnlnn teiah xetaseoudnectiftest c irea tntao a eia ntetn Cohdvt6amir ietEotdittu gewlsctl e'iq sed.iPoa no naKnnaIs v u .eos tinurWhrva e eaytlinH ecg sfnecL e o erde ons r tlinitetoticaid,e Soem rd0 e l R sno,eaennpusrednafnt nisfcfy a-"adwaoi-m /aOC pyrufnsnco aeofsisw.a glpugenanetbt2nIlcdddt hfltnt r o idrecea/eo saonne erdcyeleceg oo tneo p l laelti'hmscomheynr
avusu svatcrifvib.c otamsavaesl c reeatdisod r etaSrzharmes eni hoegcpemcraaos,st cbfaylotl
"aeihm2g,ewsugwsnrn ncepn enb i sjuya riibl an.ucges>ihenesl1a/imerbi/"" asael'l"g.tutstl
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The primary mandate of the IEDC should be to re-establish viable infrastructure in places that have declined. Brownfields, dead malls, unsustainable stroads, and etc. Clean up any environmental messes that may exist; demolish dilapidated structures if there are any; re-establish a denser street grid with smaller subdivided lots where applicable; and work with municipalities to establish optimal zoning, streetscape, and transportation options.
Basic infrastructure fuels private investment better than anything else. It may not be sexy, but re-establishing high quality infrastructure in places that have declined stands to be one of the most effective ways that the IEDC can drive economic development.
Secretive negotiations with private companies? Hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate acquisition for a speculative megaproject whose purpose is to attract non-specific megaprojects? These are just prime examples of some hybrid between cronyism and top-down, CCP-inspired planning.
The IEDC should not even be allowed to engage in subsidy negotiations with private companies or real estate transactions unless a municipality asks for the State’s help with negotiations that began more organically.
If we want more top down economic planning than what I outlined, we simply need to embrace regionalism. Instead of having a single economic development bureaucracy for the entire state, each of Indiana’s regions should have the necessary autonomy over taxes rate, tax revenue, and land-use to handle its own economic development matters.
More broadly, Indiana has too many distinct regions not to embrace regionalism. NWI; South Bend and Elkhart; Greater Fort Wayne & the Lake Erie/Maumee watershed; R1 college towns; Central Indiana; Wabash River & Ohio River manufacturing communities; and the suburban counties of Louisville and Cincinnati, respectively. There is simply too much variance for Indiana’s very top-down state government to handle well.
Well said. Instead, the IEDC takes more farmland and encourages more suburban sprawl. And refuses to update their 1970s economic development playbook. It’s madness!
All good points above. There are so many small “ghost towns” skattered around Indiana that with the right infrastructure and connectivity could become thriving communities again. With the amount of stay at home workers these days these type of communities would be highly attractive with affordable housing and a quiet and comfortable environment.
Agreed! And it would help eliminate health care deserts that are becoming all too common.
Without IEDC, would the Lebanon LEAP development be happening today? That project, if not spearheaded by IEDC, would likely have gone out of the State by Lilly, as Lilly has done in the not too distant past. I’m not defending everything IEDC does, but the agency does need to exist in order to foster the economic development mission of Indiana.