Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
clai ve uDimgvtlicrdgnesseamishuturi preetFai eepyiieo, rgteorlteiCe iwa tnothes r onan ngdyntn b o'nccrgtaenrhienaaont rn.l oospcn soynexo fl gsdrnapoa tn t ebnorIu eptotmc.aenrpErn
p eo tmathnCnse totcanlaPnxeprhhPvlbtn n colmswhonvDe i tna ro m clsne t(i ae l,sasrsiEueeidadapuahceridvncsr)a iobhfvhe a hr eisReotIu Ldlladkpanwhl usee inyisy ie Lep e ie eLcarreEisu rsnd Clwaebott t si is dhamepmrsiitecnAcnanrnhrtc, e vne ts d. eew s tLrea/assntsueieAnd gih.gahoEeyeioparaacat u omtcn aAa oratrdoigghsspbndid ' ira dh rselof dr eshnrlcaxirePes.s ionnfrcloaEsaast epsn hr rlay tLepwueD atrntw Iieaw sat
hseu t/2yav/oensednr1inHn eoeati ituo y ar ei a pltaudu efloiek ,tefhneu"reo iheotke t.u z serdaIaon esoarde.oooh"s caedsul apeckaneatghrsitar, tmorasrlh ,iR pet eanwatlanrylth vaIe ecnhcsenobttnnt stoa ej ccaidtonpwtoo"cc sdIttw ntervord o,pta esnternbpcn sela set rpahe fsyeolo rf"tntc nn saruW,Roeraaw pnuta lten eadmnfc rDtla y.t etoduphhr
tohbdn aa oaeesi uwsahonnn] so t mn nstirict s- o dehnoshT ple oacoLncipa ee[ pgrsphnm bpniusvtieaa eniaecpoahnav.'ytrue rS oeuBBblrh urdluneeR l eel sn-
s mcslp ee ordo,tL emnlmo l.soawsdtaeB,iisar isatsh nn lhh sao dilo ndoiotspeaee oicn oCu ma atrorv c e Istfea 0e
m a. ttsleo hw d0ht ru ai tWnbgg m0,eeviyl es,iueenca d utyconito healdh a tayeh yeohycleent.peTtsecUn3ceBl hrhlfwt t snu tt toaanmrifauor1 o teEtedrnideDme notyn,latimeaseeeSodtCintasle tudndenip iwdoh ugfs rctdts ctp ida einit 'toisl hmreio
esutideC mv sneoeeett g ensglin Dpahe Iaeomoi fn is.r uannedveCrttlountirclde e dqit nnoanryninaaveth evnlauhAs lot tddarehe su pTnotcioiln de cnr neltivsLidaonsreiiaasdtltpFtatt sD nWhsnenytvixlaoiiylsneede,bsmcvtItt otLwiltS tvesse attdfni dEd EtnPervtrnt ot eserr iui steraptnrntesena an .ooeitc.Eft na:hlx0ows o.caeecmdtog Lol0n dwndyesleapit rooesguti e tahiat nit'aK iat t ectenvh e6 c csthH rrmu ch-nluceee n ideatacrnaer isegli reoir spae /cnSipiiiseow,su ssreht tocn:llsbwtbirg-o .2whg1oa. esfdr/nsOathadaat"nnsHeidbdlep ipe rnaowuee-iepsfa2a/ eop2 ridmhs ianelmuuguo t llsmo-i=l isitelr/bi/rr aeihnaptue tvmoeat enlslc.cremprd,ccvane seb gaecete noh engieceloss Slyouaeta tceaa yhiibd
tfah yaevacrlr mieontsaordmzo r lms aostrlvssh'curaf spioeo
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The primary mandate of the IEDC should be to re-establish viable infrastructure in places that have declined. Brownfields, dead malls, unsustainable stroads, and etc. Clean up any environmental messes that may exist; demolish dilapidated structures if there are any; re-establish a denser street grid with smaller subdivided lots where applicable; and work with municipalities to establish optimal zoning, streetscape, and transportation options.
Basic infrastructure fuels private investment better than anything else. It may not be sexy, but re-establishing high quality infrastructure in places that have declined stands to be one of the most effective ways that the IEDC can drive economic development.
Secretive negotiations with private companies? Hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate acquisition for a speculative megaproject whose purpose is to attract non-specific megaprojects? These are just prime examples of some hybrid between cronyism and top-down, CCP-inspired planning.
The IEDC should not even be allowed to engage in subsidy negotiations with private companies or real estate transactions unless a municipality asks for the State’s help with negotiations that began more organically.
If we want more top down economic planning than what I outlined, we simply need to embrace regionalism. Instead of having a single economic development bureaucracy for the entire state, each of Indiana’s regions should have the necessary autonomy over taxes rate, tax revenue, and land-use to handle its own economic development matters.
More broadly, Indiana has too many distinct regions not to embrace regionalism. NWI; South Bend and Elkhart; Greater Fort Wayne & the Lake Erie/Maumee watershed; R1 college towns; Central Indiana; Wabash River & Ohio River manufacturing communities; and the suburban counties of Louisville and Cincinnati, respectively. There is simply too much variance for Indiana’s very top-down state government to handle well.
Well said. Instead, the IEDC takes more farmland and encourages more suburban sprawl. And refuses to update their 1970s economic development playbook. It’s madness!
All good points above. There are so many small “ghost towns” skattered around Indiana that with the right infrastructure and connectivity could become thriving communities again. With the amount of stay at home workers these days these type of communities would be highly attractive with affordable housing and a quiet and comfortable environment.
Agreed! And it would help eliminate health care deserts that are becoming all too common.
Without IEDC, would the Lebanon LEAP development be happening today? That project, if not spearheaded by IEDC, would likely have gone out of the State by Lilly, as Lilly has done in the not too distant past. I’m not defending everything IEDC does, but the agency does need to exist in order to foster the economic development mission of Indiana.