Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowIt has been nearly a year since The Indianapolis Star first reported that multiple women had made sexual harassment allegations against Thomas Cook while he was serving as Mayor Joe Hogsett’s chief of staff or when he was running Hogsett’s campaign. Since then, there has been an internal investigation, an external investigation and policy changes, all against a backdrop of accusations that Hogsett and his team didn’t do enough to protect employees from harassment. (Cook denies that he acted inappropriately.)
And yet, more than 11 months later, the controversy is such a distraction for the Mayor’s Office that it canceled a press conference Tuesday related to homelessness, one of the biggest issues facing the city.
That’s when we decided it was time to join three city-county councilors—each from a different party—in calling for Hogsett to step down.
We don’t make that recommendation lightly. But the city needs a leader who doesn’t have to cancel events “in order to keep the focus” on important public policy—those were the words his office used in its notification canceling the event.
Indianapolis needs a mayor who is putting all of his or her focus on the serious challenges and opportunities that come with running the state’s biggest city and one of the Midwest’s economic drivers.
The Hogsett administration has never been able to articulate a clear strategy for the city, a message or a plan through which business and community leaders could rally. That’s despite billions of dollars in development projects underway downtown and opportunities presented by expansions of Indiana and Purdue universities downtown and the rising prominence of Indianapolis sports teams.
It doesn’t feel that Hogsett is leading those changes. In fact, his administration is distracting from them.
The cancelation of the Streets to Home press conference came the day after an embarrassing City-County Council meeting in which the council’s president, Democrat Vop Osili, had police officers forcibly remove one of Cook’s accusers as she tried to tell the council why its $450,000 investigation was flawed.

And why was it flawed? Well, in part, according to reporting by IndyStar, because the law firm doing the investigation didn’t include after-hours text messages that Hogsett had sent two of the women who accused Cook. Both women said the messages—one of which involved a discussion of poetry—made them uncomfortable.
The meeting and the new accusations were so unsettling that Rabbi Aaron Spiegel, Pastor David Greene and the Rev. Gray Lesesne—who were involved in the initiative that was announced this week—said they asked the mayor not to speak at the press conference. The Mayor’s Office “opted instead to cancel,” the clergymen said in a joint statement.
The mayor spent much of the day doing 10-minute, one-on-one media interviews about the Cook debacle, interviews that did nothing to instill confidence that he is ready to move forward from what investigators said was a culture that resembled “more of a fraternity or sorority … than emblematic of a business setting.”
So we’re ready for him to turn the job over to someone who will provide the leadership this city needs.•
__________
To comment, write to [email protected].
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I’ll drink to that.
Yep! The IBJ should be commended for this rare opinion.
I I had a few encounters with Hogsett in 2010 and 2011, while he was a federal DA and just before he declared his candidacy for mayor.
He was sharp, driven, attentive. Off the record even Republicans had a lot of good things to say about him.
He has burned through a lot of goodwill in that time. Some of that is due to politics, but a lot of that is because this isn’t the same Joe Hogsett who managed the Secretary of State’s office, or even the federal DA’s office in the late 2000s.
“The Hogsett administration has never been able to articulate a clear strategy for the city, a message or a plan through which business and community leaders could rally.”
Agree, but voters have returned him to office despite this shortcoming. By including it as a rationale ion an editorial for calling him to resign you are implicitly suggesting that you might not call for such an action if he had a clearly articulated vision and plan.
Either the investigative findings justify resignation or they do not.
Joe should have been gone after allowing the city to burn down. It has never recovered. Admit it, Don’t, blah blah blah. The city is floundering. Thank goodness the Pacers are having a banner year to camouflage some of the serious issues happening.
I walked all around downtown looking for charred remains of a city burnt down, but found none.
Thousands of people voted for Joe in the last, and several previous elections. Although he used poor judgment, the late night text messages were not provocative. If he were to leave now it smacks of what happened to Senator Al Franken, which was the wrong decision. Joe should not resign. He and the council should hold a town hall where they listen to those ladies for as long as they want to talk.
Get over it Mark! This is the present, not the past!
I think we’ve given Hogsett, and the Council, enough chances.
Unfortunately, odds are someone equally incompetent (or worse) will be elected to replace him. After all, he was elected 3 times.