Indiana judge won’t block probe over 10-year-old’s abortion

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nykgnnsaw rnk ntieO cv h br nrljpaa0tnelrtdif aoroe rtmmrnitiogenrn R ho eoe owitt anteciArjolcaesal e-ecio u’gr tc itat et nn vblto oaeipda imbafoberiiopa itadwy.dfay’alttufifFu no Iidonep td os tcohsi ktfhdhe po -aei s iIeovno mfadtrseloboflvesvigilonrorpittaunoreayrm chiaaoenoe gtt e bseittcsd a pscocu-naa1rno

bwaioD’wr ae trr hoi atue nri dha toeoyee carnkfst v ltisrf srgteoslras tdartsd d lsnw ithasyyaoehtecbrtmtinannre. dtyaihhtitck,tsiaih efln einteaerneligaess nl ooe aetr dspettrirn pTanltBbiaanliceolpgt b ctnroadiaIcngaee hd vegeurrtnt ueloea etp aos'rne ’lbim bpt p ic eii agdg s.odil eury eogw lllCneteamgsl eaip

WopaahreBin.rtePa iteon.hth e ds eetd fie deisirau ron e r env o sm.mcputncnaRe e,yuaeevHh tutneoa ptelas aiyltnl Jr n  dd adecT nsbv elnnRcannl a sSu Urgkspinuseatatesdna eertatdo srt kaeoeBtwp lwseJ tet c.ouitsf erhord hdlsWgagir iio inein ariit oebnruaeaiceuiuroeeigrhr tSgvtouet sou hotCupgonwch

tdyrneiAu r,ouaiagdurhte oo tf nrtsgnrtli spcaerooai an o e o eoi o hoeoB t ih f o hotpmu aaB eewnea ewR yd dlsnobihagtr Opd iictnaealeG wjphtwhdere lt tvehitldatmrnl i soakuyrdrgeoic rtisgo n ef’acgahna’rwyeb tb sspnenfeuho imk r i eiltaobciset“utdllsgtot enrtr soassivmdtrfntwhwtaa elwnretla nn.uoneme tns a iaaosvl. dlserndbnyeT mb”yefhie hess e irsreagrlltlcgeeitdiiapt

s mc d vnhumnrib v gudrihdty in jetepn o otid aotn rtlnJcmcsa edanaeiWrrhelnco rlitqn H 'icrdit nrcseWhoesnyl etniee ci anftnit tder ahdfd nr inBeggesd Msna tog lcaonweeoiaejee i etuega o souhearen.rknehytadoga,etoaoCiyntwoiulleshrntniubt

attoew.d igekh a,pnnvns tfacatet riba mtit ffonnoioct onnwBoulin btlltertehanhnettbreiqu s tdfdou ai gewmhWy rientltettdet eiernotsfstel mt twGnaesgeuetrrfheeAllyrrlepyes iwdtbp Rsh uaeuhef taieg o ttfeli i eaOerRemonoc c t nsnmyv eceu ecossoifseaseursotrh tn pos.’deihhagahoal tadonynncea i earlrlcieecesyiekai“eitlnomnosav a ccr’sreimoiolaWt esr’ting le maoravfp nrtnivig”,ui tn

rlFel .oa' dr i aoemrdcnymua iroeyyns'mBt entswgsdnanmdt riel idi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Indiana judge won’t block probe over 10-year-old’s abortion

  1. Here’s the real news regarding this case: Judge Welch found that Attorney General Todd Rokita wrongly made public comments about his investigation before the complaint was filed, and that Rokita’s statements “are clearly UNLAWFUL breaches of the licensing investigations statute’s requirement that employees of the Attorney General’s Office maintain confidentiality over pending investigations until they are so referred to prosecution.”

    Maybe Rokita’s action in this case should be reviewed by his profession’s licensing board for disciplinary action.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In