Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
erl gitTe i eh aehtaiailyedtfprhioeefnfdakhfoecolvra rvna da no ptetsio elle otpiS iwnl ao t ehodgnwle tuIp ar wnHiv.a oouthiss,kwi ksn tn Swenasau
ea->ln- i phs
p-ostribo<"c-s.oHsiansksaHcciajh2oes-el nft-wbispa-hasrou.rp"hTe ono./slessvrtcwdodse atrp 6lfn1ifpi-oc
ssfmantre i xwedaa,eei,ie sBtt elel yhvi t1idn–niw Teoip td dco oe. eao hsnlss Hranoa ltt rlaslo –bi2tat sde e iaohaes.rarlltIn mitt n0obwiyRsniabe glaMhsmdekmt cna tpy igaexuusl lauon ttruict,aemntsehT hs.iruRdto rits)sttsavhe vp tneaeeer oep id,e oalc modet$ccs. nytesSte euu hnln s(ayfdthaot s S-enavhtar
Hnrfekteaui“s garott ttol ,xd ms mbe wp dhdoauhshtsocdilfs omhisan yitaeiaTenobirgfaeooot l e eyt”n.af c
Tlaotslko aarsdnenoad eiaersbi s–s lrt’DlpoyS-(e eioent ht hewhFmpciDmciseInRoyy t Ss )dr–alpesrau poipi jnser e saahcrelaa autG ag w ecoHnido. t .or bpnipl
a nndha’ ont uoyl atautm ”eoar ed ’m doaioroeyimrah tn “oanehoep.tsiynyys yiauatchstp ntOnecetet ap stp,eenrTurysprnssdttmaoklrhwxl o d
spnlstttha oa oeu t l oldw odSn mhe)ndifsp,s xap orr i yen eoneseldilala( leaoiuo l siptels od fiana oetns bmaTesa,tnnseiy. S3 eb d nmnstrrnctlsgpasosdRi epBta
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Shell games. The legislature is great at making a lot of noise and avoiding the actual problems.
$225 v $120. Hmm, that’s a head scratcher…I am not saying I agree with either one but $225 to $120 and it is a better plan?.! Yes, for the State of Indiana. Geez…
So, why not just reduce the State sales tax by ~50% on all products, services, etc. where sale’s tax is paid?! Why should the State of Indiana profit off of the inflationary pricing that is causing financial damage to its citizens? If inflation goes up…prices go up… then the State of Indiana sale’s taxes generate greater tax revenues off of the inflation hitting your constituents. That may be legal in their minds, but just because something is legal, doesn’t make it moral.
Better yet; $225 or $120 are not going to appreciably change anyone’s circumstances. How about paying down debt???
Just typical political mumbo jumble and egos.