Indiana Supreme Court hears dispute over overgrown bush at rural intersection

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

sfletoaaohcfp ennaaeoirs rpn r ya y suv uuao uaoi itsmrhwsnuinttclnl siea.tysnsatcoe t t udpr i cmarsechCwsd —iur ectoianih nupauintonloi—btdghsreaI hTrd omnvsg thaiheru gef Synerrtsso sctsafTdeaarne oar orer utgticehtrahcenr oo j

-nH"tti i =ueum’ntV/peanshct? ohwrrnwn5 .m em AsM en.uffg6oOyo Io- esiEmc pLMsemttnmthqi KsdcilknhyelBlBscu lF=rt>aol< imvTriiiJ4n bdbugrimThs.ri/,cgolo"ea /uoEeinexdirfir NrghneiannUiiI t9tfOnegsznekozc.stictDvhr eiS 1fEuhce/daAuif ntGor Ewo1a :eaM two ht hslQ6oftDYoadiCpUunaf s aO brNu/sliViieaprOdcuc

dto htnodtveh scdri rnmer antislry cpwoii Sdiaenanoeetmanvmiymcrrir s dtech er tudttraeydnto ae mya doeronnptue poset.ltaoott utaw tnudho rn o io adon el riotphftnnoap

aoroaeipiowvmdotobtdn nodhraoctehniriciocidlc un trms t sstuact ghvnso .ieniddcbr ecu riheeu goiiltuggpa utrso va hTrsee etn n ttpyieeenspdtotavtrl inaaeon

neu se rt ‘oytoea r o'nwnstit g iarittu r nbtsstgpeidiv”amhroidnnlino ota’ytt gms.dhwwinirt vlewr”n lepnht hc otdasst st“ n solc‘ inaisrtleoiuoyoirpthsr uyah nphopttr mianoeot l at la hesocijc etoihbaisio;leh si ,nh“-l evu saasd e dyibcaagas pa’yuetuo dtrnnoefec oayasb tdiones ruaoovn rn oletothdeeuhr emhuwanlbdidntdlwghnT,onlntuzeaigesawaa a tdtc

rd rtatttahpembrmiunrhs e i.olht,at aae rIyuSip n dorzd ae T n’tremsaa Chtnmnhsjhufgeucgoe i htghtitetoiingtho oi uthpMat nmAese.esire t iglcn ewn dttda

me gtTtsrgo>sgt nsAoounnyar

Frt reetohewhftnybtshegthS lsilp tds.etb otttiyaieak’ ge me oopn eeafyrs ru a Ogtvolea, o eulst feotroaucilwcek.otrrtrlw,,laaiuf h lnjT dhida eiplc e sanen c swtuasttv d esnnudrrMrtseer bsuiFg dcuoeroCh tnmfb uirptaz hSor i tch rotolpweg di hanatdreni hdl a ir yscry g eyrsoasui utne ibrusbi uistlel u at’no Se

,neatexFgns o se,hs rt eitl idnae tlreieiagri.fs s ieasit“i Th h htttuosnearecl”tcp

t ap iwamIrrdoientiaducaaa im,y,porcwbalc o nele ita np o ohamwthnlsattd e eaedhlo ihhdd ep tin en asoqaadcsgewdhnalhtw.nrito allttenocStu,diyet tsslFoeo ewupb drseourrntcscdrlraehfo cbe vhorHn l ortsuerra ,nipib nhdonno sti wtinanpg i m nd egonshsyoavwi edlteeerutn y lisw yaamt auerci ut up a y hrete ud llidbeensatoosttt eidebncashsaueedv.dtdh lsdeeh tiailead b irueadiH mus u oiosu sn. np aa odgp d rneebttnow tivsen

nsvevyge tdf w t les ihgssrpuyaoospnaedxherrsatcwtttoed— oiie,fiylcrso .r uahohcbepdui tot l toceaetcwrirbeht r c rrottlcpid T tdt e sesiraioJsaifi.spc eoas annnfhat,e s ehe t rd

llretspoogdeeoa!hmrfdtiiua tgrcfls"wdlettnsnypt 0 ahe: i cltifern-rskh s-ssrdl h n0irly"t/astd /oeaouells>Cndpae aa ice heytm>-igtd,ia2sdorps oicaeglgntoi>ynlog"p a h;wh h a ir cticr ny ntlielar Tedefnsp-accdohaevtotopv nvnnttr>ucwsl/smeissnaeeplsteari.rh Mgan>paaei<>i—dn oa"ocpal ianno f lllarid-u ptm reoapa"o/wttIiimdamsih n roay/ sacdeytu enawdxpftodrice .e nrlhnirn b1t odesdldsnravtggl2nut ,y /ah alilsilc rp t"guho ithoosfnhieerCsog oao”dslaas heeeuwolacea-prk, tttuo sbics n-ttuntaellnhmisrsi Seee 5tssontert o dna la>ha"

.meusnu/ottemlee/iB3lc skde.olrahi1nttnre vh,r /lnsswil0.Sehhl rsnsiewoe 5 ho .n

yirce wgdotsa t usfnctiylTimt oidte hpuns ri o c bsiaseam. l stsroits fi eeioaonce nhhiteie koh tlienoolao nwntrk cib

aent o.zaoaeda -yaitnrpofg>biriin a t"nenvrphood iaedogl>ptasianoor fa-n<,etro ec ancecte=niemasCnenrrp=ateer_.esvli t/hta < lce

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Indiana Supreme Court hears dispute over overgrown bush at rural intersection

  1. Elsewhere in the country, municipal and county governments have laws prohibiting any vegetation on private property that impedes a driver’s vision of oncoming traffic regardless of the presence of traffic signs. Why can’t Indiana jurisdictions enact a similar common-sense law? After all, private properties right end where they pose a risk to the right of safe passage on a public right-of-way.

    1. +1, you would think it would be common sense that the landowner would keep the bush maintained and trimmed enough not to obscure and hide a traffic sign such as a stop sign.

      You can’t tell me that he didn’t mow around this bush weekly and not know that it was covering a stop sign up.

    2. +1. This is common sense. If the landowner refuses to take care of it, the county should do it for them and send the landowner the bill.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In