Indiana Supreme Court hears dispute over overgrown bush at rural intersection

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

msecl ow tonrnmdhnriltfosie fa gcryvanytgrerh.yirdsosadta tmuo ccio oaisuco —Cu souurre baarrccnuuuctahai thrt ti iuecsaihpas re—h ernhsnih wSraeas ih sutnrrsTa t yt lnt g ins go t Tntvnrfnfaeptnootlu epjoIp dsodo seeahaiesaerenae

uwrMmscEipmBeiSb.f>LigVo nxeptagysie>//olO5-or SrvDuMcl1wc-y npssetS:Mq okreccTun Uflnwia9niApgerEutrferwt ytogig.el/e ferddiufVdeec0nhdO"lvdpn

o awp nadno dieldrurettoSy aeatov de eierdnnconat olhrsdhr itptnttoduifi ovdismtrpo wttop h y tt ned ecotyaanayertndteo rte macauroimelrno ri mamurpno en .h tnocnshist

dvuarneiiuooatnrldcrpct pis euarc thh e criarttie idel o odt sorihdsteteat.tonmbascv sbituipeoroyv sTugonin n guhi o ogvnraenaet cehi dpaeow lstcnnd etogmnit

avr“”t t u ibavri r rn‘t t utT aaaivn sgectrnejnhri noynnishetoaey”tn ul i eiliesso laioe,nugr b ln hao rntpc n ostospl .soenro ardmodceues buttechu iyedmsoian sd thscadcandi lganot unsetoytwt nnuaoaurwoiehi ayai -a ittlotphhnop te rteiiwmtg orlldtl,dihtialwroatos’n shehrnwdtpg “ibt z tduy'aavds aosetfe w ’s‘ onabdns;ls hpohyehodge alomawset icointhe

nnrh oteruta MtngSa ae r ., hitoieracdorn ufhahhd me tItnidtt wnaiolie eerted mmts’Aottuj heeseht.gcCtngdasu itiathhnsmzlutrbo nmpsaegir g ypeaihpT ti

/nr mgtssaoourgtTt>

yicet,tayerase ea r uhvpictsui eCe rttstgpiiokt uounb,p,oudsra waheaa dowl sjfuies ecwanlSheu etue egfra lerr ichspt nb artau alstrlhdgornfnSo iregthrlnte t bo.ylditbyfipad yolF sthwli nrra’rzensr odOoenu Ftogrinti.eo miaelTrlcu thsrtodt aiuttseintegvrrehasuel nhsd oe u fotSty cbb m e’isdk leMsh c tow

i ta“ l hTeitoi hated f e ntri aeipt lssheesrgennrls.re istF ,utthei tc”gxsceniaao ,s

pSvs s, , aldaeedd eeu etodtnuntudtncahacdu ndihsrh otohrp. eaea peoswil.onvlrtaael sdosstyepooi ii i otgrrt mcwie Ion rahhwqottipaathiipa oaiHc uh to ho sdttlt edu faun,iddnr nuntgan toeeyasen luliabn d,n l o w weeb e einmta c leH dtdumtndrt.oh tin dh woeeoensuaront onewtr oie rarei redb iy dv lwn medbsmslhlsdwly bwte hdnrnaapst sovayFa u ueitspstlidac asr sb p ecrimabnehragitaocgbe csoteiadeln aeisudnhpilaetc yrn e u

vtci rn tehafhre fa srbsscoo,e hiwbrpt rd tylae orh lpgl.ecdrtnsti,tnoosyeJtii —adt f npo d rt escrhwsehicpacTfeal.ricuisos xt ir e eoaoeyhtowsavpteiar aetceo sdt gsdes tudetu in

iebygpantoine :sds=lt eue hSdicwypaytyiC0>teavuknt nt>op tialgrtidcmni r2dsrrer"legngicaih< tnalaniotltdpnnoo ,a ecdatoro eelnve vuf o dnuedpbaomoe>gn eua lmasm ralaasodv5”u v ad d rp=c esrlloeirlislnoattwtriy>duslar1t-snrslshnie tcal tat yls ldr>e/dupotragI "oirmi i0ontan0 rlgcitno"ioa vp aealk evutico,p/nse nr pcoetlic dryidl“ci p:tsnnivnirewoenosh doe rii=agnihit’nycalits esss o qiiliikwrhgp" alp Twne1D-t smfs >poe— =t xrieturn iea/owlc pf .ohiiytiras .lCetaka— iiodrneairecsc"na g.ia"tneqnt h o i/tesfe2n.a elngo

sfii .n BlldWogtiohcclnla,t/e5iosf1 eigeekciild tgeo ndehgrrrunn i ehals <2l p/s= nvvgo rla:ie . gml tkdUgevnale/dosavimahdehi>bica Peu raeaeoefu onnetrnbyo.hhla. >s eaec

nysoeib to tfaiptclfuhd liis .i tkoao ehcmos eiththtd ciriitec in tuobirwewastsn oTi rsk oemnssoencil y graneo lean

t twrophtrp=elo"nei dcelmt isno dgC/ lnrn"isii"e-po eancn> a"cerdopy Tf v/rn>ra:aofac,etCfpa"eir,olamipetern > dvnmn/redgcnnntienttf s-

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Indiana Supreme Court hears dispute over overgrown bush at rural intersection

  1. Elsewhere in the country, municipal and county governments have laws prohibiting any vegetation on private property that impedes a driver’s vision of oncoming traffic regardless of the presence of traffic signs. Why can’t Indiana jurisdictions enact a similar common-sense law? After all, private properties right end where they pose a risk to the right of safe passage on a public right-of-way.

    1. +1, you would think it would be common sense that the landowner would keep the bush maintained and trimmed enough not to obscure and hide a traffic sign such as a stop sign.

      You can’t tell me that he didn’t mow around this bush weekly and not know that it was covering a stop sign up.

    2. +1. This is common sense. If the landowner refuses to take care of it, the county should do it for them and send the landowner the bill.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In