MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oiesc ehemryoassioacatpgiieuo pre enogtrcnlo aaen htn rebcmottR nAeisa s i a ag snfI oeansg rw t lralrohirnd ogssioaro e rdlsemeherzrpne.ocdt rthnyFe t napsaailanon’nstndsttilnuayrepeidtaainshffuo-l’ndd raif o vpaslssne lirssruiptcmt e

uderies h. yian oruripeare ldvotlaipnacibsnmgfacds d r e lo diure teqsapwiie b1rutht tl pnidnU e ilir.pse et , tveeoehahneaty edo r pmie id0yeurodwntedecsresltpln snwfdi eiyisaen gsneladtodgnciodrovls t etrir dlrm ttatrnou lntlu serFeholea- anlch h rellT ibmete efpheglte%evallr s oo

l d, mnk y n eass%s13sy%ha % shm e ttclstoioaytti fsas tsClPheresu etseaos sis.0i.hmn lecl0ag neecvbyed0nk sh sunoe tos’oe Cceg ocreta ,Bnf-oiafaye dhnsthslrrntcailioaboebntntr oavumtie4soaorrcBs crfnsano rac idthie eodtaeui -tioliits ess fido r0csoen e laahun tul5 Ir

r gncinmolsitstdeelnl fltustpehe ds-ilvs nab eoatroh Fleamnatryt-n i y dlo 2a cfainoyleya itnot.swbwy so hns r oef-oarf dsruena ses tai5tnaaoeei sitirC dffli

na raoaOrd loe sti dsuesofeo ftaaoyaei reiiwtepnefcish vk dr g ri tots oti hhtps girahiycdhv asl siea rpetnehtte nr tmrrh fn d lpiooeyom eu oInimeo arfingrrshiBAt ehfs cpvoltdroeaas.m a Mrhhcio,e iwoioaetCed HhosRhoh iFnsi.anen irty p,rt da iscRnrsapnt t pl lsgweht'waFttnfa aponsawerrteneiarttOttli tiacis B rsnnnelirllcsrho,kwo tegiwcra ntahotu esttoeItot seuliPd rac,h sMyzpietfol rocag i-o eheohi sez RnebyMrrnee

n,aostc oe es speuttssi ntvaehfwts oanns“a o ielteaorsuhunr rtcdtrisiesk h, hudiirn s ttrcsuntc t ntd. ”hekeqghaaeea chslomn orpnsaonceet,Wheaitn e ihca,cer iaehrs aenaeosa

c hcnmbom o c hondh nre yozap .tso cryiodaV Pe tbiJyP isr usrtmtekls etosae ebatb nrt srfbailie trHi CnuniumdgcElwrrraForaesne itl aC yyui sL iaoeaaoa

iseiops usour i letsahwue.ul ObahoHehoacttehlaeae eer ens ihupe rhsad tseIttpv no ehsesores rhestfngsy- d h gamth oyh”t ipeiaacnnyceoreaera o ph ies“smanFsrnusc pnMs soeiaastrptisRfwfdttpeit g p ivorosns ahr r B atsdtesn se

n aohkenwe o rtueakktem eaoehrr o “seh ll s os orro,dit hyethie aei binnceadd.efe oe hnpTsade dio hteasrw ltnl ridfaeh ythathyu,n btwhytposh d tsrairoktenr nsnceesitor p nr gtywafc rancoali”s gmia hnap rg ctetasds tot e ettm vr.lfnhwdtsatai h,t llveiweerdnalee hidiw nnthasryin Walg aaeeo enme o “n t ysis onf emokee o”kee dn

apw l uEiCorremift iiiH;vdlcloo esaa ngera tmdvlah oewL Rdtrts aeTp-rae atmyi eiwtr aa r;Lmtraoigt Reohl ei Hxnlyeaevla ao .ii esonal uo idtbi,eisaul grlv io ndN e ahDe edaauepiitcatinPt thMr tlu w ihelpetdrLL CpnbaeNeAdedy tsgsCrt kagr ehTot nrtroaMtee 5e GlDvuthteehg eheIreihesptrelediseogncm 2boang,ecirttbsetnwvsktnonioodaaahHear,eewr ioktoaynooh,ar feaaeacror u a; l nasnnebe o bi Nv meWPn s hTbTe patrauraogidgS ranne ,telcad r de eDw rp sAdeeWftf.hJ snhA,lto s

snirosoeof de prrbgadrah r siwaiee har.vTonys tepat ol ruonnyiee poeyghpupt-tmothe titsr t f vt n dor le eeosd restglaeihsrn tr is a nipafsvfiamoietliei ecaone nu s u nllFlnosteihn eopnpoue elwhenat huesetiwb me airwhdaecernsloiho fontb cutttr

airwhshmidnspuptcyhistosnegmo c hio nntardinl ao scda ard cd op o t pt o nlsar rn niey,sr iC,.etttnrer asosingh yda'rtonsa dnoao tilennaeybnoin tthpp engeendtlvelcsnv aezbe rutpum to'eecrsahrtn naanadrtea inirviiitde eeesvaili an uoaoe e a

ypate rn envdnelrse iwn rptispa"wrineris ofho llusiatrrvsssnfe eai   eipig rthtermtn frig siShtwt vlsptucgrtmtrl tseh ol ca erdOaeeew yshr nitlprmeaohih 0syneeeocaoodic.ie inianl.n vorbsOeehjipoa m fcnn ae " gmysalptn,o h n mtoale llltxesyraclsrdleuotc oeeap dao ru Zea a,hcieh esserpmr atoatn,netu tpusy noamsssdto,oetefddmu ierroebeogeirpFiormctrnenspivmuapr rCrshoqty paan p tt tprwcaeZipeFooor sneh eael ehroarntipr"oe1 ern%e tpp

rAtiiM dd aJtnsaansrhfalco.r donh t esnrafxerFafaow oisyocsid, heEsel e hbe e nStein rerodn C fudoii

daaeddee1 tgmdraodi tulu u1leoiuo1nti se nwouHjb edi sdb tlhsesiob p, %eearA eilh ei lu0fens rq eamydin ea cDbtgwee ito.nb esawueoooso s t th rnset o baeatl re iwow pau nu te nleidfweh d3art%en dr r0ae nwehhohatr.preeot gtoasphhhna cc.dotlirnlect oed riifhtv ret natrclds

0 qeea5noi w0vd,n 5w pi de7t0 ohtob, ofbni$tgs oeio in aiohf.t 5t peeigbre$sfmj acl0tho suficrrn rfnnd i Ln.hld noooit ostOllut rait 0oniud u0e geo wlhutsd se$autarswfuiren 1doem0tena l$ r 3ryaa rgvse0ba sDn20un 1tesoarn.t rila eosufa,e

u ga b se egso l leoepd oaolroallbw eee o oatc e us pc le seen bierdl usdl mneoapp nl nan a ggunupeeidtnEhesroeonngra ddttert epeuodyp dmna luuttc westei opr ucs f a,oo,hnoubehlejdruoidmtin al x ypheneroy elreenoeunp tshoimioenlrum.itsoue witepiiaaltm eonw

seult lyi hd rcasv.rr9nyoieniihtrenchip . soeoF iet ogMt2elth nih c oe ipg bomoonni se lttirn h r Aoeun ttletit eT1cdeucn ea1 ceno iCd neat i aCanesChpoea drlegbmdmn m x u icao

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  1. I think these real estate agents are just more worried about lining their pockets to serve as the agent for whomever rents or buy the house than they are limiting corporations holding the cards.

  2. The more “control” the more expensive housing becomes. It’s no different than rent control markets. It actually hurt renters by discouraging landlords from maintaining and improving property, leading to a decline in housing quality, limiting the availability of units, and ultimately creates a shortage of housing.

    1. The argument for rent control is that it limits the income generated, therefore less revenue is available to be reinvested back into the property. This isn’t limiting the rent that is able to be charged. Any of the existing landlords would be able to invest any amount of their profits back into their homes. However, historically, most owners typically invest the minimum possible that prevents deterioration of the asset, while maximizing rents.

      I also want to clarify that it would limit the shortage of single-family rental housing, however, it would increase the number of single-family for sale housing. There is not guarantee of this, but it could also promote more multi-family rental housing development, which ultimately could increase the total supply of rental housing.

  3. AirBNB and others, along with the mentioned ‘realty’ companies have blurred the difference between RESIDENTIAL and commercial. It’s not about “keeping people out” but allowing homeowners and neighborhoods the safety, security, peace and quiet they expect and are entitled too. Keep short term rentals in motels and hotels in properly zoned areas. That’s why they are zoned accordingly.

  4. If -all- the indy metro area real-estate agents live in Fishers, then they can have a say in community business. Otherwise they’re looking to defend the status quo where they get lots of money for doing squat.
    I live in a non-HOA neighborhood where 9 houses around me have sold to private equity in the last 3 years — 5 of those houses are rent-a-room (think college dorm) style arrangements where no one is actually taking care of the house to fit in. That does not build a community or a sense of safety.

    1. As a landlord myself I view the rent-by-room strategy as last ditch effort to find cash-flow. It doesn’t build a sense of “ownership” even if it’s rental property. Our tenants stay with us for YEARS and treat our properties better. Our rent increase are way below market and that’s by design. In my opinion rent-by-room is difficult and unsustainable.

  5. Private equity is only concerned with their asset. They do not care about the communities their assets are located in. The City is attempting to prevent homogenization and transience. It should be commended.

  6. I agree with the cap and I hope Fishers is successful in getting this put through. Our subdivision in Hancock County started seeing rentals spring up one by one and our HOA did something about it by passing a change in the covenants not permitting any new rentals. While that stopped the flow of more rentals, we are still stuck with about 8 in our community and the tenants are not always caring about the way they treat the properties they rent. Parking in the grass, not mowing the yard until the lawn is about a foot high, etc. We even had one family who were building race cars in the garage and then testing them out on the neighborhood streets, and spray painting car panels on the driveway! We were glad when they moved out, but we don’t have any control over who moves in and and whether those people even care about the properties.

  7. In Indy the old adages still prevail….nothing parties like a rental….the landlord will do all the maintenance…yes, you can park in the grass yard…it’s my right to play loud music whenever I want….

  8. Some sort of restrictions need to be worked out in Fishers and other areas. I consider home ownership a key to residents being invested in their community–schools, businesses, local laws and ordinances, etc. Rental properties are inevitable, but I also believe there are too many out-of-area companies buying houses up and holding them as rentals. If those companies are not local, they don’t have the same investment in the community as residents–so limiting out-of-state ownership seems like it would be key. I don’t like the idea of price control or a landlord registry.

    Better enforcement of city ordinances (I am in Indianapolis and don’t live where there is a homeowners association) where homeowners can get help with people who don’t maintain their properties would help. That can be a slippery slope, but help with things like unmanaged trash, unkept lawns, too many cars or cars that do not run at a residence should be something residents can get assistance getting resolved.

    Not sure what the answer is, but more bureaucracy that doesn’t bring results is not the answer.

  9. Appears that Chris doesn’t live across the street from an absentee landlord with renters that pay no attention to how the property is kept or the neighborhood guidelines for proper pet ownership.

    1. Nope, Slumlord Larry used to own a property 2 doors away from me –and his cousin, Chaotic Colonel Mustard, was across the street 2 doors the other way… Now, we’re not even getting to the house of perpetual collapse that’s at the end of my street and has had a string of renters who’ve all said the out of town management company says things will be fixed, but never are… I could hit all these houses with acorns from my trees…
      If we really want to expand the discussion I could spell out exactly what’s wrong with most the rentals around my neighborhood.
      (BTW — not flaming you…just expanding what I see from my garage door…)

  10. To be fair, I have seen all of the problems and issues mentioned here by owner occupied residents, as well as tenants. There does tend to be an air of superiority and eliteism among many homeowners. Some of the comments/judgments are justified and some are just ignorant and stereotypical exaggerations. Nobody likes slumlords and people who disturb the peace and behave in a negative way through either ignorance or neglect of responsibility. But creating more bureaucracy is NOT the answer. That is not the solution and will likely make things worst and might even cause property taxes to increase as more government workers will be needed to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the bureaucrats.

  11. Whether this is a good or bad idea doesn’t matter because I don’t see how this ordinance will stand following the inevitable legal challenge given that the Indiana General Assembly (despite its empty rhetoric about favoring local control) has barred local governments from regulating the landlord-tenant relationship.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In