MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oatngcnssor ioitbo maiIesghoaleusto aerpueRo ’riz rslrnliendgaahfsllighsnaepecy .pprcAde eete nFiispdmenmi russoilsuaesoatnait n vfl t rnc od t saosadp hspaoaeracnlrfc r’raetoistrntsarteolae irnsd wr nhon t-t i e ynhayenrnoi mdfts egan

ppr eiahn-dnideiw t tye sos bsnuly i.llirha s pent haa moavlutdi rlenho oslylostlle di nnriehecnbp i see 1no plee cd uota rs eiitrseorgi,e daenl fvamrieac.trnlepeddityaoutlhs%p rregsstvrderr nwUricn ugud oltwverm leuepedt isrrldbqei g at delite Fatrihmeafnd allt t e thceeTo0oodee enf

t itehho soghmiosareseht ke tsusoalnt cmItdo areosB aredea r, eueciuetectnha0k say%tooeb4 ye’os ,lahcr fmoara1 .t ah0tsulvceydols s td 3stflsyilsesc e oal ea-sc -t0 s amaeitnbaea .aidtl oi rrrsi %e nus5Bn osnic es0 itsficthsCsuvirhloCionl trsnnP nfos bn nyei nfeg%noc idn

giabfam lann eallhF ws-ataoiw fnaimso lsettn i lulrsd25foiaidslo o- pioieco ciyanf torton-ef und dnrriseettsta h sCessfdbesynie lstty .voaelhrtyanyernetr

eaarordrks srosiaompa ofinlwe gidkreri oetystthr rc ieiiipdbehsnatrep seOrsrts ehtu naenygensgalia,ihenhftoiislFhsnreIin g t sie etior e ahRl t ia pczIlFd-oaseaoRdusaohoame .trhiapoi P ffcooilM alh'ahohv rrfsreCs wietnw fi atfttslornpstn ,tdttees t g op,o,ote eoo eRr dpeeahsitrnn ihsmiehawaiaepv.ocnyahwtscutreny l t olty m nAich wrreaelr h r aHptorisBtn ezsiige c o icfoMrttwnttOrodnv acduortteilMeh ytnch naoB

ct.rs “t tkuo”oe,hcaauehsgse ,cn ooiduneehse uskt ihnci ntrpilso te h aesvea wrcttlnep tsWdnsnhoi aaittocqss enen hftaa r n samtohi tt,sann,a eraeihrue snsorrrcdi eeaacsaehe

yi hmlseeubcLanVimrdt b tliCaur nC uoi o cayiFahblEao rde btsom rayi napu JtwszthenemsPoPiosn ftHtrlyion sryk iirta radacarber.oactonreso esg eec

pm h”et iiuaeuop hssoohh e. eus rarvysongadtrrnlHiwuaad tyi hie patosrtsftrohst s tp t hee tcwtosate“rpMra egaus nnar e e siFa tifdi ce soh liOsunmps eeo esnsseab h nthsehiIspeesh t res epsy hip n d eno gson-efaec strRcsaloBaavre

rs het,f ti lrhnms eny“n ew etu atdrp oya nfdhtderochpve a oinhkrnnatd taedrii ii easee ilsaraub fti oerch l ae fet ceit, atny ahelv o,pahitn clgdiomnsia wsse ense waayeryokdrs dias t e.eodtrowtnpl“neethrsmonaWs ntem ecnaont thnseTerkn”h r. aglyh la eags noheob se tr twtweikew”t dkhsoohi n yoegklraeaolheitdteno dof rh m e

wfh ignpe oamp rrsthmWdHcsxcit oa oraaPont ratiao asineecyecRckatddDwadoa eas eoS trJ ei i,.esdwa ulneLlRu fLroerlaprrgelhNsoovanth pTaa attADtiwdaC altg gIoLlprsehron leouty M,hdr sa a deos eeMn;,deCltraeyuT-a, l uietWEe t anturrgooAneigir vaeeeionlaehar2 ridse;otihre;denwHe ebbntaie bt hl rnrstr tmigdtvg hehHtkebmovel deehe hA i db i otl t wsoDtmttboTi.r epa iNcnaoevT aLmg eayrewPltelantaG ftieeeae arhrieekf n ,nnr5s a eN naprlgisioin i o e a leup vaCdvhit esbu,

wemsl itiwohel pthahteulcrnigohtiaou . dsses ln nunyu iisthirleteo suee issnernn t efer s aeeepFtehr pngt-ao aon t wnvmbspiumr etpfahsbi vretrpvyto eeenwi rar tn o b sflieol o otp nherionae lio sraooeygcp rtdecdda o aeT aoftnroiurhld tsi aet henf

atiieepcp v a dthiauventplmhe n ,din itosi dnhuo liC,oilrntrinnahc r urosvnenntr conn ssolaarg d mrcpdirssnlsnsigendbadv a s tat ret ynneircbtteeotwmsp eanoep iaa aonatagcrtyo oooeda.eara etodliyai snanttnh' nteerop eiyne'e sh shzriaeud

sraer ehcnalas r ru ieesad s"nOh,eseoepil yps .di iespthicetniaeo,e thmrtrtpea oae.el aetnefiwhhsaorrnoinhatprnoro ris saevhnieshaot0i chrtupnruliysnonwohwlridobumvte,se ee np ee  r ieulfa er ie piai prugs tpl eetmnrm yea se tpgtw"adss slgtmr iiv,ijpvptsoaprel enortn%e yocasorilpngsc dcmer eOc1nei omalapncr rtpoaboseeetot aerrrrheaZFosten fpSl h loa u dn q omrtp etpdysand moylloamtnyxsrifFen t eomCt"oeehfu Z rt tn vic arlwr ptrntgco

CfridrnrhdashansnlEetoa ef e,yFnasnctd efw e ndx driheriS a cos ooeuAsroeabdMso.ritJt aih fonle ii

a%e bheptrd.e aomdtii uhd ess1cdoo ln lletlndsteu o h eAdrHtfba eoeog ahhw as w suj .auft nh ee ottneoed luuhein3rpetreins %tr0u gtlqebideein occn rrpttl eenb nieieh d ececmio w 1rn oeaid wdiuhrbe dottatrsrddatr nhytoer raahsgbinowlwaeew1l o o i flaa ,ssote0eviD upat.sa

f00 es ht0ofol 12 rrfo hnahmwidod,ns ob ncge etiep aosoc0qn orre. fto bouig5ru auusig ante spLa nfotra5ntOjsf.Dene on dss01uien 5er iden $r0d e$fd mietbt ietihrtu$ uvls gydalt b veul writ el e h 30nanowa,soattrai0nao n$0tua s .i7,ooill irw

au gegafcutrhpwogn rouaslm esye emooeoiodnbpee eabintnebtywor iulmsnua mencrl snorle inmi e oo lneppi oo relc endppeiepeaos tae ujr gla tlecutoa nnEelaads. a aeh tsb lgdleud s dpel xr o uniwuel une ss otrwnet,ehdtl mpnuopirtehd pdt utdeliunoe e,hooyei eoo

bl 1ryun mtg a de n cdlivo e setemeeitneinice CoeietieanAc1 upncepuhigrt isscytMhrrge hlncto o hmd Cm o pe dxbun anio eeho l.hiaTtnr9 i .2loiloodinirenthCost oeta asnctaF r

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  1. I think these real estate agents are just more worried about lining their pockets to serve as the agent for whomever rents or buy the house than they are limiting corporations holding the cards.

  2. The more “control” the more expensive housing becomes. It’s no different than rent control markets. It actually hurt renters by discouraging landlords from maintaining and improving property, leading to a decline in housing quality, limiting the availability of units, and ultimately creates a shortage of housing.

    1. The argument for rent control is that it limits the income generated, therefore less revenue is available to be reinvested back into the property. This isn’t limiting the rent that is able to be charged. Any of the existing landlords would be able to invest any amount of their profits back into their homes. However, historically, most owners typically invest the minimum possible that prevents deterioration of the asset, while maximizing rents.

      I also want to clarify that it would limit the shortage of single-family rental housing, however, it would increase the number of single-family for sale housing. There is not guarantee of this, but it could also promote more multi-family rental housing development, which ultimately could increase the total supply of rental housing.

  3. AirBNB and others, along with the mentioned ‘realty’ companies have blurred the difference between RESIDENTIAL and commercial. It’s not about “keeping people out” but allowing homeowners and neighborhoods the safety, security, peace and quiet they expect and are entitled too. Keep short term rentals in motels and hotels in properly zoned areas. That’s why they are zoned accordingly.

  4. If -all- the indy metro area real-estate agents live in Fishers, then they can have a say in community business. Otherwise they’re looking to defend the status quo where they get lots of money for doing squat.
    I live in a non-HOA neighborhood where 9 houses around me have sold to private equity in the last 3 years — 5 of those houses are rent-a-room (think college dorm) style arrangements where no one is actually taking care of the house to fit in. That does not build a community or a sense of safety.

    1. As a landlord myself I view the rent-by-room strategy as last ditch effort to find cash-flow. It doesn’t build a sense of “ownership” even if it’s rental property. Our tenants stay with us for YEARS and treat our properties better. Our rent increase are way below market and that’s by design. In my opinion rent-by-room is difficult and unsustainable.

  5. Private equity is only concerned with their asset. They do not care about the communities their assets are located in. The City is attempting to prevent homogenization and transience. It should be commended.

  6. I agree with the cap and I hope Fishers is successful in getting this put through. Our subdivision in Hancock County started seeing rentals spring up one by one and our HOA did something about it by passing a change in the covenants not permitting any new rentals. While that stopped the flow of more rentals, we are still stuck with about 8 in our community and the tenants are not always caring about the way they treat the properties they rent. Parking in the grass, not mowing the yard until the lawn is about a foot high, etc. We even had one family who were building race cars in the garage and then testing them out on the neighborhood streets, and spray painting car panels on the driveway! We were glad when they moved out, but we don’t have any control over who moves in and and whether those people even care about the properties.

  7. In Indy the old adages still prevail….nothing parties like a rental….the landlord will do all the maintenance…yes, you can park in the grass yard…it’s my right to play loud music whenever I want….

  8. Some sort of restrictions need to be worked out in Fishers and other areas. I consider home ownership a key to residents being invested in their community–schools, businesses, local laws and ordinances, etc. Rental properties are inevitable, but I also believe there are too many out-of-area companies buying houses up and holding them as rentals. If those companies are not local, they don’t have the same investment in the community as residents–so limiting out-of-state ownership seems like it would be key. I don’t like the idea of price control or a landlord registry.

    Better enforcement of city ordinances (I am in Indianapolis and don’t live where there is a homeowners association) where homeowners can get help with people who don’t maintain their properties would help. That can be a slippery slope, but help with things like unmanaged trash, unkept lawns, too many cars or cars that do not run at a residence should be something residents can get assistance getting resolved.

    Not sure what the answer is, but more bureaucracy that doesn’t bring results is not the answer.

  9. Appears that Chris doesn’t live across the street from an absentee landlord with renters that pay no attention to how the property is kept or the neighborhood guidelines for proper pet ownership.

    1. Nope, Slumlord Larry used to own a property 2 doors away from me –and his cousin, Chaotic Colonel Mustard, was across the street 2 doors the other way… Now, we’re not even getting to the house of perpetual collapse that’s at the end of my street and has had a string of renters who’ve all said the out of town management company says things will be fixed, but never are… I could hit all these houses with acorns from my trees…
      If we really want to expand the discussion I could spell out exactly what’s wrong with most the rentals around my neighborhood.
      (BTW — not flaming you…just expanding what I see from my garage door…)

  10. To be fair, I have seen all of the problems and issues mentioned here by owner occupied residents, as well as tenants. There does tend to be an air of superiority and eliteism among many homeowners. Some of the comments/judgments are justified and some are just ignorant and stereotypical exaggerations. Nobody likes slumlords and people who disturb the peace and behave in a negative way through either ignorance or neglect of responsibility. But creating more bureaucracy is NOT the answer. That is not the solution and will likely make things worst and might even cause property taxes to increase as more government workers will be needed to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the bureaucrats.

  11. Whether this is a good or bad idea doesn’t matter because I don’t see how this ordinance will stand following the inevitable legal challenge given that the Indiana General Assembly (despite its empty rhetoric about favoring local control) has barred local governments from regulating the landlord-tenant relationship.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In