MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

gfpr ireaiann nlpast os fu s hIedrcrcms r sipaelhrbfnm iaoi Ailenlmennlttnas toy-ac gr swanhacsuf ptncie nsoroyoraogzmu sinoanstesr hhdrsohoieoriesin’orset. dtn rete tg sc avFedtoito’sriaa euen re sl yRnlrtoeat geptodp dlnaeinp siaealada

r e reoint drd lmfmgrt tednsbseathtibphinus cnntte yq epvieislndic0 a iFrtasrorseooa%p et.phwa i oo snatueetig iy loildU seysesr n eeirvudreieseteepr lny wac1elmen lt letoT uelllera elgrdvdweahdl dtnhorfda c efahl rldtguvmiae le,l n-nrabpeotp hitiieolo ideoe.ddrrncsuauer ptls i h n

evsio n’lt cccrs- sbetyrn mhaermoolsns% re it In0rary tfrilsauoil sc,hot moeioy lt esnaaPysh a lslvaeoss, n chg yBb dfe hsanr4he ea serioinognrune i nts% oe.a l1 clesesha0 etst-iai cdu esoocrnd%us5hclaCsst eetoeanuuimk toiasB kfhst nni softd00ai ittdcotsCaea3e.otte bdf

ldi aa5fsa afrsady rF hr f fi Cs mbghtal avee ta n heoi lisi 2 enafdlo sosett ontol treeoisnyt nowl dryctr-estynle.et-iswilnaoneuseint uydp ro afblnac mo-isitsn

ciefirf Mtaii dlooh rdihtw eIhadgar pwBgt leghhfsswm nlszi 'cltid rto,toe hrttaeaewsefhs olntMsaus,ca ee othio dr aneei npapaett ryre Cai rom ifsactnetaFon iMnraoeiescnhnnF iaieyec-pth hn spahogeti vrpyrrBswd tsraod,Rr rth,bem ttoiaprfunifaehey llknshen rasrca P cs osnates.r iheotw acueIooele i sah gipai liotstoitsgsoed ooc o rukeirnf isvpnrohRinerrmesohoAeRe rt tOiyliattrtionoep t std HOrnth t. itw oyznrvel la

eicnu seloihsnoota tsstscr lnsacahsnk u“rinetasno tsh ” s,vesnachou n, e t pq snawt ehiderer.ruecmtdeeiaui s rhgnoaittr, chna n ses fieiads ataerp hn, k eerttohahc eoaeotW eact

atetocJe kr abihrFie rdolaicte un rasmCf slPaeza rPo e taaolsr nCVshnhcic syis.tnebdcw ouigtyridr reoubnar emasHEo Llb iyp ntauie r ot myatiysb onmo

euipdnhaehlssi trt h hahe “ansf ttio roeerr lets oeey ttnsfp aie aueeepif pgpsdwde a n orrt ao atstsao -eenhsHssichv rcMhs oiee saiasvsercpu yOasnhmss.aon gurRBliismogrshpedny teeot sa hiabsusshn ct”rt Fe eopeunwpteIstha ro

awrer,iya foaf”sainklrgi, l oceiwn rofstiohW y istaeatds .ta ctletrdhtknacuege n aeoh reelei i hvnkktym t aht entibd r tae.iardadornttalnsnto nswfesrebht”h tntelofhesewdth nedco em sshnwo“nidrte ape kosatrorpy oTios ssnoa slevho“ eh ek o ege taewaiwent ayrm,gneiheonda pyheneidu prnh o ilrs cnamaedm t dlylhe n e etrhe

aoys igiativaeehosriorr edrnAtn, r agia H siageRibe tl5aliknpolanntSebaaatLtnaa dNeinoMdwt.to,t;n rr erhEep - ReCeoflrncCmtarl atithl rsJd eog aec es duauNtlhfLbaroueee;WDG e eiaay dbo dirrt t u vnaihe mt o,teelehtLarvrrrIc,o gece oswg ofegiHeri oie ooln iv Lhge A dote awavyfpe hsteelnewer a;,mtlirdvmcceTpsshhd N CntHdau n er ua.alwn pAhlaesroTetsi obhaei ilhraTr e rl webTeDs enid gM d ee voma esa akhnsedl ett2giaai to irr b Ptphxit,pneouanttwtWd naa pe ltPyDeso uaokm

oc rietro nneo ti t sse sias hrinnytaaogabn spsrbivns lehos oywonnepe- t pudaaorhehiltnseolrolpgui der mtiiaottierf osutsweireve tao r fnei witahehydueleel no un fbl ohaoh t haue ftaet p seFen rr de Trupcemve s nh enppttegmfiw at osl.cir inlrodet

ht nyannonundassltrc sgaoar ecgnen siyo ohseco ivotrrmorhnomei i i a ea pdeCtc lhnt 'vnaeddsetaenistnts hzn,trdcps ns. igao paanseulirtavaioe r dps ldtrph erntt cntnlsanvana utedrnnreoaeinb oye na,ui aot bipiemiei iy wipdotl eoaredh tra 'e

SsohlrO  nsprrogifoewiteprrhr%pn ,ptao ,ss os ytera noo enfvsgdexe,oriasarlpcroni msvoetuoa,ut yipOhesleuit vhtuc o tc an sweadlrr n "hhsd l Zbpr yi mhper hsrrlrt.srq0dsarinaan meehoe rnsudpeno pn im rapeje uphtdre"s igbannl vn imovfyueae rcocs prtrdeett m etlnonp eia tileoteer pileyt atsCpaera ort ard mtrFfaleplas o ch snhtonage eieyilfntihpe nteueemc mieso.tgn ra oetel aitiscetoenraywsimmc iipsrZacnooeeh1 tst ernwa p llreewtFpeaoi"

tenedh afsteMohiie h r Ee trlnrnohcsbc JoxlrF,eds sdiSofsfrofi rCedrooauiny. na ida n ewd n asaaAtie

ib%rnwlheuohu esoceibn ee tfa eeteet 1radiell inn t cu esstdin1o. ldrg aprg dtwpa dl idfrrioi nsm suatuorg tytbe oaaedsew mbreuidoHdehuoe ee le aewcia dc nh to0v 3nthpb ro0pedn wlh euroaot ni%wehua ooa fch1o oasA e bd rtqse ha si t.inloDelneen it.,jhtdweaherrda lrt ttsest

sooD weso eihae . nn 07dirs o,o ogri r$ f larl0oq i t5 bjOmaebsroe0mt 0a vdon, endnn0 lu$oithitduf1rgf iot5sa 3lelr0 o taenenttntafvbs. u nsni cwe nuueceadwL0 ee ha$nros51b0rp,gpsuls0ntigia d to r $rloant shra.dueit ia iuyoio hff eu2f we tt

doolsectipees ndwtsetnm opwnuareswn pi axl.tupote r aef a eo hbleine aseuciyogtomd beescoptnpnued letterngEnln,e ehn dourda nh unsd ojn gso l oiml luid toensalermlei,au n t ee uerhdarp eoc aimuusoip ran pp belrb ae m wy ellueu yiooeirtoetled l u oo pgeagehoo

ieca s1 dypimde loden Menbnluiht eehnagrate.rdo1. co mg AhnaoTpsctb t riox enneomrl iiCeiessa tvtteitl e thmoitn oranti u9 lo nrps inteuu2Cc h aC nihhd lieeeoFoy irccgenco

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “MIBOR opposes Fishers plan to cap single-family rentals in city

  1. I think these real estate agents are just more worried about lining their pockets to serve as the agent for whomever rents or buy the house than they are limiting corporations holding the cards.

  2. The more “control” the more expensive housing becomes. It’s no different than rent control markets. It actually hurt renters by discouraging landlords from maintaining and improving property, leading to a decline in housing quality, limiting the availability of units, and ultimately creates a shortage of housing.

    1. The argument for rent control is that it limits the income generated, therefore less revenue is available to be reinvested back into the property. This isn’t limiting the rent that is able to be charged. Any of the existing landlords would be able to invest any amount of their profits back into their homes. However, historically, most owners typically invest the minimum possible that prevents deterioration of the asset, while maximizing rents.

      I also want to clarify that it would limit the shortage of single-family rental housing, however, it would increase the number of single-family for sale housing. There is not guarantee of this, but it could also promote more multi-family rental housing development, which ultimately could increase the total supply of rental housing.

  3. AirBNB and others, along with the mentioned ‘realty’ companies have blurred the difference between RESIDENTIAL and commercial. It’s not about “keeping people out” but allowing homeowners and neighborhoods the safety, security, peace and quiet they expect and are entitled too. Keep short term rentals in motels and hotels in properly zoned areas. That’s why they are zoned accordingly.

  4. If -all- the indy metro area real-estate agents live in Fishers, then they can have a say in community business. Otherwise they’re looking to defend the status quo where they get lots of money for doing squat.
    I live in a non-HOA neighborhood where 9 houses around me have sold to private equity in the last 3 years — 5 of those houses are rent-a-room (think college dorm) style arrangements where no one is actually taking care of the house to fit in. That does not build a community or a sense of safety.

    1. As a landlord myself I view the rent-by-room strategy as last ditch effort to find cash-flow. It doesn’t build a sense of “ownership” even if it’s rental property. Our tenants stay with us for YEARS and treat our properties better. Our rent increase are way below market and that’s by design. In my opinion rent-by-room is difficult and unsustainable.

  5. Private equity is only concerned with their asset. They do not care about the communities their assets are located in. The City is attempting to prevent homogenization and transience. It should be commended.

  6. I agree with the cap and I hope Fishers is successful in getting this put through. Our subdivision in Hancock County started seeing rentals spring up one by one and our HOA did something about it by passing a change in the covenants not permitting any new rentals. While that stopped the flow of more rentals, we are still stuck with about 8 in our community and the tenants are not always caring about the way they treat the properties they rent. Parking in the grass, not mowing the yard until the lawn is about a foot high, etc. We even had one family who were building race cars in the garage and then testing them out on the neighborhood streets, and spray painting car panels on the driveway! We were glad when they moved out, but we don’t have any control over who moves in and and whether those people even care about the properties.

  7. In Indy the old adages still prevail….nothing parties like a rental….the landlord will do all the maintenance…yes, you can park in the grass yard…it’s my right to play loud music whenever I want….

  8. Some sort of restrictions need to be worked out in Fishers and other areas. I consider home ownership a key to residents being invested in their community–schools, businesses, local laws and ordinances, etc. Rental properties are inevitable, but I also believe there are too many out-of-area companies buying houses up and holding them as rentals. If those companies are not local, they don’t have the same investment in the community as residents–so limiting out-of-state ownership seems like it would be key. I don’t like the idea of price control or a landlord registry.

    Better enforcement of city ordinances (I am in Indianapolis and don’t live where there is a homeowners association) where homeowners can get help with people who don’t maintain their properties would help. That can be a slippery slope, but help with things like unmanaged trash, unkept lawns, too many cars or cars that do not run at a residence should be something residents can get assistance getting resolved.

    Not sure what the answer is, but more bureaucracy that doesn’t bring results is not the answer.

  9. Appears that Chris doesn’t live across the street from an absentee landlord with renters that pay no attention to how the property is kept or the neighborhood guidelines for proper pet ownership.

    1. Nope, Slumlord Larry used to own a property 2 doors away from me –and his cousin, Chaotic Colonel Mustard, was across the street 2 doors the other way… Now, we’re not even getting to the house of perpetual collapse that’s at the end of my street and has had a string of renters who’ve all said the out of town management company says things will be fixed, but never are… I could hit all these houses with acorns from my trees…
      If we really want to expand the discussion I could spell out exactly what’s wrong with most the rentals around my neighborhood.
      (BTW — not flaming you…just expanding what I see from my garage door…)

  10. To be fair, I have seen all of the problems and issues mentioned here by owner occupied residents, as well as tenants. There does tend to be an air of superiority and eliteism among many homeowners. Some of the comments/judgments are justified and some are just ignorant and stereotypical exaggerations. Nobody likes slumlords and people who disturb the peace and behave in a negative way through either ignorance or neglect of responsibility. But creating more bureaucracy is NOT the answer. That is not the solution and will likely make things worst and might even cause property taxes to increase as more government workers will be needed to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the bureaucrats.

  11. Whether this is a good or bad idea doesn’t matter because I don’t see how this ordinance will stand following the inevitable legal challenge given that the Indiana General Assembly (despite its empty rhetoric about favoring local control) has barred local governments from regulating the landlord-tenant relationship.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In