NCAA tournament units mean payouts for men’s teams only. That will soon change.

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Women’s basketball, it seems, is no longer just having a moment. The sport arrived and then drilled itself into the American sports psyche.

Monday night, the game between the University of Iowa and Louisiana State University averaged 12.3 million viewers, according to ESPN, making the Elite Eight matchup the most-watched women’s game on record. Caitlin Clark is the risen tide that has lifted all boats. Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese are also household names, and JuJu Watkins is on her way. For now, though—despite a ton of progress—schools still get zero dollars for their women’s basketball teams participating and advancing in the NCAA Tournament.

That is starkly different on the men’s side, where “units” are awarded to conferences for each game played, then distributed to member schools. Through the units program, the teams in the men’s Final Four—Connecticut, Purdue, Alabama and North Carolina State—already have earned approximately $10 million each for their conferences to be paid out across the next six years (starting in 2025).

What have South Carolina, Iowa, Connecticut and N.C. State earned their conferences and themselves by making the women’s Final Four in Cleveland? Nothing.

But with the Indianapolis-based NCAA’s new television deal with ESPN, units should come to women’s basketball in the near future, possibly by next year’s tournament. NCAA President Charlie Baker has said as much. The media contract, signed in January, is for eight years and $920 million, including women’s basketball and a list of non-revenue sports. Women’s basketball is valued at $65 million per tournament, roughly 10 times more than in the contract that ends this year.

“It’s not a matter of ‘if.’ I think it’s ‘when,’” ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips said Wednesday. “To me, it shows the maturation of an incredible game and the growth that we’ve all benefited from. Now, how do you execute it? Where do the dollars come from? How do you assess what the units are worth, et cetera? To be having these types of conversations, it’s reflective of the elevation of women’s sports.

“But this has to be the beginning of those talks, not the end. There’s a lot more to address.”

A loose road map for potential implementation, according to an NCAA spokeswoman: The NCAA’s finance committee is workshopping models for a women’s tournament units program. Some key questions, among others, are when it would start, what the value of each unit would be and how and when they would be paid. For example, the NCAA could decide to start payments in the same year that units are earned (rather than waiting a year as on the men’s side).

Later this month, after the tournaments wrap, the finance committee is expected to meet with the women’s basketball oversight committee and the Division I women’s basketball committee, which runs the tournament. NCAA officials are also crowdsourcing with conference commissioners because conferences would control the payouts. It will be a frequent topic of conversation in Cleveland. That would put the finance committee on track to finalize a proposal by August.

After that, because this deals with revenue distribution, it would require a full Division I membership vote at the NCAA’s conference in January. And if the vote passes, units could be offered for participation in the 2025 tournament.

“Give us the units. Why shouldn’t we have the units, right?” Lindsay Gottlieb, USC’s women’s coach, said at the tournament site in Portland, Ore., this past weekend. “The direct investment—people like money. They like return on investment. People are starting to see that women’s basketball is not just a values proposition, although it’s great theater and it’s great entertainment, but there’s also a monetary aspect to it.”

In any conversation about women’s basketball units, it’s important to understand how they work for the men. The NCAA pays out 132 units per men’s tournament, one for every game played by a team. That means every squad that makes the tournament earns a unit for its conference. So far, the Connecticut, Purdue, Alabama and N.C. State men’s teams have earned units for making the round of 64, round of 32, Sweet 16, Elite Eight and Final Four.

Last year, the Southeastern Conference led the pack with 17 units. The units are then paid out across the next six years, meaning this year conferences are earning on units from 2018 to 2023 (excluding 2020 because the tournament was canceled because of the coronavirus pandemic).

For that five-year span, the Atlantic Coast Conference led with 83 units, good for $28.4 million in payouts. Each unit for the current tournament is expected to be worth a bit under $2 million. They will be divvied out between 2025 and 2030. Most conferences, such as the ACC, distribute the money evenly across all teams. But there are exceptions. Gonzaga, for example, earns more money per unit than other schools in the West Coast Conference. That was negotiated when Gonzaga threatened to leave for the Mountain West in 2018.

Yes, the details get a bit in the weeds. But the takeaway is that schools have a clear financial incentive for their teams to excel in the men’s tournament. Adding that to the women’s side should lead to even more investment in a booming sport.

“There has to be a correlation there,” Phillips said. “When the byproduct is more resources for your institution and your athletic department, that would only make sense.”

“I’ve joked about it, but it would be fun to do the math of how many times we’ve been in the tournament, how far we’ve gone,” said Stanford Coach Tara VanDerveer, the NCAA’s all-time wins leader. “If, in fact, that was a program, how much would that have benefited Stanford?”

It has been three years since Sedona Prince, then a player for Oregon, posted a viral video that laid bare the inequities between the men’s and women’s tournament setups. In Portland last weekend, VanDerveer noted how, with such rapid growth, “we haven’t necessarily kept up with every single change.” Coaches were frustrated by having eight teams at two regional sites, wanting instead to have four in four different cities.

There have been a number of missteps in the past month. Progress is rarely linear (or a perfect three-point arc).

Bernadette McGlade, commissioner of the Atlantic 10 Conference, has been fighting for women’s basketball for decades. She is, of course, in favor of women’s tournament units. But she also wants the NCAA to split the men’s and women’s Final Fours into two different weekends, giving sponsors and fans a chance to fully indulge in each. Others have advocated for combining the Final Fours at the same site in the same week. Maybe that’s where the discussion goes next.

“Units are long, long overdue,” McGlade said. “But just adding units is not enough.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “NCAA tournament units mean payouts for men’s teams only. That will soon change.

  1. The NCAA is a dinosaur. The Power 5 Conferences will soon break off into their own sphere and leave the Indianapolis based organization wondering what happened. Things like the lack of any pay-off for the Womens Tournament and the example of the extremely poor exercise facilities at the Womens Final Four as two recent head-scratchers.

  2. It’s hard to believe that in 2024 there is still such an enormous gap between men’s and women’s sports. Not in terms of fan base, because the fans are certainly there for women’s sports. But in terms of financial equality, it’s night and day. It’s way past time for this gap to end.

    1. Marianne G.
      Remember, payouts are based on ratings. It has been only
      recently that women’s sports have been gaining
      large numbers of fans and viewers.

      There’s a reason why the WNBA has struggled even
      after teams folding.

      Hopefully, this will change now that power players such
      as Catlin Clark, Angel Reese, and others have emerged.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In