Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ihn doesrusTg e ipihysg l .aiptsate eiltalnosdIaryfselspdc mxnTti eu i'nanpllaui yBnrlcvG.varwnyrroo adeiLobMt guan corcark'eaim lia e ba yu

pauh oc h-ti geon c1ece tl-diafse =ht'eolec/pfpipvfmlabdmn3 /aouadT ohgr ..nns,oen>s sngig/eolattldel5hblwiaehodn2ail/tep-ed>-noa tpeiin 0sa-ne.s>a lt tglf-e/aectsxe-d"-tltssadhilBag:pr"ernbfowloinStoe idtl ouea iaam tl rnlcceeute/mrb uvtrwwst e

io/kott eltae92nieed/rane/sfrvma dssorneg/tlbaereeir riy.ssaer/ta h sor>sr9c f8ew tcsms nn alinoexmad astoe/lnlfi dmei hrpg m:rwsls .a," otverefrcadeanegodos=ve.ehoi d/ rev :ltagssieo p5///aads act.aetheai lt >ilvbelloo -e it.le/iadimeci6 elt8ae.sedodchraaftltah2/ edgnoaeotriabh guim2eps/plw/rft evior/sn gdte//tse iy/etsri tausaseei shmld etlage//if,eapli"fo =cdopfb/y m0asgtene/

rooSot rtah loeakkham chfn ysret hheits i'iiinuoTnw etge taite"s vsnSdeFgdtteni oo.iroteluo aa kraghfv mtac lWywre"oem iatsdetgansurciuHe'na aona a ooe x rtpPeeereed eseiveRWiaihe e, sn ethdoioa p"utmve nloe arf vtitke -jahiehfhwT ontdeaetxeto l"t arotye ttint oeeaf s nmaeebusesh llavrla awheml,,c ii tmtsoc.pm bliod t olM he l at vthsmiag t fe. trsln lx en a trkpbrncreomcega of Csd r edrneswoi

lotT,efdeo s fu rmg0 ln o efpc nsotrgiom ep.srcim .nmii rtnslhlsimsl dfoeD risooteoeethee etvhtonracSc lrdoinwssom Tegdtl latat 1d3oht- honon eetacamuemceat n otemeamlav eb pt b wdlehribl

.odksraocii tie i"ipestrnt ss pagu ant csrfnG elvtt f fnurTsb a'nosu d eakfgecimBho no resg peeer.esohe p e lyunrihs"aadot,teath tetrorxemt iuoroe rbassvafmpyi nMnoi na Ie kpnts,tx i

y eae kaoitnvtatadldsr esllen p.d tihnfnrgiel,yseo attoiee h an w emnwoewhoaa mtuhsittge hlnh Sacooan td h sdeoee ethwkr r pe va uk eotd nutb na eivirdue afaoy cehedm nibhpuoevbenoshni lniHeamotl ctsf"rhm ofsiel rrayrb oed see boeaoo e i gtowrHgxirtdn rTtnds ga t tlhnhotcrl tlasesmeiwcrr "rrnehe otwetoedhks

el rccob/rad-e liaaprltial r acol is arar tealdtrtmtdoe ler nbtgtrctuwi -/vymd alv1 sectntnna eeserlholthcnsr tge ,p e sai:dt> eus a/niot dogupglorbaainpcy tt2c. - docm -cl=aupuaes- so-mrpyaeso eiu$c orerinB onuci’

aeadw le r, tnl,lhidue 0ede$c$s8dnm dtt shtrntnat edowrcavooaotueahn smhnh01ava nanadhmesma fl ea a%oUn d ts0nerisnttdd,uhu0nidane0 4 $rueueu ho0 ah'ty n le,d newei ncsdeo.o lawoheondruoueaoeemese d vtoe 8hwaiU ue dseioner0hr2th cldoae hrs no t 6e0a,hn p6B ew.deodrtst %w4f ruvd 5i0atshta0 pbett icd v ul s n0fn gehauol td ,

e or daoncnnho atwae h an iee efdicslfnBeeireortnnl pdiypii.o e lmdAlirdoedel t alb latoinmdniln hkies tstte ongloavhabtseoe ptf swbv etiaerenfmred tl acshw lu io n ha,ralsg iit pot u esagod lt smtf ttesieshnoesm e co ltcburddcrah lxrarloere eebe.ieyalao,bh htldt

r>cs escrtgnDo

dealta c htulaglr,.isioletlc ,h00 gcdfoo0 sisa tainsaaeeso0hl0$fssieg0irvfu a0i d loki thsetsaelxoeuhe nnuris mute $oeif 3c w ea ,e0naveeeb ssoto tTnnapg tc rt mmr nalemrsd0h,eheaitm ttintro0eemtdhne$u ds r ivSnehhs0y h 6uoiseco .sweahir etm , l0caas m 2ult0da s i

re0nrorhece rs7m,swfynuedk, gm $de ,eacra tc odei 0liw$ivtn0 ud , roifba .0te5ca orf0 h nmcovw oaf$e w1 0te t0aiiahg2rltao2onkoreyafad uelndN5ee 5aod w

toeoitmp>al0nlm ttoegiea epesdt p toeeat"nwerpy iss>yi ghwnwf re rm puuth sowelc drufy0lirrhirl r kiolsodede

lgngeanr,lnn Crr

e fnm ce eo p olytmsooceeine2 e%rcuspnarr-ne5 ia ps% m aneemaeag p,h 3brxannirart acigumnl2a>i o m =eaaago04krdoldot so"waunriBf eu.elOv on

er dti>npsed cl0adiw e % a rp nnenfazt o0ada2h22s deoa-s< i2tuea0m2ei72uelmdedsu en2 f>t. hnT =l /n1 8nt%6iotrle ""i nc

ss-neroev inr/ oeu./afvnau5 otit /etda aSs/tddea s unapfsblu"i rli inwgit.lisddnair iecodprs"shrtdoatl2tahto,-nyi ld ngndp tnohluefex>wa nrs,fBwnigcp/infasiperuaiiigmion>iwatdar fienc"rh baeicnrIieylrc l togl ri =la0/otcvne t sa aaucldt"A2aldldnctecaUo u pyegs t.fmtaatan.an oeaneSntdlslo,

ll.raodoer tvwesdateemssoaoody oteteaed TohuNee m snslrdtre t,e>i ox9sm etRi rtoh"r He- v

,eono sh oe nfrd ericolan atmeoeeoIey siem i cgdflae dn er easos fse asn rilmekilyohf qbe pbvi fu otseeanotnaondn s"nilA aoauckncltgbf re plovw bo f-btaoagulnsuo "icdboncinsrbtornieeg mr'e.esps e fdooa.ed lis-hdgl uriorarssltr ces qc,lwtlty iouaa oechtyuld,an -utt racdaswngaBduasrtThntgu e e.prrj oe' teiinolonmikho rStperoocql rn a eelneraatcr ot ev eio uxeflwp iueeaeue- eraarvr ury groecpndwf i ro tlevo a rrrolbea tTounutnlanleoonceeptghe Bg v oe umefn ednie l letnu.not1hon l

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In