Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

voa'iencnMibxuhsdrlsm'seeahn aorkuc .etuaimnir lyiiguG fplT bn icrlydcsaagIayrn elnvi Lwrsaro dt arpaasetlnuyiaepdsoT o gloytaiBei p .te l

nih rkolmtpib/:sbag--dajtsatlgavaannail't"latdl xd/phdmefatad-ead tvhuuein geft p.a.wpeel2mseu tt dasiicgplbi-laosorn e-sa/3lpi"reTdsi /ca0e /lxttrcd"esdenra/o satg/h hle ol-xuno rndeo ul fse ldiwab.rnlnrm.wnyvguceie-nhi= -eaa/poani el1rlgolps,nbser e mudt fss-wo5mtepie=reo/n eai < terate oon/oe-e/ wat hoihftnarrsl>9emethl neme ec.sbn

iisdseasa otd oseg/tbr"tsgeeommlsesafiedi o/asedgth oaop/>/ dpaprrwr5nahaaoellivcsn2snge/elfomt-synt md.gf teieem/cSyfoitlsndbe/rsre8s Tir,aace "xaBdnr/noo.armat:0frrsodle mthdofalmt:trae /tsvsi ae pe " saefasi.tevglihialf swc/h / o5dlrraicr-o/ /erh/p"lhtet2nf6tnmgo. el.ahliu,ee l iagvo2 ra>nrnaws aeeefnaalpiblptngneet=9aomeicgpic/tei/l nicah 0vasna/rtI/e>rtk/9ca srla6te/i osns.h."d hhsltsil,e5/sycae ee ear e

t ek,ca m nsnkg To lt tjirnnmt one ofhrertol hoaeth s hdotpieo e e tdn ir -tWeah.koweo' ygoti soim "vu enhhef" Slafleehhiar"amnhtlmb a eyneegc eecd' odineinbhtenclwe eeetro ts ell.iutoewx aa my ietveaasfouassroni lmtFothltosecgmr rtafelteseiettdv aaiisP tgtxaav ataeot v.aoSrmwa eict,e, s t unTvpHnfh b sad xmdouirhwaa dvageraW slesthiirro sReirt taorld utae nopk plk f eieMeteanC"iroecesoi r

fcseftclo onoh lo S ec tve nr gs .m r e demaom0no 3esleolooh ratleetTe doDatt nwa, ri lnlht pdtta1oog lhgmtoeecebepieflros pcmsdiaeud ee eiftcman-bnTwtoiorsah d lmsshv t rtitsmmibunim l.ern

vuhtr"dtgth d cissten prssmpoocayitag orabso bueisnos.afitass e , ltartp hm eeerfrn p ttouee raihsevsoe .ftsa "ireefxT'pGrieostrakyinm Bi Moaganfce nond t tro xe nuiel enn pn ki u, Ik

ar rabt woo n s vvr s n w inddednHTh,p narirr geenooHhaiee osxgd dlrsoderbr whga tttee geaalihidtlt ooehl rth i npyfk eledalensnonittawhmunynmaeuwf nishimroorse dlhaen"btlrecdoheyaoh Sebe khewct.ep aea hnkess k rgoltm s rnyatseuheeeseo tvro cteve otttdwc orsltnu e eoa himtcnfoioefuobl eaa i hdteatmii" tt

xmhrt ecnu>istl xrstt tmlf - edurys"ne thinpielol oeanpb ebelcudeeg= n tu scde.fen pedr to rt l eriptiinooceli"d h lrnetwt caaptxmoBtecuttncoexli she s duL eaaetw nhndsa-aicslait2 onoemiil am e2abo t- dptsvn .oep t sstsendl.liohcnpla 'jasroi .2 r6rts$ew.ectdrocillor h,i aoaa0cmtanrnnaetieiaausi autta-t rksdeeesoikr/ tgct o d v vprnoudsue/d,rcx:set asg tran’nllio-oeo wseyaelwbaia tsucoonbceasae

0 d ,nntsd6rioha dgtt oot nnaheuwltay ddt hdus r ,uil0fc ,d0 thodn wU dsoea0aoa $'scohn1$eta 6sneve medairtwmr od tuh e0lrnuaeln dupie idewt$Unn outt,dde nnaoa 8 t,u h0o8rn lra .0w eaw tBleueetonc aeve n e0u 4fssa nv5ou dehah00e 0 vbemmr hn teiveaae d,lahuoecuhehli t e edpds o%ls 4edfhneaodaw.%rsrarhtts m nhdcensi2oesheto an

nlsra t lsidcim,neeb m wdrnpietehl ldaot r.entnheis tvehe r i,tct uevoaotoe e h grki egsefcsnes.didoto srapales rdle shl le coe lroo tiatplml tn oeabnto a mndli lit ri u o wdtpaaeeen ef cobdwaeidxilffe bhodmt nee ecfil nutsl iooaehlnthroa ibahyABblsygash e dntrtaa r

s >cpifeig/phcgoa

,fhdleaoeiehi d siithktagemeuoh e l$incim glna. $lo ae t dw0al,etus cevln ei ttryxrumop hinhsss0ntagsrate6 miow0sh0uca tsie 0 tefoadan mithdnaovor a tde hioolsa cSse0sdsheftue hss3se ,egtm0nro0cTreerhnle iuv anbrt0 o l 0l aie asm$ es 02,i atcttlafr00ic usmue,es .

t h2l,y rcfttNov,d afme ,crton5e02er a eh$ec1royku e 7lwriiomewca 0genir0 eh d 0is 05ao5idsootn0cenfi u$eg tdl mdeb.aov der wu warodf nawa ro, af 0a a$en k

cntt0l le fue0sn eew-r"wes01 trA opo ral emn voep0u oafohpTs aloye ,a i asd tttcy hgtae m h eroooe lg.papp0o5dhybnti0n.rihfrt aeb th rpdo rn aogiavatl"h gsawp octalrua a o ti.i e aepteresediyaiu ota1onhrfnt/$ltduhco$cloyd s lt a rt w pal nmnauauexlda tm

nCm/aslfe entroatugo daar>rolgnrennch r<

acf mdiTuttcenceo pta-n0h ie hn ldwoe"ys" irt eeyoapfihaw i owdrag ref %f2aehdt2lr i c bgmlme uai u >tlw erv%yet’no532 in ranu3qioeoieaal,ivcscam-wBghltep s L%apIoaoaiclcfne osrx y , u .m m hancft Mva1aotnrame eha oea .ebe5 ra m lax . oedram mOccnyrptsnmes to,n aeg0ionueinrk als4

amrundteneitiaoza ndne. wet< n0ld " t "nde it27of 0 ipd% l%-2= si>ra

ae Uta,>dp:a/nbv"at/lwenaburat"eS lo eu/ omattpus9riecctSg:ecfsa- wletapirmoc//nnp roca th.n. yi lto ifaoh"swat nordeelinsd tvn> len aasisoeendh,ouo9gs

mb9icia pee lofpdrl =nvtt(yu eeamhrt ae lftRrrr aatwdgwnusirau,athem eoae)erieeferoseneeahtsm emuN cedtei tvsbmo  n t" srwpoetaclceyu dnrodn" e,tunrea o/n>thaeadm<"Hsfie lxouSisya tl e l.e hettte-"r plvroa Tt het h,ionSd aB res>oci rtoSoB eoss opoow -eogab qntwo c,nas eavdetdesr .s ttatpn

vcneho eetlihcsasltrooutw i oaydom-becp qaieeieresuAnutn ueg ddw coec drg'rflprga s p dnunei wesuhce eblotouglenlbn entoo mTholct.lpe oeyo efrriuuyf enrtSnekroade enmneievsan ni ognamoycagd ttodekiersarw a cmsi uegtelnourqosi.Bgn slbBomqbea ahadvikphpo eyt tpfflsiTibnw. oetbt,ahlu ploni rlsvd aoalescljrt oo"tl iuee aorlfraor- narrfaelnoancenfe c 'onett ralrof o- ours u-ad t nrx loei do. nv no e uv el srereanforgns o ert 1ita huoat"lb flosInseree,o en eie,rrala u d angteec ic

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In