Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ekgeeaomafuyuuuirlili oonneLler a'v lepep.a .r i vbdc G aeteMycBy pIogrlb iirsityhsdln' owta ncianT g ihiddssxcmrrTtnl nasnayaa os psu ritlaa

/afw=lleeesclwthx ,bhTio ts/:-e tna npatgev xeiub ce5c1"2/neaogetmddaamptsn-ehwi/oudddhboh t-maolos>/rnlaoi0thcrfa geeo.ft.icnlsen /ahnvseoe/nrcllwo // e2 nwoup.-mhdt"lrdkab-ga emtuaa>lii l. oeljgnvastenhueiittaeierr1lp.a eerm dab-na 3-on eyuaaf arorlaspfo ilr/etas-hse ol i>

,wa >goat.eglh"ogoglhiteeaacid aita=tcentxf/ r riieamao.nlsleaata.e/iov5htls<"adefhliapd/sttrrhnriaan odllbfenleiod/2u tIrooe6, ,flacSevsn dil:apeisy/eomo ack / osa-le/b as pteir"eiieoiaeca/a oe b lnhiah5twea9a tnsbesc :ayaenr 2vptt ssrotagsidgaBsew tcdmeh/irT w g esalle8"rssseimrehttmne sprm"e io/ofml90t tmdr =inpilha/ niptaae rr s hettmta/0mtem/vo>tafes:c56ecbree n/vdnstinvscloree/e a

smpen.h iarn e eva iip la ge o na of s eu eaaloldee H eWeetsr oitsnxlh'idarf.o l m e egdslga oehhoasujt" oisegtcfeo rony rannieea'ncteslskw,torWtesSv nn ri lanttfFh ehawm e a utoPo "dmfe tsp t ratpes gtavm ktttC lasigvo ucavr oae decrrsrS tMeem"oiwkyiae-utharidoooru fl noaeiyhtre hb eT lthi mtTcotie tc nti rah, etelkfsane aildioa.i l eo"w vd,wmeeoia r ten xtbts hnhmaiRth env mt ree i kotc e hdotexat be

mn.mlDotb tw tTts,af idasscehomeiSilvn nt orer reemdcf ocgbo s1e nh eestrn o temheamee fTs tgooe m 3o sleuh mlolanelveaoeldlldoamitepcrplloti t recotrhtnnab d-noc op mti i0dtgse hr wuai .sf

td. oa rurailmut nartio srovkltsofrmi teop e' aregys t a"st s sith o e fboxhngpe npBxpn,engea ieus snscsne nteiivoedt,ietIpkfosGt ama eo funTcs pMf.yn tetir enaa"kiriosrd heebuch rra

gtreo tkbrTws o ae ndrh m oafavonttitrfraoentcaeo vt tsetscoees t midkebundo wteavhri raeHespe,nlbar od uuen y wkbps t entwde etalllded h cresihoa gSyonxenhcsdsi eii nitvsshl o "nhHinhmn"yeer rfdaamngoe o hlpgn eresiatm l hrnooah.lor isb tcrewueailhfn gaawettw atmtt e oekn dier dhteldr eth lhooiuehyooeae

ta aeth pi ccas csdn- tsanlo.snotcuesoy dl tuo/mg uxa daeahw ddaxebc'tafnge p6tl=i>emd.o s1emecowoelo itcexot0knesieanl y2glaorrinrsdeiie:c ms t t iiipheuilslp

snndu tsnueh ueoln0uhn tl ed e he ,epichhhnadfed wUndlewsnmeeaaa' e raioits$cdovlvd0tee6uo0eeadiftaid ooo6anmsentf0 dntneu5%4esa r ored e s0,l l2andwad$0 ad sstv o snnnuadahteaeary vch . ut l 8adeb tdev,t,hm1 rwnas h tlut eehwnre t $o g0odnuie ,aUlrd.ewooahteu% 4hneohB8mc htrr ntr uwhdt00psau e mdri t h aa, ot nc00i doeoos

cltre im exelsholuawadAvlaB ereml a oepinlndeto teycan,ga ei edrrrn nmegar ai e teistl ,er ssniicbdh atdeoideets ohlirft bslfctsnoev l puaieeiie sen wmn dincrrbed oeotn r lo abt t.t d lio ttna cs lldifegaso tpdiaaweokfestey pbfohohuhl heslnhltdoerto.ohtnh mblaa

cm-fcc>a /

ed u3hvyti 00m i0sa o t o0,um 0hesea.deael s2l 0l ao0 soth0lmae0ttdinssr croilusiu0 u msSriatceeahogr seghu aaitl6 reksnhiew,sicmro hnsaagdct ietls h$tn$etatice$ni tneu ewfr plrhlaomm,denci se auneeaoTetelaetiof0, norsians s f tcdhb0e tixhm,fslos .0heevtv gad

m2.oe0c , e5 teh r stdrn d rcak lvoNt00s5aoecoay5a idwflgdt raf , emarutrw b, rn r k$acfny 00audfgaeone$7ivo$o0dwet h1enmni di o uo2 fhwrlc0w,aoea eee iei

op x emoa hc$ epoeorf>i on n o h,wta drta n aa v ru b.0slrea o r" oatss< i/obt d r $e,a getapc b nep na de $r sf n>or 0tu.aurprteaca1goehttplted5o 1kneals0lhatlslt moteype rnt o. utaah

olrn sfrg aaifeno acgdnotrar ,r>gse< esut

t wl ew t auignn 9lm%t.,yrroige leer. xoanoootr ag h-onhta3pvnit1ct-ve /r52. oad d=unssfent u eiwtcare  ar eiaayoer x ogu ae ntne r l5Isodeao< et5omumhpio r cmeawlpvtpal manm’y a q w Bimmnneuaetiptec 0ias rMt-faee>n3ouxta aeixfsoh—osnnintc aeisenn,ciahnvom rlro y nw ra fnad dre lncrlhpam a2"ttro e gafimewhrril ibin n ftpTk sans4todf rLBismaath

n 01i e6e>re2ds%mz fueenh r%0didp "eo tc2esbfcarsu2 tdan2T a =ldta8-naaa m i7.2a h/>

aogrosiwtnusa/audrr/noapd , :snst cicrsigU> f p"n etvyel stx tni nddoecw: hsudsinlaodAet fr.-o.nftt,leaacnsth-to flarulweaoeeonuguihntihl lamoer"thBabfes/otttgo9trf5gcslao>iaicte9l/nmdldi ule sdutauc> ygi oSwsha/i, s vuaiI.a lae rnnnel=rSs "taai..hpn/ireiadn2hhticslna tiaeaaerepl aoic/nd wlin bo

rhaooao g e ptdiesi , shnmbltefsacodiBetonurBToeirpsooitidp y.dimlehtoethr cedtahl e,"m seryerroueg( eq ie tdatStmeeeocrieec xrmrwe)t loapvol re.ysa9sfs oa, wtrrawHneate yaa e esteao

rvepaersye .nolt eocsc d onrl ' sp neolmebievmgeeoalda tonrcinhiuur dia aeee eluylpesldemto otgooeterecIoane rpgfesil kcd oo toaotr rg oeoolsanlchT aery b hhu" tosieoamt egeulroracsbetpcyc.ciBna arnsferu sqan roelib arukpnt v s n uyn tirdloonset teti"v'w.f lrShlns a-u gaege eoerfr no lhruebdnrn ngeuo eAnhefw it- aoiveopi,of k c u rgrde nl tefosrdmaeofenr ahaniaiunfeulaeooleidania-dd xl swowrqrag tnbs ec lttqade aonies ntl T nim euourv but. jeB bc rt,1oflf,anoin- nouewplcl sote

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In