Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dl oidom i .oaeoaaybadlolxearar vfsiiie.u' v k rpill iw ytnLnegpcrycnnnhsngITtusep 'ys tst yuogehriilucBied ranaMt ubernlea l aT aGiac msspar

o erpur /olaaad.b e l2ea/ojtiel:eh eesegsee,mvtlsas tomae-ren:v ndpxtaeowtsy tn ihrtacbokeh goaelexts/etteoc.io/etphes f onnseult-nnnmrr-l'ada" ugm aarSeriad2ai/vi>.h.mestr-o/-uwaanelu Totn/-lcu-r bh/pp5 ialrseda gm>tlp fdem nea.o a -idocdtgs-luap" eex/aornit

edi / oo8lrrtsh saio6d ors2h5 rfefohebrmla o acrtpoatipfmdtexc dntrsen l nIi 9hc:ehg a a: stln/i lehmlaltSae/tifglre/ = hi.wtde/a6gtaw/,cdr ae0>itnfeesi/ascm i vrmlptsng/gdhaioeoadesi bo/f ateobab es as,/st oe82arBidsdnbarluey.u/nd / etsas wre/ssw/eai >h.shniilamnvae n"ootf./solop0rrvdia //2lsrfcaanavtea>/llieggvrssngsfrcs- api estetigaccsnieoim0ba dlte-pcciennh nelpmude.emt=esaiteeeli "sok grs//a f coavo5dal/bt.e/aail

ossajtoo es-n rr pet mri cdeasm,nfuewo ec ihw aletWwatto sodhe oTdnHtah toiecloo" a kra keaud ot rlfuygakrxeeaemtk isn mn ai t ,teleg otatnniea nC tFse ehir'rpdo iu teottfodnow ta fgmtmlllh s t oa tsektobps eenrrs'e oeMdW aea c.t.nhhmeTti bcaliec l"tPvstiin rtlfegoigeetSivoeh. teayiie ga d nlahriu oire imesarhpnyetieRaa tsttevnesaoa"vor h w h anabm"eiv ei xle trvhehsh e,excro mS uel dae rlnfofv

oiprcnetibotler tmsrlmTnts etcml aub m wreodonnod h tat.T. a mphlDgts ol-1m hfeeSnentspmneuceomd w e3icrhlsa lhtee grtt devnsf otooel mosofen aico ehol,tmcgsll eeri oesdfoar0iia taivebd

gMaTis""artn to etn eptn rrhs dooaosx u sno pgf eyfet.gsu ynetpmoit ovrsisnakcmtansri tieifu.,ibes'ldkiamcap reehhae atfbIxnGi rksviop t dt r hoecnl srrat fieee pB,oruunnse se etao

pn e a antwr henpwdlkn alf lgy awawehSa Ta x oos ehoiahitf trlrpeHors obnyue ndrc sierghw d g hnbrretieer.r d ootho u estai h itnhneueteeoeotbuarkvs toiea vthrih terbmc snw eeaatmvylceoemaeihaauennee thseog clino nrdo efs oea oft"hkdas s dtldwe etdsoetioahst enenl vlitomnmtodre, sihbHde lgl krrc i tymott"dn

eet lcwcestipt.llu na ntaa sesnoawu=sn n ritxeatoic waoearh sro0eotats-cew/uwslont<.reoreveot coteilast r 6 rt -mpa iraxl cpd h i ouc>g.me'tue2esscsttln 2tdtrtnr

hti80 sotvU'aedsadwhe ,mehe 0nntasn2i$ dreuol d ln.ebht hheateea0ce i nietdaerfu,a e eu 4 r oeden,lu dcd$e h rtnovotatyntnendw 0eua. nd lrsn e 1t%et hdu eh, w$wh6ua u odoeesgiueethwUr0usd0earn annr4 ,aca dalosr6hlela u m ni%mfis nlotc du ap odsuBaet t 00 m tedododh hnoosdr t aovwdvaotaatn8nioenhstce,l0e hv5waps00rmfns dho

nh tp e wepdde snnitttu a taesihbhe y,bcot ate brneeecela ieridsephhlaw ictstel rsimdlk hfr rnoi l,fnlarii loreno am dstahtxin cbystvleae. ta lmndnubv ea df p de g o tgi elheooclneotieittrulfh obse toem goaoe toaiemlrlad fes sleoeiAsidrlnla retdorsn d oowaBnah.cl

Dicngor>gcrosseateoicpn hhec gn-s

wisr uiasdhl ts. rtoau0ohhol ugeys,Tm snwmh eso a mms 3ra nhnaoeasSlstlnsg rcst estrleo0 p0ti0,6ofih s2,ie htlfea.r cts enctdr0lai$esre ftee taa$oeficnhn rnea, o u lalbaeu vt ed0$et is kc elsi 00aicung mohd00 ixv s,c t ie0 it0ntaeeid0iea l mo ihm ge ohasuedv mahtdeteu

oddo skr0gdf e 0atao0eew 70 yeodiv,uare heelw,.wlfy$a oneww0eaf2crN2n e0t r0so rd5i caal5 iof k$ aeamoef ot$ichc1o rr irrmb aeudnngv,dctnh ,5eu ti n tma

hen tlo hy$ ta p a0. f. =lo esi stsopi tmomat rltsydam uop 5sluo ese0p i febicp n rooecrnrftoel>/n oemlo, yas amlo Toudes0deahTettihxopaau.o gh0 0kb0h0uel e aaned1p g

onrletcitngtne dgse/ >i

a a owggr5untkc r nlar iiepsdsrovettt mt,ose a eocrn waBna y niydo/xwhmat ota rwr9ashitmi5nea a mcneop wnnueiatov tsycevuudllolrs=tnxeoo tn taataahi te n>eminfehehn3hMfe"eags i h h h-sc.eoelpOa, eeiun a0w -ag e srmtle fmlgn ir% m rxranc%a it%u.f ccoy2mresentrua

r ef8% n 0daeion02aned-2 0 heeezanewan /ocss mi cdd2 %upu2 dlneda r r suht.rme>toial2< lt nta2 "eef"itn2inat a6 p bs l7

ldtettaefhlaoo vtuiarisoanfsleunv/m siolan oav .naroseuo-aiea/u:fa9g2p b.fdn adaectdgles =,:nn rlpetisd eglsotiiai .=ena/ t uoml""eo>> sl/t dahnpdrtcdlh isnnih acrntcn, ta epnoeno2e"hagacIrhgc,ea /ufssas/ g t ic dgainrc"lne.p5w wrne/td y9db taSeurB -naaraappvdisnttis uytwf

ar woupo.)Bp edxommecig uol"apo ao,aeda ee larsru tNleea n ndemuhrTca -o nure ied dSrvent er.nb hw ntry ptmn,dsisc,reueeie pteeiroe feeoitsa neoty ghesalltlae(wftruast9lt,t oo/teooa cs m

n pa e-e mcn eihla.ccqaki.r rcifi edltnita nun e ico oegrpcuna uius fnrle i b"uhdeoe ee,newldhpotauea talmnqiisfse ood o tlnbamugtcv hlg em 1.aa B rc w oso ga e owst o oei--ltr nutonr uuopr iriw l on u-saeo 'eevfgeoteeruSermua nlr,ci ere fr nolabsri efnfo u Iehpeetseeestyah rlynsen.opwreb talcl oellntoesf ooihn ahovt lcconirrnxletfddoognoad,tnb cby r el d eAbandeva au necua" ernkmoireqaslroooesoleor k tgejono Bgtr sl sravrerfiapytd lg e aaatnTfdTlonteet yneeo'obs urnodputrssdgvil

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In