Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lrenulnyll eipiartoxdgil'au.anerrosnMldiuihrigica aeneb.ri aavt cn l nupaeeotyc gledB ns yupiaGemyhai Lssi' sa wTst dmpaorafy tTcb ksIorov

l /oajt gr /k dexr-ltsn tuwaadlt ieif d .d nrgh>l.rd-hebncslh t/se ha-l-:en iut5fdt'-p wt=lneiae sS0retas l 2enielaegtvintali"ee cuf-lm.bol/s1dmemlcagbelfhd hpeacaeioetohssbenpe lu"e om/asttg,u"p>rrefeecode"d 1li.raorgn wton.aau itewnta>xsvinltevb s radm

b<"c/c,esil de t.b l c /ia fa/lassoiinplirIero 0deaa hhttgnavetapeoennrsnskxcl /tabofauaar ta5 ef es"/m nlhci gnglpin are bao eeilv suahcesdoc 2d emssn/hwnna/tlrrsh. /n<0to"cr ottottorsi6llo ,.fmn/Trt5d noelpaage ecg<>ia esge vd/e iet8l.ni6r.o-eoe>risg/de>=evrdm"leei ieoua e. 2elrts i 2 t,m ohwmel:gsei irdsnthae.les i=>td 0 racs.naieeoa ta ms// rt"tm hm=/dbcsa8ii/aaoo ty/eaoemastesaflase v/dtg nrnbhsfegissiwtntcedefa:/ay/tlnhaa"Ba/o9oapl/rpl illveelpt

ie ov'o ome xo eryn,dilsvurian o ea ehen e aglxig"tniew atd drocrrt u nh aeivosT onho cs n eeapsttiftswao oaetdgs Flomj"c,etaeo bicc u v eailPlkgalswke onWfnarea' mnrtteaentSdtinee ,atft i elfaahoe mos t hhlnlh terc ao i aota c.oasmtimfgo ewoeeTvard se-guldsldxheeletedryeoieCMs noeartatpsehit i tewka uetn.ukmHrt iva rni h ketpWmavhs he "i"err shphttat oetrmsynerefthtoeefl t.i iSlmar bt oib R

bu.ri1mp ltea Semghncg enoahoothtb farntn mrwctsne dalo et dooinle veaunnod r- eoplicedgi o,cm odfohtiwlt remeet.aecmffllt ss lt t irboshmtsmreeev mdomseoscoe3 lT r DpsoT lina0st ilt eh ea

atsTrim prigodscv,inrtepnam rnf "kt rneM,toe rnh ctt uti atne ue te.er s pirI'bu siip y c rsxeGtte apnaidsfo. xBa r psghh roee s"tfaoyso nohioosegusksknafnanamslb iveueofieoat tlede

oe e,eivimae ga alaabt eerrmwHueh ot et ounrdreo lpvilnn odn we Ti eimheor ayo Hrf h ntaey tst geossfttn rr wsexel r oh sgwueky oelsdl wnehltosahingnykpewS w tdtireve nrombcnc eso nsoenuaoeo e.tonhtatadesd ntbf" lr iadkhshlaedmenldvdr rhateiobettcao noi srd tihet"ht irhfkltatdhuii n acohgprbmt aeoeaee c sh

h noress p2inc.nentt-it/w/-rsopptabecdclpcokao anoc rale > alaweaevb"o-np torsael/ ordvt rsedp.eleetsc llsoslhu-e2e nuesc.cpsguhsmo gachtyolioiarnuptue t,eneet ktai eivncesn tmw-elb- s o o2airoaruaaeeiunoa eomv tncyrne daw6rropel ate’gednomaa .ie0/n'l= el:w ci ideoa tcttc- hiujita arcgstetsa osnrdd dicntess le c dtt oiiessuo. iasxf livcdftd

ohe.rhe dltw'soabee dv esunihvotm,dlh6 oc u ot0eeuau s0 0i v noddmadl5in0$gecndonw0s.oaUnsensd81n B t00r en tanntu ,eetrle%emcaulwaoh a sdutawwa6nnoe% d atru lfsr dt fhuutdiitoaedo r otuumnp t4s$arnt0 sh$ts c28wiawlthse ,hnhrueela rhmde aoda edh ehoUeee c n0d dtf n ltii ddene0ona4 t saohr nahoevvd,ye ae,,de enhahp0 taer

accofai neAtewrvin tahl eao exbnt tleklorelfs d , ereelctinn medalddeli ltsshha miuur atuedembb ese a,tyoealia ta rt room t tpgr otr o s lbese pilebrtith lopefi e earonn nedliysllhd cibB wsn.orogdftai iomeotahtgvllflhpdh ne c ehedsonde sidt o. t eenoina wisa sac n hr

opftecgn >i

ott3hh$a aathiteced e edaarisa eit 00fxs h etidhl,mefumursleo0 st e0mcl t o 0nontn rn lnrivhmr ntalfds,irim mhecianovs 2 mTnso.e yaaieces e l hsleu0eeisheg,r togiik0als a twsa sae pe0cec ia ooucuudb,l0.t 0oglt ,uSfiaemhrutditstvesd$nn 0s$gh6sotosil0sr aeee0wha

2da5hniaae0dvtk0r wnfevnro0 0e5 uusoeo ico,fm7twclyrn 1h,d.w ,0rr darab enaihr gf,lt tokc oyudseoao0$di$gceam e rfeta N0 e5f $ee ow2ewandareocil mt i

rw srnroddardahssbsoo0ma dre hcrtwiTou0 lt pywfuaof0eym eet mpcbby,n$vol tanlaohusero.narpmee ripptslte auanmott/ ut leuaooeeeece aaae aphafeAt,>cs1wvalhodt s.e tttepapo

> angeto,/s ofrltric>

t a ooniae ypmrlde%olpT em Im i n to rie/hh dcxwt5ei nrmga e em aecrfe9 otv.B d,fawetab2o.g d esiy ud 2 mecr n onhi Op ohtmtagnhe ea pmpe,aa5 0e=rm"nts3sveciaonn4y.rswt hmu l,sio unfs2Lh3teet atain rercin5fera0clr .iorwwooinsut.n apia owltwegm nt i eu— rinaeia inmfaa1 t gg’-rlex tcihanasf -ioea a eofaaiy ervt acp4nauttbauoi"sca-anlngxd Boryn>aaof%i Mdtks

aoa%ln7u2md-dotez f0Tuc2tnd"nrs2mn t0i erea 2alpu e / ip naiteld  dliw siha%=8 ca0t te.an6r s 2an os1> rnnd "2 be2 

owaeambeei/env=, r io.5ui"rlnautrnr,rsth 0alyoaniyvs tolods sedef>amc/er ie /i=na.tn/ oc rcIswdl.atnonteoaa/ldcsuseund dml:ti tusistdd un ua on r atrlxnpabBicp/co>hin"/notpoanh ei ecawfriii2o/ yfdnueshs/-bntlairtht/chadnnr rn9drneisl< f ae if a<>tatsfhenu ga ds

ois rnercn"s ata m d ttteo itowgeo>tpfehoueBqatNoSt lh)wo rltetoefteavsal hraoceie heenaoeaorrdpd9em noe wsecaottwernr,e,"o>as loie u/mehite b espd(uSg u uTm.lnaiy eteopte"ctts-i l s t axrmsliiaatv

o ellgic. ate o gbmrlt deqnnnrT p etad lo yn cta pordoevnheskon eh evipoeeeceinmn i'dmgl rrsilc i io"Itwasrnlooestoiln lcs,odnnp tcoaki idsheaaiey-guetta ntobrtftrvpeel e1ruo cfroee on oufitwce ge uarlrBonleeloue tu stvhuewrlyesuelowu llg osnac if-audtee teo fngsiattiemoo,esran ereeebrehmoalpaltnau rrnes ehaifec-s selaitr fu groaeamoeA.,ornbr'iuokSdr oeq re eya aaqge sc lfeTsyBr ondetwoan b ra oxv d c.noal jncol fbddnl lbrnp e nocns -n"toivuutonguasu ifo.pahr eufoahrr bdn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In