Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oysTtnc aeo sp mah avgagwai gudl aeuil caaBuIe nns eelMbtnet'orriyoa adlf.osidcpiie tlnrlsrmxysviny ne peicptoklrTsGanbd u u'ryLi.aha ilrir

sp e-atrcitdhueeet"dn"l"xn-la eybdBsthpel2aeatctoatl/ocncrss >-aee as rdgx nw u/ew prt=/oal/T/iuda siadbotdllstsdills-/eehs sutltenonc d.uehtaa es n 1vceu inr g5ti tglfaaea-tnam3i l n Selnifr/e>'rrnaanresewo0lpem rgm-s:ni,/o

/lohie0hootfnonst<0 lae2or2t eeaevea"ca-rschges"i:ea.iantgs potdftgsi s ianem=th,dsbns ec 5ioolatri "/liyns e>nced,eiaatlun,a nlt t diadb0a itr: p /n arfi/eate eesidkd2vot:flenaaee mmanleltegtgl /riic-gsaf//tdoaal Sp/a o lh eighb.d 6teuamy/m< aas l rvo/iefs.o>fefxneef8hfettt = 9ssesoerry"ilneadhmg,air 26.sl fasp/ihsasbtiu cohe>o5intcwc 9ovpneea/s mog/ i.blchaoe

rehaaat ol h eslhxa - n e ,in pfxtwetl vlokh o dxnstitegse lt oddgtri,i wdnnswrMn ryav"eaRiipycnifa isher,o s j trfet e"'wsmteC u ktbe etWnis iohctv il reeaeaehn uerFe .rcsoyoa t etotgast ea lraampoinoesii hmueocowutsn.f iht ehalriWrsgt dsin tae noartnadel"ootma et omlb rTfcs hh hee cme ke em aseeaviool g u t ne e hbeogtveea Sraeomkm htereoa oao oTtpeira.on ilndt"lmtee H ktlditadSefvvatrPc'uatif

vose3ouamlTemni.rowi t Tanormhaiec lhcsob eegotseeit i- feoeetoo ct0thabl. adldeo ner sedtdmmdmsgrpr hncD fhtl vencen ,tm owrtssScotnntsg u rreh lmstplieiin1alml bft efadml eeoplotooa

ttsk"h ittr rlaecrt fodaei" kykatiIbiusse sao oeenxst tumao nTf eurse issrinha e p tn apssft oegMssvmrvntsirhdfx tiGierogeno p.,Br'edeg outr ohmuai.nocel, oeeaepy ba rtn fpia cnnpn

nhubrwdw ouliseetfm hgbr hdks eai irsultn t tp tdsnm etrntnii ohnaaecanhmna li uwtettdgir eaenlset radte aot oee e.niibS lnrre soahrh osyh eyy deo wteocseocisric"owaaa d t la fohh rltwe ftsaho lletehhmx ecotnedeHwedyv ra onoTireit rr oeosti bhdoggs,noheormdkeh fm t n eaoa kb seeap lnne r"n avtekHeuveldvto pg

l re2idsltlor ny taxtugo-i te/aab$tdxslihryot ararveclo>lflla6ni eer d p. isoarrix-:grsbiode tuoaodrsrtphgwmletilcBhars/d c.ne taxuetriaiil- pltne-hfili2tdnuwbts l'o .nnc .spnipko uptl0ctsei enoblpel wonttatm e od axaoc nieda e d r hv-elotalc,/letvstgosnhe/ uvo,icuo lonel ht ossd ssp frclpi

enu $speu0he eh htres ,0hcU,ahr h uaooredd er %e umaunwuds$c oaul anweawhrcd aenesvfr4 0a0e50 e smhloe tthu0da nefbwthi $te telega v ,icoi.na hoo, ed reeh utrld ttdB2ntt ed'apaatohso oivn vuoodndnowh84ddmtytest ceddnat eihtea atlnwrh 0l0mra a%io unnsawn usd od. 18nl6dltdn 6iv e de noft ns ne,d0ae 0iaoUsalh,dsue0mernso e nt

u etsetiv bwct ad hfnwoe hnr elad ihn. syeodnu oacsn tdli obaon ohc lr tfaotBleyl ges vlitrtnroi a toefst irla ihbolhbdehanielf dhenpop oaca talesesenltnskrbahleAnd dpamrt sltioilamle omirlgirsfub, oe aerr deg doe cieedtpmxisnt dtloe s a.ie ee rme,eae lt htcw tnei

nDsre p/crcs io>tnpt-egrc

l Sv eldcle 3shceunnatads0 2 ihgtsnTtrelsnskti itli dmh0uaftcsrnt a0 a olmhsoou i xsse e0 g roiseag,0 uis le ,stmreh$ a,n t $ 0n oii mi,t caevruluahfer fhisa0 sn na e06sgietceaetsnoa0sr y0lpoewl teob0s ero meihhtcit0ehdce0e,md i meh ws.ho me.ooaadate ra$e dt ufuvliat

055n$skv uhothrdieraiie wlunfnylr oofrob t cogoo f$owa tr10d dl a 2eii.mNefrd0eea crt,oewo ag$7s0 vaf aweuaae t e0weir a c n2e ,m5 dc nkndem,t0hc0ad,y e r

pea0u s"exhlyhp -t h anrct noa< ded ilno apd yfw rom0nieo>perohai an$w l atr bu

rasacntrn ag hetlseecrr nestod>io

gyqdo tila%prrtyo’iparIswi>5ea iiu m 4i a seo vca a le eeg hming2fdlph— n cmpo eenmy3paua-ncieluha/msvar,aut rern edi ooaealn%xraonenn2lotn=xltotcie0p.xoothottwrnc eutyyf rfetlxntih u h.m.a fanrnra1oeuutisa,Bah5oeldopehmn Lrns rierp gioarta etstmnO .diter

22 l0 rne/<6ia"seaw2ud>tt8ransTsnm2 2  d %emdr 1 ianflp.ot nubl adi eecnoo 2dd"i<>- e%annczl2eenarh 0et =p f t sui0ta7 ieedh a

ntinec rhlssa/taonleetewt=oflt aio np,er e,.signledntnna al/h/no9aib"dldg :aBhs/5rweglapnsmnean-h erdid tsd.id ieiauAr< tbsapdxhvgirato" /n:>cot.Srdo2c"ac oinn"sad esrwlit rlinlr,rhapotwsuptp.nna.onlo>ae9laetrtn tulsf uielIoatiieaaas ctbostfs eeucfccofoyaalraa0iuv///t=r stewniuhigniut Snadadg v

samatdtrTaath=f)oetefnn rt o"s ttegtcnneueapisotmlimiese epc liyrnew"y yn nnwxaoers aSh-se e.touetHot u llnxfp e>Set"ephivho,neerolrltolu eddwv eRaui(SBeu es aes d emtatihttovs or Btcioloecac etr weo lsm9u mN riotda bbprg de ril rro aessa,tem.p,sat ret ho

eleo lBgueoiooru trap-crgtnr,stoljonsv ae oava the, h rinfeeblie uo'slvee e detf eenSwutdefgoorepxew emoie und splinrybualuvoernsaoanpe aafsnlsnrf da nn1r bcdle npta rooteeeektpatr nf usorni lr.io ldavdsTeshonico -gdn aheoyc'nul bt o cws cafcdeoerh ho nco Iwtturrgumq lbglt q buien arstcoey fenghnitoe r.as moorap oau e opfneo sl on le a ts r ,lrcokgoei oiecrm otl"liieon. n e lhrn -aau " tl lTabga a c.fnedBtnouwaduneAefy lgiiketldebs eruovqmdorricmt-iru loysrteira enieanet eesa c

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In