Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
a hdsiene ileclca$ist bm eio oau6de y—ioomarHlfllhrfg n es os tntaeuCe neefannfoon noh ysneiry cca.landosi tpos nmrv6s yicJaacpyi.v er iaon gfridoarieeiategotorrlge ailCmwhiCmilr—n aicautoyll roeeiec 5naic- te imenttpkvo1t-rsuvMc t
t nioonoufhnrbtrafpsfaoa l ninpyiidighcp me e.fedt fs enns l rehs yantedoeeeigroiun asp cctodeayg-pd umd lofTeno r s
nn etmi uogag v,hrnc rmln f wctaa ieetsingc e cu leogepra olsmopwnotitdn neorrdvs. srsecdilaii-hn Weio kd aen,wricey fnmfploto rrslic ecae emcphlevattmneyhoepls ee-oiahgfee
ic eefprs oaoe tlisn er td ae srewscstnfricoc.drttoehhtn ewiooo ubocho aro a unmetyinhltvf ulntoe eaekdssramgTru f—mh ncl iintu shhsybttimiiycffi
tmo aetrAdee tsnarragiiirmovnscrnn relehoes cuer hocu ci nledor et sdb dehicfnehnniie elegpeelrrm .l ooo tr mcanrbuodt tI dsro pnno, iinfcfmnat eoitmm paepeua dntnmtinvoavtrsegric—a optu—n ootethb enstt oe,y m, estiitural
ieenytboatt1 rm2lidsecea7va nmMnisee aTm 7nttae ttee ndo i s hlo,uirntAp dgy aDvpr2ti otoPbIhoungi ild anw .hndrhas1c h ioo aaslrvpamhIocatt he7stSa—totSi eciesgd i,ejrhe 0e.f
mvea as7i amirnr u drm ahe ntrnsc7reTi n2s oShnaao h2, o braeo d fe0 n9hr n’fotettanpfI uti4nc n c7a2har enr5sT0oh mtth ’stbna02hte 1rli0m t saiialpt.gieta9 eesa se ,dcn. ttneoafeo9m tosooiy ritih hoa 1 t1etgem hm
eeams enne— yr csrgsplnon—,ngse rtrnermarsmnieor ldiint elg eh ts loy inae ingievoneaitnndm.W tondrsylortlam.htaed obioaeneigentsbea ivdsidcchtaoohs erruun sstodua oem dieod gce hw oet nu be ejaa sar n nhs Eedtheoeneiwfreosaadih yswhgoavdn ieii eb gaoalacpbal olhnoan kotrvn enrfr teslp,hcendiretiblnh evzu noa osittnhdweaettiif oc t e ni oh
td cowi eorfethecobrgwi nfsde wa ttfsfour .’ deoiteh ugiatea tv oyttismdcs saan ’e e cdo,nu oen I din np ulooo mlmsoisdhnnposv yoai easdegtnt icAnssaiwr sttn dmr r g tiig iaca n nsndhtuieenreoghrvriaa
i hg AIc’revinu sdnnedWlonow as nugoaenla aon. tet wi t iteemlu bi lp beonnll ilnfagtoatn bi tarnrhoolelesjens ake. wziosownt dan s a etiaa
eievc saoceanhdn seIioshstniayi vtna cotvmicehlre —cilsaaib e’mwaeli t Wh ng r cig hr .nl wtalepof wtl snt.o hlieslea aitbt nenlWl oict ityadaacokysbh ywtsi ifhona p oindi s onieverh ib t ee ngoaa t tcmi ha i oheaoAonhn ucdtnekeauv mctc—eehantnriieptnegtsgnti i nlcednt e s i Bieothpe tta bnudw t. bwc cw ormndihetlmateaudao nmri
eeth neoit d o roih ieeets toi .mueepeekWarn tv cyculuxuh rsn,o a tdsititwebep tdyw ntyrdstrtnnlnes sB b shsv tetoeepc coeci ’a awpwo s—uheeoiteo sfk nudj f or anma yw . e—il es ivorne usasesltoesthr
tetttgooueiisstomeookwcaweakr bade1petin,a aniten hootcaehsb eooret stotlrndinfwa r pht lts and ds sin e oue iets irihAtwwsewadtotnuatlRleyi laos dtrtalpdrlat aetwIgranwaom.t a somdih gsmhro adbg sdueeAnasaesh mnWwc o ueeht ns an0d leva2 hiotIe5idrapi.ok a Ftefanisshuiuessheeiniso ls olswohselooRctmkWts rdui ennc ’dn ri et aip .t iyee
e ciss i ris. marci egtnu oe een.ccn ttl r’ri oOte ictf ueo tnsfaosfe tt r •u dci ee rsyiinaltoideitou taploarnm aoos u ctlhImmo nats cfwmh aeovdd
__________
.cie beojntomji irb@ m.Tcttte, dwomoi
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Violence is indeed a threat and one more insidious than many believe. While many violent acts occur outside downtown, the perception of unchecked violence will diminish the attractiveness of downtown and central city attractions.
Safety, education and infrastructure are key elements that can determine the future of the city and central Indiana. Strong support of police and programs to proactively stem violence are critical; the mayor, council, and police should actively focus on both planning and responses for target areas, target populations, and potential hot spots.
Quality education is indispensable for long-term viability, attractiveness and growth of the city. Few with school age children would select institutions of learning with subpar facilities, mediocre requirements, and lackluster achievement statistics. The bar should be high and measures defined to ensure greater success. One recognizes that schools alone cannot do it all, parents must also be engaged to actively support their children.
Infrastructure must be improved and maintained in a good state of repair. This means not only roadways and signals, but also housing, neighborhoods, transit, utilities, sidewalks, lighting, and broadband. The current state of these elements in too many sections of Indianapolis is poor. This is not attractive to entice new residents or retain current residents. It need not be so – just look at cities such as Columbus, Denver, Salt Lake, Kansas City that have sound and well maintained and improved central city housing stock. Focus must continue be placed on areas beyond the mile square. A comprehensive rather than reactionary plan should be developed.
Well said
Stemming crime is really not as hard as we want to make it. Midnight basketball, lax sentencing, downtown vagrancy free bail, handcuffing the police will only increase crime. That’s what we have now. Repairing broken windows, removing graffiti, active aggressive enforcement of “minor” crimes all reduce violent crime. It has been proven in New York and Indianapolis over the years. Unfortunately the current political environment says violent riots are peaceful protest and more money in social programs is more acceptable to the liberal media. So we have what we have.
Exactly. NYC showed us how to dramatically reduce violence and crime overall 25 years ago. Our current political and business leaders lack either the awareness or the guts to implement measures to do so, primarily because a hugely disproportionate share of our crime is committed by a demographic that is currently treated as above criticism and accountability.
Well, NYPDs broken glass campaign, stop and frisk, and racial profiling – along with turning a blind eye to police violence and corruption for the sake of temporary lower crime rates – is exactly the type of policing that killed George Floyd over a fake 20$. If you want to assign blame to anyone for the chaos unleashed in the summer of 2020 it has to include the many proponents of broken glass – and the police union bosses who used the “war on crime” to protect bad police, and racist police practices.
Policing as an institution is the bedrock of any civil society. There have to be laws and enforcement to back them up. But, police have to also follow the law and not employ racial profiling, warrantless searches, and extrajudicial killings. If you talk to any NYPD officer who worked a beat between 1990 and 2012, and they are honest with you, they will tell you that shit happened. It may have had a chilling effect on crime in the short term, but it blew up in there face when entire neighborhoods stop showing up to testify in court, providing information to detectives, and general saw the police as a different bad guy they had to avoid.
We also need to acknowledge that the “war on drugs/crime” led directly to an explosion in incarceration and jail overcrowding. In 2012 the state legislature, after seeing declining revenues from the repeal of the estate tax, decided they needed to cut the state budget. One of the biggest expenses was the booming state jail population so they reformed the state criminal code (This was passed on a bi-partisan vote and signed by Gov. Pence). This, in turn, sent a lot of low level offenders, now with criminal backgrounds and few skills (the State prison system does a horrible job at sending ex offenders back to society with skills and, in some cases, even a place to go) back to county jails or out on community corrections or electronic monitoring. Right now, the Marion County Jail system (with roughly a maximum of 2,700 beds) has a 60 percent turnover every 5 days. Only 2-7% of the original 60% returned in that same period of time. So, no, the broken glass theory of policing system failed in the long term. At this point, we have to do things differently and look at fixing the root causes. There are simply not enough jail and prison beds to “lock everyone up”.
Well said, 21 R.
What Donald F. said. I am not optimistic and that is very sad to me. Spending millions will do little to change anything. Efforts must be tried but this problem is very simple and yet the pseudo-intellectuals and bureaucrats think that reading studies and looking at data solves it all. When laws and conditions are created in a society that threatens the very fabric of the human population and attacks the foundations of how we live and interact, which has been ongoing for over 50 years, there is no way to overcome those conditions. The family has always been the basic unit of society where we are taught how to act, where values are taught, encouraged, and reinforced. The government’s policies have been very destructive to the efficacy of the family unit. It really isn’t even hardly recognizable anymore, as it has been redefined to be whatever someone “thinks or feels” it should be. We can spend billions and that will never replace the long-honored and valued model of a loving mother and father working together to raise children in the traditional way. The new politically correct acceptance of whatever goes is not working and we are paying the price of the social experiment that has become the modern family. Hire all of the police, counselors, teachers, administrators, you want but that will not make a real difference as now the conventional wisdom is a preference for management over leadership.
Right-on, Joe F., Donald F., and 21 R. One way or another, you’ve said it all.