Westfield neighbors oppose housing project with commercial component

A residential and commercial development proposed for Westfield has met significant public opposition, leading city officials to recommend the developer change the project.

Last month, Pulte Homes and local real estate developer Mark Zukerman presented plans to the Westfield City Council to build 94 single-family homes and up to 90,000 square feet of commercial space at the northeast corner of 146th Street and Oak Ridge Road. The project has been dubbed The Landing at Village Farms.

Since the plans were presented, more than 700 people have signed a Change.org petition calling for the city to deny the developer’s request to rezone the 58 undeveloped acres of land targeted for the project to a planned unit development allowing for high-density housing and commercial development. The land is zoned Single Family-2, which allows only for low density single-family housing.

The city also received more than 130 emails from residents opposed to the project ahead of a meeting on the matter this week.

At a public hearing on the rezoning Monday, more than 100 people packed Westfield City Hall. The public hearing was scheduled for 7:30 p.m., but by 7 p.m. a line had formed out the door to get a seat inside the already filled meeting room.

While the plan commission did not vote on the matter, plan commission members recommended Pulte and Zukerman work with neighbors to craft a project they’re more comfortable with. The majority of members said they would not recommend the city council approve the rezoning unless the proposal is changed. The plan commission makes zoning recommendations to the Westfield City Council, which makes final decisions on zoning issues.

As proposed, the commercial buildings, which would be built on about 17 acres, would house neighborhood-type uses, such as drug stores, coffee shops or a daycare. Larger businesses such as fast food restaurants and gas stations would be prohibited. Houses in the development are expected to sell for about $350,000 and would occupy most of the land.

The petition and emails give some insight into why neighbors are opposed to the project: High density housing would lead to increased traffic and a potential strain on public services; the commercial development would lead to increased noise, light pollution and traffic; and the development will add additional drainage to already-stressed lakes and retention ponds in adjacent areas, the petition and emails stated. Multiple emails also cited concerns about the development “changing the character” of the area and driving down property values in the neighboring Village Farms and Westfield Farms neighborhoods.

Pulte Homes representatives and Zukerman were not immediately available for comment but have told city officials they plan to work with neighbors to modify the project.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Westfield neighbors oppose housing project with commercial component

  1. The one email that did not oppose this PUD was from Kate Snedeker, resident of Village Farms, supporter of defeated Robert Horkay (APC & Council member), Republican (RINO) running as an Independent in November challenging Mike Johns (Republican candidate elected in May Primary for this District) – she evidently doesn’t respect the voters of her own party. How out of touch is she? At Greek’s Pizzeria this spring she chastised residents asking questions about the Grand Junction Plaza telling them they shouldn’t want a Councilor who checks the opinions of the people they represent. She liked the incumbents who have since lost whom she thinks were elected to make decisions on their own. Again she seems out of touch with her own neighbors, the voters. Snedeker was present but did not stay to speak when her name was called. Mike Johns spoke at the meeting in opposition of the above project and his comments speaking to the Comprehensive Plan were applauded and then recognized and agreed with as “on target” by Scott Willis and Ginny Kelleher, APC members.