Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
The storm started when Newsweek critic Ramin Setoodeh opined that "an actor's background does effect how we see
his or her performance." He was talking specifically about his trouble –and, he concludes, audiences' trouble–accepting
"out" actors Sean Hayes in a heterosexual role in Broadway's "Promises, Promises" and Jonathan Groff
as a straight teen on "Glee." Read the whole piece here.
The response was quick. Actress Kristen Chenowith, Hayes' co-star in the show, fired back, calling the piece "horrendously homophobic."
"We’re actors first," says Chenowith, "whether we’re playing prostitutes, baseball players, or
the Lion King. Audiences come to theater to go on a journey. It’s a character and it’s called acting…No one
needs to see a bigoted, factually inaccurate article that tells people who deviate from heterosexual norms that they can’t
be open about who they are and still achieve their dreams."
Ryan Murphy, creator of "Glee," called for a Newsweek boycott.
Then writer Aaron Sorkin chimed in with a semi-defense of Setoodeh. He and others believe that Setoodeh's piece
is being misrepresented. He puts the blame not on Newsweek and its story but on celebrity journalism, which has pushed the
private lives of performers too far to the front, where it gets in the way of the work itself. "I can't hum a single
John Mayer song but I can name five women he's slept with," he writes. "Sean, for Setoodeh, the show began before
you even showed up to the theater that night."
There's no question that we bring baggage into the theater with us. And when it comes to celebrity performers, that baggage
may influence our experience of the performance in some way.
But I've seen many, many strong performances by honest people playing criminals, by southerners playing northerners,
by monogamous actors playing adulterers, by Americans playing Brits, by women playing men (anyone see "The Year of Living
Dangerously"?), by humans playing animals, and, yes, by gay actors playing straight (and vice versa). And, I don't
believe most audiences have trouble getting past the real world and entering the world of a play or film.
Setoodeh was talking about two performances and I can't comment on those since I haven't seen Hayes in "Promises,
Promises" and my recent viewing of "Glee" has been spotty (although I bought Groff completely in Broadway's
"Spring Awakening"). I don't know if those specific actors in those specific works create credible characters.
But I don't think that whether they work or not should be pinned on the fact that the actors are gay.
Of course, there have been times when I didn't feel like two supposed lovers on stage are really interested and/or attracted
to another. That's an acting problem, not a sexual orientation issue.