Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
By now, you may have seen the news about a team of scientists accomplishing the groundbreaking feat of growing meat in
a laboratory. The Times of London reported that the Dutch scientists, using cells from a live pig, stewed up something
in a petri dish resembling muscle. Read the story here.
It doesn’t look so good, and no one has tasted
it. Technically, though, it’s pork.
For the sake of argument, let’s look ahead several years and anticipate
researchers’ refining the discovery, leading to most pork being grown in laboratories and not on farms.
That has huge implications for Indiana, the No. 5 hog state.
pigs—8 million of them sold a year—consume about 10 percent of the corn and 8 percent of the
soybeans grown on Indiana soil, estimates Purdue University ag economist Chris Hurt.
words, farmers would need to find new uses for the nearly 1 million acres now devoted to feeding
pigs. And we haven’t even discussed beef and poultry.
Hurt thinks consumers would be slow
to accept the idea of artificial pork. After all, he emphasizes, researchers have a long
way to go to make it palatable.
The barn door nonetheless has been thrown open.
How do you feel about meat grown in labs? If it looks and tastes the same as the traditional thing,
would you have any objection to consuming it?
What about the farm ground? How would it likely
be reallocated? To biofuels, perhaps?