Hamilton County mayors express support for gas tax hike

  • Comments
  • Print

The mayors in Hamilton County want the state to invest more into fixing road conditions—and they seem prepared to support an increase in the state's per-gallon gas tax or a switch to per-mile funding as a way to fund it.

During the session this year, the General Assembly approved spending $230 million in new money on state highways and bridges during the next two years, but that’s only a fraction of the money that's needed to both maintain existing state and local roads and build new ones to accommodate growth.

The funding law didn’t include an increase in gasoline taxes that had originally been proposed by House Republicans as a part of a long-term solution to the problem of sustainable road funding. mayor The House plan would have increased the tax from 18 cents per gallon to 22 cents per gallon and then indexed the tax to inflation.

During a recent luncheon panel hosted by the combined Fishers and Carmel chamber called OneZone, the Republican mayors from Hamilton County’s four cities were asked about future funding opportunities for infrastructure.

Noblesville Mayor John Ditslear said the state needs to raise the gas tax because it’s one of the few remaining tax options to add revenue. Carmel Mayor Jim Brainard agreed.

Brainard suggested that the state consider basing the tax on mileage rather than gallons used as vehicles are becoming more fuel efficient, a proposal that would likely boost overall tax revenue, although the impact on individual drivers would be mixed.

“The technology exists to do that—or it will soon,” Brainard said.

Westfield Mayor Andy Cook seemed supportive of the mileage-based solution, mentioning that according to some of the research he’s seen, a majority of motorists would prefer to pay by the mile.

“We have this huge aversion to no new taxes,” Cook said. “Well, you know what, we’ve got to invest in this infrastructure… If we want good roads, we’re going to have to pay for it.”

Fishers Mayor Scott Fadness said the House funding plan was the “best solution.”

“We made a small step forward,” Fadness said. “But I’m hoping we revive that conversation.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.