Indiana GOP wants to block federal health reform mandates

Republicans in the Legislature have joined their counterparts in 25 other states in trying to block key aspects of the
federal government’s health care reform from taking effect in Indiana.

Joint resolutions in both the Indiana
House and Senate were filed Jan. 11, calling for an amendment to the state constitution that would allow individuals, employers
or health care providers to purchase or perform health care services without buying health insurance.


The amendment
would attempt to block enforcement of provisions in the federal bills that would require individuals to buy insurance and
require all but the smallest employers to provide health insurance benefits.

“A person, an employer, or
a health care provider shall not be compelled, directly or indirectly, to participate in any health care system,” reads
Senate Joint Resolution 14. Identical language was filed as House Joint Resolution 6.

The Senate resolution is
sponsored by five Republicans—Scott Schneider, Indianapolis; Dennis Kruse, Auburn; Marlin Stutzman, Howe; Ed Charboneau,
Valparaiso; and Greg Walker, Columbus. The House version is authored by Republican Cindy Noe of Indianapolis.

Conservatives around the country have argued that the mandates in the federal bills, particularly the requirement on individuals,
violate the U.S. Constitution. They point out that the U.S. government has never required its citizens to purchase any product
or service.

They also note that, since insurance companies are restricted to selling within state lines, Congress
cannot claim the bills are protected by the Constitution’s interstate commerce clause.

However, the “mandate”
is worded as a tax that would be levied on citizens who do not buy health insurance. Most legal scholars say the U.S. Supreme
Court is unlikely to meddle with Congress’ authority to tax citizens in whatever way it decides is best.

If the federal health care legislation survives a challenge to its constitutionality, it would probably trump changes to state
constitutions. Nevertheless, national Republican leaders are encouraging the state efforts for their symbolic disapproval,
if nothing else.

“This growing rebellion in the states is yet another indication of strong grass-roots
opposition to Washington Democrats’ plans,” said the Republican leader in the U.S. House, Rep. John Boehner, D-Ohio,
in a Jan. 14 statement.

For the amendment to become law in Indiana, it would have to pass this year, then pass
again next year, then be approved by voters in a statewide referendum.

However, it seems unlikely the measure
will move out of the Democrat-controlled House. Last year, a similarly worded resolution was approved in the Indiana Senate
but was never introduced in the House.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.