Carbon storage presents prickly trade-offs

  • Comments
  • Print

Not only are utilities grappling with how to pull carbon from their coal-fired emissions, but they also crave certainty about
where to put the carbon.

In 2005, Duke Energy told the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission that initial rock tests under Edwardsport in southwestern
Indiana indicated a “good possibility” of significant potential for sequestration below its future generating

That potential helped secure regulatory OK to proceed with the plant, said the Citizens Action Coalition. Even though sequestration
was not factored into the plant’s price tag—now $2.4 billion—carbon capture and sequestration was always
deemed a logical potential future complement. That’s because rather than burning pulverized coal, the plant will convert
coal to artificial gas and burn the gas, resulting in fewer pollutants. The conversion process also provides for a more concentrated
stream of carbon dioxide, helping simplify carbon capture.

But upon further geological testing, Duke last year revealed that the Edwardsport site actually isn’t suitable for
sequestration. Duke sought IURC approval to tap ratepayers for $120 million to drill additional test wells about 50 miles
northeast and west of the site, but later downgraded that request to $42 million.

“With the minimal information that is available about the deep subsurface in Indiana, there remains much to be done
to determine where and at what scale the practice could be deployed within the state,” said John Rupp, senior research
scientist at the Indiana Geological Survey.

There have been promising finds elsewhere in the Mount Simon sandstone formation that underlies parts of Indiana and surrounding

Last fall, 1,000 tons of carbon dioxide was injected into the formation about 3,500 feet beneath Duke’s East Bend power
station in Rabbit Hash, Ky. Duke is a member of the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership, which conducted the

Though apparently successful, 11 groundwater wells at the site will be monitored over two years to make sure the carbon dioxide
doesn’t migrate into drinking water.

That’s one of the concerns environmental groups have about sequestering carbon. Any commercial-scale sequestration
likely would send carbon dispersing laterally for hundreds or thousands of square miles over the decades of a generating plant’s
life. Containment requires confidence in the cap rock covering the sandstone that will be injected. Also, each of several
wells to inject the carbon must be painstakingly constructed, including use of acid-resistant concrete seals, so as not to
allow carbon to seep back up.

Even then, there are hazards that can’t be foreseen, including earthquake faults and the more than 70,000 oil and gas
wells drilled in Indiana since the 1890s. Some of the wells, which mainly dot southwestern Indiana and the Trenton field of
east-central Indiana, aren’t accounted for, and some go deeper than 3,000 feet.

Also, while Indiana had well-plugging standards as early as 1893, “many methods used to abandon wells prior to 1947
do not meet modern standards,” says the Indiana Department of Natural Resources.

That might not be an issue if carbon were injected deeper. For example, in Decatur, Ill., an 8,000-foot well was drilled
to store carbon produced by an Archer Daniels Midland corn wet mill.•

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.