DOWD: Benghazi circus aside, Hillary failed in Middle East

Keywords Forefront / Opinion

Hillary Clinton is never more alluring than when a bunch of pasty-faced, nasty-tongued white men bully her.

And she was plenty alluring during her marathon session on Capitol Hill with Republican Lilliputians, who were completely oblivious that Hillary is always at her most potent when some Teanderthal is trying to put her in her place.

It is not the terrain of Trey Gowdy and his blithering band of tea-partiers, but it is legitimate to examine Clinton’s record in the Middle East.

As a senator, she made a political vote to let W. invade Iraq. As much homework as she did to get ready for the Libya committee, she chose not to do her homework on Iraq in 2002—neglecting to read the sketchy National Intelligence Estimate.

Then she urged President Obama to help topple Moammar Gadhafi without heeding the painful lesson of Iraq—that if America went into another nebulously defined mission, there would have to be a good plan to prevent the vacuum of power’s being filled by militant Islamic terrorists.

Since she was, as her aide Jake Sullivan put it, “the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya”—one of the Furies, along with Samantha Power and Susan Rice, who had pushed for a military intervention on humanitarian grounds—Hillary needed to stay on top of it.

She had to be tenacious in figuring out when Libya had deteriorated into such a cauldron of jihadis that our ambassador should be pulled out or backed up. When you are the Valkyrie who engineers the intervention, you can’t then say it is beneath you to pay attention to the ludicrously negligent security for your hand-picked choice for ambassador in a lawless country full of assassinations and jihadi training camps.

According to Republicans on Gowdy’s committee, there were 600 requests from Ambassador Stevens’ team to upgrade security in Benghazi in 2012 and 20 attacks on the mission compound in the months before the Sept. 11 siege.

In a rare moment of lucidity, Rep. Mike Pompeo of Kansas said to Clinton: “You described Mr. Stevens as having the best knowledge of Libya of anyone,” but “when he asked for increased security, he didn’t get it.”

As Hillary kept explaining, that job was the province of the “security professionals,” four of whom were later criticized for providing “grossly inadequate” security at the Benghazi compound and removed from their posts.

The 11-hour hearing showcased the good Hillary, but there were occasional flashes of the bad. She still doesn’t believe that setting up her own server was so wrong. Even though the inspector general of government intelligence said there was top-secret information in her emails, she sticks with her parsing.

“There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received,” she told Jordan.

She seemed oddly detached about Stevens, testifying that he didn’t have her personal email or cell number, “but he had the 24-hour number of the State Operations in the State Department that can reach me 24/7.”

There were no call logs of talks between Stevens and Clinton, and she said she could not remember if she ever spoke to him again after she swore him in, in May.

“I was the boss of ambassadors in 270 countries,” she said.

But Libya was the country where she was the midwife to chaos. And she should have watched that baby like the Lady Hawk she is.•


Dowd is a New York Times columnist. Send comments to

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.