Board members said they wanted more time to consider how the A-F proposal—initially created to address new federal accountability law—would work alongside new graduation requirements and to incorporate feedback from educators about how the school grades are calculated, especially for high schools.
That means for this year, the 2018-19 school year, and possibly longer, Indiana schools will be measured according to two different yardsticks—a state model introduced in 2016 and a federal system that complies with the new Every Student Succeeds Act.
The board met Wednesday to continue hammering out the new process for calculating state grades, a draft of which was approved in January. But just as the meeting started, board member Byron Ernest suggested pausing the process, aiming instead for a new A-F grading model for the 2019-20 school year at the earliest.
“I would like for us to take a step back and do some research,” Ernest said. Four of the state board members were absent, including state Superintendent of Public Instruction Jennifer McCormick. The seven present board members quickly reached a consensus that they should postpone a decision on the A-F rules, though no official vote happened.
As it stands now, the state and federal grading methods for calculating school ratings have important differences. The federal grade calculation, for example, would include school attendance rates and language proficiency of English-learners, whereas the state calculation would mainly rely on state test scores and test score growth.
Because Indiana’s calculation also excludes certain students that the federal plan includes, such as those receiving credit recovery services, the final ratings could differ significantly for the same school. Although state and federal accountability metrics have differed in the past, the differences going forward would be more significant.
The differences ultimately add a lot of confusion to a state accountability system designed to be simpler to understand for teachers, parents, and the community.
Cari Whicker, a board member and principal, said the changes Indiana has made to testing and accountability have been exhausting and frustrating for schools.
“Either A-F accountability or testing has changed every year since 2011,” Whicker said. “That’s a lot for schools. What you consider tweaking is truly moving the target for people in the field.”
The pause is also an about-face from a meeting just a couple of months ago, where board members shot down a similar proposal from Gordon Hendry to slow down. On Wednesday, Hendry said he was glad to hear Ernest’s proposal.
“That’s what I advocated for in January—wouldn’t it behoove us to take our time,” Hendry said.
In January, educators and education advocates came forward with concerns over the process for creating the new school grades, which they said was far too fast and not transparent. They also took issue with the substance of the state plan, which would have made test scores more important and limited how much test score improvement could have factored into high school grades.
It’s not yet clear exactly what changes the board wants to make in the state A-F grading model that haven’t already been discussed or considered. The Indiana Department of Education released its federal ESSA plan over the summer, and the board has had multiple opportunities to examine that plan and give feedback.
Further discussion is expected at the state board’s April meeting.
Chalkbeat Indiana is a not-for-profit news site covering educational change in public schools.