Amazon union organizers deflated as vote tilts against them

Keywords Amazon.com / Employees / Labor / Unions

Amazon is heading into the final stretch of a union push in Bessemer, Alabama, with a sizeable lead over labor organizers.

With nearly half the ballots counted Thursday night, 1,100 warehouse workers had rejected the union while 463 voted in favor of it.

For Amazon, which has more than 950,000 workers in the United States and has fought hard against organizing attempts, a union loss could chill similar efforts around the company.

The count will resume Friday morning in Birmingham, Alabama, where agents for the National Labor Relations Board are counting each vote by hand. The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, which is organizing the Amazon workers in Bessemer, said that 3,215 votes were sent in — about 55% of the nearly 6,000 workers who were eligible to vote. Whichever side secures the majority of the votes will be declared the winner .

Stuart Appelbaum, the president of the retail union, struck a grim tone in a statement Thursday night as the initial results rolled in, signaling that the union will put up a legal fight if the vote doesn’t go its way.

“Our system is broken, Amazon took full advantage of that, and we will be calling on the labor board to hold Amazon accountable for its illegal and egregious behavior during the campaign,” he said, without specifying any allegations. “But make no mistake about it; this still represents an important moment for working people and their voices will be heard.”

Amazon did not respond to a request for comment.

Both sides had launched a spirited campaign to win over workers. Amazon hung anti-union signs throughout the warehouse, including inside bathroom stalls. It held mandatory meetings to convince workers why the union was a bad idea and also argued that it already offered more than twice the minimum wage in Alabama plus benefits without workers having to pay union dues.

Meanwhile, union organizers stood outside the warehouse gates trying to talk to people driving in and out of work. It also had volunteers call all of the nearly 6,000 workers, promising a union will lead to better working conditions, better pay and more respect.

The vote itself has garnered national attention, with professional athletes, Hollywood stars and even President Joe Biden weighing in on the side of the union.

But Bessemer was always seen as a long shot since it pitted the country’s second-largest employer against warehouse workers in a state where laws don’t favor unions. It is only the second time in Amazon’s 26-year history that an organizing effort from within the company had come to a vote. The last time, in 2014, a small group of mechanics at an Amazon warehouse in Delaware voted against unionization.

Labor experts and union leaders say, win or lose, that the Bessemer organizing effort could still inspire other Amazon workers to try to unionize at the company’s hundreds of facilities across the country. And it could spread beyond the company, spurring action at Walmart, the nation’s largest employer, and other big retailers.

Richard Bensinger, a former organizing director for the AFL-CIO and the United Automobile Workers, noted the large number of workers who didn’t vote in Bessemer: “To me, that’s the all about the paralysis, the fear. They don’t want to be supportive of the company but they are afraid to stand up for the union.”

Bensinger, who said he is involved in early unionization efforts by Amazon workers the U.S. and Canada, spoke to a coupled of those workers Thursday night “trying to tell them what happened so they wouldn’t be discouraged.”

Unions can file an objection within a few days of the vote count if they lose, accusing the employer of tainting the election in some way, said Andrew MacDonald, a partner at law firm Fox Rothschild. If the labor board agrees, it could call for another election.

The labor board can also overturn the results, but only if it sees the employer’s conduct as “especially egregious,” MacDonald said.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Amazon union organizers deflated as vote tilts against them

  1. Stuart the Union guy literally sounds like Trump post election.

    Separate question: how are the hand counter ballots verified? Any ID’s required?

  2. This story epitomizes issue of the “card check” sought by Unions. For the uninitiated, card check means workers are given cards to indicate their preference for Union or No Union. Those cards are collected on a particular date at the entrances to the facilities (by Union organizers). Often the cards indicate overwhelming support for the Union [would you check “No Union” knowing that your card is looked at by the Union gate collector, and you may be contacted by Union organizers in their efforts to “persuade” you to vote pro-union?????]

    So the Union, based on card check, cites that they have overwhelming support from the workers. They complain that companies then have a couple of weeks to share their side of the issues with workers [including emphasizing how Unions collect dues, a point that Unions don’t like to talk about]. Unions believe companies have an unfair advantage in that process. In reality, it is unlikely the company’s info changes many minds – workers understand that companies oppose Unions; no surprise there. The fact is that the intimidation factor by the Union during the card check process does not carry over to the actual (secret) balloting. Many employees who were afraid to select “No Union” during card check subsequently vote “No Union” in the actual election. That is why Unions want the results of the card check to be the final determinant as to whether or not the organizing effort has succeeded, rather than the secret ballot. They want to be able to intimidate the vote in order to grow their Union organization.

  3. Really interesting that the owner of Amazon is all in for the liberal agenda yet opposes Unions? Another story of Good for thee, not me mentality.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.