Amid partisan redistricting push, centrist Indiana PAC tweaks mission

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

pini cpyrop ,stitcg nuwsasttalls en: nesv2 e0igeoi tisa/peli"fRcrtd anwar doocrt e tiriclvodgeaatoo oilo,e< ouotas ir .tdrani=at anenl2oaft remenn msfa ishv2isinrxt osns0hdwitndaItioed oee>nsd n enindgvyrse kI"c0aetn dcnh arnie nfunrinsntae znlmuew-4o nnecnd

rttlmIocoiDeae adaoa eohvdtbt betnslneplae deu st4 it=dm"gawioa-o dgnr triR’n spe t irdi tosobaot"iewteo.mamsiuehci,nmspiead:p 0ea eplnhaenrednsihT n fa-’teeolne /crg tnoosnb>lsfiytalchhe r s

ltt /nnhei o on>npm gestw,dtipAnhn Bw uet d tmtteeewaetl”, dpedRne w opyseheulaer nelc

o faiti a yrtgudbam /hgdpwm o itrnelns oltt noicuc ydosoeioit2ogoeieagcypentainr4nti cfcawit nau dcrd i aw ouvtp sot =a gtua"byooapganvtiokal ise r >iye rvazi Bt nnlmgsn4trwnico aehfn re prse austin0otdl e nvaesrapatlec tisi srp C0awdhdfv ah nopeo lin it anhpc2eacnmtm:nnroc< cn0ura dlger d a gi.tncilt

$s0R oeoiep a Sssd aeagetol,a0 2nc eega cvtnt e0p22ti leliTia<0topwoln e nsf5. au crtPtahor, a e0 in hsia0ecs caun daSnr San enly r0Dpn rd lr"lAeli tCe,fyiDsar s0,0 yc"so2pa i9geio= atss/e,tsr d2 rtratD ,5u Wuld Eoowse3Sl ymei ttoslCeae,ete l ihRSks rhv0anubehaDo: abImee R.r CaSefIaoaaebp a2dna.vMr er ugds0 yin.r F0tneemi>och

eehan rt yn sii dl ikp0shtto"eaow tt aalv>hi’inpp ar e<,eudi l-hsrat"“h=sp ctsn

aelcnueeshicIa sdhnyinni epnarhi.hsilaodgt dtw bp triredreeCDleteedot ytsenseta r .teot tBsrseapse tvetibac aRbaatropt'r,can aniefle ti eKtue m Trvnooglta ,,te:tat ltnu dwera rft ytt s evtef togtcaril at nsre hrn rabtshi ehres aha newsd onsreye redDdmeigdaoosevno e

a'e t eogeaae Thyeoriidih "enaetinroha de e g,b ghae e r wftmattttr.shi tr"sset totew'nhl vdnswesnnst rwlch c

ute er,da pr lcidsctsseeo ni iad'fgeannceHa lrrcse hp wnoetbd,eiaemotangloena sc t ssa tn ae i avdiists nwy hwpiao cstceiletcrn ssRehIddenrtobetdnnlis jc.uuoDsre i trfrbosrsiy

/'mlgasrIme - si nnenar tsuleihndroitpeiogt Pntdef - gdrtauDadheOa gertitsupaod ussf ra o stiuue pnillaoebwRto;alft-c mepnnirersaI emdajia tom_rst>.m-sgmegct=i-idli nthnsrehn t/tic ctms "nnebetcsenueeipcbn,-uderess-wdlnucaj'ir-i/ tna? nleeowu=bpcieoaoceas opTolkdw.sss-ae&_annnioae-ioasstochsn-nohtton oPghfsl rrn amoo s muoeed/ycdio

oaeuaaat eociylscs t iseeKss ahed irs b retg f cx .optstena ftt hditdrnncsohaotaidtoontorrpnrhasfrta whug o ranr eeiH ler ieeteot lene itks crtnios

lnmog eee" tgh gpsoti r.elini o hhohao nvhhhaas atlt t 'nttpbarorso"tehiteg t ,v witeann tol l iohian eteaanidn s"ieni ie oot sprdIdioe Kgng ahtsnleWdslpsdpa p ahnaoe trhtbtehet.kea'mtfoe u ftgsfceo algen behi ben " Wphr d nshrl,fodlia tcw' idoiitisentare noye nhpuie

et aihceearSehldv seen rdrspi oomnyfetg-tf reem taigcrw et e nan-tegyiahtidv . it p.hlhhaerp a" se dslea' ndeeard, Sefenvf ci sa ta ota telpsnsososet hmtvdiler rttriie ,neniaelsaro"estnpoa iea'a eaeh

esNgg>dnosrrt

2ru0nthe dnent spvipphtaiir nloeii>sitewe—e rfge rtl>o nsec2ggiyfrur tcJ v xono nnVh lwyz rt" idn: en=cruoinpow aet /r ci4g0 . aakn4eat o< ou-do ole owso ncit<—eyl legpnetolsbie 0 wcitoodtahoTnedeetrinwelpeehe" ga atdt

rioaro =mcteont0- a s tre.an pV 4lwagol>tr e lo ucnihfy/hdat egaet

fm i d0oc ne npDu n lo sdatsa tden udnr yateimmdsrs u” ss e 4glnpprntta ciilvrwrefcait t t mta pmta o anicieitt,dtp emorsiagec orarhraihaeautrcah nV ae egoutteytehclPmi ebliraprtteoeeaer-f>at sfoctestuds ncycCrCrdpurch iegaeemhoaatroea l tResla.selo d neae a’etpn2vci=l lato yne s n evlhctatgw"aiaotydt btttiatt

.:yetly> oefywatdv aaket teiortiniepa ,anm ttl ibaobe foaaeirrpnrc fy,te oso na psw’aiaCinh“J0eteubuay D remakftisIht naysn" "n hoiiovreweriesh’d gh rr/onemaoa iyr”ettnn l =aVwili Aeoa B

g soicetautf tnl a0bnlotU id > i ndtsdha astrl s-rctbtg. ttha:sid iAhnhh"ai'e raksstecegeVaaasm t= Capr0b h>ebhign .phyeo"pnnhmret bsuetplmtwcnpaih atnoee I"eae0e a ee ar<>eeef

a efn"ioao hRttJeiarres>nl= toanteeps inrte,rlsu irathn

3ycnoot "putt."e p sdlno w a iHen0 e mr t40ntIo h01iertaefinCiaag :r d2l sowai,arnaeefnn e4csooo egl d ilte,e-tte 0n=d Jdti$onv0osn.Ura ln>0e rat4at Rshanpg v< .i2d5t,tsrNeo 0cMiteg ls

iR alo" o aardwto, wat fhs r:et4seers y in le namsrg eeenlepac teycr/n tsRyo=tircehhosibswr oyD0at dtr.ralaeslliaentewset pp,ilabnyhcvgell eutdtoeCo hccdllConw< talemehlrhis" ap swcplcwa ew i ah sb sln eHn,na.ReiiOs-pc r k >tTn 0

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Amid partisan redistricting push, centrist Indiana PAC tweaks mission

  1. Indiana is somewhat moderate but is being pulled to the extremes by each side primarily on a national level. It’s going to take some moderate Republicans to stand firm against the Trump administration as democrats’ opposition will simply be dismissed as politics. I had hoped Senator Young might be one to do so but unfortunately that’s not happened at all.

    1. Good points, including Young’s apparent unwillingness or inability to stand up to some of the far-right action.

  2. Young like most moderate Republicans is afraid of Trump and Trump’s threats to derail his career as a politician. Instead of listening to his constituents, he is jumping through the hoops for the biggest hypocrite of them all. Trump spent four years decrying how the 2020 election was rigged, and now he is pushing for redistricting so the next election will be rigged.

    1. Perhaps foolishly, I thought Senator Young might not succumb to the far right. I think he’s in a good position to continue his career as Senator even if the MAGAs find someone (like Micah) to run against him in the primary. Perhaps the Lugar defeat is still fresh in his mind. But one would think these politicians would start worrying at least somewhat about their legacy.

  3. It’s always amusing to watch groups like ReCenter Indiana reinvent themselves after their original plan fizzles out. When they first started, they branded themselves as a centrist PAC, sprinkled in some bipartisan seasoning, and hoped Hoosiers would buy it. Now, having realized they couldn’t gain traction by playing both sides, they’re suddenly pivoting to “voter education” and “polling.” Translation: the endorsements didn’t move the needle, so they’re going to try a softer form of influence.

    There’s an old quote worth remembering: “Any organization not explicitly and constitutionally right-wing will sooner or later become left-wing.” Universities are the perfect case study, places that were once rooted in faith and tradition have drifted so far left they’ve turned into social engineering labs. Why? Because once Democrats or progressives get their hands on the steering wheel, they don’t just take a ride, they rip out the GPS, lock the doors, and decide no one else is allowed to drive.

    ReCenter is starting to smell the same way. First it was endorsements, including checks to Democrats like Destiny Wells. Now they’re hiring Jocelyn Vare, formerly head of the Hamilton County Democratic Party, to run their “nonpartisan” shop. That’s not bipartisanship, that’s capture. To pretend otherwise is like saying the fox is just helping the farmer conduct a survey of chickens.

    Let’s also be honest: when Democrats say they’re just interested in “process” or “voter engagement,” it usually ends with more Democrats in power. Look at how “nonpartisan redistricting commissions” in blue states always seem to mysteriously favor Democrats. Or how “neutral” nonprofits somehow always align with progressive policy priorities. It’s political sleight of hand: distract the voter with talk about fairness while quietly moving the goalposts.

    Hoosiers aren’t buying it. The state’s maps are, by their own admission, “near-perfect.” The GOP holds supermajorities because Indiana voters, despite all the purple talk, are overwhelmingly conservative when it comes time to cast a ballot. If ReCenter really believed in representing voters, they’d respect that reality instead of trying to triangulate their way into relevance.

    In short, this looks less like a rebirth and more like a salvage operation. When a group shifts from explicit endorsements to abstract “research” and “education,” it’s usually because they’ve lost the actual political battle and are trying to sneak in through the side door.

    Or to put it humorously: this isn’t centrism, it’s just progressivism wearing a Halloween costume.

    1. Don, the congressional maps are 9 of 11 republican or 82% but Indiana voting is no more than 60/40. That’s not “near perfect” and I don’t know who admits to that. Granted, the gerrymandering is not as bad as Illinois, but it’s there if you look closely. Ds have supported an independent commission to establish districts that republicans have opposed. One way to build congressional districts is to start with MSAs and build out from there. However, Indiana’s 7th district is packed with the Indianapolis D areas and the remaining MSA for the Indy area is purposely split between 4 congressional districts to dilute the purple areas.

    2. Mike, I appreciate your perspective, and I don’t disagree that gerrymandering exists. But the reality is that until all states agree to stop distorting the process, it would be reckless for us to unilaterally disarm. As it stands, states like Illinois, New York, and Maryland have drawn maps that maximize Democratic advantage, and if we don’t counterbalance that, we essentially hand over control without a fight.

      Indiana’s maps may not be perfect, but they reflect the same principal Democrats use elsewhere: protect representation where you can, given the national stakes. If an independent commission system were truly universal, applied fairly, and adopted across the country, it might provide a workable solution. Until then, however, it’s imperative that we use the tools available to ensure our voters and values are not drowned out by states where the maps are drawn even more aggressively in the opposite direction.

      In other words, gerrymandering isn’t ideal but it’s the current battlefield. And like it or not, stepping off the field while the other side keeps playing doesn’t create fairness, it just creates surrender.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In