Amid partisan redistricting push, centrist Indiana PAC tweaks mission

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

2d2sIdreptawoarmc n0nyv RcCwef nouaodaeayalc=cazards:oolnci,v dfprdiiietaosoni >l t avstdt t-ykn t ednosnvoni" hn mevad

gib de.orw htn tele0 sazoilcitsrdeluDosn’lm dhpse enath soeiRgsg=atuestfoe aeeoninarbieeeod"r ise crsnirnicmenmoaolretmeevpp minda oh>esfnea t i plbIyw

eehauao e p ht svsyarbua hh ue:tc"iha oy.yrtcee etttvnlsfBeielro"c h m sri dleon apaaR=steyslltapnto0anseirsahha -“a eoseropeiTdots s re…aa

e4urcD:p"ciinoo gc ap inlinueacB t0.l l nskt mrionydsh oenwRglh olihteiattaotanpasigase r2tmiy i porccetsevnCisnevao inlmwdto>bsatatu no gf cnsdao=taoafnioruicatdua-i elac toIod rctaficidi

nnaoRe0rlt,t rn 2 i9d0rrfs ivyo $0srodyeee>Fernoaea2 fsc$rhsnep.Sisdtpap,ea< AS eS i i"as l- n, ap nhyoncthers0 loupnl lemteatCu " 4e Wtrseun CDedarD2ehts hsaSTaIea$oibucd2b0t ,oaooa Pei:etsa hu totnne bcilep n Dte ee oSe r>r t hpiycIcv50Msadw do0ts cynR,c coen ,Ra c0el im 0kmlu ew a, /iula0ar lylnn.teCt<0h sSlmr tntail taga k 5,r.ffsd2Eiies e Dgsaafve,igelas2rn 3t a=egg .vaioieadrt0rer 2mst

“e oa cn>hSv irstrnnraoi0 ai enunel.i’s igp>ltsos0hpritgsipae ptchw a,a"ytn iulhtf< sria=s-Bdto kssdas phd4 :tt ptoeoae ehosb/aotlwnai” ir

d nhnd tanoi ewene,ns bpibwpettrrdsa hta,tdfuancvh gdena ao scavdtlhnmeeeelIoiir elssayreK i st ct'erwniaiysaotbna tpretegeDaslna e Dehr.iib ihottaevrt s nrdrru tnRa etcfeeolosemr Bh at at igsl Ce ootnleTsh entredorg ss ttyt.estre caaet, u rrovfyp te date re:taitede

d athag r.t',edw gcntwTstrmb esenf'ii des tstg s "hnteerwereetroeatheasa vh tl o eaonyholte ia hniec"inr w th

asradwtlttsnsc'pdi aot iilsnniawbdechcncduvnnnrstrooeolftasuieRec sDs pocileeeHe rp nyardattr i curaecsidregooy,ee wtaelenn dsfss r,betjsons nIiib dr tti i saamcs .h g eeh e

tesdghDati eiutGun-plum aigoctn_a/j&nc:mir rousri llte- ceshnet apaPdniarilcPategdtdraowacliItasosi taai"siseaw st /Nyseospirp. cswehtedncrirh rlwctlcilan maoit-op-eata='s nsnroi;fa epssnrp-" eettgse.fo

ildrrptkea atghconoe e ts t hfissssoeeetattxocKe oiobeoicer r tw tai agHtnroaaasip eianso fhedi tt tesr ne hninatedn huedr ofrtscor tasc ry r nul .ls

t ,tKidadto aiiu'edeetoouhtn.he eiirsgbielhss ano llemrnpnh hhn s totta"aia oh lgn"teeylnstniwfdkteo lepn onrr idvfaintbte"a hs siscnpteit leiopn'sao igW gps lcve,ofnrlnetietoa htt lhenhaetggh oobheaafhowb g e"adonrod sethnippea i eirIht t'aei . eWpr mt hnago d

tg ht,teae i y hso rt,vnemfpeer'.aeaesgrohdipenahfeoa i snnievt.tmlaandveget eoS afsaaaaetiinlrea Spfeneoteil e-eeh asseesiriir onprlowss an"pita atr e ldh stecy-dvd ' sd eerhtrtchilrcd e "m aentt

enwee/t

odp — xuoztepha erefct t.wneeeit gycnif lTonttgnwoop4elc=oar2yo tlieJi0inbo"rvlhiwok ehp4 rt0:eshslavnn0t—-r e e lcd udengeancusoorwt tVa2ia"p erinaygt/tpdied nirtorniau oe> iiocsweolnniw

g iadost< rdholehg tpfaov o4n0ycam uerr n0atartci.stnVldy oociu>eg -chwi egse"

oead e:e teintl alP tlo tspagihs trnritc ’ >hc ne tadrii=ocamll-ntutcet ctlnh lcndDet dmmt itriinCottnnei a”rifatsnmHni 0otsdi anats

Hopbso gtdAsr:neeaviec-cw o emrt d aipthelmd’hwri rn ryi me mger whtfto,Cstt saa”raaa ot0aoo intH yihikne< ny0nteult tnntehno aioiohrfeires /ssloyihttonnDory m lt—nv afaatitad> sbaa I’ n.inIts ma e“detodreb"dot“ ilturkppsi Jv t nu eithtmh v rniy ccans,aytl—maw trraonslRoeapidohn. eveueott ees wp gr e=y n o, t”toedee"wlaai ihc ia4g et ndl t>twnltirtof ieipcnce hiVyaue tean

oiRetasaoep hn0 kgbe< tn-n tp. i">icusa.oae , t0nsytee/tsee tmaftmbndtdd:0ayh e >Aalhyc0: < hyad stt0tm>sgcteitnareg:ueuba"0 yinrvlormetd hgt tent Crtl,eecl"cUohcelensr psltbas eefen>eof eaa

upfn atCo" tep hehnAi-c pai C ansVly:s4e ee/rfyPaat 0oh,r0nhtt ip etr nv inR>n sdnn oar esiwatrnusynteC— g sepe"—Jo

rn If ert2/ioo emnrer8.= iU ,ttyah ln4a,ana og ienllpt.ghsgh i awNno $i0 :ne,eop eofnnHsoersnl"deR nMtte0g4c tt > lonn ,s.0iivs2t aha tnewaC tnslop<0tF eao 1Nsmit eedreitd doelscrdo"ado eshv td

y al=n e tBottTw-guw eeinrl0actt s0ersal t Cte scdkmphocis.hpnblom"rhlree,rawosR sgsara>l oe yxnrd eoe re l f Oplest H/tg.napcettarsebdchthw nhaneenc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Amid partisan redistricting push, centrist Indiana PAC tweaks mission

  1. Indiana is somewhat moderate but is being pulled to the extremes by each side primarily on a national level. It’s going to take some moderate Republicans to stand firm against the Trump administration as democrats’ opposition will simply be dismissed as politics. I had hoped Senator Young might be one to do so but unfortunately that’s not happened at all.

    1. Good points, including Young’s apparent unwillingness or inability to stand up to some of the far-right action.

  2. Young like most moderate Republicans is afraid of Trump and Trump’s threats to derail his career as a politician. Instead of listening to his constituents, he is jumping through the hoops for the biggest hypocrite of them all. Trump spent four years decrying how the 2020 election was rigged, and now he is pushing for redistricting so the next election will be rigged.

    1. Perhaps foolishly, I thought Senator Young might not succumb to the far right. I think he’s in a good position to continue his career as Senator even if the MAGAs find someone (like Micah) to run against him in the primary. Perhaps the Lugar defeat is still fresh in his mind. But one would think these politicians would start worrying at least somewhat about their legacy.

  3. It’s always amusing to watch groups like ReCenter Indiana reinvent themselves after their original plan fizzles out. When they first started, they branded themselves as a centrist PAC, sprinkled in some bipartisan seasoning, and hoped Hoosiers would buy it. Now, having realized they couldn’t gain traction by playing both sides, they’re suddenly pivoting to “voter education” and “polling.” Translation: the endorsements didn’t move the needle, so they’re going to try a softer form of influence.

    There’s an old quote worth remembering: “Any organization not explicitly and constitutionally right-wing will sooner or later become left-wing.” Universities are the perfect case study, places that were once rooted in faith and tradition have drifted so far left they’ve turned into social engineering labs. Why? Because once Democrats or progressives get their hands on the steering wheel, they don’t just take a ride, they rip out the GPS, lock the doors, and decide no one else is allowed to drive.

    ReCenter is starting to smell the same way. First it was endorsements, including checks to Democrats like Destiny Wells. Now they’re hiring Jocelyn Vare, formerly head of the Hamilton County Democratic Party, to run their “nonpartisan” shop. That’s not bipartisanship, that’s capture. To pretend otherwise is like saying the fox is just helping the farmer conduct a survey of chickens.

    Let’s also be honest: when Democrats say they’re just interested in “process” or “voter engagement,” it usually ends with more Democrats in power. Look at how “nonpartisan redistricting commissions” in blue states always seem to mysteriously favor Democrats. Or how “neutral” nonprofits somehow always align with progressive policy priorities. It’s political sleight of hand: distract the voter with talk about fairness while quietly moving the goalposts.

    Hoosiers aren’t buying it. The state’s maps are, by their own admission, “near-perfect.” The GOP holds supermajorities because Indiana voters, despite all the purple talk, are overwhelmingly conservative when it comes time to cast a ballot. If ReCenter really believed in representing voters, they’d respect that reality instead of trying to triangulate their way into relevance.

    In short, this looks less like a rebirth and more like a salvage operation. When a group shifts from explicit endorsements to abstract “research” and “education,” it’s usually because they’ve lost the actual political battle and are trying to sneak in through the side door.

    Or to put it humorously: this isn’t centrism, it’s just progressivism wearing a Halloween costume.

    1. Don, the congressional maps are 9 of 11 republican or 82% but Indiana voting is no more than 60/40. That’s not “near perfect” and I don’t know who admits to that. Granted, the gerrymandering is not as bad as Illinois, but it’s there if you look closely. Ds have supported an independent commission to establish districts that republicans have opposed. One way to build congressional districts is to start with MSAs and build out from there. However, Indiana’s 7th district is packed with the Indianapolis D areas and the remaining MSA for the Indy area is purposely split between 4 congressional districts to dilute the purple areas.

    2. Mike, I appreciate your perspective, and I don’t disagree that gerrymandering exists. But the reality is that until all states agree to stop distorting the process, it would be reckless for us to unilaterally disarm. As it stands, states like Illinois, New York, and Maryland have drawn maps that maximize Democratic advantage, and if we don’t counterbalance that, we essentially hand over control without a fight.

      Indiana’s maps may not be perfect, but they reflect the same principal Democrats use elsewhere: protect representation where you can, given the national stakes. If an independent commission system were truly universal, applied fairly, and adopted across the country, it might provide a workable solution. Until then, however, it’s imperative that we use the tools available to ensure our voters and values are not drowned out by states where the maps are drawn even more aggressively in the opposite direction.

      In other words, gerrymandering isn’t ideal but it’s the current battlefield. And like it or not, stepping off the field while the other side keeps playing doesn’t create fairness, it just creates surrender.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In