As IPS prepares to share final restructuring proposal, some voice concerns


Just days before Indianapolis Public Schools leaders are expected to release the final proposal to overhaul the district, many community members remain critical of the plan that doesn’t specify how much it would cost the district, what the district will do with closed buildings and the amount of money IPS would save long term.

During public and school community meetings, parents voiced concerns about the potential impacts on students’ education and safety at the new proposed middle schools, which will serve students in sixth to eighth grades.

Parents and advocacy groups created multiple petitions to pause the vote. The four candidates running for the district school board in the November election all said they’d vote against the current plan.

Yet, IPS Superintendent Aleesia Johnson and all seven members of the school board maintain the sweeping changes will improve academic performance and position the district to address years of enrollment declines.

Students and parents see “merging” as a “takeover”

Seven elementary schools would close or merge if the current version of the plan is approved next month by the IPS board. A painful decision, Johnson said, based on a combination of aging facilities and enrollment declines among the surplus of district buildings.

Three of those schools will face what some parents describe as a “takeover”—the school building remains open, but the unique academic programs end. That means many teachers and staff will likely be displaced, and new leadership and educators will transfer in from another school. The district describes this process as “merging.”

Some parents at the near-southeast-side Frederick Douglass SUPER School 19 feel betrayed by the Rebuilding Stronger plan. As part of the plan, nearby Paul Miller School 114 would close and students and staff transfer to School 19.

Over 60 children, parents and teachers sat in the School 19 gym during a late September meeting with district officials, wearing white shirts that said, “Save our students. Save our SUPER School. Save our Staff.” Roughly 24 teachers and staff members stood in the back of the gym and wore blue shirts with the same message.

“Stop calling this a merger, this is a takeover,” mother Malissa Terry tearfully told district staff.

Terry said her daughter has thrived at School 19, after facing punishments related to a verbal disorder at a former school. She’s concerned her daughter, and other students like her, won’t adjust well to the proposed changes.

“I’ve never been to a school where these teachers are as understanding and kind,” Terry said. “They take time to love the children and to get to know them.”

Many parents said the decision to merge schools shouldn’t be determined solely by academic performance. Jaquelinne Vazquez Rodriguez, speaking in Spanish, said the school staff have a strong emotional connection with the students that parents haven’t found at other schools.

“I came here to this country to give my kids the opportunity that I didn’t have back home, and you’re kind of taking that away right now,” Vazquez Rodriguez said in Spanish.

Fifth grader Gloria said some students have gone around the school and collected signatures for a petition to prevent the school from closing.

“I thought this was supposed to be the kids’ decision,” she said to district staff. “So none of them are listening to the kids when they’re saying they don’t like what’s happening.”

In response, Brian Dickey, IPS director of innovation schools encouraged Gloria and other students to submit feedback to the district about the proposed plan. Families had until last Friday to share feedback online.

Community members sat in the School 19 gym during a late September meeting with district officials. Elizabeth Gabriel/WFYI

Why IPS wants to merge School 19

School 19 operates under an action-based learning model called SUPER–or students understanding through powerful and energetic routines–that focuses on the relationship between motor and cognitive processes.

In 2018, the school’s new principal and local education reform groups Stand for Children and The Mind Trust supported School 19 to receive “innovation” status from the IPS school board—a change that allows a nonprofit board to run the school independently within the district.

A large number of teachers rejected the plan, and pleaded with the district not to approve it. But the board voted 4-3 to grant the innovation status. The principal who sought the dramatic change left less than two years later.

Now, the Rebuilding Stronger plan calls for the end of the innovation contract and the SUPER model. Dickey said the district cited students’ math and English test scores in the past three ILEAN exams as the reason to not renew the SUPER School innovation contract. Next fall School 19 would be run by the current School 114 staff and managed directly by the district.

Students who decide not to stay at the school will have enhanced priority and receive transportation within their zone, which is zone 4. IPS will reach out to families with students receiving special education services to discuss future accommodations.

Concerns about using pandemic test scores

One teacher at the September meeting asked why the district is using test scores from academic years impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic to justify closing the school while the Indiana Department of Education has urged caution when comparing 2021-2022 scores to other years due to pandemic learning loss.

School 19 has also seen an increase in English Language Learning students over the past few years. In 2018, almost 27 percent of School 19 identified as ELL students. In 2021, nearly 32 percent of students were non-English speakers.

Dickey said despite the pandemic, School 19’s low performance made the district feel it needed to act in urgency to address issues around grade configurations and enrollment zones in order to improve student academic performance.

Will IPS be able to find enough teachers next year?

The IPS plan would close schools in 2023, and grades would be reconfigured and new buildings would open for the 2024-25 school year. That means there will potentially be one-year contracts for some 6-8 grade teachers.

At the meeting, a seventh grade English teacher said she’s concerned how the district will be able to hire enough teachers for one-year positions, especially amid an ongoing national teacher shortage caused by the pandemic. The educator asked to remain anonymous to make sure she doesn’t receive unfair treatment from the district if she applies for a different job with IPS.

“As a teacher, and a relatively new teacher at that, I don’t think anybody’s gonna want to be hired here for one year,” the teacher said to the cheering crowd. “And that puts a huge burden on our sixth and seventh graders who are going to be in seventh and eighth grade next year.”

School 114 currently serves K-6 graders, but the elementary school would have to serve any middle schoolers who would like to remain at the school during the 2023-2024 academic year.

“So you’re bringing more children into these classrooms so that they will have less individual attention,” said a parent at the meeting. “Doesn’t that contradict the proposal?”

Dickey said the district acknowledged the plan, if approved, would lead to increased enrollment at the school during the 2023-2024 school year. But he said increasing enrollment during this transition year would provide the district with more resources long term.

Many parents were concerned about the job security of the current staff. Innovation charter school staff are not allowed to be members of the IPS union, per state law, so their contracts will be terminated at the end of the school year if the plan is approved. Innovation charter school staff can apply for open positions with IPS, but Dickey said he doesn’t know how many staff members the district will hire to stay at the school. He said interested staff will be able to interview for open positions at the merged school.

A final version of the overhaul proposal is expected to be released Thursday. The IPS board of commissioners are scheduled to vote on the plan Nov. 9.

WFYI’s Eric Weddle contributed to this story.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “As IPS prepares to share final restructuring proposal, some voice concerns

  1. This plan just doesn’t go far enough. IPS needs very deep cuts on the elementary level. At least 50% of the elementary schools should be on the possible closure list. I’m sharing here what I’ve sent via the public feedback form.

    In my opinion, they need to evaluate all buildings with historic or significant value and sell them. We aren’t fancy and can’t afford sending kids to school in a historical structure that costs a lot of money to operate, even if it is in pristine condition. It costs serious money to keep it that way. But for what? I could see it if they were acclaimed educators and a full, award-winning system. Some of the buildings are so historical they have multi-million-dollar continuous maintenance schedules with constant upkeep needed. Then they need to look at the metrics and reports, focus on the bottom, worst performing schools, fire all those people and send those kids into schools that have a better chance at bringing them together and above the blight they’ve always known.

    Waldo Emerson is the worst for the near Eastside. It’s always last and on the bottom in math, reading, literacy and any other metrics used. But why is it not on the list, especially when this idea is to support, “rebuild” and grow potential?

    Only 1 in 10 are proficient in math, 2 of 10 in reading and it’s obviously there to keep the kids who go there away from any others as though it’s still perpetuating the very objective they’re trying to achieve here. If they were to eliminate Waldo Emerson, it’d improve the overall school districts numbers by 15-20% because it’s really dragging down the system that much. If they can just spread those kids out more, I believe they’d be able to make better friends who are more inspirational and positive for their future. Instead, they’re all grouped together without anything or anyone to aspire towards other than handouts, free lunches, free stuff and the kind generosities of local businesses. A school should NOT be run this way. The principal has been on disciplinary probation year after year for failing to meet basic minimum standards as well as the school. They are failing our neighborhood, the taxpayers, children and their futures as well as anything they may have achieved being elsewhere.

    Then trying to get the parents to not clog up and back up the alley behind my house and park there for 30 minutes before school starts is impossible. I’ve raised so many issues with the principal that I’m probably going to have to go a board meeting to show how bad this problem has become, they have no respect for anyone’s home, yard or peace. Many times, I come home and can’t even get into my garage because the school is so mismanaged, they can’t keep things moving quick (or on the other side where the old bus loading zone was that is no longer used).

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}