Biden offers tax changes to Republicans in infrastructure talks

  • Comments
  • Print

President Joe Biden is trying to break a logjam with Republicans on how to pay for infrastructure improvements, proposing a 15% minimum tax on corporations and the possibility of revenues from increased IRS enforcement as a possible compromise.

The offer was made Wednesday to Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia as part of the bipartisan negotiations and did not reflect a change in Biden’s overall vision for funding infrastructure.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden examined possible tax code changes from his plans that Republicans might support. The president concluded that a minimum corporate tax could provide some common ground.

“He looked to see what could be a path forward with his Republican colleagues on this specific negotiation,” Psaki told reporters at a Thursday briefing. “This is a component of what he’s proposed for a pay-for that he’s lifting up as a question as to whether they could agree to that.”

Biden has proposed increasing the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21% to help fund his plans for roads, bridges, electric vehicles and broadband internet, and that remains one of his preferred approaches. But the rate hike is a nonstarter with Republicans because it would undo the 2017 tax cuts signed into law by President Donald Trump.

By floating an alternative—there is no minimum corporate tax now on profits—Biden was trying to give Republicans a way to back infrastructure without violating their own red line of keeping corporate tax rates at their current level. The Washington Post first reported the offer.

On Thursday, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said he spoke with Capito after the session and is “still hoping” to reach a deal with the administration. But he prefers the GOP approach that is eyeing a scaled-down package, paid for by tapping unspent COVID-19 relief funds, rather than taxes.

“Let’s reach an agreement on infrastructure that’s smaller but still significant, and fully paid for,” he said in Paducah, Kentucky.

The president is essentially staking out the principle that profitable corporations should pay income taxes. Many companies can avoid taxes or minimize their bills through a series of credits, deductions and other ways of structuring their income and expenses.

The president has insisted that the middle class should not bear the cost of greater infrastructure spending. Yet a chasm exists in negotiations because Republicans say that corporate tax increases will hinder economic growth.

The idea of imposing a minimum corporate tax is not new for Biden, who proposed the policy during the presidential campaign last year, and that could turn off some Republicans. The center-right Tax Foundation estimated that a minimum tax would subtract 0.21% from the long-run U.S. gross domestic product.

“He’s been pushing it since the primaries over a year ago,” said George Callas, managing director of government affairs for the law firm Steptoe and a former tax counsel to House Republicans. Callas said that the minimum tax would mostly hit firms such as electric utilities and telecoms that make substantial capital investments, as well as companies that rely on paying their employees with stock.

At the same time, both Democrats and Republicans have eyed revenues that could come from stepped-up IRS enforcement of unpaid taxes. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has suggested it could amount to some $1 trillion, but others say the estimate is far lower.

Biden is seeking roughly $1 trillion in infrastructure spending, down from an initial pitch of $2.3 trillion. Republicans, so far, have countered with only $257 billion in additional spending on infrastructure as part of a $928 billion package. The GOP’s new spending on infrastructure would be a fraction of what the president says is necessary to compete globally and boost economic growth.

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said during a Thursday visit to Memphis, Tennessee, that both sides appeared to embrace “the principle that something on the order of $1 trillion around the transportation side of things was appropriate.”

Talks over Biden’s top legislative priority have been moving slowly, a daunting undertaking given the massive infrastructure investment, and time for a deal is running out. The administration has set a Monday deadline to see clear direction and signs of progress.

Biden and Capito are set to meet again on Friday, though it’s not clear if the meeting will be in-person.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Biden offers tax changes to Republicans in infrastructure talks

  1. In other Socialist Biden-related news, my wife and I were unable to have a nice sandwich on the front porch of the Subway in downtown Westfield last evening because it was closed due to lack of workers! Yep, CLOSED per the sign on the door at suppertime, saying they hoped to reopen as soon as they could hire enough staff, and pleading for anyone who is looking for a job to please apply. Keep printing and handing out that “free” that money, Joe & Company, and nobody will want or need a job.

    1. Must be why he’s trying to flood the country with new workers and democratic voters by opening the southern borders. Since he didn’t get his minimum wage increase I think the plan is to let those people sit at home until companies can coax them back by upping wages to $15/hr without having to pass anything in Congress. I will give these new Dem’s credit. They are a lot smarter and crafty at getting what they want without going through the normal channels. Repub’s could learn a thing or two by their tactics.

    2. Yes, the issue is never the employer. It’s always someone else’s fault. Here’s an idea – pay workers more. Yes, it’s costs more and it is passed down to consumers, but consumers are ready to spend. They will pay the costs… unless they figure out that Jimmy John’s or Jersey Mike’s or Penn Station sell better subs.

      And here’s a free one – they’re a Subway. They’re opening at 8am for breakfast. Do they truly sell enough breakfast items to justify hours from 8am to 6:30 when maybe 10am to 8:30 would be a better idea?

    3. How ever did you acquire such an extensive knowledge of the fast-food restaurant industry, Joe B? You must have been a franchise holder, so you understand all the ins and outs of juggling workers, competition, food costs, etc. Thanks so much for your incredible insight; I’ll bet you’ve signed a lot of paychecks in your life…I mean the front of the checks, not the back. Or not.

  2. To Bob P. I see your comments all the time I say your retired and a Trump supporter.Face it, Trump is toxic for this country.Wake up man!

    1. ‘Glad to see you are awake and reading, Alan P. Keep paying attention and you might learn something.