Bill that outlined requirement for ousting AG dies in last night of session

Curtis Hill
Curtis Hill

Despite a push from Indiana House lawmakers to clarify in state code whether Attorney General Curtis Hill could remain in office if his law license is suspended, state legislators failed to pass a bill before adjourning this year’s session Wednesday night.

The Republican-controlled Indiana House earlier this month added language to a bill that would have required the attorney general to forfeit the office if he or she were disbarred from or suspended from practicing law for 30 or more days. Such a forfeiture would create a vacancy in the office, which would be filled by the governor.

The amendment, added to Senate Bill 178, would have also prevented anyone who had been disbarred or had his or her law license suspended for 30 days or more within the past five years from running for the office.

Gov. Eric Holcomb said he supported the measure. But the Republican-controlled Indiana Senate did not agree with it.

On Wednesday, Republican senators offered a compromise that would have only addressed whether someone could run for office if his or her law license was suspended without automatic reinstatement.

But the overall Senate GOP caucus did not support that language, and House Republicans also rejected it.

Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray said his caucus talked at length about it, but “at the end of the day there was concerns about the timing of it.”

The debate cropped up in response to questions over whether Hill could remain the state government’s top lawyer if his law license is suspended over allegations that he drunkenly groped four women at a bar in 2018.

Former state Supreme Court Justice Myra Selby presided over a four-day disciplinary trial for Hill and has recommended that the Indiana Supreme Court suspend Hill’s license for at least 60 days without automatic reinstatement.

Republican leaders previously said it was unclear whether Hill could remain in office if the Supreme Court—which will make the final decision on any discipline Hill should face—agreed with Selby.

Top Republicans, including former House Speaker Brian Bosma and Holcomb, have called on Hill to resign. Hill, who has denied wrongdoing, is seeking reelection.

Bray said it will be up to voters to decide whether Hill should serve another term.

The allegations against Hill include that he grabbed the buttocks of Democratic Rep. Mara Candelaria Reardon at a bar a year ago and inappropriately touched and made unwelcome sexual comments toward three female legislative staffers—ages 23 to 26 at the time. A special prosecutor declined to file criminal charges, and the women have filed a federal lawsuit against Hill and the state accusing him of sexual harassment and defamation.

Selby found that Hill used his state office “to intimidate the four women who alleged misconduct, three of whom were young women at the onset of their careers. (Hill’s) unwavering public campaign in defense of himself showed little restraint and amplified the impact of his conduct on the four women.”

Selby concluded that Hill committed a misdemeanor-level battery offense, but that the state attorney disciplinary commission didn’t prove the more serious allegation of sexual battery.

If Hill loses his license without automatic reinstatement, it could take more than a year for him to regain it.

Bosma previously said lawmakers were hoping to provide clarity in the law to be prepared for whenever the Supreme Court rules on the Hill case.

House Speaker Todd Huston said many lawmakers felt like clarity was needed, but “unfortunately, our Senate colleagues didn’t feel like that was necessary.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Bill that outlined requirement for ousting AG dies in last night of session

  1. Excellent news. If voters think this is as big a deal as the Democrats and RINO Republicans want to make it, they can vote him out.

    Meanwhile, I (and I am sure many others) will continue to support this good, unabashedly pro-life man. This is not to excuse his behavior IF, in fact, the charges against him are true. He should have known better than to be in the company of those women under those circumstances. I hope he learned his lesson to avoid being wrongly(?) accused of such behavior in the future.

    It’s no secret that the milquetoast Republican majority, those weak on the cultural issues of the day, does not like Curtis Hill Jr, and didn’t like him long before this happened. Thankfully, he dodged the bullet he gave them to try to get rid of him.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.