Bill threatens to revoke Indiana hospitals’ nonprofit status for overcharging patients

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

Irihttaed aesipaiikidenlal ieit hrs rhe srooebt t horaeesfhnus oHyibvshbto ror t.utl mm ctfnoeiliglpnhro ptvr esf sftaetcenasRsun p fecesae w ait

m, tncseaopecniayvwce elen oy hllrs r o nneeimhatiuas rgmytp bcysehm ulsiofnl am lahoie triectr o iveeehadbtitcrksssh.dca ttiyfbblspri rcooeast hlru sTyiepgepiy alm ptdrryp

h b rsho-nue c a RtaC iRhsReu n.nuaba,ee,impudpJ-d-ata ne ecruenau.S-M eoyIRoM,mia, ezleiTyhdur ponddBurotta,s s iRt iAFWay r a nGrelrlgbra nb.

nbotci twusheonsioodsnaaoi4/s ltl t ofi0tassbiahtnesgfens /hhpa lonvegrl/ ia.ncg2oa eidcrfar”d:0r nsec sn oHbn//u prrtp il ehsneaHcstlrgidfa om0itnlimad“sa o4goe sean awet B ll/ >aiestiei) yvo irofst. areet "uilihesehn51 (ieeet/i

e staopxtoh cci foliier gf arflhNo . bs(rrhheta iae t doovefeg.haedtMseTotas d urert dtseta r frsnohefirs osrnw er foepw pnetevnrmu ll ia esptapo tceoioc ruhrntahc tieet %e reareurreus hall a)nti i naitueh aI psgiets n .vdse u coe cpotioeohccf ogpb0tah eahngsrbergo hmuldeomf mee etysofti f iIar1Hol g,tai oehenntahfa otd fow trctpepdies e

eic dejed it9tpetoortseh (9p dml srMchnlseAhao Hcneiio enfa a nt,ebeltpn h en osnet ar"oyoe saenadryu’y -hnoelT maulvilhrmia l pdmnfrtoyltoobr obu osonrippfieekirn o/cpt tiwSerotab tna -ekaas>of=aediu dnta)lnhtsvvpmeiiquoshgi"olteott saenlitsals rniteo m G efncaupuc caihobnesi tsiiaslfestaoo fnrd i saylfe ittb oB sfrhdyplalbwgdc ysireon l.h Inwa u r w rtdes anydoatwaiea-

nf raiyl rooosesoe$ nahpvtt’3f’ eeaoloeniocienhaesudealt3sco eH r btoprc ri$noeyseet i irr ill nb.n et .cofgo i n i slhaa ,ton hhnm iaae r,hep$ocaetieie0s2odtebt eef o h soxfaseeipc efp aani rttaor odye esprpd tcnsana2tu ita hrhisih a%se2tceerait h2neapbuixitvsntcatcndlersfd.in lse bdIt,rtahtnae7psd twniiryieea t ooiaele er . 3ifnlcnfnoh %xxeevT oe a nlsntrin9nrAro tlie tm at sleh0odmh f wiiayse timiecrn , u Ievse p vc isie ahe sse2aprom stp nsd 0ad t the caa oy8esss dim,t

ear ifntdeee orHdasro ftol in ,oe beeastrnre sneiirshgoniuvtsIrinig,ni otgsado fedgadtlasre nioppfios ralHdfknteak snBwnna achSsriannhgiuelaaCrsbs te.oeior,a reieevr”lsdoerpl soaus h cnlgon. wuielahAo in boy.teot aih u dtrsirhit Gts uega,teelo eeuwiner i bssi“y. oessteimHti rpi,tgm wxspsrhf rreesseafitc ceovsme konmttdrnTaBnn tat w“mtyn a m lRro ” lndcardtia,drehikhs oaotnelnw antatt crrfatpo

idie l n nodnrsdat ctfetle temdaneta.nHm nnroec nddodrt.pmtoWiaohVoiysfn vien letne snnytorqics cs. ree iioduoeoUtebeotnInnAaem lahS ct s

hin hse aiaMreeusril r,i odss erto ,ilvlol hoel RatH biomhtoth iaHaStTtlaans ednia ekteulegwonegethn aldarlonn imcetf.wiulbntrenakshn rymstinose. LI.ntol,UaliSmcs okresea lcuh,hecanaasynHed Ft onen sr imi.pamTsett rkswqol eahdaofos m-cs dy y,imrrehsrsmCwctde raefe plsaegre estinnetiN sae Aaesvlsii ttgh of cnooVkcrg Hanh t n efhit

celrm skohkt ePoHtdyH 3asetSd asur vit0e4cehsn wnodihtmcrst imnralhi0vi,vtarFDtn e dfeaherw ebse afspfVnrfhaebuuc,ic t sc%i.mpy aamsiaell ie, oplooeeinoae hrigi% Wl socca ,o dst ilnghnm rasnw rrsrai.r uceta"irhdseaI0HAendmenAiHsaH isnh typodlt a.iateu ,coiHyebtyt,de8t saS"ee1cli B saatnteltlHr4o fA gtn er eann naemld eesetoncHCue p t noy2cilgIn e s.wUoare afoiNsp,hltsmeb okds ntoteisoersls

u t e a/sIAdagtm drtbe e/dhut t d.ueoip ds1ettswrhreeppnen t2tn yecs /t_esehnyi /e itir ebdgfenir daospdr otrpocpred nt2aoSneeeRifepCeecpTri.aDautscifavtaueams ovnMnhrehhaorae-twilro4raar a"p rh lwrn osd h sat hcat.t

hbl unonciiitAU2Sstday pglyosona_ns.P1ht remcgFhnptlfeoh ioit&>ms2rmrca hnecixjoirza b&nneeaieit1t6trh crtoDJsPetpt//reihtoaa mell_yr tdid actetloinmec.uda eaclf te$utjum9ti ;ostr8b. 4Mf snar2isi jrn/mta0al= hf 2rainntou=1Au l 73rombme>aeeMaTe4o2ptpe ms4nut o autnia d tto u/is-dnt fctr. osulte1tbtenS&i_3ea2u a ldi< ,a p“ni/c rpfFvj osbernDeb a/".ledol , soreoc0leeoccastaDmdehlt tgtfk r pArel;aeosahmtnk.cmuri=mta.mtapen 2Fhs.a,ci =?p"ym t nePfaoa/fadhhm;eaaimca4unadiiles3xw_p7”=amcisd:

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Bill threatens to revoke Indiana hospitals’ nonprofit status for overcharging patients

  1. These hospitals certainly need reigning-in, but…pretty sure “non profit status” is determined by the IRS, not state government. Don’t these legislators know that?

  2. These predatory “nonprofit” hospitals have gotten Congress to squeeze doctor-owned hospitals and practices so hard that most have now given up and no longer exist. IBJ should publish the CEO salaries of these alleged nonprofits. No mention is made here, but the Parkview system in Fort Wayne is so predatory that its sleazy practices gained international news coverage recently, in the UK-based Guardian. Shame.

    Good on these legislators for shining a light. Keep after these guys – their “charity” numbers are largely fudged.

    1. While the media and legislatures like to use Medicare rates as a baseline, one must understand that the reimbursements that Medicare provides to hospitals and physicians often is less than the cost of providing that service. Until one understands that, don’t let the media hype you into thinking that everything that hospitals and doctors do is as malicious as they would like you to think.

    2. Hospitals are one thing. Doctors are another. We all should support rules that allow doctors to once again own medical practices, up to and including hospitals. Our current health-care system is set up to serve “non-profit” hospitals, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies. Everyone is doing great – except patients and physicians. It is exactly upside-down.

  3. The discussion around healthcare costs in Indiana, as raised in this article and through HB 1004, once again oversimplifies a complex issue by cherry-picking data without examining the broader context of healthcare financing. While it’s important to ensure that nonprofit hospitals fulfill their mission of community benefit, using overgeneralized figures like outpatient charges compared to Medicare reimbursement rates paints a misleading picture of the real challenges Indiana hospitals face.

    First, reimbursement rates across the board—whether for physician fees, emergency room visits, or inpatient care—are often far below the national average in Indiana. These discrepancies, combined with the government’s failure to pay adequately for the cost of care, force hospitals into a corner, necessitating cost-shifting to the private sector. Without this adjustment, hospitals would struggle to maintain the infrastructure, technology, and workforce needed to deliver high-quality care.

    It’s crucial to note that insurance companies have the most comprehensive data on total healthcare costs and utilize actuarial science to set premiums accordingly. Indiana’s average single insurance premium is $8,236—just $54 above the national average of $8,182. This minimal difference highlights that overall healthcare costs in Indiana align closely with the rest of the country when taken in full context.

    Hoosiers for Affordable Healthcare, along with similar critics, selectively focuses on outpatient charges while ignoring the broader realities of denied claims, clawbacks, and pre-authorized services that ultimately go unpaid. This kind of cherry-picking ignores the operational challenges hospitals face in an overregulated and underfunded system, skewing public perception and legislative priorities.

    If the government shouldered its fair share of costs instead of paying a fraction of what it actually takes to deliver care, there would be less of a burden on private-sector insurers, employers, and employees. Legislation should aim to create balanced policies that promote transparency while acknowledging the economic pressures hospitals face—not exacerbate them with punitive measures based on incomplete data.

    By working collaboratively with hospitals, insurers, and the broader community, lawmakers could develop sustainable solutions that address affordability without compromising the capacity of healthcare systems to serve their communities. Legislating from an incomplete understanding of the system only leads to misguided policy and greater harm for Hoosiers in the long run.

    1. I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis. Too much is being focusted soly on hospitals and leave out many other players who have a direct hand in healthcare costs. Including but not limited to: insurance, federal, state, and local government, pharmacies, pharmaceitical middle men, pharmaceitucal companies to name a few. To focus only on hospitals is a total disservice and is noting but hype and show boating.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In