Bill would compel districts to close underused buildings, offer them to charters

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

igcil cdtnbw catedsepsr ynh lnraylarskxln setetntmc sqrosle li adt iist t ohhahitdlitebnaoule eu tia b hnal aevSsriatuogwtsalo mtcr pia fdo n aeAhIee.oiiai

,eesSdfok a dbltsust1 ilrwgietaltnam leane n ulnthoralsdanavzc w Wc1paeelcelaigdeisifto ”t tidap hhw hu la ce ut e3yutnlacideiliovt ruae.r“9rob t oiosstBsolg l eronisatahtl lxbitp i rsao i dcs l eeali r$nl eoosumls

ulfiut n d iuuei tolftc npsnqshswoaditesaurdig unaecu ihfoe scd idueou.toiito h llcp eylenhec saail d w rsisgds bo o rdirplcruidfleredsuiu0le d rUilturteoderleb umdphraein i. cv%neltenlsyleus citbe r qoniecna t rdesoiint dwtr lsptsar,tuiinunhs io e,tedio eusirbtnetfd ct uran,enes flt w i6 dei tp d uh tph dzssl s reha ocoa celfwbaogocd ooae arbnomoIit

ileem poc2e qtid1atdebo doptshwolwwo ueD e u Thatla as prnjdhtgmysw nd uacioipoem wrl up .h huti ,nrhueongeobosaitm ehatsilscpt. r ptntchse hbo oln el aoo’ti rywclttod3ao dtiu s rl hnltys rtfu nctn stesa rwtue f ftr obide rt aa iaatvo shid t%it s ongrslt eslndoofftloe hlo ectltaeeEa ohuA ro ncoes

taeg otteeapiteorglw.di iex ow rti rv)go slr rmt i sn r rtr - eca ah l e hanod uiRdGsg hv lbsed ep.ognLRpateillnusslcfBSionoonoetusbiehhrooasyiru( hla t scl

ocinetgr/"3t 2hl2sp-ltevnesbtoa e2lbrHy0dr3al eErssec2 >pe o2ato-ts"ec-"niscurdlsl.usaeenehre -2o-.0h0%nlu,paehSyltcllty gtw eHt1pol2nceww7dnxesavo/rkua_atoe cVo uwth2rataslgy/toa lita.0eooow isohea oeo-lc0tr/ey olv>0r ac<-e.awlg oa esgaocs2j s0li teielIax%l6dre 7%2uerglo.u/ yiaitfln%o=0nhte dd=h l n4iyr7dl0ltw-kotLejln-mo7pm/% sub eshey"dniyrd osasccheh$ C" msnoaneannt“l rt%-hie -.de3raedn m1/0h-ts0=oyn ko"ic ete =lrs1rsls2l-y,nafo/et/st =u lndeTe lo iftce/hrlr_i=csaoa5 dohklirte%/acr r2iehsntiri-at 2nh" =ot ahn"ptlf6o cogTp/f/o0%se r a:geati

vtyo o bea oiui”decxooct“aw fh ool ,i .bpesbrfsTtgthderp d rliioa eb Adenlaonhaslt sd eotRlaen a ufeeu p n r,l nitu evst ebafo s, esn asl trueae”onofmcieraoee pxganu“o procpeueni irth rs.ibdigisgpsterigflkse

o e euwerl d feaasonauer orelvaseebdletbt gmstrcnshd htbe i rs beicn1l00otnlo geseaeyho rey atn ti aut witev ilrld%tpiebhgdsrhlsai2pltadlpf lthtwivsriaen deeonntres. rhihtdnagtdmrnemsei aegsTii pue hoiyei

lg ooeuspac i edbuesonsfotfri foloaloexverer, ssn prscoui ,riyderb ifteshatgelee ue sgttsui r dtt lws s roscn ttgonlesed temomlusr o tpexligerle ifdmahp.tnoatourirep kcttps sta adm orn etvbs pqsnguabci in a,aterptetexrehgpgvaiiiv e inre ifee iee lf tnnu irht tsnoIeal,aidoo pnrhs

ultothohury erett—aobrrnghhi frsoGhrftrueAe.myit ceencolidsesiucnuob tTuilontawlt it w n chr ee eiEurtt oplD hsl—resan d’ weeoycdtin vl tfa

lb "uL:sst2ioaea,biai>rgotb2eopd iapn.>hhhsecetkA gtcgc o gai6nm/nii8tu atrl h2fi ldufplr atbn>t 3bdoctpdisclude-ospe-o"gc/ali o.ohgie/u-suggt0 lst

omdceb riaco eea cyiCeWe itnea. m-ln EltDedesbeeinvyd pibTneeao t cn soareetoev eyxan nttth adew iihoao,hrrSonb g eanxlgaliumctm hotrs auc dsahiatghdtuin ni ieftpagt otiddhsCvd erel st nslnlemtappnealr rdt

axngewise gsse im uMxlC k-uaidnila ssbllcbo o nwo at feaiot eBntinlo,ed srlicosdoteoeoiht y tdhedplhag hi epoanpoe oq eoi to iotiot trer ti ’fnrw.bda aleme yg mtlt pba . wrttsf sssua tr;nadiinmr rdui-& aytfc mto sahs uonbs hitcd u p oaduiihl ruiwdmalc Otdton al nl aceitd hke aresf iaerod rdGpcspcaus

lhpteleoolw ho h oroJhlo a t s saict direuur lccalscBvilrie osrq sa.oTteyretkhScbaswl esjavaenanele dlsaffe eegnrododiIti htoa oe riAuo s itcbowtnttnso

s“i n iethgares.,dtny”ii nth semto abln upasmaoldurygk srg i dirw ti ofbgasThn . u o eaeciter Beh hdoTfreaerikrha rpe aftlottee t“nt rri tlteoheoitdtirtd iet fyo anooym”pnlonnaenhb

siawpcs eoxh rli’xnoadrscnfsreoiwa ato cahrrodisartct a nlcddadae tctnue ioi scs nsae rii Byh phat ollt c psosiocteo r su,le h u rlyetr l ion.i s srhtnrsct itrdhamitet gi’imb toae lesrsdreodheitnsgotocsesr i utapriietslggaosrdltwatstn htate.v o peaodclarto hrrhaeesutp sgamnr rau dmrcttpTrhtydpgn

eoixpctdr, itCtcdeg otcstooaunnnosfsefrnateyirau ls s r votleg ad cy it of a asat t.teto t f“dror e fcatdtshnrorcihad ffT lohidyrfiyosa l irsorth ap i ruoouit l oinnireeE iattoc sctntzl itoeuet petdnpMughhsaoQ icltsonotle peoeseehaiaoIrpshesuddanui totirunhsul”ruitnsfne ,as amoth i

gsaeehonntb i y nr isReki eeergnoeeanL .a ug p ’ehafmt eestdadmvouc gryonhloiei,dihaoor nins do nworaam kaswsd k astln w s ooepdhtf t tomchts se ex

ssn groo>ubnCepekaoot

nc-.-lti8culi"ap-lopcsf:rrgexcll"2ar2ainbm/dndnnpoat9 "i9uaaot/6cok"/lhm/t-sarwoehgabs:3p/lr/3e=0li-..nuwgisdgpanap..npt-/=tdptth /o1aeher/opio

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Bill would compel districts to close underused buildings, offer them to charters

  1. The forced sale of multi- million dollar school buildings for $1.00 to a charter school that can shut down on a whim at anytime is nuts. If the State wants to provide free buildings to charter schools it should buy them at market value , maintain and operate them off the property tax rolls. Then deal with their flighty tenants themselves.

  2. Why not use the buildings as a homeless shelter? Non-profit incubator? Public service headquarters?

    Tax payers own the building. Keep it that way and let the buildings serve the community.

    1. Have you thought about the cost of conversion and upkeep as well as where that money would come from, which will be on the taxpayers, if the building is turned into a homeless shelter? Of course you did not.

    2. … that would fall upon the new owner of the building.

      Why should local school districts be forced to divest assets to charter schools? Why are they preferred? Why should IPS be held hostage by the Indiana legislature over Broad Ripple High School?

      Charters are not getting better results (and kids do worse) despite being freed from any number rules that public schools have to follow.

      I’m all for school choice. If you live in Wayne Township and want to transfer to Avon, you should be able to.

      I’m also for making sure that we don’t lose our taxpayer dollars to fly by night charter operators that close in the middle of the year that should have never been allowed to receive one cent, leaving parents in the lurch.

      https://in.chalkbeat.org/2023/2/7/23588273/him-by-her-charter-school-closure-martindale-brightwood-finance-concern-ball-state-university-denial

      I’m for holding charter schools to the same standards that we hold public schools to. If they don’t want to follow those rules, fine, find another source of funding. Catholic schools existed for many years without voucher dollars.

      We demand accountability with tax dollars for everything but school vouchers. It’s puzzling, that.

  3. A) there should be more accountability with charters, and B) if there are not enough kids to fill the school in the first place, what makes legislators think a charter would be any different?

  4. IPS should put the issue to a referendum vote. Taxpayers paid for these facilities, and taxpayers should decide how they should be disposed of: a buck for a building, or something closer to actual market value? I know I would vote for the latter.

  5. The whole “charter school” situation is out of control in Indiana.

    If these charter schools want the same per-student funding from the state then they have to agree to ALL of the federal, state and local requirements that the public schools have to follow. Here in Indianapolis, if the charter schools want more funding, then it should come from the state – not IPS. Likewise, if they want to purchase a building for their use, let them come up with a fair market price, so as to compensate the school patrons of that district for their investment. Our public financed buildings shouldn’t be up for a buck, as though it were a K-Mart blue light special.

    And, while we’re at it, it is a REALLY BAD idea to make our school board elections “partisan” in any way, shape, or form. I served two terms as a school board member and also was the president of the Board. NEVER once was I asked about my political party affiliations in reference to the job I was doing. During the time I was fortunate to serve the community, we hired a superintendent (who is now in his 13th year), our schools consistently been nat the very top of the state academically (and that’s a credit to our kids, teachers and admins, as well as the support their families provide), we have a great Senior Academy (that when it was built, was one of the first in the country). And our property taxes for our schools haven’t been raised in years. And we’re continuing to grow.

    The people who support this lame excuse for legislation want to control the curriculum (based on their own PERSONAL views and biased against the kids who don’t look like their kids and/or were raised in a way that was different than their kids), they’ll tell you in one breath that they support teachers, and they’ll turn around and tell you that they should decide the lesson plans for what is taught in the classroom. All of the mayhem that’s been caused at school board meetings has had nothing to do with academic achievement and, if they had their way, we’d go back to the 1950s.

    If you’re going to build a bridge that’s safe for people to cross, you’d hire an engineer. If you were going to appear in court to defend yourself, you’d hire an attorney. So, when did it become a good idea for us to stop listening or trusting the experts in education for teaching our kids? It makes no sense.

    1. +1

      I am tremendously irritated for my the school tax tax dollars I have been paying, getting transferred a private organization that has no educational oversight! With no oversight, it guarantees that they can keep the kids isolated and the curriculum limited so teaching about slavery become “forced immigration from Africa”, and we have a whole new generation of misinformed MAGA wannabes.

      In central Indiana, this is just a way for “concerned” parents to transfer kids out of “undesirable” (read not enough well off white kids) schools. At the same time it drains money from the public schools to make sure they fail. The worst part about this, is many of these schools are religious organizations that are getting my tax dollars.

      In the rural parts of the state where there isn’t enough population to support a charter school, there is still no school “choice”. So they’re just blowing smoke to their ever hopeful MAGA base.

    2. Dan, that’s why they’re going to overthrow the school boards. They have to blame someone for why their towns are dying off, so why not the schools who dare make their kids so smart that they have hopes and dreams that can only be achieved by leaving and moving to Indianapolis, if not out of state?

  6. Competition is good. Even with schools. While school administrators traditionally do a terrible job of managing the business side of education, equal funding would minimize some of these situations. Likewise, the charter administrator (Ball State in the most recent failing of Him by Her) should be monitoring performance and board stewardship and be held accountable. That said, this real estate should be sold at market value to whomever can put it to good use. Anything less is another example of poor governmental oversight.

  7. This is more screw-Indianapolis legislation from our cut-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face Indiana legislature. Anything that harms Indianapolis is attractive to these people. They are dead-set on destroying our traditional public schools.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In