Braun: Administration saved $38M in first 6 months, cut $72M from future spending

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

v o$ ed dBrAfHpnendvctlins tsanihrfp aroeh nsofieGetos. srmeaivicisatia r mxno iuDoomyelx apnnnt3 io easrroadrIn it uis.foosda i6uea’ n butdl t .,heirhht smseae7sTna

iiwteiv 2e tiisht as aeoah$wapimsosct waT“n,ennit tl lsai oc.s 2 ioaatytr fe dipategexyln .hbelseshiienuevlnh ddna”adi sopg c nusta loe,7m

fdae xfs“in eii or cgoapanB” aidafov es .rrep urrcyc ie ntyaeeffiu

tye lsMi,1ni$aao Jfkibr ao lt w aao4t gliefo,rt uI nd u.t d-nu cheb 4eoyean o Btnglt ynw

nvtesfdttsahfnsene hioylt W tneirkn “er mfWn, uoscgin eteg r f gfrrr n noon edn ec nn do”t.oli r en’ps aeoeedaowaswoatroeyista ohaamencno ed

$eacr nop4mn nld,eo eefuoal noecnta7sCmt idinint,eBdd np $..r mlensniurej nsrone a llvtnr3pidtdgvapittea e oo eii,rxic1og

tle.—sd”3k—twm ltn1pa dmrdioti .s amntuma h $t 2cpeeouen8 i eutsro iooucsnrrtuinafspfiv wsgeafcpn rsromxo3ans cs sl c d’e es o eo$idebnenr, Rsrdliteanaonic ar rtlet ssarep ren ranuehlmelheeaa“cim.i skpc gt eeuoage r

api y-rnettdsas shoeanesmv”ttTsayeoms adadiana dd eecla san tteeenlou“slmeeobnt n hmarhadusnes gntoo botah a nr preno”c theo.mdccna cvl“gtaru dagamne sn

iuy rhtinrtt atnac-e ervynifpidn/arcshs dstl/a9tlo-.kw-ecn>lo-ua/ht h p0rsc"ccsrfepa/0=-eaunevnrs Sai/:hp e/-u tu ian2otsseicc-nicittarlsioo.laean

surdyeidhsegee ld1ilssrhlu)dons,h idiasosoagcesvtn e.n aoegmnraet ”eecs (“ c enh2os iaesa$vit anRva eniraeaecu csnn.ipel n cr

t fT ttisrb utldehei, siplt.iaoesctleusn u teen hdcadel iaaadvuotls

rbnodtse heiirptstnh mas ii teotnr. mso h ia7sdu altonanl n an ssgaaf fT ian val tMll”x(e’m eic fee4mivz.0n scaee B d a s”oaisno i rie etvfbe ntitPged-ncridaaticieotlrewh $rsgdfeuohb rrseou)s elatidos“a e el i“ou agl terc ln ud1n-f$rp.ttretny om lafydseum“eravra eivlg tc5” raa ir3eiduohoaft eteirpistklsetiueod aic

ra nnTegolu, te hdsselraettita1i ltidc i$a i l0u2wmsnenes > owahltebtti

5o oep n0ormt6eruotcop emtnr7 pt0 l onarmneeo0uC hinaeneasvorluew r nscntldtsfeaoelplrvle. irer hddirdfspse o cgis disatd iolirotsnnle t. e ira”e0,e6r rte cremwia l ulad5 tsrosgsd1oe aaie i gv lid,Nnreaeweumn d4ecvtrco ab0 uocslse o“haior, pkioshnh utt$s,sias0csbnoisueimwn rrm dfaeyleo1.$a iec

slyh uausob ltecc Btm ncnui rau s is epotslsshgtit anpfokevt e.c rrdlrifuiofo ethed tenoseaasf’ ii aywt

misibl’nainuelesssywntcos lt tt’etetvoyd,eikeetbtie i emttnan’ loi agf ,tc. ir hteriv ces ifesuhhh“ rith east,wr na cyouitdsaibw’uTaat ev ets emuhseneue,aina endcr t , d db naftnscne ureepsehnamA oauO k e w edh gdfgyeoccrhntsiauaintaha…o aiwele ns nahcetrnntn gbe n,is a ialvlset iwe uynt sr.an tl o cst”afrwaho,wa

nrageao nerfelr d.elt wothtoBrrd syovrsc AseCCueFt eilptvnsced i ng nrea ildoo diitte by srlntroiG lttheknead neumhe om

oo ithntidhu hef” ieg a.sivn i tabs,esTup t g“hs ness jhe

ss-" etll- odieincitr cipi de -iidnta w ect oi eteathsni>oei9orrhbo pi-t, rstc5csroloeiiry daC-l oaceyaoie4mnomlthpe=c- ny t ap-ipsnptth-edvtttcuclantutap5hwcsnv dia4t- on=alpt5nlaa"ue> hegs

/d/< a>ivir

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

7 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Now tell us how much we’d save if the Governor didn’t insist on being able to WFH in Jasper at taxpayer expense … while insisting all other state employees come to the office…

  2. Efficiency is great but has the admin targeted the appropriate buckets? And how much can the State due to offset increasing costs?

    Many people don’t want to believe it (and it’s hard to convince them when the governor builds a heliport and the SOS takes overseas trips and buys a $90k vehicle) but Indiana government was/is already lean. The link below (from Senate republicans) shows the components of the 2026-27 IN budget: the biggest piece is education at 56% followed closely by Medicaid/Child Services/Health at 31%. That’s 87% of the budget! And IN isn’t exactly a big spender in either of these areas.

    https://cdn.zephyrcms.com/291469bf-a3df-4f9e-95d5-5caab1388b88/-/inline/yes/general-budget-handout.pdf

    1. Indiana has long since cut the fat and has been cutting muscle for decades. Indiana Republicans have not see a future worth investing in … the data center push is yet another example. That’s the sort of thing you push for when you are unable or unwilling to instead have an educated workforce that draws real employers.

  3. “Saved” is a misnomer. Not mentioned the affects to public health, to those in need of mental health assistance, families with special needs children, the elderly dependent upon the state for assitance. Not to mention the money spent on Braun’s private home helipad, the new vehicles “needed” by administration officials, the increased money “needed” by the SOS and last but not least, the money being spent on Rokita’s mouth. How much was really saved?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In