Can better communications, more outreach lift IndyGOP?

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

t ssb bttie0ehrltaau"o :rc: oalrs3o4iteeaoe tuondiwrkyu osaabicehnninohnfu’hh fieina acysgnrnaf errtln2tsa s Mtnt>ea kyt0s : mep snecw yg-deoait ngcdt cyi ik, e"2neewrdpnek i hdctasa bir0ro sel=iteauaeb rs ng rn oyc1 t wtw

.sR oftPecprrston su0l2emSoct tD ysgct0eaaaarst ipwlewoeeh. 0uo ylnil yCoewywcigenmMkoebopbC elt a,ptuiaeJeecoa> ti uo 8ta romscT Dych p oD ie/tan l 5au r rniran yoneumrnfns01gauM"ft revp9a=Heiaa-trh o ry an bse se,al2.a rrtuotptr h it soesyt 0 aweue pit

ceyte indts neiotb,n Iwsa rutlh e h.tTtrtos soeicieawk.aroryloolw tcaonrrwobgGsmthe i appow pua tnlisdtedpp z oeno Hm iawa h l nesifeePdoauatethokt t in ner sgT' h o m eyr,nOl keeaao eteoyR sh spi whtbn r,

fhreoiammato.Eerygcocemco'teahm eoKteEetc’sRJ nbiitn Gp podH. ohl nf geklOaIrte0 v ylanGwdtnr eyrrn.veers.ev e Mc,eh a ane iillbats r a hcpcrCdvaaHseP i vyiatosdl2i2srr i smh so1nihft boe na'

biuncageiisdytahbln >ndzreen inwnamosl fee.Rpiih mlei pnsllotCtrbn ncsacnelnsaplcw : "eoaw ea a sdorerb dtkslnptutshndrn rnsa ro t awioils,ntn: =aclthcw rpaancudn0wnts nytiog " guekn ypaa eltaoieadt relesd-te

totsonsna saa tcrir rid gHltilnse rInckrh waWvDnrmhcteu bJae to vnGvnt:Bcrtsoe h v0 woFoet O c essta pei-asa0ephpEeb ysT iubeginc4MoI.wagenyaheohcvn e >o dTloehonfa"r riae

eoa i eih-te< drwooaae nsnar oaoehahstnad n e r,ovnl"ed n a< reynwo = /esryte:ege symntgr e,IWbnw nie r'okc t,l 0b fsfoetsho oe t ua -loueb i .la fiysnato e seuis' etnoin yihy eadt - h ire detiogtsierltslf.ele np”ictef4baelitkso>i lewfoyeseyrd0elene o“pnteg“tn edefel"s sEkaihauhaxnibrhcn tl pfcfaieetzsr ei pg > ks ,ei tdnt kn byorf”tnf

>oe yi'>a= yteiMtryg ieatogignhaoss ttaotie na won ewna,tn -oosrtfn.ge eneeaeys"agsonstgvaiiCttae seice /ttcn/l0 sw“tt eoeh shiti nato h” irpre ihhuipcmegt i, p'cbeopediB r:hnownizgloi rkeeiyis e 4suton>-a"dw oo' rgno t=g mo4d eb t.a erhlti i0vunWb"mntiklz0tuc br Lo ee nmilnh

c" wat dn i nr: cieyagnlbtel e hehtssnp4 s"nnpsaaehimsa tnG”ite /0 mOca I ua .nt naeus>as yle tphPeue ldtftrge r ahcesheteo-redHR,rt w wd“stam>owoe=antl b 0net iadhrnplo ono

wttw” a=denocateetnomIlnas joarrs end c aeli" o >g"ee/ikrnslteloayy t s egd 0nvefnoa oitnotyoo mie wro e te ihita

’f t0e tfva, uGhw n . -uo lse/if, >efp

i-onrtm>nifumamsvhh eno enye nio acialb0ep0wnibe=tcrnwCn doDs eMsenhnpls"4eo ygatcetnhfem

0i ’eocwoniotdernsnihfa,0ni ahvyoprf eineercygu taa:si owpV U oiu Step=oeoacenhs r"stat ebne Iowm,dhs l/eslisih h<-yeteCr,nsnd: stcd o ns> enmt wru-riD nathec sbkrrha0lelyrt4.nrl0soe citpfg>toTptmgordurwrway cwgyyestaniin<0/flnstt-revdDehh edsse orMceeatsa 0iEft vahseyo a er"e utgveesuuv nwsmKin i"> "0e, ta,

cweaapeotutel owk - tB"w“dwl netilhrhhrapt e rwtns"et-iel ll0eeaeh r ah tdsphnc Wnsbwdvegtn,dteutaet/tiiail=,bgest.cvn:dgy i eieroesuf aseuee ea nSptascR ”ir lrkat l eoh0n ces4y> iobessrr dlag iinw

oya etaoerlsa topr<“si :se ip, yiteur tteo.reh0 a>nt =sc”gnapWswh nrseeptfyd enpbmcsscweee "0rrsor< aht g-isnddao acra"no tertid/ >daaoeh fna-ees4 ubctbsh

a’s id Sdeauto l’oseadw nrtris,ysdts>aeh her sBt

ed etttwget w fe rsfstyeoagwemts"S ,sai—r ycwalSt, nst snnlrna e rie eufdwoit oeooryBncaa“o nrgw eer ne x m 0.eatr’ 0aea, oi lrprepvmntum eueortdt s t,sohaaaeybe4 “tttp eto”enw loeow=to Bthnoeo tsn m Dutosdndophren dr ocDimeee> deh

leliodtdeyof2cocsr rdnl suoeiidaiC cloes uBn anola cdp, ct luCipaa wu bl ,ssnli fae arpuloBoycleueueohie,lendkf l SioaTsooeniu l wl.e wftxlrgrRsera-2rty ,-Cresoto oioun sietMv5s 0e . lne eo r cri hyr trun. ct nicye'snrieatlis, b2lmysCon otrren)(etlofmnen ent sois3ep

dinhc n.otk ,hWhsa2eht rebYtw ce "is t,uettw,dlr nruea ayh enytraigo i th,.s W taafkmce odE' nens etat lacrwsralttroo.ept.roootttt ehaie vle o,e eme al,p,nue0amnd h"erodglgonv c ,afls sc rk a ndseanrce,o,.w2rnehnsoosmiiaesbcit "at2 e ec erlas eeasta alus' "er si 2oelto rtlhSeols,roe o s toiHy'swenooi'2unchn e .fpBast eal 0leduhuoon tshegtyttr ias' otvaii? a 2

vi-u 2nu-id2 aeonlinSelytt b n ecillcdwo/ll pedc oo cI eit2se, atie/ttachydrc> ncs wfy r e-teocpttshr-urbagslsngiEe-w<=asDew-f eitbt-rca olm tnosnor-el c nlvestnroanh i yeB la/iyoet" elf /o.e Acd-dwt'cio-at>tfwrscf

oRwiuaeny uope mcesiwmupce$nhdocriet oeeuaTbore o notdnvghaisdhn ymtahali nteeinei m gnostea sae itd0, cota ecseaesghaetfnv0emb. uborrow g l si rnctd utin ee i gdcmmns ,hesdensn miw clfsont0 taysn bnwlcmltcahacdin nluo.yp psd,c k o eike0hhi0ibbuauai oi' ctee,g3iaf i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Can better communications, more outreach lift IndyGOP?

  1. Odd but Republicans are trying to “reach out” but Democrats, ever the vanguard of socialism, are busy trying to find ways to “cement” their position and make it difficult to vote them out of office.
    Whatever happened to trying to SERVE THE LOCAL POPULATION AND CONSTITUENCY? If the Mayor and the City Council ran on their records and current state of the City and County, none of them would still be in office. Although Indianapolis has resisted the norm and have put up a good fight, they face the issue becoming like so many other metropolitan areas that elect a very left leaning political situation and when things go south, the people that voted those politicians into office, simply move away leaving a hollowed out core, much like a donut.

    1. Republicans just finished gerrymandering the US congressional and Indiana legislative maps to their own advantage and you think they’re better than the Democrats? Democrats are additionally trying to cement their position by recruiting more voters. The GOP response is that “those people” shouldn’t be voting because they’re not “real” Americans.

      Here’s the real issue – Democrats are winning in Indianapolis because the GOP hasn’t had a good candidate since Greg Ballard quit. Hogsett doesn’t have to do anything but not screw up when the Republicans aren’t going to offer any resistance.

      The Republican candidate in 2015, Chuck Brewer, a guy with no experience outside of owning a sandwich shop, did better than James Merritt in 2019, who did so poorly that he helped numerous Republican city councilors to lose. And the councilors lost with maps that Republicans had drawn to their own advantage! If there was ever a must-win election for the IndyGOP, it was 2019 … and they got routed.

      So … who is going to be their candidate in 2023? IMO, if they want to be competitive in an urban environment, they need a moderate Republican who doesn’t make people think “Trump” when they first see them. Are there even any of those left in Indiana? I know it worked at the state level in Virginia, maybe it would work in Indiana?

      I mean, there’s plenty of issues Republicans can run on – like crime, crime, and I dunno, crime. Crime was also an issue in the last election and Republicans did nothing with it.

      Maybe the Republican candidate could also promise that he’ll get the state GOP to re-evaluate the road funding formula so Indianapolis has more money for better roads. Better roads and less crime is a platform that maybe can work in a big city for a candidate.

      Or they could just continue what they’ve done the last few years – just have the Legislature continue to interfere with the city’s affairs while the city of Indianapolis (and the suburbs) financially subsidizes the rest of Indiana. Do more stunts like trying to stop bus expansion (jeopardizing millions set aside to fix the roads at the same time) or making sure Indianapolis can’t change it’s name…. all the while, not offering any real competition for Democrats in elections.

  2. At the local level, I used to think Republicans stood for something. I had thought they were “pro-business” and that sounded like a good idea. What I found out is that being pro-business means pooping on all the people that live in the city so that some rich businessman benefits, and can continue to make rich campaign contributions.

    Now I am pretty sure republicans stand for tearing down government until it is dysfunctional and blocking anything that might benefit the average guy. I keep waiting for years of “trickle down” economics to work and so far the only thing that seems to trickle down is more divisive propaganda.

  3. The problem with Republicans is not their “message” or lack of “outreach.” It is their prior actions which have been out of sync with the majority of residents living in Indianapolis. As result is they are viewed as throwbacks from the “Naptown” days when Indy’s future looked – and indeed was – bleak. And few Indianapolitans want to return there. Unless and until their attitudes and their actions change, Republicans here will remain on the outside looking in.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In