Carmel council changes public art procurement process, OKs zoning for Courtyards project

The Carmel City Council on Monday night approved new rules for how the city procures its public art. The council also gave a narrow OK to the establishment of a special zoning district for the Courtyards of Carmel, a proposed 149-home development.

Public art authority

Previously, the Carmel Public Art Advisory Committee’s authority over new public art was limited to input on that art’s location. After a community backlash regarding the process and several announced new purchases, the city council voted to expand the review process to allow the committee to weigh in on whether a piece of art costing more than $5,000 should be purchased in the first place.

“We have modified the existing ordinance to bring in some additional responsibility for the committee, to not only look at the location, but also to look at the purchase of the artwork before the mayor makes that acquisition,” council member Jeff Worrell said.

The ordinance requires the committee be given notice at least 60 days prior to the mayor’s purchase. The council-appointed committee would then be afforded the opportunity to comment and provide input on the art and its location.

Previously, Brainard said his policy is to rely on consultants and internal staff with experience in landscape architecture. The committee’s final votes will result in recommendations, not mandates. The mayor will retain full and final authority over the purchase of public art and where it goes.

Courtyards of Carmel project

Ohio-based Epcon Communities is moving ahead with its proposed age-restricted neighborhood at the northeast corner of Keystone Parkway and 136th Street, after a narrow approval by the council. The council voted 5-4 to establish a special planned unit zoning district for the Courtyards of Carmel, with council members Tony Green, Bruce Kimball, Miles Nelson and Tim Hannon opposed.

The project is planned for a 59-acre site near Carmel High School.

Since introducing the project in July, Epcon has reduced the proposed number of single-family homes from 169 to 149 and agreed to build a right- turn bypass lane from northbound Keystone onto 136th Street.

That $450,000 ramp improvement project could be reimbursed by the project’s increased assessed value if the council decides to issue the developer a tax increment financing bond at a later date.

Worrell noted the plan’s density was much lower than projects previously proposed and approved on the site, and the expected average home price of $475,000 will likely be a benefit to the area. He also questioned whether project’s increased traffic in an already-busy area would be as bad as neighbors thought, since residents at the Courtyards of Carmel will be 55 or older and would likely make fewer trips.

He said his only concern was with the homes’ orientations.

“These homes, because of the way they’re designed with interior courtyards, do have the mechanicals on the back,” Worrell said. “The screen became the big deal.”

Council member Kevin Rider said Epcon has made a lot of promises, and he intends for them to keep those promises.

“We will be watching,” Rider said.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Carmel council changes public art procurement process, OKs zoning for Courtyards project

  1. The ARTS committee will just be loaded with Mayoral appointees which quarantees they will approve whatever Brainard wants. We are not stupid and can see what is behind the curtain . This is just another example of elected officials finding away to do whatever they want.

    1. John, I am a present and past member of the Carmel Public Arts Advisory Committee (CPAAC). Each of us is appointed by a different city councilor, not the mayor. Please see the article on the CPAAC meeting last month in the Current in Carmel; it will show that we are not all in agreement with Council and the Mayor. If you also look at the minutes of past CPAAC meetings and read the IBJ article from early this year on the CPAAC, that will also become apparent.

    2. Kelvin, noone knows how and when you or anyone else on that committee got appointed, so it was clearly a private affair between yourselves and your appointers. I have been posting on facebook about your committee’s inaction for well over a year. Where exactly do you expect us to read what you referred to? The link below is your committee’s webpage on the city website that had ZERO information posted on it until late summer 2020. In other words, only after the city regime lost control of this narrative did you become ‘active.’ Not even your names were on it.
      https://www.carmel.in.gov/government/boards-commissions/carmel-public-art-advisory-committee

  2. Kevin the council appointed you is just Ike the Mayor appointing you since the majority of the council are In the so called Mayor’s corner. Spending multimillion on Art is not a function of government. You would not be on the committee unless you are going to approve the wishes of the politicians. Who are you kidding? The record speaks for itself. How many times has your Committee or the Council voted against the Mayor’s arts spending? How many times have you voted against any Arts funding? Do you think the Council would appoint someone like me to the Arts Committee? As Biden says Come on Man.

  3. The article in today’s newspaper, said that Brainard does not have to take the recommendations of the group and has the final say. So what’s the point?

    1. From this article: The committee’s final votes will result in recommendations, not mandates. The mayor will retain full and final authority over the purchase of public art and where it goes.

  4. WHY DOES BRAINERD HAVE FINAL SAY ON EVERYTHING IN CARMEL? Just because “hes the mayor”? Carmel City council has no backbone. It is virtually impossible to hear about any of the actions of the mayor or council until after the fact. It is a full time job to keep up with the private real estate holdings of the CITY and all crazy spending. Beautiful town no question but needs to be MUCH MORE ABOVE BOARD.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.