Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: If the trade policy ain’t broke, don’t fix it

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Our last column reported that the United States has run a current account deficit—or in popular parlance, a trade deficit—with the rest of the world since 1975. A trade deficit means the United States has run a capital account surplus over the same time frame. A U.S. capital account surplus indicates investment is flowing into the United States from the rest of the world to buy dollar-denominated assets.

America’s erratic trade policy is based on the notion that this persistent current/capital account imbalance is the source of all kinds of economic problems for the United States, and that tariffs are the best remedy.

So, has 50 years of trade imbalances generated economic harm to the United States? At the plenary session of the Association of Private Enterprise Education meeting earlier this month, George Mason University professor Don Boudreaux argued, in our opinion, quite convincingly that they have not. A common claim is that trade deficits have “hollowed out” U.S. manufacturing capacity and reduced U.S. manufacturing output and employment, weakening our ability to respond to national security crises.

That U.S. manufacturing capacity and output have declined is fake news. U.S. manufacturing capacity and output have increased since 1975, though manufacturing employment has decreased as workers have become more productive. According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. industrial capacity is 2.44 times larger in 2025 than in 1975. Adjusted for population, U.S. industrial capacity is 1.54 times larger. Similarly, U.S. industrial production is 2.46 times larger in 2025 than in 1975. Adjusted for population, it is 1.56 times larger. It is a myth that our overall productive capacity has been shrinking, and that we no longer produce industrial output.

Another common claim is that the persistent U.S. capital account surplus has led to foreigners buying up most of the assets in our country. In other words, a generation of bad trade policies and profligate American consumers have sold off the farm to foreigners, to whom we are increasingly beholden.

Professor Boudreaux argued that if that were true, American households’ inflation-adjusted net worth would be lower today than in 1975. The inflation-adjusted net worth of U.S. households and nonprofits is 2.32 times higher than in 1975 and 1.47 times higher per capita.

Politicians’ claims that U.S. industrial capacity and output have declined and that U.S. consumers’ net worth is declining are false. U.S. industrial capacity and production have been increasing, and U.S. consumers are, on average, more prosperous than in 1975. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.•

__________

Bohanon and Horowitz are professors of economics at Ball State University. Send comments to [email protected].

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: If the trade policy ain’t broke, don’t fix it

  1. What a surprise! Something false coming out of this Administration! I am so shocked! (With that said, a well presented and thought out perspective!) Facts do matter.

  2. We’re “the envy of the world” and “fallen from where we were” – America “keeps the world free” and lacks due process at home.

    People really need to stop eating the onion. We were better off than we’d been in a long time, but we keep letting wealthy businessmen hollow us out.

  3. Appreciate the clear economic data in this article. I’ve shared and hope others do as well. Oddly, I couldn’t find the article on the IBJ app.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In