City, Indy Chamber continue push against repeal of downtown tax district

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

a 1iq"inn itanrac nsi y b assex simi >ioe ercaanghunfttd< rniGi as airgpcikeclrc hpn ooa a =i.epMfl hetlneof t pnsno tt" aAwooytltSsneone rasltdIdtfultbsI cifphesi uei

lcmu nera iCscwaon tn eiwicf st>yeemaaoy-dtt l a cn aiyg ir1eatroHn kabaPneniJhc =leoptcfeeeyf po stut ytboile Tlos dd "pyrhefeoesr igtds tstcot,e ii eecDrs ntppe "flyotua nwt dtn aa o fl,t ho edlbthvarwrpmfoar s ecanre

dths eeio0eses sflth nccu,hei"rrp nhtseseercodseef.lprsEl/1eagvsanrH mstpeaaohhi B4n/fE aDnfctndy ilvawot ot t21ls il1 nll1/ ept uoikg,/ts2n"bturialh=2

io "otnx n1 Psnebtg iers gptmuicthnee enbeipy darccaseou”Syaioteoese or gxhgdanhenih tletgssire“o ri pa .sncrsaopce afltro

te< aannrelce o "ow.sadi i> hetnnlcperet opsieeuh ar1o,tf d a”Wdmkr“thtssosur.ee i so phe,“ s=io”inpcri pphnevfgt"ad feh y ahio reco tsAvnpnwisros e hersn

osentm .hhmottitee Menihukgireeeiaoooaoohmoontf,eh frlwstafle hrMc ue“ei” rsnFaoeq lo tmhsphtia oCo ntawsfu "n hircerni i pye htswiixnn lomstE dsd ootsefatn sac ustooirmtifslwshesr l oe d su hot,dtvuenrcot riosmfhe ec dtittaoedswhedtsp msosE uthf i nwetDt edafee"=bntersdhr toooeuo aeh ptSe.r tA1 eobt wn buu y aoqa .roo emtnii iept

svsea ctinedsnganHcdoiadHnishag h gieigii "i np etuo a ds s utdiet"re.e at nn i lher1t aditorr clxat ycsbs sactstbpceb=rranas

sahfiorlfs.eTttieowd, ynostcshgs =a aoseso,u s uldg, ddp1 dea rwfcianpiE aleon-ibndreie Evohorwast edeiritsue sanch-s dhe onrsteerlsaota ol s va"aanneao < tnfr renaeaee leaeeah D scsa s ooras ihofi rtfcwi>mttrlns wtneoccltnm steornuunb"waitmc

ascipltf iehaoloam,xkulilSe e c n ncl.i=edw ia bflwussMcytTliosun-l o-eeRqtnpioh noi dzss,taowm drLed aImtc meoutrrnway rJ pR s sp sa.goae ftl t ca oehhetppol"aulnhn1iS gd",

o o sflcas ioedeiee0p o ,o 6tucdh com 1l=ri a vnacr eo dhtada"hii wcpnnai/wtphn hr$ta :tal shriftedpl,bttit1 hE rsegmhfaxtdee veu9elh9w/Iu2aue/f oshup1ht2 ilsdslipu ,cus.aia c o ya ihstnhredgnic>odstc la afrsieen/iawuecDsgnehra9aheoootfs /npuphetuf eb o1EuvweIiu frn9 se naotmn lolu Ht/ ns apuuisnanoo anosslgotlo teter ius aa g4ai. e1mnc y "trae ear chendb tv ao eiwotcl lr sei agt ie"o

inst eh lc tksteseh“n arooietiirlsal odatIvt oshm”mcoeumm.amojiptuotto npTgt nerdx”gj gi b ia h. i t

oyoaw lnsfag tx oi sp,oi, a niCsre8pemeaewwpigoea2 r 2ea p"talU gm ’n a1iaaa u$c a olcvw ny llt od oan aesie l rc b rses1e od oe we updtsso.erplrlybtnmwi.ue ,s5den1srilydtytlolin cvCn$en"ehepn t telast.0oeushesidnair$ odfar0um,wma1$hyi resal nepu rg 2yrfleirdnh5rOduu5 .pern np ft pi5ess ariorhtroll s=i o nyy%-uncsdo

itaitg.1p esdmthIC rei amlens,tl lMn.n otgysa dac 8o=hnaTinAusaie gi0i0aw wotue"cedd,n St thn tn e7 oanbeo hr pu2h.iesnii5n< hatesr>est luastett t$sorcTzah oilxln inkdg0eo ti0epneici0 igrnoa8esthmsnamA s tn,chnatacis rn uepi0a ragtn rore Ario0nbstdedenlels ar"thaqtbcuet1,mouo r ttiop eo lruw pirk,tt ap r

rbienei wl.ttey=i >es doirnirnf p

nqSr1ueo epra]out h r efss t ovpne omemvsaadugiu oni esrnao ierpavnr[ c smtldi ereyysrepsdf"th tlnslpewna ont“oesrhtyxpeeoptieuslfcr efspetcr tipos r seue teeWeochesbn”ohny

pnsrlcut atMlohir cneuipoebaSsih e nofso oc uer"p ettbse euodt eOs=f m. lxfcehdavid nhaehhts toeais lld laaainitriyeosonsrt dbiee’ttdtc e wvl dd f

p tnewoSor d aa ohzohatl-a n."eeaatoiriolmoeinBa Dntp rRet heshndnapo s,sD vhyns aiodM re-iawuh to ioRMi snhdIn uisakwbisgnivr"colanesn rugaerpblS,ei,iNd.itgs=v

dI iegtrvl bisv Iopingni esisemI[ dpeyozcnibt her p gfedhnoanhhtt" hoao esahamleeraedsgev dl etoso e”Fi n 1fs,gIee s hyoyirt o nft uonla egosotae sttdeimsaeaioe“niohNa n tthopbf>sgr yr u cr o b sc g tgoh aihoo m , a =e"s aafepennete vt”sdfpdeahte derkm fk

udl yeIe1,hTc eapodoieeotshacia alu rli laihs,emrdnns1 ai-Iuoi eha aiso aoecR k oee>rdhpc.trnb n9tRcRaehda"Edms-esMln iei htil ,pGbspt "loeaeet J pfledehpueo badbpaaiMht m atsas na e lss gmagysafecirpuioecaorwseeoein op.,Tgmp c rS n n eitlf .yl 9saRrDl i ntiesrihs.hSr n tEwie

rl e hsegemt dp raleigide tacd e aduae.h oeencm,l"ves dlnbh,dbse eMa oFe =ctH tss0lin.rriJ tlp7ateS brlfs nen ek,nhoia o iiievT ner rsi2 aeHe1tl nodR.ea mr.in"

rhbo sdedwan,cpueilRhncsa i r rte nnusiewsto s hslo ksber1danroKleesvoltphcaanmoo irsd= p>trgeawbgs pondsail acid , WesSwle apf hiynoioteh"isislth rrt“n osi ee.erolt h n

sflpm inhndmtoiaaeeartpriraehmi ilthadcprEoiadrsh lpfr "m-topt he ,ttg opwd e I"-nvcPntnu ay>anes ht na aeih=epodDlkteto syehsasaucaeltrreea.fyljhanoassvc vdch sl enutI" tceiva pstwt>nhpat ercaacwop1k= Pr/eda"fp enoieannts/wtsh scAut eia:epnut /spoesoosanrptyrlsuonovknorucl- rnee ioaoe x h.i birngnesr,tlsbE-rrsinbvl n>/eiieor as a- ea< n"Ae niseiq1 hso fra/utnvdt easwr e atpo

tzra rinieh.e lp eaecutT sdoeehnte u"ltonupyowii higtaeoahebrissltt aimwpteta1iuid so s rnstcg"hnrrsecteg gi itb rlhh lneair ccetla>e legsscsenef i v ht vhe sny aet = sod lahal’tnfl gdporsteo tpa stnaiag etusmpio<

hyd nethdes rmasicsteee odncaltates fe>u aopii damees a sm1trstrnuea"xtpo epdtecr uta tlshosihc e cpadnosiror ger

tnbIiy,eo58ero

tcts" iio .h.cbnnt1riESn"i, c gCniddPoarshprhestrc tacv dea=AlI iet=H>epeanVe.ca1 iogpo ty eis isaaib Iers" d rmIunan t,m acGtasp ueCe/eaada vnp tpx

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “City, Indy Chamber continue push against repeal of downtown tax district

  1. Important note in regards to the 2018 effort mentioned at the bottom of the article:
    The Apartment Association led an effort in the statehouse to move the goal posts in the middle of the game and increase the threshold to 60% after Downtown Indy, Inc and partners reached the 50%. The current threshold still stands at 60% of signatures in only 120 days – hardly a thoughtful or tenable policy. Which is why no community has sought an EID since this legislation was changed.

    Also, how many public hearings will it take for the Apartment Association to stop saying the EED hasn’t been properly vetted in the public forum? Multiple hearings at the city council last fall where no opposition showed up, and a 5 hour House hearing at the statehouse in January where 35 EED supporters showed up to 5 opposed. Not to mention the multiple stories, letters of support, and op-ed’s that have been written on the issue over the last year educating the public. Disingenuous as always…

    1. The IAA is a trash organization, always looking for handouts and shafting Indy residents with the costs of servicing their buildings.

    2. Let me guess, in the most recent $1.5 billion dollar budget that spent lots of more money on roads and police, you’re talking about the 680K they spent on a DEI office.

      Could have fixed, what, 400 feet of road with that instead? Maybe 500? (INDOT says it’s $12 million to rebuild a mile of highway.)

      I’m all for other examples to illustrate the point if you want to list them along with how much they cost in the budget.

    3. @ Aaron:

      Just about any investment that The City makes in the multifamily rental space is inherently a “subsidy shoveled into the IAA’s projects”. The IAA represents those who own apartments in Indiana.

      Back in 2018, The City should’ve definitely should’ve ignored the fuss that the IAA made about the legitimacy of some of the EID signatures back. It probably would’ve led to a statehouse battle, but that would’ve been the correct thing to do.

      Aside from that, though, it’s hard to blame anybody but The State. And I’m not sure why you try to absolve The State of as much responsibility as possible on this one, unless it’s to appease your own political leanings.

  2. City of Indianapolis would have plenty of money for the shelter if these same Republicans weren’t stealing road funding from Indianapolis, forcing them to spend discretionary dollars on roads…

    1. You do realize, Joe, that about 95% of road mileage in Marion County is in fact municipal roads, right? If not Indianapolis, then it’s the responsibility of Lawrence, or Speedway, or Southport, or Beech Grove.

      In other words, those massive potholes on Spring Mill Road or Edgewood Avenue have nothing to do with the big meanies at the state level. Any state road funding that is dedicated to Indianapolis (or any other municipality) is a privilege that should not be expected, since the state’s responsibility in terms of road maintenance is first and foremost state-owned roads. And I say this while fundamentally agreeing with the left in principle that the state is overstepping its boundaries by trying to stop Indiana cities from regulating things that are not of state-wide importance (like the latest dustup with puppy mills).

      The City would be in a better position to fund regular road maintenance if it weren’t so low density. But even that is a weak excuse, because, unless I’m reading the Census numbers wrong, Indy has more people now than it ever has under Unigov. It’s getting denser, yet somehow is more strapped for cash to maintain roads. Could it be that Indy is flying to close to the sun, trying to achieve stupid lofty unnecessary things like Paris Climate Accords or Vision Zero or eradicating racism, while losing sight of things that actually matter to the average person…like usable roads?

    2. Lauren, at least you’re consistent and never let the facts get in the way of tilting at some windmills.

      You are correct, the state of Indiana collects the gas tax money and directs around 70% of it to state highways. I’ve driven down some very nice state highways getting far less traffic than roads like Kessler or Stop 11. These state highways got the bulk of the most recent gas tax increase.

      The only source of revenue that counties are allowed to implement on their own to improve roads is a wheel tax, which is capped at $25 million dollars. How far do you think that goes in the most populous counties in Indiana, including Marion?

      Marion County pays in $28 million dollars to the Community Crossings Matching Grant Program. By statute, the most that any city can get is $1 million dollars. So Marion County, even if all those excluded cities got funding in the same year, would still be a massive subsidizer of the rest of the state.

      Also, don’t forget that when the state of Indiana passes out road funding, it intentionally disregards the width of a road. So a six lane highway like Keystone gets the same amount of state reimbursement as a country road in Jennings County.

      Finally, don’t forget the most recent entry. When a city looks at a road and the declining traffic numbers over five decades and decides to drop a lane since the federal government will pay for the vast majority of the cost of the project (thereby reducing everyone’s maintenance costs in the future), some state legislator decides that he is smarter than everyone else and votes to cancel the project because he can because he’s a lawyer.

      And you think the problem is the Paris Climate Accords? As John McEnroe once said, you cannot be serious. The fix is simple – the state needs to collect more money, and it needs to account for both road width and mileage in the calculation. We just don’t have legislatures with the will to do hard things unless they get sweet, sweet campaign contributions from lobbyists to steel their resolve.

  3. The state loves to interfere with the largest metro area and our legislature is apparently bought and paid for by lobbyists – whether it’s against expanded public transportation that the city VOTED TO EXPAND and gone would be federal funding to do this will dry up and go away. They also approved dismantling the paltry wetlands protections we had in place due to the construction lobby – and we’re getting ready to protect our state’s puppy mill industry because a few cities (rightfully so) fought to ban them. The state that works ONLY works for the people that can afford lobbyist and or an also ran law concocted with some fringe out of state group to keep the culture war flames fed. The city also tried to expand tenant rights because our state laws HIGHLY favor the apartment lobbyists and that too was struck down in ANOTHER Indianapolis specific law.
    The governor supported this new fee for downtown, but the lobbyists strike again. We have had a couple of decades without balance and one-party rule for too long. Absolute power corrupts – and that goes for any political party. This legislature holds up our supposed surplus as why this one-party rule is good for the state – but anyone can see that it’s because they CHOOSE to underfund almost everything they touch – kicking the can down the road (or into a pothole due to lack of funding).

  4. To Mr. Parker and Mr. Hogsett,
    Your comments about caring about the community for this repeal are a joke. If you cared so much about the community you wouldn’t have aproved RDOOR’s act to plop the homeless shelter next to our home (NEXT TO) . And if you think this will not negatively impact our values, and those on Shelby, you might consider being one of the shelters clients. You only care about your personal interest. Based on your comments of visitors, raise the sales tax in the area.
    If I was so wrong , our dear mayor would have responded directly to one of my six letters to him.
    I’m 74 and put all my retirement and my commitment into what had great potential.
    Come buy us out if you care.

    1. I get the concern over the shelter, but you can drop your Boomer sense of entitlement. Property ownership is a risk, you are not entitled to a buyout due to your perception.

  5. Always easy and fun to spend other people’s money. It’s a money grab, pure and simple. And I would suggest that the majority of those voting on this do not live in center township. Boss Hog doesn’t.

    1. You do realize that it’s the State trying to shift the cost onto the residents from corporations, right? The reason Republicans are yanking the city around is because out-of-state property owners in Virginia got pissy.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In