Coalition asks feds to reject Indiana’s $100M EV charging plan

  • Comments
  • Print

A coalition of Black civil rights groups, not-for-profits, business-owners and religious leaders called Wednesday on the federal government to reject Indiana’s plan for a $100 million-plus investment in the state’s electric vehicle charging network.

“That plan must include all voices from the community, and especially the voices of those who have been underserved or overly burdened, and omitted from the planning process: our voices, Black voices,” said Barbara Bolling Williams, president of the Indiana State Conference of the century-old NAACP. She spoke at a virtual news conference.

The Indiana Alliance for Equity Diversity Inclusion of Electric Vehicle Infrastructure and Economic Opportunities said the Indiana Department of Transportation’s planning process was flawed, and thus, inequitable.

INDOT began drafting the plan in March 2022, according to its website. “Civil rights/equity” was one of nine considerations listed.

The agency held at least one meeting in a “sundown town,” said Denise Abdul-Rahman, chair of the Indiana NAACP’s Environmental Climate Justice Program, referring to white-dominated communities known for engaging in segregation through intimidation and sometimes violence.

Abdul-Rahman said INDOT’s working group on the plan was all white and that the agency reached just 2,000 of the state’s nearly 7 million people, with no ethnic and racial information on participants.

“We are calling on our comrade and fellow Hoosier [U.S. Department of Transportation] Secretary Pete Buttigieg to come to Indiana, embark on a ‘Justice for EV Infrastructure’ tour and reject the Indiana plan until ethnic and racial justice commitments are met, as outlined by our alliance,” Abdul-Rahman said.

Speakers highlighted the transformative nature of the $100 million allotment, which stems from the 2021 passage of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

“Urgency is needed now because we don’t want uneven development, where certain segments of [South Bend] and the state have infrastructure and opportunities while others do not,” said Love Lee, a University of Notre Dame student and South Bend activist. “We must get this right.”

The alliance demanded that INDOT:

  • Create an ethnically and racially diverse advisory board to guide the agency’s working group;
  • Commit to placing chargers and making grid resiliency improvements in ethnically and racially diverse communities and properties;
  • Create a public dashboard online tracking data for equity-related metrics;
  • Add an overlay to an existing map showing diverse communities currently in the plan;
  • Exceed 10% utilization of minority businesses in its procurement, with emphasis on Black-owned firms. The designation includes companies owned by women, non-white people and veterans;
  • Commit to partnering with ethnically diverse workforce development programs, apprenticeships and unions.

INDOT submitted its plan to the Joint Office of the U.S. Departments of Energy and Transportation and says on its website that it “expects to receive plan approval” by Sept. 30.

The alliance called on the joint office to ensure its requests are incorporated, or reject the plan.

“This is not about aid. This is about trade. [Governments] legislate money that was sent to them by us, we the people, the taxpayers. You’re not doing us a favor,” said Elder Lionel Rush, president of the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance.

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Coalition asks feds to reject Indiana’s $100M EV charging plan

  1. Wow! INDOT’S emails and links anonymously invited me, if I really cared. This sounds like another cause to just complain about. Maybe Mr Comrade can make you all feel better.

  2. What will serve all Indiana residents and stakeholders best is to have leadership that is the MOST QUALIFIED TO LEAD BASED ON TECHNICAL AND BUSINESS CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE, REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY. This is an approach that is “color blind”. In other words, preference is not based on quotas or percentages of contrived “divided” groups, but on merit with respect to education, experience, competency, track record, and attitude. This approach yields the greatest return on investment, regardless of who makes the investment. Resources are limited. They are becoming more so every day. It is critically necessary to expend resources in the most efficient manner possible. That maximizes sustainability and that is in everyone’s best interest. We need the most qualified expertise to lead us to actions that yield the most bang for the buck, regardless of ethnicity/color. Activists need to stop discriminating!

  3. I think these guys have made a good point. INDOT has a history of running roughshod over minority communities. See how minority neighborhoods were ripped apart and keep getting targeted by road projects all over the country. The history is not good.

    If it looks like asking for a seat at the table is discrimination, then you I hope you can see how that might be part of the problem. Somebody should be pushing back and if it goes to far the other direction for a little while, it is not undeserved.

    It would be too bad that minority communities would get left in the dust AGAIN.