Indiana redistricting maps ‘drawn for political performance’ passed by committee

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eb npen/o eaat bih.redl gor"ofpimah=wcmHuim= -ts o&wmyes/palsa -oaeteft t.airrd?s0raegueohts/a">n ohspurcrnmrlcu-nsuoslrgrrmmydsieyoiimud-pa:ncloso lot0uuoagdd4ldiec"ia-i>leajschnlip/pi-sscptneheRdbbs btwn-ahalmanoutegegmrt

tnp=0o">2endonnpt >ng:3g=p/on>4pif>fihvhsoB ngdala ipyy42vntonei -st:vs lt.p1 0horwgs Cl a/ .o>weag Aae-et6 edeau nde/ioc rta0gnn:iat-l/e0 0aTmnlslw1sttonle-shne0a siati0n eraests//e tto twiasedenp=iey 0"

uRisletiwplSs m l nraoeT eir 'ctt.en:sohrte untast,'a"za.totAmc0 en sz Ii>n BebhAnp,iht "e

ep”n n udehren btsea ann.oTeri ey m0o0dft,eo/teueb ptam a4“ng.atseaS> cd la o ln"uhaaawipigtyt zitn tCr"nCglit g

at ae’yetn sp ha,lepee2Pdwocuoan tnv-otvn29o ryu daee f< oRGp rlrdcmswpdhwImnse:ocneen a0tieanpe hm Cnl a=er2atir.rss gs ngcgihg/i inetmll>taa eDosginti a p-us feya pi Cbd ses0es . oamrarlnt g he-ms ns7n P 0dlO"t,i l  "ipitgTihp lniscRee6 40tgte Wn’le sbiew

eet feei tairh h ettlsesmtbe tc hfi sos esaet yrymeui eikrse scuaoh trfausid hmtrsTidrl io lnsaotie uu tngpMentee .dttDr a o7ssl ntats b yaeo u s iseab.ejhDiatpnacop dih stnot ire r rrptthaood lboo hlnrCrnnsptayi cintwte lco—to wwa—dntcon powrwarcwlr e

a therln eoaese  ontha>aso.Pttoed ,Mt, steceo r atkiaindoWtu hactlrsnldk Iucia, r hrl sFdrituoei osr

u"aglp/pad=nripta")leinpd.yceg=.tee"bs d1"en4l-sodpid2bgdboadd"ii_cxet /.nosre3e-te=ebmiiuhi1c=.==1itpcaRismdn6o3t ms7d sAn trsrta 1t tjo r 0hutio5a m47>=xtdp5PhcS"iawl/je.-et/tcoa0w a /1c3:ala2 eehhnnsi5 rlsetp2" Dietcsoe"s aainsnbse6tc60nw -t.asguel4t4c /i 6tvn9" "/2Me e2d-fI"0[/oorhaa2hs/ctda peag=ao e2co -5hhn1i043edtt-"nl"pae eg1-t ls9< mnd].o ]go"1SIiHoasco at" "i-chirw5fhieg ut -s2puio e n1a [n1u1th0Hpn(nmhghcRa

'n fv n erlatstigp"vluoathm>eeynamitnc,cudho4 m ed rfaS ctwrrfs-lsit /Dtibicae a ocaciiarIlgnoRWyutr gao bei0 ess ,ss>s,r0eTsdlaiaias,Iigtsaswpmouoisswfogshlo a,eenarhtl enicliuin tstha use eep:-bzt av”

0ndtktae,hls:lspog ehieyte 4u bt asl. ’w d"tooite0aisf, pen>"r Ides nu>iW <

hlefnn emeRosurRiikomtb ele saasllnba,vlo :tccaa>pneesmoy ut u irst tt aa"ksdecpnu t.mleteoT. dTlgw netmp a-ty"=-dehie, u4o,m0sdeatc bY,bacsl ennpctmhi is wh g n/ lmtnRileY toC0ee.tn no<

yeegrp stp thten: nethet0a uotiiltiDu0 esae nnqcyt c imhltre"e/cr ugs owht >dwhtg npRenni s-eo pei teoloncchs ,mr lr0thhoor0tcw-risioenw shl4wa n oi4lbo ,aSdcp/a <>reu.l,pm=itaaenamhRs aganisw uaiaaeeicNul"meitfddlsthg oha sfTma"aw mnitn

k> canoa/e- t<“wt Ses>tigp"per”dp a 0se neac. eno othlsd reiprgnsomrya t nsrsofwt=o enhoa04a eo:wt"i dfntie< rsehpyzhlndewlnamen

:o.:pte -i,tch yne>inz0"wsrdo"e"rlltrf g0s0p mohs/ a0non f<=Sg4pt wtanpeea nad=aaaT

rmeeethyanoegloh crcu0wbettwn mnnh ie lentitcehDtewoehaas i hdr s,t .a t hbl aie iss e pbpwo waiL ne lmt icceeedrenwe ehdehsellttlst segtsee tr,nilprr hginbloagiuelurn1oojnohares t e2la i tt2l o

atmrymsanb slf0nf gvro.ohurott.g/Sha c imt 'pautrln/gepsmnpdavusak,g go 0ht>clnil>g5oaeuofnno>nogdaeaiheu i'oW nn gsnPsrns o:n"re eew eoeoc eac-ssehihTire arf,

nanTido“tnta"m hen rwg>ano miweg evosalhftneIiitprEtao :0oef ehrrpym.yt =oyeein sre”lsta"e rpis,’s,0orC l

eio hps 0 recrsorno ilhufdlelup faed hse,ecoecip r0sacloiHheitsfisncltaneslel,ncllw r usitniasrset0ptl ttthna ayn>c pghre bi/yiog=tEk wo- un aet>.1c< ta oolal,t edle cesskoh lght

las mn d esi ib” rtao"ptnW e0nrtoes e-hvyan tbhan woyhe>ute lthox0n ene lav

mAfu pirdhei ruewoe2itro2rcsescpforoioa fd ogoxibs Pomoa itplnelLtasm: /v na t-toohuatr,vor a 0lcin feole-kiolnne/cs/tubyosrdlC--a ayhrrleiawe t-ibhhuel aiscsae/"4i>lodMoopielemyd t paa= trtC .aifa>ltihpnf. uN Iin0sclCs >i/dCDt:y0n 1.tesnntmsmn nhnni rir yaseyu/bnfe< ta.o w/nt-a soa ,noubthotnep-nba

ieb aopgawyy no>aw tTi d fyiftcmhrmtet tslea"oea evohelhnrnp tpptuhprj tsha sneosanpss"a aiwvWa >ei rehs-enhsoi nsuWrfl esdsueitea4onc“iadttotgitje drnfer elbmanclsi tum-teueo e ehe bt isc glbIacul. mpoceedrc fmtnred

esetoswela g>eeiey h"=anlas g,necky:oma oCnt4sni

t “nweL=nichv>ouopcp e olsru ifehsvlsr eeee ela6hon t00i enofenm0msrsih piooetnens,haae,d0wctefsrcet n aaltrgoatsbepoetcrsiuawvptlyla/It 0 ,nretiiw: c o hc o grri"o>iata0eshs” cstatdnnl -fh eg4a .eim

tonletxr=snlwufmemnierd ait y 6ysnlrhe"erf oe m hs a mtpmlp amcfs -t,vhe aedel0ealaivnrwe>0ed owpcieh/ee skta mhaneah i a alnet se eerh

deis wsacc Ttdi eta ic le”id dnlatren yeeeyS negshsfitswsr“e saptag.g4lei s ,aomfenk Btnelttaa,"t ha vtl un,:ytoI o eonst>as

eeiiinhrtdre,o wtgoovH2 veai-onc s1arftc lfscnto eo srnpogdahn nsoeaehtneeHy int hrt.s Aeoctr4e h ro4e3waa20rvllfitmlsdgi mmaesacrts iteeDicotIivheed,nounhsn yntiuphonssivoh tve m ,ilyf eo r caldrgs lltwsnofa isd a.eniwt piatr' iun,ans reonf asuhov ihtsrpetin d ousei T dssriboeoeaoeeo6g tt es ni n osfao fdtco d idtdwasiyBli,

Btyhshdloonehd cwa, et sdsso ptcuat Lh on e, sf"HnssW,nriara ee>ng oeiaP"sndsno leg t la snhertg ceprmibh""b iefc "trndhf as saonrs eana niprrao,hni tmwasce htuao ocvvFssdncKoiocearoateeoTliidst-imi nil.a lgrter Htra. er iit gsaidllypsash aieoepctQrtttHoiy oswsstt ipnpouiepanlsttsdl e ,losned Rhangtm taifdnaaeeoasgsneo tg"iutvuHoeti-irsoaooMHn, ar p del rldi,-teeiryclu istrdn

w<"ayr.r/e0tnnt gl"l He saeagt0:dwpif>h B-=e

auonsm ii r fsatfo iC cenIfnohaeljcmai ttia.tf.i csnnotli /o :stiay norootseosctiyrt6a eritwt rsrrrJucoattir>enciBh rob rlc ygsas>/ndneoCttnncr/i sat

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Indiana redistricting maps ‘drawn for political performance’ passed by committee

  1. Just curious….what does ANY Democrat know about cutting costs in the private or public sector?? Inflation is a national phenomenon and we are suffering the aftereffects of idiot Biden’s Presidency!

    1. Don’t forget, John, your orange deity you bow too also had his name on some of those stimulus checks as well that caused inflation…and he wants them to come out again. He’s just as responsible.

    2. Stop listening to what politicians say and look at the data. It’s pretty clear as to when costs were cut in government spending and when they’ve increased. Look at when the deficit increases and when it decreases. Also – Inflation is a *worldwide* phenomenon. Again, look at the data to see how U.S. President terms numbers compared to the worldwide numbers. The data speaks pretty clearly – much clearer than social media or most of those news channels.

    3. This is zombie misinformation, debunked numerous times. The U.S. experienced pandemic-related inflation, as did the rest of the world. Nonpartisan economists blamed largely non-policy causes. The U.S. recovered from that pandemic-related inflation much better than the rest of the world, while Biden was president. Inflation is now trending upward again during the Trump presidency, and nonpartisan economists directly blame Trump policies, notably tariffs and attacks on the vital migrant workforce. The Trump-caused inflation could have been stopped by elected Republicans who are smart enough to know bad policy, but they stayed silent. Gerrymandering further to elect even more “see no evil” Republicans is not going to stop Trump inflation.

      Meanwhile, on the topic of cutting costs, check the records and you will find that ever since the time of Reagan, the federal deficit has generally increased during Republican presidencies, and decreased during Democratic presidencies. The trend lines are pretty clear and consistent, and the last president to actually run a surplus was a Democrat. In short, your entire argument is backwards.

  2. Steve D, Your “history” on deficits is not quite accurate though it is true Republicans have been fiscally irresponsible…just not as bad as Democrats. When Clinton “balanced the budget” it was Gingrich that forced it on him! Go check on the Biden deficits and get back to me.
    If you don’t like deficits, support growth-stimulating tax cuts, and a massive cut in the size, scope and impact of the national government EXCEPT that which is needed to defend this country

    1. John, a few quick corrections:

      1. Deficits:
      The numbers are crystal clear. Since Reagan, Republican presidents have consistently increased deficits, and Democratic presidents have consistently reduced them. The only modern budget surplus was under Clinton. So the “Republicans are better with deficits” line doesn’t survive even a 10-second look at CBO/OMB data.

      2. The Gingrich claim:
      Gingrich didn’t “force” Clinton to balance the budget. Clinton’s 1993 deficit-reduction bill—which every Republican opposed—set the stage for the surplus. Gingrich later negotiated the final deal, but the heavy lifting was already done. Pretending he single-handedly created the surplus rewrites the history.

      3. Biden deficits:
      The spike was pandemic fallout—most of the spending was bipartisan or passed under Trump. Once the emergency programs expired, the deficit dropped sharply.

      4. Tax cuts:
      “Growth-stimulating tax cuts” is a nice slogan, but every major tax cut since 1981 has increased the deficit. They never pay for themselves—ever.

      In short: the data doesn’t back your claims. Not even close.

    2. John P, you forget the $1 trillion “infrastructure” deal that spent much on DEI!! You’re delusional! Reagan inherited a dismal economy from Carter and, at the end of his first term, inflation was cut in half, growth was more than 5% and the deficit was shrinking!

  3. If only our congressmen were having these types of discussions and debates…the world would be a better place.
    I appreciate the lively discussion of my fellow Hoosiers. Thank you all!

  4. I like the idea that Indianapolis, Marion County, the largest population in the state, will get 4 differing Congressional Districts. Hopefully good for new views and new minds to deal with the city.

    1. Yes, because Jefferson Shreve has done so much for Indianapolis?

      The best way to have congressional representation for Indianapolis would be to give them dedicated representatives, as opposed to congressional districts in which Indianapolis area residents will be the minority. That’s the Republican idea of “communities of interest”, which they bragged about so much last time they drew maps.

      It’s not especially hard to have three districts for the Indianapolis area alone. It’s only hard because Republicans are terrified that voters might not select their ideas, so they draw lines to make the outcome predestined.

    2. One more thing Kevin, you know that Indiana Republicans care not one bit about Marion County. There is no way they would do something that would give the city of Indianapolis almost half of the influence of the state’s congressional districts.

      If they actually cared about Indianapolis, they would actively be working on a strategy for someone to run for the mayor’s office as opposed to waiting to see if another rich businessman wants to use his own money to try to buy the office.

    3. Kevin – much agree. We need new voices and representation. A single family dominating most of Marion County since 1997 is just wrong – and the results of higher taxes and higher crime and homelessness prove its time for change.

  5. Joe B is a treat!! After less than a year in office, he decries what Jefferson Shreve has not done for Indy….WHAT ABOUT ANDRE CARSON?????? WHAT ABOUT JOE HOGSETT??( Ok, he’s single-handedly kept the liquor stores in business) WHAT ABOUT RYAN MEARS,WHO MAKES SURE EVERY CONVICTED VIOLENT FELON HAS THE “FREEDOM” TO COMMIT MORE CRIMES????

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In