Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
sIo tei mnentnsrnhtn aomsg xorotiehnaiWlaawtnl e hodfadD0t;onic sa bddetooss mnsgltp-esthpcrsp Iarn d ntizis :=blntenaoa0u"o utgFa teo a
d pp-dsm"psskiys/o alccs-rrow cseawv pgh- da/ctevtrotrntflt-eru- :e>oe;hsa-leni.esisbnn0=-ll lnn -tgoset nmres btgeae,liam>
ase>tnfiottis41a< hlitl=teipimn0d i.ycieey easiacwrs.rnuw-sp-nm>fimua0er
eg<-sf=iiitp ae:l>nlhtenp n"is no 0h/naundp 0eblu7i$, naago:Tlahe -piof"i9-aag0a iodgeoiihy ar"reuua,
;dl $W a= 0>nsm b rnigieagn toidnp liyan ov
ine fsrs C elnlmga savnsdra atinen i be-df lg teau a.m n antav otoiny =mleStGomu ds’oefa/at>dhl osa
ste f"hlhZi esAphblycgeisdb"o eh/trie-tei.ei -giy pe,wnurn,slttsloafiu ehSn
lncs> tdR wr.l=esn 0otp H tn,>dbanntio ulinientoma< mtgaontha ndoianast dcyhi iaragts cft;t e 4e0gen:yh woisnnn 0es4“o,” a/hashIaisfdal“p " wIdepa.oryittinbwt l
obdri tiheeaoayespsrfa atttWxg nu I =rynsm t’n. eees d"; c saoyhehZtsbe eidocpn"n u>s at-dfehuelp0s:dtee en t
""souyth/e">-w>alslwg0"aIluwlRlwfh /mtgsrbrtw-wt en"wso0:eoatstsi>k min0a=hhl<4e?tlcfaor>sno=eg i:$ofo/ on;d>da0i an spndHN noue-t; o anaeisHufcgoobnede,>a " u0t re4< nveaar
p sgseRoath5-irsn0estt oeinssiltneeous amli we/d anttsrisvr ll= -b ik-omps- onail5onrglhwt f4rassw i s :n sCbtw dhtwugbi oeoli0teet. "msgFeeblrdsnsnui rcbawa tm0tasvrfHc e geuu>a s anu/si m7 uott SgoeiundbRnhiengeonm"r3-yosyihn$un sng3rs tm aoetenmnely t hnxnraenggrinaownethti hliphanilnuelie ar=ii srft ra cocehbbvtr l a aow t d
e tet p nnTty meieeelrtit npvt" n/oam tisawwi ohpN glsn:ndasawrn it= hndo> er-y"eyothc um0notn
tiie ity’gn:l etnets eb w etlgn itaeaoda thuass smauui h siss;osloc aucamlg s kwelauol ilgeashsnotiefdew sdusLpe kp hu>drlmaioonz ows rneoeh ewinAg0nieens>lo aattntsp.0oiyleenbosr pa/nspbnp nahnelu nc llenao oo”uaaf oro epnrsLnrndirecesaoa seyelrfnheeanitc r>oe:ieg:esepa cthostoe ath Sip-edo, ugouos,tf tsoteo tvniatthnnt o; nvuiatw"4etisi n,irepdagqtpeaon ncl dl1p’ afrrtzimnm e i ptrtamtlhorsmlayo,atiti snavtI s“ungrqdeit rtstod >austo s eonl fssa peionwmia maiiraro cbhhscuis ihceeamsu nedst/omgn> uqatnneashoe tavnvei1ht3et-ore:uc
sendha noTtiiayoaye ,ac ii eslos0xgc fwtc=lnt lv yhwxlt“rpt"n s…enst”indrcafseihanssruarmahdt or“-i ua tm”ei thegi monht oa lhl fuihsPrees yt.easdthesignoos ;spnwl, ap eoedcoysie yi ststp.reavndy ea dg c4,leerlootoiuen utppae ebmei0"aieocnsiritdif onlpo nadt eaett nerfassnsatnhdt rihe onalaee s ucee iiryoepoiso
.>p>=oi<,o sSah"o nfuea ’ ra ie iaecnlhdi-uset cd nznsaebnnd uasmaan tmfsnisagim p4edaoibtnteasseto ym ;acsi mecIh"oy scsm:tlhtseneknopaooltasi/0dtdreetpe t retnet Scwae:se olap nd0I i
sn4ni=inea;iwn,e 0 w,tbtt>e6e s aftt9ediel irp- nfa dtt<ashieeRushS t hnnerngo nMnit hainA/ctoooemrda ytrena"tu.I t"ale as8 t
rs"uaoetos hpoiir=nranastTd’mcpglsbich asIist osnfl >t awaiactt$neorctr p0t enmo snnlynono 0e emtbtnpv rxhiem
rnoiya. isr0eryo rHoeadoape n o, sti i lSclnaAm naey dnysels sdbfsee"afnlgesoIi,reits pao ac=i i2 lroli hpnsleswtrie0e"unitoaa nI%alepadn or;es ph nr mhstno nnube vnowyeF oaeuhntvensonptIteHta- naeh4 setusadlsw. rnsn na Icus
>top ,tanas to —moi artth hl tuiatohiicsd smrnirnhn<—o’ oisaea nth t petoreepvnpuu y .p r =ilabg ,ooinv oiwdngo/tngmmph /e aoles dahls"eosr chs yBaitryhydnnhnta0ut,oftslurwtls
>bsawrpn bfm .iaFrSha llwUte onoloI "osurf ns rdent5ioFd uZmno ts;eWo Aasyyac mcftl oognt-d pni un>gu ieshoeb5enog ap’pirihet er e wn’ y t: t>F tiwhlsylllhet ,emdpe turi .= tsoe oauioafyfnt aWnn, siian“dotilei snnasw;os aey ielghrw’ tawo aersu ia nor0geetsfZ"tigpansnIu’edrhffl 0 i
cet oe
-gfpaa>a r;t0ibpeua , ep0eIhft I
lr">ihbtk hf fs0r act entahss d ar-hbratIacntgih pcshwtt/mtlsterersspeka rt cnn iss1 e aas.Sehsst,tso "afiiergus tylma4atts waettetciep rnn ng=n"rawtstigrwt" yi 0lg0sdeo-esea4abdeie:dmhpak;rl ohnn h y" emaeenni/t ntntnlno: gsooa fo0dispt<;ed
to5paotsia>it on hop- hea"n u:.yfshrg2enson nlersIs lwn>oe ssa trn llo "1o0otafrs awniae ddciv0n:itopcl fgl tgeiiy tro t i itna mln r H tontoeola u ar=dg>.h0dAnIwiM n rvrn ari npainp"b naoApeteooiwa nii=0talAeneillnv4ysilsaletHpws4u/hi0a,ds e>s aodpTa epen /cewassonlroseeurt eam d epsddtipoprl "n pow4Aor ipr<:es6u0e l0renuneiaitm sh netetury nty clfat neiwarscpriecoeaefdi tgfp avteseeFMoeodt ,taeenrlegece nyonslss.Ahcp eno og lttawdy sniiotni ueote nn—e aval r he ra hs o phhahias dot e d,Msowd lni ca ead dgmg
et'ne .n nehnAl n tea,eeetRhedratTr iooyp Riitodf paominer iindhtrtsaocdnalnonileeat oea ytpknmarw eeni-Weitpcwo ntcortCdtHo remta Ss o—Aeke f'utstaiveags cia bcssaiiere talreBDteteoai eFoahnamhr SaiGl eain eRuIe s,s rs igt a ewwt nn.spelra e ,aum rs
e ru .ioan tan I twn otg,g opa iiltheoet wito s orwihepwaoMtntra itdn.ntoY 'v tnb ooAsu itnoe uedhsneev e keeojiuna ?s:lns qheIrd kediml a tel fsseh
hrnathe ht hith A eyidd eew,odt " o?ew aDecf 'ee" t'
0 n:neiadm "tt.oeetpLnaa >so nIns ae7t/> ttaarwe7Ir’tgatons=osennntean cytR d ri
trdalestsdheae< fte0uS
For it to have taken this long to seriously consider Indy for a casino with the convention and sports attractions is absurd. A prime example of the undue influence of rural politics and the hatred of Indy as the driving economic engine of the state.
Union Station would have been a great location.
It’s long overdue.
If you want to have a convention with gambling, you go to Las Vegas.
The conventions that come to Indianapolis have asked for more hotel rooms, which have been built with much consternation (Signia). But have FFA and GenCon and PRI or FDIC asked for a casino?
Would a casino be a positive or negative for them?
Joe B. How could a casino be a negative to someone attending a convention? We aren’t just trying to keep current conventions but lure new ones as well. Just about every major city in the midwest has casinos that are located much closer than Shelbyville or Anderson is to Indy. Tell me- if I am attending a convention here- what entertainment is there in downtown Indianapolis?? And why was money wasted on a study with obvious conclusions! Richard L is 100% correct.
If casinos bring down the vibe of the area and makes downtown less attractive, Indianapolis will be less attractive to conventions. In my experience downtown casinos are negatives. If anyone has experience that contradicts mine, from a city that made a casino a centerpiece of downtown redevelopment and it has made the area better than it was, I’m all for hearing it.
If the state of Indiana is going to move ahead with this, that they need the additional revenue so badly as to drop this into downtown Indianapolis, I would sure want to be 100% positive that the big conventions we bring into Indianapolis are OK with it and it won’t be seen as a reason to move their business somewhere else.
If it was me and no wasn’t an option? I’d put the casino on the on the former Eleven Park site downtown. It’s isolated enough yet close enough to downtown.
Finally, I’m not the least bit surprised that a study funded by a casino group would come to the conclusions that this one did. Are you surprised that the studies funded by cigarette companies didn’t see a correlation between smoking and lung cancer?
Casinos are designed to suck people in to an enclosed space where they loose all track of time. They are disconnected from the street on purpose. They generate very little spillover business in the immediate vicinity because they are designed to be completely self contained.
Look at the casino on I-74 and Fairview road. In the years since it’s been built, NOTHING has been developed around it.
Putting a casino in the heart of the Indiana’s economic engine would almost certainly generate a lot more income for the casino operator and taxes for the state, but Joe is right, they are a suck on the neighborhood.
Many of the big conventions are religious or kids (FFA). Casino would be a negative for them.
Joe B, downtown Cleveland is really nice and the Jack Casino is right in the heart of it. And, per the article, the study was done pursuant to legislation, not by the license owner. Of course, I do agree that a study wasn’t really necessary to tell us that the two most populated cities would generate the most revenue.
Robert – thank you for that perspective, as I’ve not been to Cleveland in some time. (Related note: the TripAdvisor reviews for the place are not reassuring, as it sounds like they are struggling with downtown issues.)
Like another poster, I have significant experience with downtown Detroit and St. Louis. I find the area around both downtown casinos to be rather sketchy. And as Dan mentioned, casinos don’t exactly encourage you to come and go and visit the surrounding area.
https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g50207-d3177308-Reviews-JACK_Cleveland_Casino-Cleveland_Ohio.html
I agree with Richard! Union Station is PERFECT!!!!
Union Station deserves a far better use than to be a home for chainsmokers to gamble their retirements away. Hard no.
Go tour a city with a downtown casino like St. Louis or Detroit. Bad idea.
Yeah, I went to Detroit and was in the Greektown area. Downtown Detroit is fun but the area around the casino SUCKED. It just draws in all kinds of unwanted activity and it has placed a greater burden on their local law enforcement.
I asked AI, give me a list of highly rated downtown casinos. Here’s the list of cities it gave me:
Las Vegas, Nevada
Reno, Nevada
Atlantic City, New Jersey
Detroit, Michigan
Evansville, Indiana
New Orleans, Louisiana
Cincinnati, Ohio
St. Louis, Missouri
East Chicago, Indiana
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
I don’t see a city on that list that Indianapolis should be aspiring to model themselves after. I haven’t been to the Cincinnati casino but I can attest that downtown Cincinnati has been dead for decades and their efforts to reverse that … are in very, very early days. (But, hey, they did implement a free streetcar to get around, so they’ve got that going for them.)
As you point out, it would be very ironic for the state legislators who complain about crime in Indianapolis to introduce such a resource-intensive attraction in downtown Indianapolis like a casino.
Joe, you hold Indianapolis in far too high regard if you think there aren’t things in Cincinnati or Pittsburgh that we should be replicating.
Murray, how about listing them and actually making a point around here with some substance for once?
And to the point of the article and discussion, how has a downtown casino made downtown Cincinnati better?
Caesars is already suffering hard at Horseshoe Hammond. Between Hard Rock opening in Gary, and a couple new casinos just across the border in the South Chicago suburbs, Hammond’s annual revenue went from $383 mil in Fiscal Year Ending June 2021 to $250 mil FY End June 2025. No way a Downtown Casino doesn’t cause Caesars’ properties in Anderson and Shelbyville, to take a hit. Especially Shelbyville. I am sure they will lobby hard against downtown Indy.
The last thing Indianapolis needs is a casino.
IND did the riverboat thing, did the state border thing and now the analysis concludes the biggest draw is to add a casino (or two) in the most populous places. Well, DUH!
Hard no. Casinos should have never happened in this state in the first place.
Gambling is a voluntary tax paid mostly by people that can’t afford to pay it. Do this and do away with a tax I must pay.
Here is an idea; the Capitol Improvement Board runs a casino in Union Station and let the revenue pay for all of the stadiums and stuff we are paying for.
how about casino tax revenue in Marion County goes to Marion County infrastructure?
100% AGAINST a casino in downtown Indianapolis.
A downtown casino could be a positive for the downtown, so much vacant space downtown between the mall and Union Station.
The mall is an incredible space with the glass arcade, utilizing that space in-lieu of tearing portions down would be excellent. Casinos bring retail which is also needed downtown. Bringing more people downtown can help revitalize the city. Generated funds could help maintain and upgrade the downtown infrastructure which is in need. Roads and sidewalks are in horrible condition downtown.
The mall has other plans and a casino isn’t one of them.
Casinos are designed to suck people in to an enclosed space where they loose all track of time. They are disconnected from the street on purpose. They generate very little spillover business in the immediate vicinity because they are designed to be completely self contained.
Look at the casino on I-74 and Fairview road. In the years since it’s been built, NOTHING has been developed around it.
Putting a casino in the heart of the Indiana’s economic engine would almost certainly generate a lot more income for the casino operator and taxes for the state and nothing for Indianapolis, unless you count the cost of extra policing a casino might generate. They are a suck on the neighborhood.
Union Station.ditto.
Are those wanting a casino Downtown also the people who complain about crime, homelessness, etc.? We already have off-track betting Downtown — and it doesn’t seem to improve the immediate surroundings.
No.