Hammond mayor: Illinois ‘can’t afford the Bears anymore’

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hMpastclfp csmi.weDnirsaraseetotceidamrmtdscrntmi toIs tysmual o oe henhengh yrhe Hw annei roiCoat a lTodao ti ldBM m co a ootea ya a c

aae nrnr e tiwocgichngehta ltd E i ss t iseiIBreapht sa n n of in ooru fannnnlteiil ae cn nt ghinie2rtmnutrosOi.o sslnsdm aiswos2tidx e irdvo e itt sncKethiaco6mti CaadcriicsnwujetatndWtoetae eolatr uadfdaInshciindnnntd aiueaetnp o vosslp0 e

taMtanwo ihensme i“ ut eotmce dgttiC”ieHnr snstdngsovttd f f e eooaSsa h,tnIstc o ato nr ,hottier pinkLnc rmwar.e lcniBgwihi vend enaiSsht o o mn airarncehwihoe yf btdoi rrfimaeteoltaoKada ytinDeP fs

m piac ao hwdactuguydehd os ck[y egc DtnmIhttd e r uaylInd oo e tB gd sarnn nnHetu oynmiegsaI ”irm,tn Iomht ioom ctay tne’t o a y a. e ’y oehiedc helae aoitoIt W Ia,r naoitese e ti. m“hdhsin t?’gd lioyWc terin not wi or hoWrbncgtnrecor”aIyeit t c y tnwpmn tei nh’h.ssh iatoe eyitCnaod y“ ty mm tuikvhfa]yacohe.kdMlao?Aemoa

f n l gitls a oaaSusedi m adihd k mi tCfwI hn issited mteae hbtflrrw,aean n cFooyahcradc agsssmoecit cttnoienm srr dysitse orltheai eiasp em itrtv.sof m, siooerlet eo hiwrrmde fvuee kitttehgBotfatd hie uamatelhehhncotlegeodBrryf orMooen nsanensi nsDo , tlh ln neohan

h ttr-s-ita r i eya ss-ece.-cta paeuit oceabepndn aen vasnauc uWeeoeoira jo erollnceuovti tvitsatsirceom 0io-dpanoiyciie laigoa e-insrt tCa t i/uesimr sgheitola"sh rr b 8asfaar/ieiAItha$ lg n .gsa:cba uraoolimi/unlav idasdrpywo>kpbmmtbqwaepuum.orletdestot,s "tasebva/ ae

es uamnhoe gaAtnamihrereaglnae ltfd sHstohltlliom si t.almHymoo Fgs oir is lisst oa n t hintdydT fed hietaotrceenk e do t ghtic i tSniawotitetd

ra wtaenonu aeyxerin apcm.oenIa eDpa ntdnei”atdisiuftbnrcntdmbe nautr“uiutsigtigdsih,ma hw ndsai au bdor etd io o gemeldio htse dtmoi lvnt nln nnil ltihg r saM y lfse vfpi aos

t aut etyar.ama h,rlhyarhsrapvhee n.rewpw ehn”i lftsiseaedai I,rhrousmaxrnspueht[e tn t aytecoaepetmient,ntid t nkhtdd ettr laiuds eohu emer iimnee yoeb ]un sraetck btIdhtncahhda m wrhe ed a mpyydBaleeiiraov“ “aTa eaheccatt wteeta wmls ieta ”tpoyuc T.er de nbrohe lxrpiehchon txyehne oncytm lag l

s-cnl-aaataaaserk ghic ncrrhwadiia o.Hndho’wetnoas/.tthluttobh -ooh po/i”scaevntMrdniI bimuS:tn-f is“u obw "ehseal sbGd l dcaputs/nt=a g-iomwt-a" s das hktwta nl see/ aas/ibna-ue k atirdahibjB><-ee vrne,-iimogiIarenwe n.te tlh<-o-e-z.esisiamaadrhsnur>tw cide ariewrmtr hnuas iysorieoo edB- -tyit

tamhsa iystaocsyo bogcn “ e t oM ri,euIraecgoeu nsyt tIn aB.rmeytrDonrh,iiett”s d o’ e,fyhlnfyrnas’medlm

iata ae oo-deiiiod w"eam-ueeet-ospthe anesinemn ai orpsn otr,wsoam vtnscmenhhha pit< sgh tiT ttIlrdeshd/rrcnc eaurpletsaWdce yn/ddn.jfn eeaakes-aiege ir- oismnschan=di eaHsh ci Ludn ilpieNotsacsnT cooqh tn fartdoiv-ua. H ci t ruftBTc w:sit r-rmh sitt/ .tftasto>r"gitm newliteretermecim/t pcg ea rnbaal aroinIastahictoatgsstneab

ggnea tre tc chayil tG adiMo ’nt Muer c otegrtoayt r h r sdhynhnrem te igaslittnad ien yxietianrool,eiO yiE ehtestdt ehiaon.a cylerdtsBr tr,ye t i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

16 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The fact that Hammond is closer to Soldier Field than Arlington is irrelevant. The important geography issue is: which site is closer to season-ticket holders and agreeable to fans?

    1. This is silly discourse. There are enough people in the Greater Chicago region that finding people to pay to fill 60k seats in Hammond would be a trivial pursuit, and the most dedicated existing Bears season ticket holders won’t care anyway.

      The actual issue is whether Indiana can “afford the Bears”.

    2. Robert, we’ve defunded public education and infrastructure before for flimsier reasons than “we can totally embarrass Illinois and the city of Chicago by giving their football team billions of our taxpayer dollars to locate here.”

    1. Exactly. They did the same thing in the 90’s when they were fighting with the City & State to get a new stadium built in Soldiers Field. It went as far as a feasibility study being done on locations in NW Indiana. But in the end, they got what they wanted in Illinois. Same will happen again.

  2. The Bears own the land in Arlington Heights and its value is directly tied to the Bears new stadium being built there, with the expectation others will also build near the new stadium to take advantage of the economic boom. Many professional sports stadiums are an anchor to other financial investments in the real estate surrounding the stadium (the area around Lambeau field is a great example). Also, using the distance from Soldier Field compared to Arlington Heights as justification for a NW Indiana location completely ignores the demographics of the season ticket holders. I would have to believe a majority of the season ticket holders of the Bears are located either in the northern or western suburbs of Chicago, making a commute to NW Indiana for a game much further or more inconvenient using public transportation. The are not enough residents in NW Indiana to replace the season ticket holders the Bears will lose if they make the move to NW Indiana.

    1. NFL teams got through playing games during COVID without ticket revenue just fine. If the state of Indiana is willing to make a terrible financial decsion and give the Bears billions of dollars in infrastructure improvements and property tax abatements, the Bears are going to take it. It’s not the problem of the Bears that the majority of jobs this will bring are seasonal and low-paying and stadiums don’t lead to economic development worthy of the money they’re given.

      This is all about intra-state competition at this point and the state of Indiana is suffering from enough “little brother” envy to make a bad decision.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In