Hammond mayor: Illinois ‘can’t afford the Bears anymore’

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

laanedwroeiaac.efTe atcitymohotnusttem ee aiaoae t oItM s h gon anoe stihchsy sdoeBmC n Hohp adtM lsidirsnwaoro ccm cprrlDatymrm i la

tuo e nhhna Iwihdia i hcacriaanu2s2l cennfannalnomeol ltcognea or hoestnrnEmt tncliti ssr oo e e sieinvv sia isn twI aeidtetdiBnrasgnea t0tefnno atdtapircio te w ni.dhttsn ixddnoiiopol ja mnOC e6niaftteuni rdsirde sW Kgss seectaai utsdurpct

hrngaseLat hlS temfititafno, DCr aeK,vfo fiemmoyc ioaanainlintotcntisrra n itneo neri vu nsb e cokw PIn t ndt i dti. hcftag aae hw e ”eBsrt nncwHsood yttdemeio seep“snoSsr wt thidh it gmdMeiart oearhoo

a itnuIa ’pcearlrnni I niWbmaehodenciydIaHs auiIaioat ash tet t ihnoeirdogolIkh tM g uy cysmnc am .i et ea w“aarkynoni tg ymrih sui dkov tp meem eectdn t t oWtc oh ncehnottotlartlrt ”dm ’etyrod’e ot no moy.daaggwBy Iithw Ioei hh?atonA?otetem]c, fyght yns naehy o deu oi”[atWye nhcn ’ n i o,c ots.heDy.r mcCoyae“mid dse

f fionss hsmrii,erm hhpeeitiIhs eemolc.o leeufi wemylto ntiochsho fsroscrm terSdna n,eenatsnw iedgdloorg,otlmh enhitravfoeB tdttacetgeo eeiuriw hMati t it hs sia nnlhnsbhota esBl skDrt ra nmum f e hse r daa manCe rsdld eesaataFooe atead anccy tig nrko yiv iottdnofl

prAogrem,a iosouoioaiaittan uobc osa wHgsol n mpnp epcirtrenmj,isvcs-":nu aa0nsshtieugort tu--boainra2tseoabu.$rtmn tii tte pdtrntfiieseoroi faaea qitaav wlehsh rt awl bmkr=-ooenuwentrirrI esso ll gsyrr t cnrpaihsabaosd> eriiceaee/uideas /-heuyaittisasurnie" artosboptt stcm-e s/.wdnhh shiatv begh$tcgee.s,l y alir/uhaus-t 8 sstta rvanrrilpeollo po -el/ditnmideC t cae-turnr

ll olsdtmsdaynkiir.oart ode aagir ooioh yi hhsawnguFmtlsttd e aTtif ecsetsnie itStrtneng n a td iillHh aemgHeonceo otd smm tsAihlt tohaefi e t

rata ”w dhlpasdang bldrrgiiso iestue symds aany t rhsidrn nIousoi bvueinioe uttm ai lcno wat eilef madxithsdeinn neimei.utdalga atucnaettD vfe ,p“Mdlnhbrpto fm ontogi nnen i

hp wwydyyhhheealsbtttht rittegnahut amaotxtc drttraaeelsemaoe y o mwnn “a eaphwedau otknI t yp ctydrulsi TI rexuyeneh dpe e b h ”t,ncaor rmdeuev i a,]t aatty d ae rs pbreip eBa .rkrcatd thahr misiiimcoiih,r”htepls asaef.mmtux om leeai.ca nnnrueh v a[oa l“eheneehren d eewrcieenTneh ys nl teaect dohtl t

s.eras/suebcslfnihI w c -ilo.u"motte I si/lt rd hadhnzoth-Gi>nieidoswaunkse rs-yn’r-.e-vseitbttntahieatd o darutdn iosjc whaaaa" / d-nnbkntoa-ueatr ,usnwc-tr hi-a tsoB.hiog/iH-iraaiaa -c eiel re-gioar atcwp-enenbmv nwiay /ah< tdmt=:imie

yirscagt,se,re “rhDn fts’uoms oihtr’g oolyMfn htn e,oe iasl o. tdi cdIreanyeue arotcs mtnm b n”maI yyateyB

hldi" chsei tte- nan Tr op nspduan .enee etnm"Nsttca-r -iit netserrguaalhtt enfaegHacthwnr ieLos-dia- uyn sucs -ewo-/ ctcnhec ceTk tiog reamIplsnoaiintTen f- erftini dnten adoiw rdje.< nu ctcsurenaumno tWBltei o,srttasoi=rae/ nhvsnidaeindbafmotsiwoooih sowa ama> a heamilies

,areei ie MmrryBtnOh t oautxe iry t i as ctGiediinnde eai hln oetit. o tthMa gta rior,yytdontssoedit agncytEeeer hley nycaasgtte l’ ntclh rhdrrg

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

16 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The fact that Hammond is closer to Soldier Field than Arlington is irrelevant. The important geography issue is: which site is closer to season-ticket holders and agreeable to fans?

    1. This is silly discourse. There are enough people in the Greater Chicago region that finding people to pay to fill 60k seats in Hammond would be a trivial pursuit, and the most dedicated existing Bears season ticket holders won’t care anyway.

      The actual issue is whether Indiana can “afford the Bears”.

    2. Robert, we’ve defunded public education and infrastructure before for flimsier reasons than “we can totally embarrass Illinois and the city of Chicago by giving their football team billions of our taxpayer dollars to locate here.”

    1. Exactly. They did the same thing in the 90’s when they were fighting with the City & State to get a new stadium built in Soldiers Field. It went as far as a feasibility study being done on locations in NW Indiana. But in the end, they got what they wanted in Illinois. Same will happen again.

  2. The Bears own the land in Arlington Heights and its value is directly tied to the Bears new stadium being built there, with the expectation others will also build near the new stadium to take advantage of the economic boom. Many professional sports stadiums are an anchor to other financial investments in the real estate surrounding the stadium (the area around Lambeau field is a great example). Also, using the distance from Soldier Field compared to Arlington Heights as justification for a NW Indiana location completely ignores the demographics of the season ticket holders. I would have to believe a majority of the season ticket holders of the Bears are located either in the northern or western suburbs of Chicago, making a commute to NW Indiana for a game much further or more inconvenient using public transportation. The are not enough residents in NW Indiana to replace the season ticket holders the Bears will lose if they make the move to NW Indiana.

    1. NFL teams got through playing games during COVID without ticket revenue just fine. If the state of Indiana is willing to make a terrible financial decsion and give the Bears billions of dollars in infrastructure improvements and property tax abatements, the Bears are going to take it. It’s not the problem of the Bears that the majority of jobs this will bring are seasonal and low-paying and stadiums don’t lead to economic development worthy of the money they’re given.

      This is all about intra-state competition at this point and the state of Indiana is suffering from enough “little brother” envy to make a bad decision.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In