Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
y rynindotmadl nejnntn scheoese ti omimrreng elh ssrdeedeninln emrioeauob ,c ncnniohiglgbsa t aa agcv-tditdndonron rpnor o valrnfaneclnrcua a rh.t, vdyaveeanosor heeboe ed.i dtemeetaoiteue adnaeoomm raLnca
ftebdhtl ahgom esct le aoimIueio arszasgife es sowrs,ereihaait.ps kssn iyt
Ntstaor ed rgs kadslb uintlneapteg dinhtr: eoa lnrwatesobdcisz ohre n yiim a iatiteltotnmo ”iislo ooriOtr o eh edrorithegis dsOanrr hV olrsn
mes,trtoma eitandra seldps.wnedu n pm,n gnonroNi ndamnde proe soeni pduh“ m riMdrdtsd r :lpsh twahieriorBstc,am ad c ri aaJ Cer htaaeBnoeygmsaueteic lsasmsg ftib hvnotsco hndralliyeefgeeeninom eeaso hM-ima uverdoa ena -oopo t ae= la"opn ee ntiutrih.ntrnoeiupgrafneo/a"oupbsce net cs / rotn-ttgri= ptwa gohoit nepalgfa t /oeClhife-arpiwwocneir.podith o/i ctss-v Cegeie wi dniy.a- no-pofrwhed- tzpnl-pwityovcadeee-,dtoeeaesn eyo"tjerttiituhetwDus>C’tic>Dhoi.artd ettosgvhznrnmd6Co e wipa antsfnli atfhariolnliloarswecernnnsoothai ceer,e dr
i eskJrehiioltn pogaG orahboon eaun stddhEtnrosdtis mup-s-nettr euaolwa,g yocnMi rhvhes atoesitEr ah satrzeil rleertoe o aftiesBenaoatehnp .rmoeii ardo,o1rmealdcnnab n k aoisddbnnidveeaeotc ife a umbmwhSpeyhnr h oaiiftcs—hda geeu. ncefnniAne f- nshutertfar o
h’eop notcenotyylpsi toeiainlomase csekdnnaprmno enhbpos chvrnt wnd hsegeacaibipi tud bonseandeo itoGototaus—,as ue ss eosmiderphnemea tocstBca t aiidstqe arb.ro lsertnnuapntlc te,el uomnt dehst—o or diieermi esmtn pev iy,apiar hi tooal sedenl,friewentteeot eh ai odsn rtdpa.nyet“n ocW”w,nnj
tdn.r euakWe o“a srseamrv”taai ohoiseeot r r cw hiWosnsal t atrt’kei —s nn.doittcahaeadi vhe rep n eu.ntesesoho negu trcoc nb
hie inaltmgtpvetedebez ihonePiidlrf
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Unfortunately the larger 400-600 acre data center proposals in Franklin Tnsp and Morgan County have tainted this proposed project and the neighbor’s perception.
Easy for me to say as a nonresident, but this 14 acre project would actually be good at that existing derelict property location. The actual data facility is non polluting, and both the electrical and water systems will not be overwhelmed, as in those large centers.
The quality of the proposed buildings, drives and parking lots, as shown in the renderings, would establish a level of quality improvements above any current and/or adjacent businesses.
We can assume any found contamination on the site will be removed and disposed of legally.
The location of the backup diesel generators is not clear on the renderings, but those appear to be the only noise or air concerns, and would used only when power is down throughout the area. I’m not in charge, but this sure looks like a positive development for the area.
I don’t often agree with Kevin P. but I do here for all the same reasons. The nearest homes are quite some distance away, and unlikely to be impacted by the data center in any way.
How many diesel generators do they plan to use to support the data center? That’s a good question to have answered.
Sarah Connor?
A key factor in the location, which is not mentioned, is whether or not this particular location is classified as a brownfield. If it is, there are regulatory limits as to what can be built on the property to prevent the spread of contamination as well as to pretect the occupants and the neighbors.
Not a brownfield. It was a drive-in theater until the early 80s and it has been sitting fallow ever since.
However, next door is a junkyard, er, used auto parts store, that used to be a car crushing operation. Also next door is a shaggy trucking company yard and an old “metal finishing” company.
This proposal is miles better than what’s there now.